Thorny issues remain on EU leaders' table long after dinner plates are cleared
If you are not inside the room when the
European Union's
27 leaders gather for a summit, there tends to be quite a bit of hanging around to be done.
One question will always do the rounds among the waiting diplomats, officials and journalists: 'What time do you reckon they will wrap up?'
The national leaders, European Commission president
Ursula von der Leyen
and former Portuguese prime minister António Costa, who is president of the
European Council
, got started just before noon on Thursday.
The meeting of the council, which sets the big-picture policy direction of the EU, was pencilled in to last one day, though leaders were told to keep the early part of Friday free just in case things ran over.
READ MORE
The summit covered
EU-US tariff negotiations
, the wars in
Gaza
and
Ukraine
, proposed new sanctions on
Russia
, defence spending and migration policy.
Details of what is going on in the leaders' room can be scant. There are a few short breaks where they leave to confer with advisers and diplomats. When the doors close, they will also keep officials updated with the odd WhatsApp message.
Denmark's prime minister Mette Frederiksen speaks with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Greek prime minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis during a meeting at the European Council in Brussels on Thursday. Photograph: John Thys/AFP via Getty Images
At about 8pm on Thursday word got around that things might wrap up in an hour or so, which would have been remarkably quick. The talk was that rather than stopping to eat, the leaders might power through with a view to getting out early.
It wasn't to be. A dinner of smoked cottage cheese dumplings, duck leg confit and strawberry cheesecake was brought in and the discussions went on for several more hours.
Leaders like the fact that Costa has been limiting the summits to a single day since he took over as chair last December.
But sometimes a row actually needs to be had. The EU has been deferring contentious matters in an effort to keep a loose consensus intact. Taking decisions can be tough when each head of state or government has a veto.
For instance, Hungary's far-right prime minister Viktor Orban has consistently blocked EU efforts to aid Ukraine in its war with Russia. He has also held up talks between Brussels and Kyiv about Ukraine joining the EU in the future. A showdown between Orban and the other leaders is overdue.
Dutch prime minister Dick Schoof (L) and Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban at the start of the EU leaders' Summit in Brussels on Thursday. Photograph: Olivier Hoslet/EPA
The EU did take a leap forward on defence policy in the spring, which Costa and Von der Leyen can hold up as a win. A summit in March approved a plan to significantly increase military spending to deter the future threat from Russia, given the question mark over continued US defence support.
The union can move quickly when it wants to and a crisis does focus minds.
The discussion on Gaza on Thursday was short. There was a sense that entrenched positions would not be moved. Germany, Austria, Italy and Hungary oppose efforts by Ireland, Spain and others to sanction Israel, so the EU remains stuck.
[
Pro-Israel countries to block Irish efforts to sanction Israel at EU summit
Opens in new window
]
European Council president António Costa: leaders like the fact that Costa has been limiting the summits to a single day since he took over as chair last December. Photograph:Other internal reforms have been talked about for years without movement. Proposals to build up a European capital market have gone nowhere because countries don't want to change their national rules around issues such as insolvency.
Those close to Costa say he will have no problem presiding over crunch summits that run on. The Portuguese politician likes open-ended strategic discussions, rather than having leaders squabbling over the wording of a joint communique issued after each summit.
Leaders spent a record five days and four nights hammering out an agreement on the Nice Treaty reforms in 2000.
There is no need to hole up Taoiseach Micheál Martin, French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and the rest of them in Brussels for that long.
