Summer break is costing parents more than just time—here's how debt is becoming the new normal for child care
In a world not built for modern parenthood (seriously—why do we still accept a 9-month school year designed for an agrarian society?), summer can feel like the peak of institutional abandonment. Between bosses who pretend the season doesn't exist and a government that acts like every parent has backup child care on call, it's hard not to ask: Why does no one seem to care that summer is such a massive source of strain for families?
Turns out, the numbers back up the burnout.
Families are spending big and still falling short
A new LendingTree survey of more than 600 parents found that 62% of those who used summer child care or camps have gone into debt to cover the cost. On average, they're spending nearly $900 per child.
Two-thirds of parents—66%—said paying for summer care is a financial struggle. Nearly half cut back on nonessentials, while 19% reported reducing spending on basic needs like food and utilities.
And that pain sticks around: A quarter of parents took up to a year to pay off the debt, while some are still carrying last summer's balance even as the next one rolls in.
'Many parents don't have any other option but to pay for child care,' said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree. 'As much as they'd love to take a bunch of time off during the summer to spend with their kids, that just isn't a realistic thing for most Americans, so they're forced to shell out for child care. That extra cost often requires sacrifice.'
Related: Child care costs over 50% of income in some states—and moms are done staying quiet
Parents know the value but can't afford more
Even amid the financial stress, most parents still believe summer care is important. A full 91% of parents surveyed said summer programs are worth the investment for their children's development and well-being.
Still, 86% wish they could afford to enroll their kids in more camps or activities, and 36% say affordable options simply don't exist where they live.
While nearly half of respondents receive some form of tuition assistance, the patchwork system doesn't meet the scale of the need—especially when families are already stretched thin the rest of the year.
The emotional load is constant
The money is one thing. The planning, coordination, and constant hustle? That's another beast entirely. Each summer brings a logistical obstacle course of drop-offs, pickups, sibling schedules, and desperate group chats about carpooling.
For many moms, that mental labor is relentless. And it doesn't pause when the budget is tight or your inbox is overflowing.
Support systems that could ease the burden—affordable child care, flexible work schedules, equitable co-parenting—are still the exception, not the rule. Which means summer ends up landing hardest on the very people already maxed out.
The reality for single parents is even more pressing
The math becomes even more unforgiving in single-parent households. According to WalletHub, single parents in New York are spending up to 45% of their median income on childcare. In New Mexico, it's as high as 36%, compounded by some of the lowest household incomes in the country.
And that's just for care during the academic year—summer often adds extra weeks of uncovered time and an additional layer of debt.
It's time to rethink the system
We are long overdue for a national reckoning on what child care actually is: not a private family issue, but a public infrastructure need. Without summer care, many parents—especially mothers—can't work. Yet every year, we treat the cost and logistics of camp like an individual puzzle that families should just 'figure out.'
Parents need a system that fully supports child care as a core part of family life—especially in the summer months. That includes public investment in summer programming, employer flexibility, and school calendars and community options designed for the actual lives we live—not the ones we were expected to live in 1955.
Because surviving every summer shouldn't be a parenting badge of honor. It should be a policy failure we're finally ready to fix.
Related: A push to pay parents to stay home is gaining traction—but moms say what they really need is child care they can afford
Sources:
62% of parents using summer child care go into debt. June 2024. LendingTree. 62% of parents using summer child care go into debt.
Best and worst states for working moms. May 2024. WalletHub. Best and worst states for working moms.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
19 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
South Floridians spend more on transportation than almost anyone else in U.S.
