AIB report warns on economic fallout of Trump's tariff threats
Mr Trump backed away on Sunday, agreeing to extend the deadline until July 9 for talks between Washington and the 27-nation bloc to produce a deal.
Mr Trump, who has repeatedly expressed disdain for the EU and its treatment of the US on trade, relented after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told him on Sunday that the EU needed more time to come to an agreement.
She asked him during a call to delay the tariffs until July, the deadline he had originally set when he announced new tariffs in April. Trump told reporters he had granted the request.
"We had a very nice call, and I agreed to move it," Mr Trump said before returning to Washington after a weekend in New Jersey. "She said we will rapidly get together and see if we can work something out."
Ms Von der Leyen said in a post on X that she had a "good call" with Trump and that the EU was ready to move quickly.
"Europe is ready to advance talks swiftly and decisively," she said. "To reach a good deal, we would need the time until July 9."
Trump agrees to delay 50% tariffs on EU imports until July 9
The euro and US dollar rose against the safe-haven yen and Swiss franc after the deadline extension.
It comes as Tánaiste Simon Harris wrote to Mr Trump's commerce secretary urging him not to hit the pharma and microchip sectors, which are of great importance to Ireland, with tariffs.
The fear and uncertainty caused by Mr Trump's extreme and unpredictable policy announcements is feeding through to dampen consumer spending and business investment growth, with both expected to cool in Ireland, according to AIB's Economic Outlook Report for May 2025.
The authors say the Irish economy has built up resilience to withstand a potential trade shock in the short term. Modified domestic demand, a measure that focuses on the so-called real economy, is forecast to grow by 2.3% this year, 2% next year and 2.6% in 2027.
The jobs market is also expected to keep growing, but slower.
AIB chief economist David McNamara said the uncertainty created by the dramatic shift in US trade policy and the responses of other key trading blocs is expected to dampen global growth this year and next, globally.
'Given the globalised nature of the Irish economy, we expect significant volatility in GDP as exporters seek to get ahead of potential trade restrictions this year. For the domestic economy we expect a cooling in growth this year,' he said.
He thinks the economy here is now better positioned to weather a crisis than during the global financial crisis.
'Ireland enters this period of uncertainty from a position of strength, with the economy growing at a robust pace in recent months, while both the public and private sectors have built up material financial buffers in recent years,' he said.
The report suggests households are building up savings in response to the uncertainty and are expected to pare back spending growth while some business sectors may delay planned investments, particularly those in export-orientated sectors, AIB's economist said.
US tariffs and future US tax policy are the main downside risks to the Irish economy. Some exporting indigenous Irish sectors such as agri-food are exposed to US tariffs, but the key risk is to multinational-dominated sectors, which account for around 12% of total employment, but 80% of the value of exports and 50% of gross national product.
There's now a heightened risk of tariffs on the Irish pharma sector, which, along with technology services, dominates multinational sector output, they say.
A hit to multinationals could spill over into domestic sector output and jobs, they say.
It comes as Mr Harris warned the US administration of the negative consequences of imposing tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals and microchips.
He has written to US secretary for commerce Howard Lutnick following the latter's instigation of two investigations examining whether the reliance of the US on foreign imports in those sectors poses a risk to national security. The outcome of the investigations could result in significant tariffs being imposed on pharmaceutical and semiconductors sold into the US from abroad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on plastic pollution: global action is desperately needed to deal with this scourge
Plastic pollution has reached the most remote and inaccessible parts of our beleaguered planet. It has been found in Greenland's ice cap, near the summit of Mount Everest, and in the deepest depths of the western Pacific Ocean. Nature programmes have sounded the alarm over a human-made crisis that has become an environmental scourge and a serious threat to our health. Yet global production of plastics is on course to triple to more than a billion tonnes a year by 2060, after increasing by more than 200 times over the past 75 years. This gloomy backdrop should inject a sense of urgency into UN-convened talks in Switzerland this week, aimed at agreeing a binding global plastics treaty. In 2022, when 173 countries committed to work towards such an accord, there was widespread relief that at last a multilateral route was to be taken towards solving a quintessentially global problem. Sadly, as delegates gather in Geneva, there are reasons to be fearful. As major oil-producing countries seek to circumvent the consequences of the green transition, the fossil fuel-based manufacture of plastics has become a key battleground. During five rounds of negotiations, over three years, a 'petrochemical bloc' led by Russia and Saudi Arabia has stalled and obstructed attempts to agree a reduction in production. And as a recent investigation by the Guardian laid bare, corporate capture of the talks has also become a significant problem. Industry lobbyists have sought to dominate and divert the debate, promoting implausible panaceas in the form of new recycling technologies and other mitigating measures. The return of Donald Trump to the White House is unlikely to improve the prospects of a truly ambitious reset. On the first day of his second term Mr Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris climate agreement, signalling his contempt for multilateralism and his unflinching backing for big oil. There are already signs that in Geneva the US plans to align itself with fellow fossil-fuel producers in resisting any attempt to agree to a reduction in virgin plastic production. Given such headwinds, the scale of the crisis bears reiteration. Ahead of this week's talks, an expert review published in the Lancet described plastics as 'a grave, growing and under-recognised danger to human and planetary health'. Thanks to television series such as Blue Planet II, the grievous impact on blighted marine ecosystems is relatively widely understood. But plastic production also contributes more than 3% of annual global greenhouse emissions. Most insidiously, its ubiquitous presence in everyday life means that chemical additives and pollutants find their way into human bodies. According to the Lancet report, health-related damages globally add up to £1.1tn a year, with infants and children particularly vulnerable. Carrying on with business as usual, while seeking unlikely technological fixes, will not be good enough. A cap on global production is desperately needed, though achieving that in Geneva looks like a tall order. At last November's talks in South Korea, more than 100 countries supported legally binding reductions but negotiations collapsed without an agreement. A consensus of sorts may be found on the need to eliminate harmful chemicals from future manufacture, and phasing out single-use plastics, which account for half of the 400m tonnes produced every year. That would at least be a start. After years of obfuscation and delay, something tangible must emerge from Switzerland.
