Tice announces ‘renewables war' with new campaign opposing ‘eyesores'
The pressure group, which will oppose renewable energy projects, will initially launch in Lincolnshire, with the support of Greater Lincolnshire mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns and Lincolnshire County Council leader Sean Matthews, but Mr Tice said he hopes he can drive the campaign nationwide.
Mr Tice, who is MP for Boston and Skegness, told the press conference: 'We are basically going on a renewables war against Mr Miliband and his merry band of fellows, the eco-zealots.
'Lincolnshire opposes renewable eyesores because it's an absolute outrage, what the madness of net stupid zero is doing to our county, as well as doing to our country.
'We have to stop this madness, and that's what we at Reform are doing.
'We are going to battle it. We are going to fight, we're going to campaign.
'We can win this eyesore war.
'It's also a war against the energy crisis, and it's a war against the blight of our countryside, our beloved countryside, here in Lincolnshire and beyond.
'We know that the reason we have the most expensive electricity in this country, almost in the first world, is because of the cost of renewables, and yet we keep being told by Miliband that the bills are going to come down, and yet he never tells us when.'
The campaign, which is also planned to launch in Suffolk and Norfolk, is a response to the number of proposed pylons, solar farms, and wind farms.
The campaign group's website will map proposals of renewable energy projects.
Mr Tice wrote to energy companies urging them not to invest in the latest round of green energy contracts, known as Allocation Round 7 (AR7), a move which was criticised by energy minister Michael Shanks.
The Reform deputy leader said: 'We plan to win the next general election, and we will do everything within our power to seek to stop AR7 rounds being developed, or if they do develop them, then they should take nothing for granted. We will look at all options to stop this madness.'
He said: 'This is the beginning. We're leading the way here in Lincolnshire. We will help drive it. If you want change, if you want to stop this stuff, then put us in positions of leadership and power.'
The Department for Energy Security & Net Zero (DESNZ) said all projects are subject to rigorous planning processes and the views of the local community must be taken into account.
A DESNZ spokesperson said: 'Families have seen their energy bills go through the roof due to our reliance on volatile gas markets controlled by dictators like Putin.
'Solar and an upgraded grid is central to our mission to become a clean energy superpower, delivering energy security so we can get bills down for good.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Could the Scottish Tories do a deal with Reform?
It's not a good time to be a Scottish Conservative. While the SNP has seen a bounce in the polls – despite the infighting that followed Nicola Sturgeon's resignation and the Operation Branchform police probe – the Tories and Labour have both suffered from a surge in support for Reform UK north of the border. Scottish Labour is projected to lose Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) but ultimately it is the Tories who look to be hit the hardest. It is the fear of an electoral wipeout next year – and projections that suggest Reform will pick up around 15 seats from a standing start – that has prompted senior Tories to float the idea of an electoral pact with Nigel Farage's Scottish outfit. As reported in the Telegraph, party figures have suggested a deal could help avoid splitting the vote on the right and oust the SNP from government. The idea at present would involve the Tories avoiding standing candidates in areas where Reform is projected to do well and vice versa. It comes after 14 Tory councillors defected to the Farage‑run group ahead of next year's Holyrood election, and both the Conservatives and Reform UK expect that a sitting Tory MSP could switch sides. Some Scottish Tories have dismissed switchers as being ambitious and seeing an easy way into Holyrood via Reform, while Farage's Scottish organisers have suggested that the party could introduce a deadline for defectors to stop opportunistic politicos taking advantage of Reform's surge. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay is against the idea of a pact – and so is Nigel Farage. The Reform leader told the Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' His Scottish team echoed the sentiment, with a senior party source telling me: 'Why would we stand down in areas we'll win?' They added that no Scottish Tories have approached Reform with the strategy and reiterated that the party will stand candidates in all 73 constituencies as well as on the regional list. They concluded: 'There's absolutely nothing in it. They're at it.' The SNP is the only party to have published its candidate list for the 2026 election – featuring a mix of former MPs, current MSPs and a number of younger councillors. Scottish Labour and the Conservatives have not finalised their lists yet, while Reform UK is vetting candidates and conducting parliamentary assessment meetings with the help of its London team. After this, a committee will approve applicants before branches select candidates for 2026. A full finalised list is expected early next year. The Scottish Conservatives will be hoping no more councillors – or MSPs – defect before then.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Tech Secretary Peter Kyle won't apologise for what he said about Nigel Farage - 'it's true'
