Groomed terror suspect not treated as a ‘vulnerable child', says her mother
Rhianan Rudd, who died aged 16, had an 'obsession with Hitler', downloaded a bomb-making manual, and threatened to 'blow up' a synagogue after she was radicalised online by an American neo-Nazi.
In the 18 months before she died, Rhianan was diagnosed with autism, investigated by counter-terrorism policing and MI5, and prosecuted over terrorism charges after she had been groomed and allegedly sexually exploited by extremists.
Senior coroner Judge Alexia Durran concluded that she was not satisfied that Rhianan intended to end her own life at Chesterfield Coroner's Court on Monday.
She said that 'missed opportunities' in Rhianan's case were 'not systemic' and she will not make a prevention of future deaths report.
In an interview, Rhianan's mother, Emily Carter, said she believes the teenager's death was preventable and the agencies involved in her case need to be held accountable.
Ms Carter said: 'They need to recognise that the way they dealt with things was not the correct way, because she's dead.
'I don't ever want this to happen to another family. This has been devastating.
'If I could save just one child from these people making all their changes and making sure they follow through with everything, there's justice in my eyes – my daughter didn't kill herself for no reason.
'It was just one thing after another basically, but all of them should learn from Rhianan's death, all of them.'
Ms Carter said Rhianan was not treated as a vulnerable child, despite her autism diagnosis, and she does not believe her daughter was ever a threat to other people.
The mother said: 'She was five foot one, weighed seven stone. She was tiny.
'I don't know what people thought she could do, but I don't believe that she was ever a threat. It was just what people would put in her head – brainwashed her, basically.
'They (the agencies) treated her as a child, but I don't believe they treated her as a vulnerable child.
'If you've got vulnerable children, you take extra steps to watch them, to look after them, to make sure they feel safe, even from themselves, and they didn't. Obviously, she's dead.'
The mother said the moment 19 police officers and two detectives came to arrest her daughter at their family home was 'mind-numbing' and she felt 'violated' when officers turned her house 'upside down'.
She said: 'It hurt … the fact that they thought that my daughter was some sort of massive terrorist.
'They were going to put her in handcuffs, but the handcuffs didn't go small enough. Even on the smallest ones, they just fell off her hands. That's how small she was.'
The inquest heard that the police did not refer Rhianan to the National Referral Mechanism (NRM), which identifies victims of human trafficking or modern slavery, when they began investigating her in 2020, but the referral was made by Derbyshire County Council in April 2021.
Her mother says the NRM referral should have been done 'at the very beginning' because 'they could see that she was vulnerable'.
Ms Carter added that she thinks Rhianan should not have been charged, and said: 'She was a child, a vulnerable child. A child with mental health issues.
'She should have been treated as a victim more than anything.'
The mother also said it 'angered' her that Rhianan was investigated by MI5 before her death and added: 'If they knew that my daughter was being groomed and sexually exploited online, and then you're investigating at that time, why did nobody come and stop it?
'Why watch a child be completely humiliated, sexualised, trafficked, brainwashed?'
Speaking about her daughter's autism diagnosis, Ms Carter said Rhianan would get fixated and 'sucked into' something until it was the 'be all and end all of everything'.
She said Rhianan's fixations began with My Little Pony before she became interested in German history, wanted '1940s German furniture in her bedroom', and eventually made contact with extremists on the messaging apps Telegram and Discord.
Ms Carter said: 'Finding out that she'd been groomed, and the way these people talked to her … it really changed her wholeness as a person, the way she thinks, the way she feels, everything.'
She said that Rhianan was a 'bubbly' girl but she became withdrawn after she was radicalised, and added that the extremists 'took away an innocent child' and 'took away her substance as a person'.
She said: 'After she started talking to her so-called friend online – I thought she was talking to gamer friends and friends from school – she started withdrawing.
'She stopped talking about normal things. She wasn't very bubbly, and I'd literally have to drag her out the house.'
Ms Carter said she believes Rhianan's death could have been prevented if she was placed in a mental health unit, rather than the children's home, to 'deal with her mood swings, her brain going mad'.
She said: 'They don't know a child like a mother does. Even when she was at home, I would wake up two or three times throughout the night and go and check her. These houses aren't guaranteed to do that.'
The mother added that it was 'scary' when she referred her daughter to Prevent but she 'knew it had to be done'.