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Trump to announce White House taskforce for 2028 LA Olympics
Donald Trump is expected to announce on Tuesday that he will create a White House taskforce to oversee elements of the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. The president is set to sign an executive order establishing the taskforce, which will include cabinet members and government officials and will handle security and transportation on the first Games in the US in nearly three decades. The announcement comes after a summer of political clashes between the administration and Los Angeles leaders. 'During his first term, President Trump was instrumental in securing America's bid to host the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles. The president considers it a great honor to oversee this global sporting spectacle in his second term,' Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement. With the Olympics just three years away, the city has been rushing to prepare for the Games, which are expected to attract millions of people over the course of 16 days. City leaders have been in what the Los Angeles Times described as 'high-stakes' negotiations with LA28, the committee managing the event, over the use of city staff, including police officers. Meanwhile, a proposed ballot measure could require some Olympic venues to receive approval from voters in order to be used. Meanwhile, Los Angeles has been through a tense standoff with the Trump administration, including over aggressive immigration raids in the region and the deployment of US troops into the city over the objection of city and state leaders. The International Olympic Committee president, Thomas Bach, has expressed confidence in the 'strong' city and said the games have the support of US leaders. 'With regard to LA, we have the full support of the president of the United States and the governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles for the success of these Olympic Games,' Bach told the Associated Press in June. Trump has frequently touted his support for hosting the games in Los Angeles. His recent budget bill allocates $1bn for security, planning and other Olympic-related costs. In a statement to the Hollywood Reporter, which broke the news, the chairperson and president of LA28 expressed 'deep appreciation' to the administration for their 'unwavering support'. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'The creation of this taskforce marks an important step forward in our planning efforts and reflects our shared commitment to delivering not just the biggest, but the greatest Games the world has ever seen in the summer of 2028,' Casey Wasserman said. Reuters contributed to this report
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration to reinstall Confederate statue toppled in Black Lives Matter protests
A statue of a general in the Confederate army that was toppled and set on fire during social justice protests in 2020 in Washington DC will be reinstated, the National Park Service (NPS) has announced. The bronze statue depicting Albert Pike is being restored, the Park Service said in a statement on Monday, sharing a photo of the statue undergoing cleaning to remove corrosion and paint prior to repairs, with a view to reinstalling it by October. 'The restoration aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues,' a statement from the agency said, including an executive order issued by Donald Trump in March calling for 'restoring truth and sanity to American history'. The restoration is just the latest action undertaken by the NPS, faced with unprecedented staff cuts and threats to some $1bn of its federal funding, that falls in line with Trump's agenda to sanitize and rewrite the country's history. It has come under fire in recent months for removing or editing content to scrub references to certain historical narratives, including slavery, stories of women, African Americans and LGBTQ+ individuals. It removed references to transgender people from its Stonewall national monument webpage in February, while pages about Harriet Tubman and a Black Medal of Honor recipient were restored after public backlash. The agency also faced scrutiny for directing park staff to review gift shop items for content deemed 'anti-American'. In the wake of the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, antiracism protestors used rope and chains to topple the Pike statue – the only one of a Confederate general in the nation's capital – and set it ablaze on Juneteenth, the day marking the end of slavery in the US, in 2020. Floyd's death had sparked a nationwide reckoning with racism and calls for the removal of monuments to the Confederacy, more than 300 of which were eventually removed nationwide. Trump, then in his first term, quickly tweeted about the toppling: 'The DC police are not doing their job as they watched a statue be ripped down and burn. These people should be immediately arrested. A disgrace to our country.' Several days later he reportedly requested that the statue be restored. This time around the president has tasked the Department of the Interior to look into restoring monuments, memorials and statues that have been removed since 2020, and the Pentagon has restored Confederate names to army bases (something Trump said he 'would not even consider' in 2020). The statue had long been a source of controversy, as have Confederate statues and other markers of the Confederate legacy across the US more generally. Many were put up long after the civil war had ended as a way of continuing to intimidate Black Americans and serve as monuments to white supremacy. Pike was a longtime leader of the Freemasons, a centuries-old secretive society, who paid for the statue. His body is interred at the Washington headquarters of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, which also contains a small museum in his honor. The statue, dedicated in 1901, was located in Judiciary Square about half a mile from the US Capitol. It was built at the request of Masons who successfully lobbied Congress to grant them land for the statue as long as Pike would be depicted in civilian – not military – clothing. Civil rights activists and some local government officials in DC had campaigned for years to get the statue taken down but needed the federal government's approval to do so. A proposed resolution calling for the removal of the statue referred to Pike as a 'chief founder of the post-civil war Ku Klux Klan'. The Klan connection is a frequent accusation from Pike's critics and one which the Masons dispute. Since NPS announced its plan to return the Pike statue, Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC's House delegate, announced plans to reintroduce her bill to remove the statue and donate it to a museum. 'I've long believed Confederate statues should be placed in museums as historical artifacts, not remain in parks and locations that imply honor,' she said in a press release. 'The decision to honor Albert Pike by reinstalling the Pike statue is as odd and indefensible as it is morally objectionable. Pike served dishonorably.'
