
The GOP war over clean energy comes to head at vote-a-rama
The amendment could set up a clash of Republicans with energy projects planned for their states with staunch conservatives and the Trump administration officials, who vehemently oppose continuing subsidies for intermittent wind and solar resources that they claim are unreliable.
Rounds said Monday afternoon he's 'inclined to support' the Ernst-led amendment. His vote, along with the sponsors and all 47 Democrats, would give it majority support in the Senate.
'If [conservatives] get a few more things to save money, we should be able to get this thing moving,' he said. 'It's critical for the electric needs as we get into AI development. We can't do it without wind and solar power.'
A key factor to swing its success or failure is whether Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham and GOP leaders allow the amendment to proceed on a simple majority vote or a 60-vote supermajority, depending on whether they deem that the senators proposing the amendment have sufficient offsets to make up for the cost of easing the rollbacks.
'We're talking about that,' Graham said in a brief interview Monday.
If their bid to amend the bill fails, it would put moderates in a major bind, forcing them to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects, job losses and higher electricity prices in their states.
But if it succeeds, and the Senate proceeds to pass the megabill with the softer treatment of wind and solar incentives, it would test House conservatives who then would be pressured to back the bill to ensure it meets Trump's July 4 deadline.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
12 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws
CHICAGO — A judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said that he was pleased with the decision and that the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, welcomed the ruling, saying in a social media post, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security and did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies it sees as interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, N.Y. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during President Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party. There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces U.S. immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
This post ended up becoming a ‘Democratic confession': Emily Austin
Panelists Emily Austin and Samantha Jo-Roth discuss how Democrats tried to bash President Donald Trump on X for grocery prices on 'Fox News @ Night.'


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Americans ‘deserve' to know what happened in the Trump-Russia 'hoax,' says Tom Cotton
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., discusses allegations against the Obama administration relating to the Trump-Russia 'hoax' on 'Hannity.'