Driving in South Florida can be harrowing — and costly. Of residents in the 10 largest U.S. metropolitan areas, Miamians tie Houstonians for spending the most on transportation. Roughly 20% of what people residing in Greater Miami spend each year goes toward getting around, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On average, that's more than $14,400 per household in the tri-county area of Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach. Americans in general are spending more on cars now than almost ever before. According to Kelley Blue Book, new car buyers paid almost $50,000 per purchase at the end of 2024, just under 2022 highs, when supply chain disruptions led to shortages of new vehicles on the market. And that number doesn't yet take into account the Trump administration's 15% tariffs on auto imports from Japan and the European Union, said Chairman Howard Dvorkin. Those costs hit especially hard in Greater Miami, where residents generally earn less than their counterparts across the country. Tri-county residents' net automobile expenditures — the difference between what they paid for their cars and what they recouped by selling their old ones — accounted for nearly half of Miamians' transportation costs and 9% of their total annual expenses, again tying Houston, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Necessity explains part of that expenditure, said Cathy Dos Santos, director of Transit Alliance Miami, a local nonprofit promoting walkability, bikeability and better public transit. Greater Miami, she noted, offers few practical alternatives to driving. 'We're asking people to choose between paying really high costs for transportation by having to own or lease their car,' Dos Santos said, 'versus spending sometimes twice as long using public transit to get around.' Unsurprisingly, most stick to their cars. And given how far many South Floridians have to travel to get to work, it's hard to blame them. Census data shows that more than half of tri-county workers commute at least 10 miles to get to work. Nearly 15% have a 50-plus mile commute. Compounding those distances is often-grinding traffic. According to INRIX, a traffic-data analytics company, Miami is the 14th most car-congested city on Earth, with local drivers spending the equivalent of nearly three days a year stuck in traffic. And those cars, whether they're actually moving or idling, need fuel — another big line-item for locals. Gas eats up roughly 4% of Greater Miamians' annual household spending, one of the highest shares among major U.S. metro areas, according to the Census Bureau. They also need to be insured. Due largely to the higher risk of severe weather conditions and rates of uninsured drivers, Floridians pay more than $3,200 in car insurance premiums — the second most in the country behind Louisianians — according to MarketWatch. But beyond necessity, culture can explain some of those high costs, says Dvorkin. 'A lot has to do with image,' he said, observing that South Floridians tend to 'like fancy cars,' even if their checking accounts are dwindling. Fancy or not, South Floridians need cars to get around because much of where they live is built for and around automobiles, said Dos Santos. That's something local governments can take steps to correct. Low-density, sprawling housing — a large portion of the tri-county's housing stock — makes it difficult for people to live within walking or biking distance of work, or even regular errands, she said. Denser, multi-use zoning can make it easier for people to meet their needs within a walk or short public transit commute of where they live, Dos Santos noted. That, along with investment in capital projects that can improve public transit across South Florida, could ultimately reduce what residents pay. But they're longer-term projects. In the immediate future, Dos Santos said, local governments can invest in cheaper, high-impact 'small infrastructure' — bike lanes, sidewalks and improved pedestrian street crossings to make non-car transit, which is the cheapest way to get around, more attractive, especially for short trips. But for those who drive dozens of miles just to get to work, as many South Floridians do, their employers can play an important role in reducing transportation costs, said United Way of Florida CEO Melissa Nelson. By providing gas or bus cards — if employees have convenient access to mass transit — for example, employers can help ease their workers' transportation cost burdens. For workers receiving government assistance, those perks can help offset costs without increasing their taxable income. That distinction is crucial. Sometimes, slight increases in income can cost assistance recipients thousands of dollars in lost benefits by pushing them over eligibility thresholds — a phenomenon known as a 'benefits cliff.' But perhaps most critically, offering flexibility — especially for work that doesn't necessarily need to be done in person or at a specific time — is key to reducing time and money spent on transportation, Nelson said. Such adaptability is especially invaluable for families with children that need to be picked up from childcare or school. Ultimately, she said, helping workers remove transportation barriers opens doors to personal and professional development. 'People who are stuck in their car for three hours a day' can't invest in themselves, said Nelson. 'They're not doing any continuing education, which means they're not training for the job that you might like them to move into.' This story was produced with financial support from supporters including The Green Family Foundation Trust and Ken O'Keefe, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald maintains full editorial control of this work.
San Francisco Chronicle
19 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
In his own words: Trump's comments over the past year on the jobs report
