
Rahm Emanuel tells Megyn Kelly a man can't become a woman
'Can a man become a woman?' Kelly asked Emanuel, former President Biden's ambassador to Japan, on her SiriusXM show.
'Can a man become a woman? Not — no,' the former Chicago mayor and Obama chief of staff replied.
'Thank you,' Kelly responded, adding later that Emanuel's answer was 'so easy.'
'Why don't more people in your party just say that?' she added.
'Because we're — I'm now going to go into a witness protection plan,' he joked.
Following former Vice President Kamala Harris's loss to Trump in the 2024 election, Democratic policy and messaging toward transgender Americans have come under intense scrutiny both inside and outside the party.
Some moderate Democrats contend the party went too far in defending transgender rights, particularly when it comes to women's sports.
President Trump campaigned hard against Harris's past support for gender-affirming care for incarcerated people. Since returning to the White House, he has sought to curb access to gender-affirming health care and reinstate a ban on transgender troops in the military.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), Harris's running mate, has said it's 'a mistake' for some in the party to not defend transgender Americans against Trump administration policies seeking to restrict their rights.
LGBTQ rights groups have pushed the Democratic Party to 'do more' on protecting gay and transgender Americans' rights amid threats from the Trump administration.
'With increasing frequency and intensity, the LGBTQ+ community is being targeted substantively as well as rhetorically, in campaigns, state legislatures, Congress and from every corner of the Trump administration,' leaders of nine national and state LGBTQ advocacy groups said in a letter to the Democratic National Committee back in March.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jimmy Kimmel attends anti-Trump rally as president predicts his cancellation
Jimmy Kimmel is taking time out of his vacation to protest against President Donald Trump amid 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's' cancellation and the president's prediction Kimmel is on the chopping block, too. The 57-year-old host shared a photo of himself at an anti-Trump protest with his family just days after the president threatened his show could be 'next.' 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next,' Trump wrote on Truth Social post. 'Has even less talent than Colbert!' Trump also took a shot at late-night host Jimmy Fallon, adding he is 'the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show.' Kimmel responded to the president's threats with a pointed caption writing, 'May every day be another wonderful secret,' he said referencing the letter Trump allegedly wrote to Jeffrey Epstein. In the post, Kimmel is photographed with his wife and children as they hold signs that include the phrases, 'Don't bend the knee, 'Make America Good Again' and 'I wish we had a better president!' This all comes amid the abrupt announcement that Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show' would end next year after 10 seasons. The ending of the longtime show raised the eyebrows of many given the timing. Earlier this month, Paramount settled a $16 million settlement with Trump after the president accused the network of giving a flatting edit to a '60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris. Paramount released a statement insisting that ending 'The Late Show' is 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night.' The network also said the decision was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.' _____


American Press
8 minutes ago
- American Press
Trump administration releases thousands of previously classified MLK assassination documents
The Trump administration on Monday released records of the FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr., despite opposition from the slain Nobel laureate's family and the civil rights group that he led until his 1968 assassination. The digital document dump includes more than 240,000 pages of records that had been under a court-imposed seal since 1977, when the FBI first gathered the records and turned them over to the National Archives and Records Administration. In a lengthy statement released Monday, King's two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said their father's killing has been a 'captivating public curiosity for decades.' But the pair emphasized the personal nature of the matter and urged that the files 'be viewed within their full historical context.' The Kings got advance access to the records and had their own teams reviewing them. Those efforts continued even as the government granted public access. Among the documents are leads the FBI received after King's assassination and details of the CIA's fixation on King's pivot to international anti-war and anti-poverty movements in the years before he was killed. It was not immediately clear whether the documents shed new light on King's life, the Civil Rights Movement or his murder. 'As the children of Dr. King and Mrs. Coretta Scott King, his tragic death has been an intensely personal grief — a devastating loss for his wife, children, and the granddaughter he never met — an absence our family has endured for over 57 years,' they wrote. 'We ask those who engage with the release of these files to do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief.' They also repeated the family's long-held contention that James Earl Ray, the man convicted of assassinating King, was not solely responsible, if at all. Bernice King was 5 years old when her father was killed at the age of 39. Martin III was 10. A statement from the office of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard called the disclosure 'unprecedented' and said many of the records had been digitized for the first time. She praised President Donald Trump for pushing the issue. Release is 'transparency' to some, a 'distraction' for others Trump promised as a candidate to release files related to President John F. Kennedy's 1963 assassination. When Trump took office in January, he signed an executive order to declassify the JFK records, along with those associated with Robert F. Kennedy's and MLK's 1968 assassinations. The government unsealed the JFK records in March and disclosed some RFK files in April. The announcement from Gabbard's office included a statement from Alveda King, Martin Luther King Jr.'s niece, who is an outspoken conservative and has broken from King's children on various topics — including the FBI files. Alveda King said she was 'grateful to President Trump' for his 'transparency.' Separately, Attorney General Pam Bondi's social media account featured a picture of the attorney general with Alveda King. Besides fulfilling Trump's order, the latest release means another alternative headline for the president as he tries to mollify supporters angry over his administration's handling of records concerning the sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself behind bars while awaiting trial in 2019, during Trump's first presidency. Trump last Friday ordered the Justice Department to release grand jury testimony but stopped short of unsealing the entire case file. Bernice King and Martin Luther King III did not mention Trump in their statement Monday. But Bernice King later posted on her personal Instagram account a black-and-white photo of her father, looking annoyed, with the caption 'Now, do the Epstein files.' And some civil rights activists did not spare the president. 'Trump releasing the MLK assassination files is not about transparency or justice,' said the Rev. Al Sharpton. 'It's a desperate attempt to distract people from the firestorm engulfing Trump over the Epstein files and the public unraveling of his credibility among the MAGA base.' The King Center, founded by King's widow and now led by Bernice King, reacted separately from what Bernice said jointly with her brother. The King Center statement framed the release as a distraction — but from more than short-term political controversy. 'It is unfortunate and ill-timed, given the myriad of pressing issues and injustices affecting the United States and the global society,' the King Center, linking those challenges to MLK's efforts. 'This righteous work should be our collective response to renewed attention on the assassination of a great purveyor of true peace.'


