Kansans intrigued by potential of bringing voters together with multi-party candidate nominations
TOPEKA — Former Kansas House Majority Leader Don Hineman finds himself searching for a remedy to the Republican Party's movement away from a framework that anchored GOP role models Dwight Eisenhower, Robert Dole and Nancy Kassebaum.
'It feels like the center of Kansas and also the American political spectrum has been abandoned by the Republican Party,' said Hineman, who left his southwest Kansas seat in the House six years ago. 'Those of us, like me … who identify as Eisenhower, Dole and Kassebaum Republicans, feel as if they were abandoned as well. Where did my party go? What do I do now?'
He said one option for drawing the GOP closer to the center would be the return in Kansas to fusion voting, once a common feature of American electoral systems. It would allow more than one political party to nominate the same candidate. If three parties nominated the same individual, the candidate's name would appear on ballots three times in association with each nominating party. This approach to coalition building — used in Kansas until the early 1900s — would determine the winner by combining all votes received by each individual.
'I believe that fusion voting shows us a path forward — a chance at a much brighter future for representative democracy,' Hineman told participants at a fusion voting seminar Thursday at Washburn University in Topeka.
He said election of candidates through this method would foster alliances with a more diverse groups of supporters and provide elected politicians greater autonomy to make decisions outside demands of leaders in the dominant Republican or Democratic parties.
In Kansas, Saline County District Court Judge Jared Johnson dismissed this week a lawsuit filed in July 2024 by United Kansas, a recognized political party in Kansas, to challenge the state's prohibition on fusion voting.
Secretary of State Scott Schwab, a GOP candidate for governor, submitted the motion to dismiss the case based on interpretation of the Kansas Constitution. Schwab said the idea of fusion voting was illegal. Officials with United Kansas plan to appeal the judge's decision to idle the lawsuit.
Bill Kristol, editor of the center-right web-based publication The Bulwark and a contributor to CNN and other networks, said he grew up with fusion voting in New York state and was intrigued by how multi-party endorsements could help the electorate find middle ground. He said states should be open to reform such as fusion voting, especially because it didn't require disbanding existing political parties or trigger complex changes in mechanics of voting.
'The obvious point to make, you know, our politics is pretty broken,' Kristol said by video link. 'We can debate who's responsible for that, but surely we can't really think that the two-party system is working well.'
Kristol was a Republican for 40 years before declaring himself an independent in 2021. He served in the administrations of Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. In 2016, he opposed the nomination of Donald Trump, who was elected to a first term as president. Kristol said he voted for Democratic President Joe Biden in 2020 and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris in 2024.
No longer do the Republican and Democratic parties serve as big-tent organizations skilled at assimilating different groups of people and capable of compromising on finer points of public policy, Kristol said. The two-party system used to work, he said, but dogmatism and authoritarianism has dominated the major parties for the past decade or so.
'It is striking how rigid the parties have become. The gulf between them has widened and the ability and desire to work across the aisle has lessened,' Kristol said.
Oscar Pocasangre, senior data analyst in the electoral reform section of the New America think tank, said a shortcoming of elective politics was the insufficient number of competitive races. For example, he said, only 8% of the 2024 races for Congress were decided by less than 5 percentage points. In the four Kansas congressional races, winners secured a seat in the U.S. House with double-digit margins.
He said many areas of the United States essentially had one-party rule, but introduction of fusion voting could produce greater competition if minor parties decided to form coalitions to support independent candidates.
'Electoral competition is a feature of elections that makes a lot of the good things about democracy work,' he said. 'Electoral competition is how you get accountability. It's how you get disciplined politicians. Without electoral competition elections lose a lot of their meaning. You get to vote, but not much of a choice.'
Jess Wisneski, co-chair of the New York Working Families Party dedicated to labor and community issues, said the history of fusion voting in New York state showed voters appreciated the chance to maintain allegiance to an alternative party while casting votes for candidates capable of prevailing.
