‘One-stop Shop': How RMA Reforms Could Shake Up Local Government
Change is in store for local government, amid RMA reform.
Proposed legislation to replace the Resource Management Act (RMA) could bring sweeping changes for local councils.
Amid speculation the Government is looking at local government amalgamation as part of the legislation, some believe many council functions could be stripped from them leaving them wondering what functions would be left at a local level.
But Environment Canterbury chairperson Craig Pauling firmly believes there is a future for separate district and regional councils.
''There needs to be a partnership between local, regional and central government and we (ECan) are good at bringing people together.
''If you are in Kaikōura, your main focus is Kaikōura, but at a regional level my focus is Canterbury.''
Among the proposed changes is compliance, monitoring and enforcement (CME) functions to go to ''an Environment Protection Authority-type regulator''.
A single regional plan is proposed, which would bring together ECan's seven regional plans, four river plans, the 10 District Plans and the various spatial plans developed by local councils.
Mr Pauling believes there needs to be something at a regional level for planning and consenting, ''but you can still have delivery of services done at a local level''.
He says the proposed changes could lead to a ''one-stop shop'' for consents, instead of developers having to apply to ECan and local councils for different consents for the same development, but is not convinced a unitary authority is the answer.
''You shouldn't have a student marking their own exams.''
A single spatial plan chapter for the region is expected to have legislative clout.
But whether this will prevent housing developments, such as the proposed Ohoka sub-division, near Kaiapoi, appearing outside of a designated urban area remains uncertain.
''I suspect not because of the premise in the RMA reforms for private property rights,'' ECan deputy chairperson Deon Swiggs says.
ECan is continuing preparation work for a new Canterbury Regional Coastal Environment Plan and a single regional plan.
Former ECan chairperson Peter Scott blasted his colleagues last month for ''wasting money'' in allowing staff to continue planning work in the face of change.
But Mr Swiggs said staff were conducting research and analysis which will help to inform future plans, regardless of the planning framework.
''We still have work to do and we need to get on and do it,'' Mr Swiggs said.
''The work of our staff will endure regardless of what planning frameworks we have in place in the future.''
In November, ECan voted to delay notifying the Canterbury Regional Policy Statement until January 2026, while it awaits more certainty with RMA reform.
The council is also waiting for advice from the Environment Minister on whether it can notify a plan change to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan designed to resolve issues arising from a Supreme Court ruling in 2023.
Local Government Minister Simon Watts said amalgamation is a local decision and the Government will not force councils to amalgamate.
He said the RMA replacement legislation will include provisions relating to the roles, responsibilities and processes of local government.
'I have asked my officials to work with the sector on what that could mean for councils.'
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop said the new legislation 'will provide a radical transition to a far more liberal planning system with less red tape' and an emphasis on property rights.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Government's Announcement To Stop RMA Plan Changes Impacts Regional Planning
Press Release – Te Uru Kahika This move means we can channel resources into delivery, such as supporting landowners and catchment groups to improve water quality, progressing flood resilience projects, and ensuring our planning teams are well prepared for the transition and implementation … The Government has announced that they will stop all new RMA plan changes and suspend current plan review obligations, including requirements for councils to implement national planning standards, as part of its work to reform the country's resource management system. 'This announcement comes as councils are gearing up for a new resource management system,' explains Al Cross, Director of Resource Management System Reform at Te Uru Kahika, the collective of regional and unitary councils. 'For councils, the positive is that it provides clarity and the space to redirect effort into critical environmental delivery and preparing for change ahead. 'This move means we can channel resources into delivery, such as supporting landowners and catchment groups to improve water quality, progressing flood resilience projects, and ensuring our planning teams are well prepared for the transition and implementation of the new system. 'We're very mindful of the impacts on councils and communities invested in planning processes across the country. Councils have undertaken major work and engagement with locals, iwi, and industries. 'Every council is at a different stage with their plans under the RMA and implementing national direction prescribed by central government. There will be mixed feelings from those who've contributed their time, knowledge, and aspirations into those processes. 'However, our intent as regional government is unified: we all want a less costly and complex resource management system that deliver the outcomes our communities desire. We are committed to making progress toward this,' said Mr Cross. The announcement requires councils to withdraw plan reviews and changes that have not yet reached the hearing stage within 90 days of the legislation coming into effect. It also suspends mandatory 10-year RMA reviews and implementation of national planning standards. Immediate legal effect rules will cease to apply once the associated plans are withdrawn. Te Uru Kahika, on behalf of the sector, also noted the broader implications of the Government's approach. 'While clarity is welcome, we are concerned about the level of central government intervention in local planning. Local plan-making is a rigorous and locally accountable process. As central government leads reform, it's important that respect for local decision-making remains,' said Mr Cross Te Uru Kahika noted that a more locally empowered approach could have helped manage the transition more smoothly; and acknowledged that the Government's proposed legislation includes some practical flexibility—particularly exemptions for notified plans and an ability to apply to the Minister for specific cases. With the announcement now made, Te Uru Kahika Executive Director Iain Maxwell advised the focus for councils now shifts to ensuring a smooth transition to a better resource management system and maintaining delivery of essential services across the country. 'Regional delivery is grounded in place, expertise, and accountability—and remains essential for improving land, water, and air management, biosecurity, and hazard resilience,' said Mr Maxwell.