She said: 'I was hoping that it was just going to take her two or three times a week to work on her mind, unpick her head, and turn her back into Rhianan.
'Not end up with all these police officers turning up arresting her and pulling my house apart. You don't expect that at all.'
The inquest heard that Rhianan took an overdose of her mother's medication after being encouraged to by the 'two competing individuals' in her mind a week before she was charged and moved to the children's home.
Recalling that moment, Ms Carter said: 'I go down the stairs and Rhianan was laying on my living room floor. And I actually thought she was dead, but she wasn't.
'She basically called them (an ambulance) when she decided that she changed her mind and didn't want to die.'
Ms Carter continued: 'I've made mistakes, and I want the organisations to put their hands up and admit they've made mistakes and to rectify their mistakes so it doesn't happen again.
'And then that way everybody can be happy, except me, because I've already lost my daughter.'
Ms Carter described Rhianan as 'loving, kind' and a 'really beautiful soul'.
She added: 'Her brother, Brandon, and Rhianan were like two peas in a pod, and he just feels completely lost without her.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Senior judges reveal regret at handing out ‘unfair' indefinite jail terms and call for scandal to be ‘put right'
Senior judges who imposed 'unfair' indefinite jail terms, which have left scores of inmates locked up for minor offences languishing in prison for decades, have revealed their regret for their part in the 'injustice'. Former High Court judge Sir John Saunders said he would apologise to offenders he handed imprisonment for public protection (IPP) jail terms, which were scrapped in 2012, but not retrospectively, leaving thousands already jailed incarcerated with no release date. Now the very judges who dished out the punishment have joined calls for the government to take urgent action to help more than 2,500 prisoners still trapped under the abolished jail term, which has been branded 'psychological torture' by the UN. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. Sir John, 76, who served as recorder of Birmingham before he was appointed to the High Court, told The Independent that if he met an IPP prisoner he had jailed who was years over tariff, he would apologise. 'I should say I'm really sorry this has happened, it's extremely unfair,' he said. 'I didn't want to be party to unfairness. I would feel very bad about it, I would apologise to them.' He said that when the sentence was introduced in 2005 by New Labour in a bid to be tough on crime, it appeared there was a 'certain degree of sense' to plans to ensure offenders completed rehabilitation courses before they were approved for release by the Parole Board. But judges had no idea those prisoners would find themselves trapped in prison indefinitely, often without access to the courses they needed to be released. He added: 'I think the essence of the job of a judge is to be fair. And we really do all try to do that. So when we conduct criminal trials, we attempt to be fair. In passing sentences, we attempt to be fair. 'If we have been party to something which has been accepted by everybody as unfair and we have been part of it… it's a bit of an affront to the job.' He and Simon Tonking, the former recorder of Stafford, have lobbied prisons minister Lord James Timpson to help those still trapped under the jail term. Both have backed a package of proposals put forward by an expert panel convened by the Howard League for Penal Reform, calling for IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing. Mr Tonking recalled imposing an IPP sentence with a minimum tariff of just six months for a relatively minor offence after a man was caught following a woman in an alley. 'Now I wonder what happened to him,' he told The Independent. 'He was in his late twenties. For all I know, he may still be there [in prison]. 'And when I look back at that case, I think I should have tried harder not to impose it.' Although he was doing his best to administer the laws in place at the time, he is now determined to be part of the solution. 'I don't feel guilty, but I do feel, having been part of that, I should be doing all I can to put what has turned out to be an injustice right,' he added. 'And I am driven in part by the fact that I was part of the administration of justice at a time when these sentences were being passed. 'I have been a part of the system that is wrong. I feel that I ought to be part of the system to put it right.' Successive governments have resisted calls to resentence IPP prisoners, claiming they cannot risk letting prisoners out until they have passed the Parole Board's release test. However, at least 94 inmates have taken their own lives in custody after losing hope of being freed, according to campaigners, with many struggling as their mental health deteriorates in prison. Mr Tonking urged the Labour government to use its majority to finally end the injustice by taking up the Howard League's proposals, adding: 'Virtually everybody who has had any professional dealings with IPP knows that it's unjust and now is the time to act.' The proposed reforms also include providing a package of mental health support for released IPP prisoners and tightening up the criteria for recalling them. Currently, many find themselves hauled back to prison indefinitely for minor breaches of strict licence conditions, despite committing no further offences. Paul Glenn, who last year retired from his role as the most senior judge in Stoke-on-Trent, also backed the charity's proposals. He told The Independent: 'Nobody envisaged that 10 years after they should have been released, they would still be in custody. The injustice there is pretty obvious. 'It's undoubtedly right that we should be sentencing people for what they have done, rather than what they might do in the future.' Prisons minister Lord Timpson said: 'It is absolutely right that the IPP sentence was abolished. 'As the IPP annual report shows, we have significantly improved support for these offenders, with greater access to rehabilitation and mental health support. 'There is more work to do as we reduce the number of IPP offenders in custody, but we will only do so in a way that protects the public.'