In New York's 1994 gubernatorial contest, for example, the Republican and Conservative parties aligned with GOP state Sen. George Pataki, while the Democrat and Liberal parties fused for then-Gov. Mario Cuomo. Cuomo won the major-party competition with 2.27 million Democratic votes to Pataki's 2.15 million Republican votes. But Pataki upset Cuomo, the 12-year incumbent, by adding 328,000 Conservative Party votes to Cuomo's 92,000 votes from the Liberal Party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump fires Biden-appointed Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after bad jobs report: ‘Numbers were RIGGED'
President Trump ordered the dismissal Friday of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), hours after the economic data collection agency released a report showing unemployment ticked up last month. Now-former BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, triggered Trump's fury after her agency announced lower than expected employment gains in July and revised the numbers for May and June downward by a total of 258,000 jobs. The president accused McEntarfer of manipulating the data and charged that she had done so in the past. McEntarfer was nominated by Biden to head BLS in 2023. She was confirmed by the Senate for the post last year after previously serving in the Biden White House. Bureau of Labor 'I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election,' Trump told reporters as he left the White House to spend the weekend at his Bedminster, NJ club. 'So you know what I did? I fired her.' A BLS spokesperson confirmed McEntarfer 'was terminated today' and Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will take over on an acting basis. McEntarfer, a career federal employee, was confirmed by the Senate to lead BLS in January 2024 after previously serving as a senior economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisors under Biden. Trump explained in a Truth Social post that he was 'just informed' that the nation's employment reports were 'being produced by a Biden Appointee' and charged that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory.' 'This is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that overstated the Jobs Growth in March 2024 by approximately 818,000 and, then again, right before the 2024 Presidential Election, in August and September, by 112,000,' the president wrote. 'These were Records — No one can be that wrong?' Last August's revision of job growth for the 12 months ending in March 2024 – the largest downward revision to US payroll figures since 2009 – drew outrage from some Republican lawmakers, who suggested the numbers were intentionally fudged to boost the Harris-Biden administration. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Trump wrote, noting that McEntarfer would be 'replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he continued. 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months.' 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative.' Trump argued the numbers were 'rigged' to make him and Republicans 'look bad.' AP Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who demanded testimony from McEntarfer last year over the Biden-era job stats revisions, praised Trump for removing her from the top BLS post. 'I have been raising concerns for the past year about inaccurate job numbers put out by Dr. Erika McEntarfer,' Marshall wrote on X. 'Her cooked-up numbers have misled the American people for too long.' 'Glad President [Trump] is going to clean this up.' Trump doubled-down in a separate social media post, arguing that the July BLS report was 'RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' Trump told reporters Friday he has 'about three' people in mind to replace McEntarfer. 'I have a lot of good candidates. I will say, everybody wants it,' he said. 'We're gonna put someone in who can be honest.'
Atlantic
3 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump's Irresponsible Nuclear Threat
Donald Trump, beset by a week of bad news, has decided to rattle the most dangerous saber of all. In a post today on his Truth Social site, the president claimed that in response to recent remarks by former Russian president Dmitri Medvedev, he has 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions.' (All American submarines are nuclear-powered; Trump may mean submarines armed with ballistic nuclear weapons.) 'Words are very important,' Trump added, 'and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' And then, of course: 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump's words may mean nothing. The submarines that carry America's sea-based nuclear deterrent routinely move around the world's oceans. Each carries up to 20 nuclear warheads, on missiles with a range of more than 4,000 miles, and so almost anywhere can be an 'appropriate region.' And Trump may not even have issued such orders; normally, the Pentagon and the White House do not discuss the movements of America's ballistic-missile submarines. Medvedev is a man of little actual power in Russia, but he has become Russia's top internet troll, regularly threatening America and its allies. No one takes him seriously, even in his own country. He and Trump have been trading public insults on social media for months, with Trump telling Medvedev to 'watch his words' and Medvedev—nicknamed ' little Dima ' in Russia due to his diminutive stature—warning Trump to remember Russia's 'Dead Hand,' a supposed doomsday system that could launch all of Russia's nuclear weapons even if Moscow were destroyed and the Kremlin leadership were killed. The problem is not that Trump is going to spark a nuclear crisis with a post about two submarines—at least not this time. The much more worrisome issue is that the president of the United States thinks it is acceptable to use ballistic-missile submarines like toys, objects to be waved around when he wants to distract the public, or deflect from bad news, or merely because some Russian official has annoyed him. Unfortunately, Trump has never understood 'nuclear,' as he calls it. In a 2015 Republican primary debate, Trump said 'we have to be extremely vigilant and extremely careful when it comes to nuclear. Nuclear changes the whole ball game.' When the moderator Hugh Hewitt pressed Trump and asked which part of the U.S. triad (land-based missiles, bombers, and submarines) would be his priority, Trump answered: 'For me, nuclear, the power, the devastation, is very important to me.' That power and