However, the preference to get out of dodge after a single day means several thorny problems still remain on the EU leaders' table, long after the dinner plates have been cleared away.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nato's new defence spending commitment aims to reverse decades of military decline
In cash terms, The Hague Defence Commitment, as it's to be known, agreed last week , will add roughly $1 trillion a year to the common defence of the Nato military alliance, according to US president Donald Trump . But cash alone is never enough. As critical in military terms are the new capability targets the deal will activate, triggering increased cross-border standardisation, improved technical co-operation and more operational integration, aimed at readying the West for war with Russia within five years. On Trump's insistence, the European alliance members plus Canada agreed to increase their defence budgets from the current 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – 3.5 per cent on 'hard military spending' and another 1.5 per cent on related civil costs such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. That's why, as the 32 leaders who comprise Nato's decision-making North Atlantic Council were doing their best not to fall out with Trump over the spike in cost, behind the scenes the military planners who assess risk were calculating what strategic difference the extra trillion will make. READ MORE With military efficiency, a 10-page briefing, ' Future-proofing Nato's industrial capacity: how the decisions at the summit will strengthen the allied defence industry ', was circulated in the summit's closing hours, underpinning the imperative to reverse '60 years of progressive decline' in spending. Although the alliance was set up in 1949 as a post-second World War collective security network, it's worth remembering that with the end of the cold war, however, many of the allies switched their spending away from defence to modernising their societies, in what became known as 'the peace dividend'. [ Hostile actions 'are real and accelerating': is Russia already at war with the West? Opens in new window ] Consequently, faced with rapidly diminishing activity, defence companies on both sides of the Atlantic underwent a series of mergers and acquisitions, leading to consolidation in the defence sector. The 51 significant defence manufacturers that remained at the end of the cold war merged into 'the big five' – Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, RTX and Northrop Grumman. Here, European multinationals such as Airbus and missile systems developer, MBDA, emerged. Everything changed, however, in February 2022 with Russia's 'full-scale and brutal invasion of Ukraine', which reminded the allies that 'although the Euro-Atlantic area is not at war, it is not at peace either'. The reality, maintains Germany's chief of defence, Gen Carsten Breuer, is that a full-scale attack on a Nato member is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Moscow, he says, has been producing at least 1,500 battle tanks a year, with a significant build-up of missiles, artillery shells and drones as well, not all of which are earmarked for the war in Ukraine . His assessment, shared by other military experts in the region, goes as far as to conclude that the 'most vulnerable' area for an attack would be the Suwalki Gap, a largely unpopulated corridor in northeast Poland where Poland meets Lithuania, Belarus and Russia. The military experts' briefings to their political leaders have been uncompromising. 'Individually, all of them understand the urgency of the threat that is approaching Nato', says Gen Breuer, who adds he believes Russia could attack by 2029. [ If Russia is indeed planning an attack against a Nato state, distance and neutrality will provide no defence Opens in new window ] Given that threat, Nato's new capability targets involve co-investment, co-development and co-production to make the alliance 'more lethal' as secretary general Mark Rutte put it. And that collaboration will by global – reaching far beyond its 32 member states. Nato's four Indo-Pacific partners – Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, known as the IP4 – will be critical to that 'enhanced co-operation'. So too will its partnership with the EU, where the political and cultural links are already close and often overlapping. The aim overall is achieving a 'new coherence' in dealing with a familiar enemy. [ The Irish Times view on international politics: law of the jungle taking hold Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Teacher and SNA resign from Dublin school over alleged ‘harassment' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves
Two staff members at a primary school in Dublin resigned after claiming they were 'harassed and bullied' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves, T-shirts and a tattoo in support of Palestine . The man and woman, a teacher and a special needs assistant (SNA), expressed disappointment with the school's handling of the issue, claiming a small group of parents were 'allowed to harass and bully with impunity'. The pair said they handed in their resignation this month and are due to cease employment in August. They claimed they were asked to stop wearing keffiyeh scarves at work following complaints from parents who accused them of 'blatant anti-Semitism' and 'psychologically abusive behaviour'. One parent also allegedly complained about a T-shirt worn by the SNA that, the parent said, bore a 'watermelon covering the full state of Israel ' and about a tattoo on the male teacher's arm 'with the pre-1967 borders of my country, which is interpreted by many as a call for the annihilation of my people'. READ MORE In a complaint seen by The Irish Times, the parent claimed the SNA's T-shirt 'promotes the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel'. The teacher said he had been wearing a keffiyeh to work since he began teaching at the school in September. Following initial complaints over the scarf, he claimed, he was told to remove it while on school premises in a decision made by the school's board of management. Despite this, he said he continued to wear the keffiyeh and claimed his photo was subsequently taken on multiple occasions by a parent, which he described as 'extremely intimidating'. 'It's been so stressful and so deeply upsetting. We go home every day and we have a live-streamed genocide on our phones along with the fact that we were being harassed and bullied by this small group,' the teacher said. The SNA claimed that on one occasion earlier this month, a parent confronted her over the clothing while another 'shouted' at her in an encounter she described as 'intimidating and distressing'. 'I just couldn't continue to work there,' she said, adding that she raised a grievance with the school, though is 'incredibly disappointed' by the response. While saying staff should not be seen taking sides in times of war and conflict, she claimed, 'this isn't a war or a conflict, it's apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing, and if you're not taking a side, you have taken a side'. Both say they exhausted 'every avenue' with the school in an attempt to resolve the issue, including calls for a dress code, which they say is not currently in place. The issue was raised with Tánaiste Simon Harris in the Dáil on Thursday by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who claimed the staff members were 'pressured by school management' not to wear the keffiyeh scarves. 