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It's no good telling us there's less crime. The British people know better
Following a 999 call on a recent spring afternoon, armed police rushed to suburban street in Boston, Lincolnshire. The emergency was triggered by a teenager in a tracksuit, whose casual demeanour suggested he did not think he was doing anything wrong. He was sauntering down the street holding a foot long machete. As it happened, the local MP was out campaigning just around the corner. Cue an impressively speedy police response. Mindful of the murder of two politicians (Jo Cox and Sir David Amess) they quickly cordoned off the area and apprehended the suspect, who was charged with possession of an offensive weapon in a public place. Today that teenager is at liberty to do the same thing again. Somehow or other, when the case came to court, he was found not guilty of any crime. Quite what defence his legal team mounted is a mystery: prosecutors had no shortage of witnesses and photographic evidence. For now, the case is just another illustration of the proliferation of offensive weapons on our streets, and the challenges associated with securing convictions. In the kind of Third World hell-holes where armed militias rule by fear, machetes are practically fashion accessories. When bladed weapons are carried casually in rural England, yet no convictions follow, clearly we have a problem. The exact nature of the crime wave sweeping Britain is the subject of much debate, with conflicting data sets recently triggering a 'war of statistics' between politicians and commentators. Some argue that overall crime is in fact falling – citing evidence from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW), which shows a dramatic drop in offences excluding fraud, from 19.8m in the 1990s to 4.6m a year today. Others insist the survey bears little relation to 'lived experience', especially in urban areas. What few dispute is that petty crime is rocketing, just as public confidence in the police is collapsing. Ordinary people can see the explosion of lawlessness with their own eyes – and are stunned by how little anyone seems to be doing about it. This is not just about theft from supermarkets and other stores, which, at the rate of three cases per minute, is forcing thousands of businesses to hide stock, lock their doors and hire more guards. It is also about mugging and phone theft, rates of which are out of control in some city centres, especially London. Meanwhile a 'shrug-shrug' approach towards weed smoking in public and tube fare dodging has allowed such behaviour to become commonplace. The proliferation of masked youths using electric bikes to deliver fast food and perhaps worse has added to the impression that the authorities are turning a blind eye to criminal activity, some of it by illegal immigrants. This general sense of lawlessness is what Nigel Farage was talking about when he declared that our country is facing 'societal collapse'. Apocalyptic sounding? Yes. Born out by every line of crime data? No. But reflective of how hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of people in this country actually feel? Absolutely. Plucking the most convenient statistics, ministers, and commentators can protest all they like that this crisis is imaginary. All their denials do is fuel mistrust in an Establishment that seems at best, hopelessly out of touch; at worst, mendacious. When one of his first decisions as prime minister was to let a bunch of hardened criminals out of jail, Sir Keir Starmer can hardly complain. The sight of champagne-spraying convicts swaggering out of prison gates into waiting Lamborghinis created a very early impression that this government would be soft on crime. It was an extraordinary message for any newly elected government to convey. Since then, the government's decision to keep rolling out of the red carpet for individuals who enter the UK illegally – including sex offenders, drug dealers and other criminals – has done nothing to boost public confidence in the maintenance of law and order. How could it, when every boat load of illegal immigrants (some 45,000 since Starmer entered No 10) literally increases the population of known law-breakers? Illegal immigration is another so-called 'victimless' crime that is not reflected in the Crime Survey for England and Wales. Meanwhile there is no doubting the policing crisis. Such is the recruitment and retention nightmare that some months, the Metropolitan Police is said to struggle to attract a single new entrant. As the blue line is stretched as thin as gossamer, police chiefs are getting increasingly desperate. To plug the gap, in London, senior officers have been ordered to return to the beat. Naturally, the new policy has not gone down well with highly trained firearms officers and forensic investigators who thought their days of dealing with road traffic accidents and drunks in A+E were long behind them. Nonetheless, needs must: bobbies on the beat are becoming an endangered species. Just 12 per cent of the 