devastation, however, is apparently not enough to stop the president from making irresponsible statements in response to a Kremlin troll. One would hope that after nearly five years in office—which must have included multiple briefings on nuclear weapons and how to order their use—Trump might be a bit more hesitant to throw such threats around. But Trump appears to have no sense of the past or the future; he lives in the now, and winning the moment is always the most important thing. Trump's nuclear threats are reckless. (I would call them 'silly,' but that is too small a word when the commander in chief even alludes to nuclear arms.) But such threats serve two purposes. First, they help Trump maintain the fiction that he wants to be tough on Russia, that he is willing to impose consequences on Moscow for its behavior, and that he's not about to take any guff from anyone in the Kremlin. He takes plenty of guff, of course, from Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom he seems genuinely to fear. Trump has never aimed such invective at Putin, and using Medvedev as a surrogate helps Trump to thump his chest without any danger of getting into a real fight with someone who scares him. More importantly, Trump knows that a foreign policy crisis, and anything involving nuclear weapons, is an instant distraction from other news. The media will always zero in on such moments, because it is, in fact, news when the most powerful man on earth starts talking about nuclear weapons. (And here I am, writing about it as well.) Trump's had a terrible week: He's dug a deeper hole for himself on the Jeffrey Epstein issue, the economy is headed in the wrong direction, and his approval rating is cratering. Using the implied threat of nuclear war to pick a fight with one of Red Square's most juvenile and odious figures is a convenient distraction. Nuclear-missile submarines are not toys. No one understood this better than Trump's predecessors, the 11 presidents who have been the only people in American history with the authority to order the use of nuclear weapons. They treated any declarations about nuclear weapons with utter gravity and sobriety. They avoided even mentioning such things unless they were articulating a carefully planned policy, and communicating it to allies and enemies alike. They did not engage in petty spats with nuclear-armed foreign powers. And they only considered using nuclear signals when faced with crises that involved America's vital interests. Trump, however, has now discarded all of these taboos. He has initiated a new era in which the chief executive can use threats regarding the most powerful weapons on earth to salve his ego and improve his political fortunes. Once upon a time, America was governed by serious people. No longer. For now, America's nuclear-armed opponents seem to have priced in a certain amount of drama and foolishness when it comes to Donald Trump, and his most recent social-media bloviation will likely amount to nothing. But if such outbursts are ever taken seriously by our adversaries, the president—and America—may one day regret it.
Politico
3 minutes ago
- Politico
Can you ever trust a jobs report again?
Presented by Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben The July jobs report showed that hiring in May and June was far slower than earlier estimates. Hours after its release this morning, President DONALD TRUMP added someone else to the unemployment rolls: the head of the agency that wrote the report. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Trump said the Bureau of Labor Statistics under Commissioner ERIKA McENTARFER released overly positive jobs reports during the tail end of former President JOE BIDEN's term in order to influence the election. He did not provide any evidence to back up his claim. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote. Labor Secretary LORI CHAVEZ-DeREMER confirmed on X that McEntarfer was removed from her position, and that deputy commissioner WILLIAM WIATROWSKI will serve as acting commissioner 'during the search for a replacement.' McEntarfer, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment, was confirmed by the Senate in 2024 with overwhelming support, including by then-senators Vice President JD VANCE and Secretary of State MARCO RUBIO. Former BLS commissioner and Trump appointee BILL BEACH called McEntarfer's firing 'totally groundless' and said that it sets 'a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' DAN KOH, who served as chief of staff to Labor Secretary MARTY WALSH during the Biden administration, said the move could have rippling effects across the global market — and that BLS appointees have never been political. West Wing Playbook spoke with Beach and Koh separately this afternoon. Their conversations have been edited for length and clarity. You said that this move was 'groundless.' Why is that? Beach: These numbers are constructed by hundreds of people. They're finalized by about 40 people. These 40 people are very professional people who have served under Republicans and Democrats. And the commissioner does not see these numbers until the Wednesday prior to the release on Friday. By that time, the numbers are completely set into the IT system. They have been programmed. They are simply reported to the commissioner, so the commissioner can on Thursday brief the president's economic team. The commissioner doesn't have any hand or any influence or any way of even knowing the data until they're completely done. That's true of the unemployment rate. That's true of the jobs numbers. As a consequence, there's very little chance that there could be any influence from the commissioner. I believe it's a groundless claim. You trusted those employees to get you accurate information? Koh: It was not because we didn't know the methodology. We understood the nature of sampling and how it worked. Revisions happen all the time, regardless of party. Sometimes it's not politically expedient at that given moment when job numbers come out, as well as what the revisions are. But that's just the nature of statistics. That's the nature of statistical sampling. The insinuation that this was some sort of borrowed Biden appointee is outrageous. They're appointed on terms, which is why we had Bill Beach when we came in. Why is the political independence of BLS important? Beach: These numbers that BLS produces … are used all the time to guide investment decisions, business decisions. Most importantly, by members of Congress and the members