'When Russia invaded Ukraine, schools organised shows of solidarity with Ukraine. But when it comes to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, some teachers are being silenced, and their clothing choices are being policed,' he claimed. In response, the Tánaiste said: 'There should always be a very high bar before you interfere with anybody's clothing', adding that he would discuss the matter with the Minister for Education. In a statement, the school's board of management said it 'places the welfare and education of the children at the centre of all decisions'. 'As a diverse and equality-based school community, including children, families and staff from over 40 nationalities, the board is committed to ensuring that all actions taken are respectful, inclusive and welcoming to every child and family. 'The board will not be commenting on any individual staff matter, in line with its responsibilities as an employer,' it said.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israeli military operations in Gaza ‘well over the top', ex CIA chief tells Dublin event
Israeli military operations in Gaza have been 'well over the top', a former director of the US Central Intelligence Agency has said. John Brennan said he 'very much' admires the Irish Government's position on Gaza but is 'disappointed' by the positions taken by the Trump administration and the Biden administration before it. As the US 'provides most of the military capabilities to Israel', he believed it was obliged and 'should have done everything possible to prevent Israel carrying out what I think were too aggressive military operations', he told The Irish Times in Dublin on Friday. In his view, Israeli military operations in Gaza 'have been well over the top' and the number of women, children and non-combatants killed was 'unnecessary'. Asked would he describe it as a genocide, he said that was 'for lawyers to decide'. READ MORE 'The deaths of 70,000 Palestinians, a lot of those deaths obviously were intentionally done by the Israelis. They are not targeting civilians but I think they have allowed disproportionate civilian casualties when they have gone after Hamas operatives.' In the context of continuing debate about Ireland's military neutrality, Mr Brennan said Ireland's neutrality 'is much respected and needed' but it does not mean Ireland 'is not impenetrable by foreign adversaries, particularly given the digital realm and how much we are interconnected as a global community'. It 'makes sense' for Ireland to evaluate its security, defence and intelligence needs, he said. Ireland has taken 'some very principled stands', including on Gaza, he said. If Ireland opted to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato), there is a question whether or not that would limit Ireland's ability to continue to pursue independent policies and positions, he said. Joining Nato is, and should be, a matter for the Irish people to decide, he said. 'Nato has been evolving, its European members recognise they need to do more on their own and cannot continue to rely continually on the US, so I think it's a worthwhile question for the Irish people to ask.' Mr Brennan, whose father Owen Brennan emigrated to the US from Co Roscommon in 1948, was in Dublin to address the inaugural summer school of the Law Society's Centre for Justice and Law Reform, which explored the theme Defending Democracy: Legal Responses to Emerging Threats. Other speakers included EU Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath, Attorney General Rossa Fanning, Online Safety Commissioner Niamh Hodnett and UK commissioner for countering extremism Robin Simcox. Mr Brennan was a CIA officer for 25 years from 1980 before serving under president Barack Obama as his chief counterterrorism adviser. He was director of the CIA from 2013 to early 2017. Asked how Ireland might combat extremism, he said all governments have to set a 'delicate balance' in allowing free speech while not allowing hate speech and incitement to violence. This is something the Irish people need to look at and to 'weigh in on' with their politicians. The Law Society and other objective actors have important roles to help ensure that truthful, factual information is 'pushed out into the communications bloodstream'. During his career, he was mainly focused on countering terrorism by groups such as Islamic State and al-Qaeda but in more recent years, he is concerned about the growth of domestic extremism and violence in the US, epitomised by the assault on the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021, he said. He has been personally targeted by extremists, including with a pipe bomb, Mr Brennan said. He is concerned some domestic extremism was 'fuelled' by commentary from public officials and said government officials have a 'special responsibility' to try to clamp down extremist sentiment and be more uniting, less divisive, of people. Some of president Donald Trump's rhetoric is 'rather combative' and there is 'an increasing coarseness' in the public discourse, especially in the way Mr Trump and others make reference to their opponents, he said. 'I served for six presidents and none of them would publicly refer to their political opponents as scum and Donald Trump does that. I think that's beneath the dignity of the office of the presidency.' Even if public officials do not intend matters to then 'take it to the next level', it has that effect, he said. This sometimes happens on both sides and it is important to bring down that level of tension, animosity, anger and hatred and to try and find 'more civil ways of discourse'. He is concerned about the US administration's commitment to the rule of law, including efforts to use the US Department of Justice 'to go after political opponents', and to try and 'get around' some judicial rulings. Democracy and the rule of law cannot be taken for granted and a lot of people see the US as 'sliding towards authoritarianism', he said. In the CIA, he saw some countries use the democratic process to put authoritarian leaders in place. 'The playbook is very similar, you crack down on opponents, use your instruments of government, whether they be the intelligence and security services, the courts, you crack down on the media.' Asked about Mr Trump's recent authorisation of a US military attack on Iran's nuclear sites, Mr Brennan said he shares the concerns about Iran's nuclear programme but believed the US attack was 'unnecessary' and had not addressed the problem. It seemed, from press reports, there did not appear to be a change in the intelligence community's assessment that Iran has not restarted its nuclear weapons programme, he said. Now the issues include whether Iran will move, perhaps in a 'more clandestine' fashion, to try and reconstitute its programme and even move towards a nuclear weapon.