30,000 people questioned for the CSEW see them regularly – a fall of two thirds since 2010. As for crime-solving rates, they are woeful, with just 5.7 per cent of offences resulting in a charge. That is half the figure in 2015. No wonder fewer than 50 per cent of people say they are satisfied with police performance – the lowest proportion in the survey's history. Worryingly, news of the crime wave is spreading beyond these shores. When tourists, business travellers and other overseas visitors fall victim to our lawless streets, they can be forgiven for warning their compatriots. Donald Trump's outspoken attack on London Mayor Sadiq Khan seems likely to fuel international concern about the capital. What happens when the police can't or won't do their job, prisons are overflowing and frightened citizens lose confidence in their political leaders? The answer is that ordinary folk, who would much prefer to be getting on with their lives, but are increasingly alarmed by what is happening to their neighbourhoods, become tempted to take the law into their own hands. Already, we are on the cusp of this, as 'justice seekers' without any party political affiliations have begun hanging around migrant hotels trying to gather incriminating evidence. Meanwhile a growing number of affluent communities and business groups have resorted to paying private security companies to patrol neighbourhoods. And who can blame them? Unless our leaders get a grip – and fast – exasperated communities will turn vigilante. Then things could get really ugly.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woman, 31, who mugged her pensioner partner in broad daylight before threatening to 'knock the jaw off' a good Samaritan is jailed
A woman who mugged her elderly boyfriend in broad daylight before threatening to 'knock the jaw off' a Good Samaritan has been jailed. Katie Bland, 31, from Greetland, Halifax, was in a relationship with a man in his 70s who she would often abuse and demand money from. On January 6, the gentleman left after an argument but was met with a barrage of abusive calls from Bland asking for money, Bradford Crown Court was told. At around 4pm, she found out he was at a bus station in Halifax and travelled to him where she continued her abusive onslaught, calling him a racist word and a 'dirty dog'. Moments later, she grabbed him by the collar of his coat and threw him around as she demanded cash. The pensioner offered Bland £20 but instead she wanted his bank card and became aggressive when he refused to hand it over. He offered to go to the cash point with her to withdraw money, however, she became violent on the way and started kicking him in the leg and screaming at him. A woman who witness the attack tried to intervene but Bland then turned on her, grabbing her by her scarf and telling her she would 'knock her jaw off' if she 'didn't shut the f**k up'. She then carried on assaulting the elderly man and managed to withdraw £40 from his bank account before police officers turned up. Bland was arrested and, despite responding with 'no comment' to all questions, later pleaded guilty to robbery, assault by beating, fraud and blackmail. In his witness statement, the elderly gentleman said he has 'never been so depressed or worried' throughout his entire existence as he was during his relationship with Bland. His statement, read out by prosecutor Nathan Davis, said: 'I wake up and don't know how she is going to be. I get abused daily. 'I lost all of my friends for my relationship. My friends have told me what she is like and asks for money to buy drugs. 'Her behaviour is the last weeks has become worse. It has affected me to the point I want to give up with life. 'I never want to come home due to the mess she has left in my house.' The court heard that Bland, who participated via video connection from HMP New Hall, possessed prior criminal convictions and was serving under a suspended sentence for a separate robbery when she carried out the offences for which she faced sentencing on Friday. In mitigation, Shila Whitehead explained: 'What she tells me is she has been in custody since January. She said she is aware her behaviour towards him was unacceptable and she is willing to accept help. She accepts at the time of committing these offences she was using drugs and was heavily dependant on them. 'During the time she has been in prison she tells me that she has undertaken a number of courses which has helped her. She is hoping to get help and change her ways and not have the lifestyle she has had for three years. 'When she has appeared before the court she wants to make amends and lead a law-abiding life. He has been in touch with her while she has been in prison and has been in communication with her family. 'He says he wants to support her if she wants to put in the time to lead a law-abiding life. Her family are supporting her throughout this. They have accommodation for her. They are supporting her and will be there for her when she is released from prison.' Bland was sentenced to two years and three months in jail.