WASHINGTON (AP) — In firing the head of the agency that produces monthly jobs figures, President Donald Trump alleged that the recent weaker-than-expected numbers were phony and that positive numbers reported before the 2024 election were manipulated to make him look bad. It's a familiar cadence Trump has adopted in reacting to jobs reports: He treats the figures as legitimate when they are favorable to him and fraudulent when they are less than stellar or seem to benefit his opponent. Aug. 5, 2024 'STOCK MARKETS ARE CRASHING, JOBS NUMBERS ARE TERRIBLE, WE ARE HEADING TO WORLD WAR lll, AND WE HAVE TWO OF THE MOST INCOMPETENT 'LEADERS' IN HISTORY. THIS IS NOT GOOD!!!' — Trump post on Truth Social Suggesting President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris were responsible, Trump was reacting to the news that U.S. employees had added 114,000 jobs in July — 35% fewer than expected — and that the unemployment rate was at its highest level in nearly three years. Nov. 1, 2024 'Today's jobs report is a great embarrassment for our Nation. Kamala has lied for years about their pathetic job growth, which has never been real. Kamala killed 46,000 manufacturing jobs, while 773,000 Americans have lost employment in just the last year — all while their jobs have been taken by foreign-born workers. America is a Nation in Decline because Sleepy Joe, and Lyin' Kamala, didn't do their job. 'TRUMP' WILL FIX IT! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! GO VOTE!' — Trump post on Truth Social Days ahead of the presidential election, Trump blasted news that U.S. employers had added just 12,000 jobs in October, a total that economists say had been held down by the effects of strikes and hurricanes that left many workers temporarily off payrolls. Nov. 4, 2024 'Nearly 250,000 people dropped out of the labor force. They dropped out because they couldn't get a job. Can you imagine that? Can you imagine? These are the numbers, and they don't want to talk about it, but that's OK. These numbers are disqualifying.' — Trump campaign rally in Raleigh, North Carolina According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, around 220,000 people left the civilian U.S. workforce from September to October 2024 during Biden's presidency. April 4, 2025 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, FAR BETTER THAN EXPECTED. IT'S ALREADY WORKING. HANG TOUGH, WE CAN'T LOSE!!!" — Trump post on Truth Social Trump quickly praised news that in March, U.S. employers had added a surprising 228,000 jobs, showing that the American labor market was in solid shape as he embarked on a risky trade war with the rest of the world. The hiring numbers were up from 117,000 in February and were nearly double the 130,000 that economists had expected. June 6, 2025 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG! AT THE SAME TIME, BILLIONS POURING IN FROM TARIFFS!!!' — Trump post on Truth Social Trump responded enthusiastically to the initial numbers on the May jobs report, which indicated that the economy added 139,000 jobs. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most recent revision down to just 19,000. Aug. 1, 2025 'I was just informed that our Country's 'Jobs Numbers' are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory. ... I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY." — Trump post on Truth Social Trump ousted McEntarfer following a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported, taking issue in subsequent days to the revisions of jobs figures that are a regular occurrence with the monthly reporting.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
27-year-old first-grade teacher lived paycheck to paycheck due to impulsive spending: ‘It became so stressful'
Maddie Baker, 27, will be the first to admit she was an impulsive spender when she started teaching kindergarteners six years ago. She bought coffee at least once a day, frequently shopped for new clothes and spent lavishly on vacations she says she "probably had no business going on." "Any day that I had a hard day at teaching, I would immediately go from my job to a store," the now first-grade teacher tells CNBC Make It. "The way I was coping with hard days was by spending money." Baker isn't alone. Almost half of American consumers say they make purchases to boost their mood, according to LendingTree survey data released in July. Emotional spending isn't always bad, either. It can provide temporary comfort or a needed mood boost. However, it can also lead to financial strain. Baker says her impulsive spending got so out of hand, she found herself in "horrible cycles" of living paycheck to paycheck to avoid going into credit card debt. Nationally, almost three-quarters of emotional shoppers admit they've spent more than they intended, and 44% say it's negatively impacted their financial well-being, LendingTree found. It took Baker three years to get her spending under control, she says. Today, she's very intentional with how she spends her money and has even developed new hobbies from habits she's built to save money. "I remember just waking up every single day, and the stress of finances was just really getting me down," says Baker, who was making around $50,000 a year at the time. "It became so stressful." Nearly Baker's entire paycheck would go directly toward paying off her credit card. Because she was paid once a month, that often left her with little to live on — forcing her to rely on the card for new expenses and trapping her in a constant cycle of borrowing from herself. She tried everything to earn extra cash. She tutored kids during her summer breaks, tried selling her clothes and donating her plasma, but none of it seemed to sustain her lifestyle, she says. Baker got her spending under control three years into teaching through a tax refund that allowed her to pay off her credit card bill without using her paycheck. Now, she keeps enough in her checking account to pay her credit card bill every month without having to rely on an incoming paycheck. "It took a total restart and being tired of the cycle I was in, in order to do something about it," she says. Young adults are particularly susceptible to overspending when they're online or bombarded with bad news, Ylva Baeckström, a senior lecturer in finance at King's Business School, said in 2024. Overwhelming feelings can lead to unhealthy spending habits as a way to cope or find relief, Baeckström said. To avoid overspending, "one of the biggest things you can do is take a beat," Keith Barron, a personal finance expert and former head of marketing at Jenius Bank, said in 2024. Rather than heading straight to checkout when shopping online, try adding the item to a wish list and waiting a day or two. This brief delay can help you decide whether you genuinely want or need the item, Barron said. Today, Baker is working toward building an emergency fund and saving for a house, and says she's way more intentional about what she decides to spend money on. On top of learning how to spend less impulsively, she says she's found alternatives to save money and a side hustle creating videos on TikTok to bring in more income. Her silver lining: Many of the activities that started as a way to save have become hobbies as well. She enjoys painting her own nails, making lattes at home and meal prepping to avoid eating out. On TikTok, she earns up to $2,000 a month from sharing videos about her life as a teacher. "All of these things happened because I had the mindset of, 'I need to save more money, and I need to spend less money,'" she says.