New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Iranian foreign minister confirms nuclear sites ‘seriously damaged' by US strikes but vows to continue uranium enrichment: ‘We can never give it up'
Iran's nuclear facilities were 'seriously damaged' by US missile strikes last month but the regime intends to continue uranium enrichment efforts once they are rebuilt, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed Monday. 'Our facilities have been damaged, seriously damaged, the extent of which is now under evaluation,' Araghchi told Fox News 'Special Report' host Bret Baier. 'The facilities have been destroyed,' he later acknowledged, noting that Iran hasn't been able to refine nuclear fuel since President Trump ordered military strikes on three uranium enrichment sites on June 22. 3 Araghchi indicated that Iran would not agree to any nuclear deal with the US that would bar it from enriching uranium — a critical component for a nuclear warhead. Fox After the interview aired, Trump took to Truth Social and demanded an apology from CNN, whom he claims doubted the effectiveness of the airstrikes. 'Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, on the Iran Nuclear Sites: 'Damages are very severe, they are destroyed.' Of course they are, just like I said, and we will do it again, if necessary! As interviewed by Bret Baier,' Trump wrote. 'Fake News CNN should immediately fire their phony 'reporter' and apologize to me and the great pilots who 'OBLITERATED' Iran's nuclear sites. CNN is a major ratings loser, as is MSDNC!' the president added. Araghchi insisted, however, that the sites would be rebuilt and the enrichment of nuclear material would continue for 'peaceful purposes.' 'It is now stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe, but obviously we cannot give up our enrichment, because it is an achievement of our own scientists,' the foreign minister said. 'And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride,' Araghchi added. The regime official signaled that Tehran would not agree to any nuclear deal with the Trump administration that would outlaw domestic uranium enrichment, calling it 'a matter of dignity for the Iranian people.' 'If the goal is to make sure that Iran will never have nuclear weapons, that is achievable,' Araghchi said. 'But if the goal is to deprive Iran from its rights, including the right of enrichment, I think we have, we have difficulty.' 'Enrichment is now stopped because our facilities have been under attack, but any settlement for Iran's nuclear program should include enrichment in the future, because that is our right,' he continued. 'We can never give it up.' 3 The foreign minister claims Iran has not been able to enrich uranium since the US strikes on three of its nuclear facilities. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images 3 Araghchi vowed that Iran would rebuild the sites and restart its nuclear program. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images Araghchi was adamant that despite the devastation to the regime's nuclear facilities, Iran still has the resources and expertise necessary for carrying out the highly technical process – which experts and world leaders have warned Iran has been undertaking in hopes of developing a nuclear weapon. 'It is developed by ourselves. It is an achievement by ourselves. The technology is there. The scientists are there, the people who have run these facilities are there,' Araghchi said. 'Buildings can be rebuilt. Facilities can be rebuilt. Machines can be replaced.' 'I think the recent attack proved that there is no military option for our nuclear program.' When asked about the condition of Iran's stockpile of already enriched uranium, Araghchi insisted that he had 'no detailed information' about whether it was destroyed during the US airstrikes. The Iranian official also indicated that the regime would be unwilling to accept terms for the Trump administration that would direct Tehran to reduce its production of ballistic missiles or stop funding terror groups Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. 'They are fighting for a just cause, and we have always supported them,' he said of the Iranian proxies. 'On our missiles, as I said, that is our most reliable means of defense,' Araghchi told Baier. 'How we can disarm ourselves? Who can [Iran] accept anything like that?' 'So, we will never disarm ourselves.' Trump has been adamant that any nuclear deal with Iran would need to include a mechanism that prevents the regime from ever engaging in uranium enrichment activities again. 'We are open to talks [but] not direct for the time being,' Araghchi said of the state of negotiations. 'If they are coming for a win-win solution, I am ready to engage with them.'