Trump tells Fox News he has group of wealthy people to buy TikTok
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said in a Fox News interview broadcast on Sunday that he had found a buyer for the TikTok short-video app, which he described as a group of 'very wealthy people' whose identities he will reveal in about two weeks.
Trump made the remarks in an interview on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' program. He said the deal he is developing would probably need China's approval to move forward and he predicted Chinese President Xi Jinping would likely approve it.
The US president earlier this month had extended to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok despite a law that mandated a sale or shutdown without significant progress.
A deal had been in the works this spring that would have spun off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors, but it was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods.
'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way,' Trump said. 'I think I'll need probably China's approval. I think President Xi will probably do it.' A 2024 US law required TikTok to stop operating by January 19 unless ByteDance had completed divesting the app's US assets or demonstrated significant progress toward a sale. Trump, who credits the app with boosting his support among young voters in last November's presidential election, has extended the deadline three times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
A game of power
The world today finds itself at a dangerous crossroads. Regional conflicts once seen as isolated flashpoints Palestine, Iran, Ukraine, South Asia are now connected by a shared pattern of escalating militarism and institutional paralysis. These clashes are not random, they represent deeper power shifts and systemic failures that affect global stability. Gaza has become a global symbol of civilian suffering and collective neglect. Since the latest round of violence began earlier this year, more than 55,000 civilians, many of them women and children have perished under Israeli airstrikes targeting densely populated neighbourhoods. Hospitals, schools, and residential buildings have been reduced to rubble, leaving families homeless and traumatized. Aid convoys were delayed, communications blacked out, and displaced families had little time or space to find shelter. These events bear the marks of a broader strategic purpose yet were met only with official statements urging 'restraint.' This disparity between words and deeds has exposed serious flaws in international governance. The United Nations has repeatedly failed to enforce its own principles. Security Council resolutions condemning the violence were blocked or diluted, and the institution's ability to hold perpetrators accountable has steadily eroded. Meanwhile, some of the world's wealthiest nations traditionally champions of peace have maintained steady military cooperation with Israel, citing 'security partnerships' and shared democratic values. But when these ideals clash with civilian devastation, they echo hollow. These interconnected crises highlight troubling inconsistencies in global response. In Ukraine, Russian aggression sparked worldwide condemnation, sanctions, and aid. In contrast, the immense suffering in Gaza continues under a more muted chorus. Israel's strikes on Iran did not trigger the kind of protests or political backlash that similar actions might have elsewhere. The metric for international outrage appears selective, shaped less by principle than by political convenience. Israel's current leadership has pursued a policy rooted in deterrence and territorial control. Statements by officials emphasized pre-emptive removal of threats. This posture culminated in June when, under intense domestic pressure, Israel launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. Though justified as halting nuclear weaponization, these facilities were under international inspection, with no clear evidence of weapons development. The US President Donald Trump, responded with 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' deploying seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to strike the same Iranian facilities. The use of bunker-busting munitions and Tomahawk missiles represented an escalation beyond deterrence. In response, Iran launched a measured counterstrike, targeting the U.S. base in Al Udeid, Qatar. However, diplomatic warnings were issued in advance to avoid human casualties. Analysts interpreted this as a display of capability rather than a bid for escalation – an assertion of sovereignty without tipping into war. Iran's situation remains complex. Decades of sanctions and embargoes have fostered a national identity of resilience. Whether its measured response will lead to renewed diplomacy or deepen the arms race is uncertain. Still, Iran's recent moves suggest a willingness to assert strength without surrendering to war an approach that may open paths to new negotiations or at least delay further escalation. The India-Pakistan standoff in May 2025 highlighted the dangers and limitations of South Asian power dynamics. Triggered by Indian cross-border aggression near the Line of Control in Kashmir, Pakistan responded with precision airstrikes using JF-17 jets and electronic warfare systems to neutralize Indian defense assets. Within days, Indian forces withdrew, unable to consolidate their advance. Though casualties were limited compared to past conflicts, the episode underscored Pakistan's enhanced military readiness and redefined South Asian strategic equations. Pakistan's global position is increasingly important both strategically and morally. As one of only two Muslim-majority nuclear states, it bears significant responsibility for regional stability. Domestically, it must confront internal paralysis, combating corruption, modernizing infrastructure, and strengthening democratic accountability. Externally, Pakistan has the potential to lead through religious diplomacy and peacekeeping efforts, projecting a vision of stability rooted in shared values and multilateral engagement. Despite its strategic significance, Pakistan often remains outside mainstream international discourse a silence that can no longer be afforded. In Ukraine, now in its fourth year of war, over 12 million people have been displaced and hundreds of thousands killed. Economic fallout has rippled across Europe and the globe destabilizing energy supplies, inflation, and food systems. The West has justified its involvement as defensive solidarity, but broader