UFC analyst says Robert Whittaker's title days over after UFC on ABC 9 loss
Thomas was on-site Saturday in Abu Dhabi serving as the broadcast analyst when former middleweight champion Whittaker (26-9 MMA, 17-7 UFC) suffered a split decision loss to de Ridder (20-2 MMA, 4-0 UFC) at Etihad Arena. It was a competitive battle with both men getting hurt at moments and fighting hard until the end, and two of three judges had it for the former two-division ONE Championship titleholder.
At could've been a deflating moment for Whittaker, who lost consecutive fights for the first time since 2014. Instead, he only said he was "butt hurt" about what happened then left the octagon with no further excuses. And Thomas likes what he saw in that moment.
"Even when the result was read and he lost, he still seemed to be in a good place," Thomas told MMA Junkie. "I like this for Robert Whittaker because he's not sour, he didn't seem like he was complaining and he wasn't pointing fingers at anybody. He knew what he was in with that fight and he knew it was a tough fight, he knew it wasn't a dominant performance so neither fighter could complain either way.
"I was really impressed with Robert Whittaker his ability to withstand those hard times in the fight and have a lot of positivity left a lot of confidence in his ability to win. ... In the trenches in this fight, Robert Whittaker still seemed to be able to bounce back, and I liked that. I thought it was inspiring."
Despite his commendable performance, results are almost always the ultimate dictator in the UFC, and now Whittaker's record shows four losses in his past seven fights, albeit to elite competition.
At 34, Whittaker has logged more than four hours of total fight time during his run at 185 pounds. It's a crossroads moment going forward, and with the top of the division being as intruiging as ever, Thomas said it would be a good time for Whittaker to drop down in rankings and fight someone who will truly serve as a barometer.
"I think you give him Roman Kopylov," Thomas said. "I think you give him Kopylov before you start feeding him to the guys. Before we say, 'We're done with you and we're going to start feeding you.' Because Kopylov is somewhere in the back of the rankings. You give him Kopylov to say, 'We're giving you No. 15 and if you win that we keep you up here. We'll keep you fighting these guys. But if you lose that, now you've got to fight the up-and-comers.'"
Fighting up-and-comers is surely a far cry from what Whittaker wants to do, but Thomas said it's not an easy spot. "The Reaper" needs a victory to keep his head above water with the emerging contenders, but as far as the pre-fight plans he expressed to have a "fairytale end" to his career with UFC gold? Thomas said that seems like a long shot.
"No, if I had to bet I wouldn't assume he gets there," Thomas said. "It's interesting though because he said he had a four-fight plan to get back to a title. Now it looks like it's going to take about four fights. With a win over RDR it would've of been less than four fights."
To hear more from Thomas, check out his complete appearance on "The Bohnfire" podcast with MMA Junkie senior reporter Mike Bohn above.
This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: UFC analyst: Robert Whittaker's title days over after Abu Dhabi loss
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mailbag: If Tom Aspinall loses to Ciryl Gane, is it devastating for the UFC heavyweight division?
