EPFO office leads country in processing higher pension claims under SC order
The apex court had opened a window for eligible employees and their employers to jointly apply for higher pensions under the Employees' Pension Scheme (EPS), 1995, on wages exceeding the ceiling limit of ₹15,000, provided contributions were made accordingly, and the employee was in service as on or after September 1, 2014.
Following the judgment, the Chandigarh EPFO received a total of 24,250 applications from EPS members, including 19,367 joint option submissions by those still in service after the cut-off date. These were among the highest in the country.
To meet the exceptional volume of applications, the regional office worked in a 'mission mode' — beyond office hours and through weekends—- particularly during the last fortnight of the 2024–25 financial year. As a result, 14,158 joint-option applications were processed and approved for higher pension eligibility.
Demand letters outlining the lump-sum arrears and interest payable were dispatched by March 31, 2025, with a three-month window for remittance. This accounted for more than 73% of the joint-option applications — ranking the regional office first in the country in percentage terms and third in absolute numbers.
EPFO officials said many members have already begun depositing the due amounts, and the office is now in full gear to finalise Pension Payment Orders (PPOs) and disburse arrears by June 30, 2025.
Given the high footfall of members seeking status updates, Regional PF Commissioner Dr Kishan Pratap Singh has urged beneficiaries to wait until the first week of July to allow staff to complete the processing efficiently on a first-come, first-served basis.
Major gains in claims settlement
Dr Singh also highlighted the office's strong overall performance in FY 2024–25. A total of 6,97,372 claims were settled, marking a 37.73% jump from 5,06,325 claims the previous year.
Improvements in turnaround time were equally significant. While 91.55% of claims were settled within 10 days in 2024–25, only 77.72% had met that benchmark in 2023–24. Similarly, 99.41% of claims were cleared within 20 days this year, up from 96.86% last year.
The claims rejection or return rate also fell to 20.18%, compared to 27.22% in the previous fiscal. This efficiency gain translated into fewer grievances. Complaints dropped from 16,835 in FY 2023–24 to 14,797 in FY 2024–25. In terms of volume, grievances per lakh claims settled fell by 35.6%—from 3,325 to 2,139.Dr Singh said with the one-time processing of higher wage pension claims nearing completion, subscribers can now expect even faster service delivery and redressal going forward. He said the performance reaffirms EPFO's commitment to improving ease of access, employer facilitation, and overall user satisfaction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Sam Altman warns ChatGPT is not your therapist and your secrets aren't legally private
If you've been spilling your heart out to ChatGPT, you might want to pause for a moment, or at least think carefully about what you're typing. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman has recently admitted that, for now, AI chats don't enjoy the same confidentiality as a conversation with a doctor, lawyer or therapist. Appearing on comedian Theo Von's podcast This Past Weekend, Altman revealed that the AI industry simply hasn't caught up when it comes to protecting deeply personal conversations with users. And that could have consequences if those chats end up in talk about the most personal details in their lives to ChatGPT,' Altman confessed. 'People use it, young people, especially, use it as a therapist, a life coach; having these relationship problems and [asking] 'what should I do?' And right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it. There's doctor-patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality, whatever. And we haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT.'Altman warned that, as things stand, user conversations with ChatGPT could be disclosed if a court orders it. 'This could create a privacy concern for users in the case of a lawsuit,' he said, explaining that OpenAI would currently be legally obliged to produce those records. 'I think that's very screwed up. I think we should have the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist or whatever — and no one had to think about that even a year ago,' he grey areasThe candid remarks come as OpenAI finds itself in the middle of a high-profile court battle with The New York Times. In June, the newspaper and other plaintiffs sought a court order demanding that OpenAI retain all user conversations, even deleted ones, indefinitely, as part of an ongoing copyright has described the request as 'an overreach' and confirmed it is appealing, arguing that allowing courts to dictate data storage would open the floodgates to future demands from law enforcement and legal OpenAI says deleted chats from ChatGPT Free, Plus and Pro accounts are removed from its systems within 30 days unless they need to be kept 'for legal or security reasons.'Unlike encrypted messaging apps such as WhatsApp, OpenAI's staff can access conversations. This is partly so that they can fine-tune the models and also keep an eye out for level of access has become a sticking point for some would-be users, particularly in a world where digital privacy is under increasing scrutiny. For instance, following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade in the US, millions of women moved away from unencrypted period-tracking apps towards safer alternatives such as Apple Not yetadvertisementAltman's warning might hit home for those who use ChatGPT as a sounding board for their emotional ups and downs. Without a legal framework, AI simply doesn't yet offer the same protection that a professional human counsellor does.'I think it makes sense to really want the privacy clarity before you use [ChatGPT] a lot, like the legal clarity,' Altman told Von, who admitted that he avoids using the chatbot much for exactly that while ChatGPT might feel like a non-judgemental friend, the legal system doesn't see it that way, at least, not yet.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi govt moves SC against blanket ban on overage vehicles