The Tech Secretary refused to apologise for saying Farage's opposition to new online safety rules puts him on the side of predators - suggesting Reform UK are "wilfully misleading" the public about what the new rules do Tech Secretary Peter Kyle has doubled-down on his attack on Nigel Farage, saying the Reform UK leader's opposition to a new online safety crackdown puts him 'on the side of predators.' Writing for the Sunday Mirror, Mr Kyle said he'd never apologise for the remark, made earlier this week, 'Because it's true.' And he revealed how the new law was already being used to prosecute online offenders. New online safety protections for children came into force on July 25. Since that date, so-called "risky" sites and apps have been expected to use age checks to identify which users are children and subsequently prevent them from accessing pornography, as well as other harmful content including self-harm, suicide, eating disorders and extreme violence. Farage's Reform UK party has vowed to scrap Online Safety Act if it ever gains power, claiming it was a threat to free speech. And Farage has said Kyle's comments about him were 'absolutely appalling'. Mr Kyle highlighted two cases where the new law had been used to prosecute and jail online offenders. Last year, Nicholas Hawkes, 39, sent explicit photos of himself to a 15-year-old girl. He was convicted under the new offence of cyber-flashing and sentenced to 66 weeks in prison. And Tyler Webb, 22, was the first to be charged with encouraging serious self-harm under the new act - and was sentenced to nine years and four months. Webb used the messaging app Telegram to repeatedly tell a vulnerable 22-year-old woman to cut herself, then to kill herself by hanging during a video call so she could watch. 'Let me be clear about what the Act does not do,' Mr Kyle wrote. 'It does not stop adults from posting or seeing anything online as long as it's legal and anyone who suggests that does not understand it or is willfully misleading.' He added: 'For years we fought for a safer internet for our children. I refuse to let anyone who is trying to use this issue for their own ends take that away.' 'I won't apologise, because it's true' Earlier this week Nigel Farage asked me to apologise for saying he was on the side of predators when he called for the Online Safety Act to be scrapped. But I won't do that. Because it's true. Under this law a 39 year old man was prosecuted for the new offence of cyber flashing because he sent a photo of his erect penis to a 15-year-old girl. These new categories of crimes are sadly necessary to combat crime in the modern world. But beyond these crimes the law takes steps to make the internet a safer place for children. If you're a parent, ask yourself this - do I want my child to see graphic violence and sexual content? Do I want kids as young as five to see porn on social media? Do I want strangers to be able to message my children - or anyone else's? And do I want them to be able to see my child's location when they're online? This is what the act does - it stops children from seeing things that they should not see - and that we would not want them to in the offline world - porn, extreme violence, suicide and self harm content, images and words that encourage and glorify eating disorders. But as well as blocking disturbing and upsetting images and messages from children's feeds, it also cracks down on child sex abuse images and videos. For the first time social media platforms have to detect and remove that horrific material which has shamefully lurked on the internet barely hidden from those sick enough to seek it out. It also means practical steps to protect children from strangers who want to do them harm. It stipulates that children's profiles and locations should be hidden to keep them safe by default. Because no adult should be able to message a child they do not know. And let me be clear about what the Act does not do - It does not stop adults from posting or seeing anything online as long as it's legal and anyone who suggests that does not understand it or is wilfully misleading. In my first week as Secretary of State I met with a group of bereaved families who have known the absolute worst of the internet. Some of those children were encouraged to kill themselves, others were egged on to do dangerous and ultimately fatal challenges and others still do not know exactly what role their child's online role played in their deaths. I have been clear that not only did we collectively fail their children but that I would do what I could to stop such awful deaths in the future. For years we fought for a safer internet for our children. I refuse to let anyone who is trying to use this issue for their own ends take that away. This government has a Plan for Change to keep children safe both online and offline so that they can live happy and fulfilled lives.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
UN report finds United Nations reports are not widely read
UNITED NATIONS, Aug 1 (Reuters) - A United Nations report seeking ways to improve efficiency and cut costs has revealed: U.N. reports are not widely read. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres briefed countries on Friday on the report, produced by his UN80 reform that focused on how U.N. staff implement thousands of mandates given to them by bodies like the General Assembly or Security Council. He said last year that the U.N. system supported 27,000 meetings involving 240 bodies, and the U.N. secretariat produced 1,100 reports, a 20% increase since 1990. "The sheer number of meetings and reports is pushing the system – and all of us – to the breaking point," Guterres said. "Many of these reports are not widely read," he said. "The top 5% of reports are downloaded over 5,500 times, while one in five reports receives fewer than 1,000 downloads. And downloading doesn't necessarily mean reading." Guterres launched the UN80 taskforce in March as the U.N. - which turns 80 this year - faces a liquidity crisis for at least the seventh year in a row because not all 193 U.N. member states pay their mandatory regular dues in full or on time. The report issued by the taskforce late on Thursday covers just one of several reform angles being pursued. Among the suggestions Guterres put forward on Friday: "Fewer meetings. Fewer reports, but ones that are able to fully meet the requirements of all mandates." (This story has been corrected to clarify that not all countries pay in full or on time, in paragraph 6)