consequences remain under-addressed. Similarly, the Gulf states Saudi Arabia, the UAE have remained largely passive despite their financial and geopolitical leverage. Their silence on Gaza and Iran reflects missed opportunities to lead. More engaged diplomacy, humanitarian outreach, and conflict mediation could reframe their regional role from bystanders to stabilizers. Trump's latest term has been defined by a transactional, often unpredictable foreign policy. His critique of Israeli aggression while still affirming support was a marked departure. Praising Iran's measured missile response signalled internal rifts in U.S. strategic doctrine. These shifts reflect a broader American reorientation away from global policing toward tactical selectivity. Still, the core issue persists, war has become an industry. Global military spending topped $2.2 trillion in 2024, with the U.S. accounting for nearly 40% of all arms exports. The overlap between commerce and conflict casts doubt on the sincerity of peace pledges. If war sustains economies, can peace truly be achieved? The time for cosmetic reform is over. International institutions must prioritize substance over symbolism. The UN must overhaul veto powers, enforce civilian protection, and ensure real accountability. International law must move beyond rhetoric to penalize violations with real consequences. What's missing today is leadership rooted in human dignity. Sustainable peace comes not through bombs or balance sheets, but through transparent governance, economic inclusion, and shared purpose. Even incremental progress a unified humanitarian framework, regional deterrence dialogues, enforceable rights charters could pivot us away from the brink. The world has a choice. We can let wars define our era or reclaim the moral architecture that once gave diplomacy its weight. Peace must be practical, deliberate, and centered on prevention. Power, after all, should serve people not destroy them. The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
China to resume some Japanese seafood imports after Fukushima ban
BEIJING: China has lifted a ban on seafood imports from most regions of Japan, partially mending a years-long dispute over Tokyo's handling of nuclear wastewater. China and Japan are key trading partners, but increased friction over territorial rivalries and military spending has frayed ties in recent years. Japan's brutal occupation of parts of China before and during World War II remains a sore point, with Beijing accusing Tokyo of failing to atone for its past. Japan began gradually releasing treated wastewater from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean in 2023. The move was backed by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the plant operator TEPCO says all radioactive elements have been filtered out except for tritium, levels of which are within safe limits. But it drew sharp criticism from Beijing, which banned imports of Japanese seafood as a result. Russia later followed suit. Samples from long-term monitoring of nuclear-contaminated water from Fukushima had 'not shown abnormalities', China's General Administration of Customs said in a statement Sunday. As a result, China 'decided to conditionally resume' seafood imports from Japan, except imports from 10 of the country's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and Tokyo, which remain banned. The Japanese government received the decision 'positively', Kazuhiko Aoki, deputy chief cabinet secretary, told reporters in Tokyo. China, Japan close to resuming seafood imports after Fukushima ban But Japan 'will strongly demand the Chinese side lift remaining import regulations on seafood from 10 prefectures', he added. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning confirmed Monday that Beijing was resuming seafood imports from regions 'that meet China's standards'. But she warned that China would take measures to restrict imports 'should any risks be identified'. In 2011, a huge earthquake triggered a deadly tsunami that swamped the Fukushima nuclear facility and pushed three of its six reactors into meltdown. China vociferously opposed the release of the treated wastewater, casting it as environmentally irresponsible. But in September last year, it said it would 'gradually resume' importing the seafood. Production companies that had suspended trade must reapply for registration in China and would be 'strictly' supervised, Beijing's customs administration said Sunday.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Canada drops digital tax on US tech firms
Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting US technology firms late on Sunday, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump will resume trade negotiations to agree on a deal by July 21, Canada's finance ministry said in a statement. Trump abruptly called off trade talks on Friday over the tax targeting US technology firms, saying that it was a "blatant attack." He reiterated his comments on Sunday, pledging to set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within the next week, which threatened to push US-Canada relations back into chaos after a period of relative calm. The breakdown in trade talks comes after the two leaders met at the G7 in mid-June and Carney said they had agreed to wrap up a new economic agreement within 30 days. Canada's planned digital tax was 3% of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year, and payments were to be retroactive to 2022. It would have impacted US technology firms, including Amazon AMZN.O, Meta META.O, Alphabet's Google GOOGL.O and Apple AAPL.O, among others. Monday collection will be halted, the Canada's finance ministry statement said, and Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne will bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act. "The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians," the statement said. "Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation." Stocks index futures rose after the news the digital tax will be rescinded and the bullish sentiment spilled over into Asian markets. Canada is the second-largest US trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S exports. It bought $349.4 billion of US goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the US, according to US Census Bureau data. The Biden administration had requested trade dispute settlement consultations over the tax in 2024, saying it was inconsistent with Canada's North American trade deal obligations. Canada had escaped Trump's broad tariffs imposed in April but faces 50% duties on steel and aluminum.