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Government Agency Warns Controversial Bill Could Delay Disaster Response
As the cleanup begins in flood-hit Tasman, fresh documents reveal a stark warning from Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) that the Regulatory Standards Bill could hinder the country's ability to respond to climate-related disasters. In a briefing obtained by Greenpeace under the Official Information Act, LINZ - the agency responsible for managing Crown land - warned that the Bill may "limit the ability to respond quickly to emerging issues (for example, climate-related or natural disaster issues)." Greenpeace has called the advice "yet another nail in the coffin for the doomed Bill". "As families, businesses and farmers in Tasman begin the difficult cleanup after yet another devastating flood, it's shocking to learn that officials are warning this Bill could make it harder to respond to exactly these kinds of disasters," says Greenpeace spokesperson Gen Toop. LINZ also flagged concerns about the Bill's impact on critical infrastructure and public works, warning "an overly rigid emphasis on property interests may conflict with broader regulatory objectives, including the Government's ability to acquire land for infrastructure or public good projects." This was a concern echoed by the Treasury in its advice on the Bill. "The Regulatory Standards Bill is dangerous. It would tie the Government up in new red tape at the very moment when urgent climate action and disaster preparation are needed most," says Toop "The advice is clear. This Bill would make it harder to build the infrastructure we urgently need to decarbonise the economy and prepare for climate disasters - things like flood protection, improved communication links, and renewable energy." LINZ further flagged that the legislation could create new legal barriers to returning land to iwi under the Treaty settlement process, citing concerns raised by the Waitangi Tribunal. "These new warnings are yet another nail in the coffin for this doomed Bill. It has attracted blistering criticism from the United Nations, legal experts, health professionals, Māori leaders, environmental groups, and the public service itself." "The Labour and Green parties have committed to repealing the Bill. It simply has no future. The Prime Minister should withdraw National's support immediately before further time and money is wasted on yet another one of David Seymour's disastrously unpopular policy ideas." This latest revelation comes as news broke this morning that MBIE had warned the Bill could be much more expensive than previously expected and have a negative impact on economic growth, and just days after news broke that the United Nations has issued a letter to the Government criticising the Bill.
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Government's Announcement To Stop RMA Plan Changes Impacts Regional Planning
The Government has announced that they will stop all new RMA plan changes and suspend current plan review obligations, including requirements for councils to implement national planning standards, as part of its work to reform the country's resource management system. 'This announcement comes as councils are gearing up for a new resource management system,' explains Al Cross, Director of Resource Management System Reform at Te Uru Kahika, the collective of regional and unitary councils. 'For councils, the positive is that it provides clarity and the space to redirect effort into critical environmental delivery and preparing for change ahead. 'This move means we can channel resources into delivery, such as supporting landowners and catchment groups to improve water quality, progressing flood resilience projects, and ensuring our planning teams are well prepared for the transition and implementation of the new system. 'We're very mindful of the impacts on councils and communities invested in planning processes across the country. Councils have undertaken major work and engagement with locals, iwi, and industries. 'Every council is at a different stage with their plans under the RMA and implementing national direction prescribed by central government. There will be mixed feelings from those who've contributed their time, knowledge, and aspirations into those processes. 'However, our intent as regional government is unified: we all want a less costly and complex resource management system that deliver the outcomes our communities desire. We are committed to making progress toward this,' said Mr Cross. The announcement requires councils to withdraw plan reviews and changes that have not yet reached the hearing stage within 90 days of the legislation coming into effect. It also suspends mandatory 10-year RMA reviews and implementation of national planning standards. Immediate legal effect rules will cease to apply once the associated plans are withdrawn. Te Uru Kahika, on behalf of the sector, also noted the broader implications of the Government's approach. 'While clarity is welcome, we are concerned about the level of central government intervention in local planning. Local plan-making is a rigorous and locally accountable process. As central government leads reform, it's important that respect for local decision-making remains,' said Mr Cross Te Uru Kahika noted that a more locally empowered approach could have helped manage the transition more smoothly; and acknowledged that the Government's proposed legislation includes some practical flexibility—particularly exemptions for notified plans and an ability to apply to the Minister for specific cases. With the announcement now made, Te Uru Kahika Executive Director Iain Maxwell advised the focus for councils now shifts to ensuring a smooth transition to a better resource management system and maintaining delivery of essential services across the country. 'Regional delivery is grounded in place, expertise, and accountability—and remains essential for improving land, water, and air management, biosecurity, and hazard resilience,' said Mr Maxwell.