Delhi government has moved the Supreme Court challenging the blanket ban on diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Bhushan R Gavai is likely to hear the plea on July 28, which seeks recall of the court's October 29, 2018, order that upheld the National Green Tribunal 's initial directive. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Public Policy Others Artificial Intelligence Operations Management Data Analytics Data Science Management MCA PGDM Design Thinking Data Science Cybersecurity Digital Marketing MBA Finance Product Management healthcare CXO Leadership Technology Healthcare others Project Management Degree Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Months IIM Calcutta Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management Starts on undefined Get Details The plea submitted that a comprehensive policy is required to tackle pollution in Delhi-NCR, which gives vehicle fitness based on actual emission levels of individual vehicles as per scientific methods rather than implementing a blanket ban based solely on age. The plea seeks a comprehensive study by the Centre and CAQM to assess the actual environmental benefits of age-based restrictions versus emission-based criteria. The apex court had earlier directed the transport departments of states in the National Capital Region (NCR) that all diesel vehicles more than 10 years old and petrol vehicles more than 15 years old shall not ply in terms of order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) order. Live Events "All vehicles, diesel or petrol, which are more than 15 years old shall not be permitted to ply on the roads and wherever such vehicles of this age are noticed, the concerned authorities shall take appropriate steps in accordance with law, including seizure of the vehicles in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act. "The vehicles which are more than 15 years old, will not be permitted to be parked in any public area, and they shall be towed away and challenged by the police in accordance with the law. This direction would be applicable to all vehicles without exception i.e. two wheelers, three wheelers, four wheelers, light vehicles and heavy vehicles irrespective of whether commercial or otherwise," the NGT said in its November 26, 2014, order.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi govt files review plea in Supreme Court against blanket ban on ELVs
Delhi govt on Friday filed a review application in the Supreme Court, seeking reconsideration of the 2018 blanket ban on diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in Delhi-NCR. Environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said the matter is listed for Monday. The application requests the apex court to direct the Central govt or the Commission on Air Quality Management (CAQM) to conduct a comprehensive scientific study evaluating the actual environmental benefits of the age-based ban. It also seeks assessment of the feasibility and fairness of a blanket restriction across vehicle categories and technologies, and whether the policy meaningfully contributes to air quality improvement in the NCR, compared to targeted emission-based measures. Delhi govt argued that the current system enforces collective compliance without individual assessment of pollution levels or roadworthiness. "This approach does not align with the objective of reducing pollution," the application stated, adding that the directive disproportionately affects middle-class citizens whose vehicles may be less used, well-maintained, and compliant with emission norms. The 2015 National Green Tribunal order banning such vehicles was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. However, Delhi govt now contends that the landscape has changed significantly with the introduction of Bharat Stage-VI emission standards from April 1, 2020. It noted that as of July 24, 2025, Delhi has 2.8 million BS-IV and an almost equal number of BS-VI registered vehicles. "If the 2018 order continues, roadworthy, non-polluting BS-VI vehicles may be forced off the roads in a few years without scientific justification," the petition added. It questioned the rationale behind taking even BS-IV vehicles—meeting Pollution Under Control (PUC) norms—off the roads, asserting that such decisions must be based on updated, data-driven evaluations. The application pointed out that countries like Japan, the US, and those in the EU do not impose blanket bans based solely on vehicle age. Instead, they follow nuanced, sustainable policies that assess actual emissions and focus on roadworthiness through regular testing. Delhi's review petition, settled by Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, stressed the need for a "graded, balanced and technology-driven regime" to tackle vehicular pollution. It urged for a scientific framework that accounts for individual vehicle emission data rather than broad age-based criteria. The CAQM's July 1 order denying fuel to end-of-life vehicles sparked public backlash, prompting Sirsa to request a pause in its implementation. Lieutenant governor VK Saxena later advised govt to approach the Supreme Court for a review. Following this, CAQM deferred the fuel-denial order to November 1 in high-density NCR districts and to April 1, 2026, for the rest of the region. Govt highlighted that other major pollution sources—like stubble burning, construction dust, and industrial emissions—also need to be considered. Its strict enforcement of PUC norms led to over 1.63 lakh challans in 2025 so far, up from 29,589 in 2021. It said the good AQI days increased from 159 in 2018 to 209 in 2024. Till July this year, there have been 106 such days. The robust implementation of Graded Response Plan has contributed to reducing pollution in the national capital, it said.