of the administration to create policy. As a consequence, they need to be as straightforward and independent of politics as possible. You need to rely on them. You need to say, well, this is the way the world works. We can't see an economy by going out and picking it off the tree. And statisticians are there to create the estimates that literally create the shape of the economy that we can see. You always want independent numbers. Even the suspicion that they're shaped in one direction for one party or another party, or for one political ideological viewpoint, undermines them. It's like building a good bridge. If the bridge has got shoddy construction or you took a shortcut, you're going to pay the consequences sometime down the road. What could be the broader implication of this move? Koh: The biggest concern, candidly, is, will Trump's replacement for Commissioner McEntarfer be someone who believes in statistical sampling and statistical and sound mathematical methodology? Or will it be just somebody who makes up numbers that are convenient for President Trump? If it's the latter, our entire economy and the basis on which we make so many economic decisions that the market does … will be thrown into question. Beach: The main thing it does is undermine the credibility of the statistical system, by inserting into the dialogue the possibility that these numbers might be shaped by the White House. I think that's the main danger. As a consequence, we get a less valuable statistical system. And I hope we haven't crossed that particular threshold yet. This is just one firing. But it could set that precedent. You were commissioner toward the tail end of Trump's first administration, and throughout most of Biden's. Did either ever ask you to change the numbers? Beach: No, no one ever did that. Even when I announced that 20 million people had lost their job in one month in the April 2020 report, I never got any hint or shade from the White House that, 'Oh my gosh, we're going to have to fire Beach because that's a bad number.' Everybody believed it. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Which president was known as the 'sly fox' or 'little magician'? (Answer at bottom.) Agenda Setting CLOSING UP SHOP: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS, announced today it was shutting down its operations, after Trump rescinded funding for the nonprofit, our AARON PELLISH reports. The CPB, established by Congress decades ago as an independent nonprofit, said it will begin 'an orderly wind-down' after Trump signed a measure last month to claw back $1.1 billion in grants for CPB over the next two fiscal years. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' CPB President PATRICIA HARRISON said in a statement. IF A TREE FALLS: The Agriculture Department will spend more than $100 million for a program that protects state- and private-owned forests, our MARC HELLER reports. USDA said it would support projects in 10 states through the Forest Legacy Program, which helps localities maintain forests through easements and land purchases. The projects, totaling $110 million, cover 177,000 acres in Arkansas, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, New York, Oregon and South Carolina. The program had a mixed history with Trump officials. The first Trump administration asked Congress to eliminate funding through annual budget requests, saying the Forest Service should focus on land under its own jurisdiction. But it looks like this administration is taking a new approach, despite looking to eliminate other programs that support state, private and tribal forestry. The Oval SLOW NEWS DAY, HUH? Trump today said he's mobilizing two nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions' in response to threatening comments made by former Russian President DMITRY MEDVEDEV, our ELI STOKOLS and PAUL McLEARY report. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he made the move 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Medvedev on Thursday referenced his nation's nuclear capabilities in a social media post amid Trump's latest efforts to increase economic pressure on Russia in hopes of ending the war in Ukraine. WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT BOOTED FROM THE ADULTS' TABLE: Health associations representing a range of public health interests will no longer be included in certain activities with the CDC's vaccine advisory committee, our LAUREN GARDNER and SOPHIE GARDNER report. The email, obtained by POLITICO, came from acip@ to several Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices liaisons, who have in the past represented 30 trade groups for medical specialities, pharmacists and drugmakers. It's unclear how many associations received the notice. The email attributed the change to a desire to shield the group's work from conflicts of interest, something HHS Secretary ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. has leveled against medical groups that promote vaccination. A HHS spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. In the Courts SLOW DOWN: A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from rapidly deporting hundreds of thousands of immigrants who were paroled into the United States to flee violence and oppression in their home countries, our KYLE CHENEY, JOSH GERSTEIN and MYAH WARD report. U.S. District Judge JIA COBB in a ruling today barred foreigners with immigration parole, typically a short-term status that allows foreigners to live and work in the U.S. legally, from being subjected to a controversial maneuver the administration has adopted in recent months: dismissing immigrants' pending proceedings in immigration court — only to immediately arrest them outside the courtroom and put them into a sped-up deportation process known as expedited removal. What We're Reading Trump administration firings mount as staffers' loyalty is called into question (POLITICO's Eli Stokols, Adam Wren, Ben Johansen and Myah Ward) Federal Reserve's Kugler to resign, giving Trump earlier-than-expected opening (POLITICO's Victoria Guida and Michael Stratford) 'Clinton Plan' Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, Declassified Report Shows (NYT's Charlie Savage and Adam Goldman) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER The eighth president, MARTIN VAN BUREN, got the monikers because he was a 'clever and beguiling politician, proficient at manipulation, persuasion, party organization, and compromise,' according to the National Park Service.
