logo
The GOP war over clean energy comes to head at vote-a-rama

The GOP war over clean energy comes to head at vote-a-rama

Politico30-06-2025
'I'm a lifelong conservative, pro-business, pro-growth Republican from a fossil fuel state that has worked in various roles in state government,' said Mitch Carmichael, the former lieutenant governor of West Virginia who now leads Built for America, a newly launched advocacy group. 'For the life of me … there would be no justification for wanting to add a new tax on domestic energy production. We should be doing everything we can to drive down the cost of energy.'
The amendment could set up a clash of Republicans with energy projects planned for their states with staunch conservatives and the Trump administration officials, who vehemently oppose continuing subsidies for intermittent wind and solar resources that they claim are unreliable.
Rounds said Monday afternoon he's 'inclined to support' the Ernst-led amendment. His vote, along with the sponsors and all 47 Democrats, would give it majority support in the Senate.
'If [conservatives] get a few more things to save money, we should be able to get this thing moving,' he said. 'It's critical for the electric needs as we get into AI development. We can't do it without wind and solar power.'
A key factor to swing its success or failure is whether Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham and GOP leaders allow the amendment to proceed on a simple majority vote or a 60-vote supermajority, depending on whether they deem that the senators proposing the amendment have sufficient offsets to make up for the cost of easing the rollbacks.
'We're talking about that,' Graham said in a brief interview Monday.
If their bid to amend the bill fails, it would put moderates in a major bind, forcing them to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects, job losses and higher electricity prices in their states.
But if it succeeds, and the Senate proceeds to pass the megabill with the softer treatment of wind and solar incentives, it would test House conservatives who then would be pressured to back the bill to ensure it meets Trump's July 4 deadline.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws
Judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws

Los Angeles Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws

CHICAGO — A judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said that he was pleased with the decision and that the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, welcomed the ruling, saying in a social media post, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security and did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies it sees as interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, N.Y. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during President Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party. There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces U.S. immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store