Just how bad is it for the UFC heavyweight division if Tom Aspinall loses to Ciryl Gane at UFC 321? Could it really be a problem with the logos that nixed the new UFC gloves? And what would the world have looked like if Chael Sonnen beat Anderson Silva all those years ago? All that and more in this week's mailbag. To ask a question of your own, hit up @benfowlkesmma or @ben_fowlkes on Threads. @muna007: Okay, let's add Threads to the mailbag! "How far back will it set the Heavyweight Division, if Gane (already lost title fights to Francis and Jon) goes out there and finishes Aspinall'? I hate framing it like this. I really do. But the reality is that, for the sake of clawing back any last shred of credibility for the UFC heavyweight title, Tom Aspinall has to win this fight. He just has to. If he goes out there and loses to Ciryl Gane — a man who, as you pointed out, posted losses to the last two heavyweight champs, both of whom then departed without ever losing the belt in the cage — it'll make this all feel totally ridiculous. It will look like the UFC heavyweight title belongs to someone who's definitely not the best heavyweight in the world, but merely the best heavyweight who's left. Again, that's terrible of me to say and I hate it. Gane is such a nice guy who's generally easy to root for in both life and fighting. He's a top-five heavyweight, despite the glaring holes in his game. But if he wins the title now? Under these circumstances? It will feel like the MMA gods are laughing at us and punishing us for ever daring to think that we could make the heavyweight division seem legit. It's up to 'Gas Hands Tom' to save us from that fate. @MMAFAN2019: Should a ref call a fight from too many knockdowns? What happens in the future if a fighter is so durable that he can take like 10 knockdowns? What does the ref do? Knockdowns alone can't be the thing that decides an MMA fight. It just doesn't work for this sport where there are so many legal ways to end up on the floor, up to and including faking a knockdown to bring your opponent down to the mat with you. What we're doing here is grasping for a potential rule change that will take some of the guesswork out of refereeing. And we're doing it because the beating that Mohammad Yahya took against Steven Nguyen made us uncomfortable. I get the impulse, but we're still talking about trying to codify our way out of what will essentially always come down to a judgment call. The refs have an incredibly hard job. Any time they intervene, they either end or alter the entire competition. When they don't intervene, a bunch of people who have the benefit of hindsight and replay will blast them for it. Jason Herzog is usually one of the best. But even the best will slip on that tightrope from time to time. @GabeDert: They are gonna slaughter the Ali act. Who can stop them? Can the rich franchise anything? The thing that seems most galling to me is that, as the big homie John Nash explained this week, this is a carefully crafted piece of legislation primarily meant to benefit one specific company. That company, obviously, is TKO, parent company to the UFC and WWE. It is an offshoot of Endeavor, which used to be WME IMG, which used to be two separate companies (William Morris in entertainment, and IMG in sports). So basically what started as a lowly talent agency in the infant days of America's entertainment industry became a giant, voracious monster that looked at the worlds of sports and entertainment and asked: Why don't we just own it all?? That progression feels deeply emblematic of how America's business and legal landscape have changed over the past century or so. And now it's coming for the sport of boxing, all so more of the money in it can be redirected from the athletes to the owners/promoters. Anyone who thinks that's a good thing should reflect upon this period in which so many MMA fighters were trying to make the leap to boxing, while almost no boxers wanted to do the opposite. Why do you think that was? I'll give you a hint: It wasn't because boxers feared they couldn't compete in MMA (even if most of them couldn't). It was because there was so much more money and contractual freedom in boxing. And then someone drafted a law to put a stop to it. @NeedXtoseePosts: So we finally know why the UFC got rid of their gloves, The logo wouldn't stick to them - according to Khalil Rountree Jr anyway. Is this is most UFC decision yet? It's almost too funny to be true. I've heard a few different explanations for the sudden reversal on the gloves, but this one has got to be the one that feels most hilariously symbolic. All that time and money to research and develop new gloves. That whole presentation about how this would improve the sport. Then a matter of months later the UFC abandons the whole thing and goes back to the old gloves and you're telling me the reason is we couldn't bear the thought of the company logo not being visible at all times? That would really be … something. @AlexBehunin: Map out the landscape if Chael beat Anderson at UFC 117 First we would have spent a couple weeks marveling at Chael Sonnen's incredible upset. You have to remember, almost nobody gave him a chance in that fight. The whole selling point there was that he could at least make Anderson Silva mad enough to really want to hurt him. In other words, he could motivate a champion who had looked decidedly unmotivated even in one-sided victories. We all felt like, well, Sonnen is going to get his face beat in, but he's willing to make that sacrifice for the sake of giving us all a memorable show. Then he went out there and nearly shocked the world. For four-plus rounds he dominated the champ. I was sitting cageside on media row and I couldn't believe my eyes. He got that takedown in the final round and I think I may have said out loud, 'My God he's really going to do it.' Then came that desperation triangle choke from the bottom and, well, he didn't. So yeah, we would have reeled from that shock for a while. And probably immediately booked the rematch. Sonnen would have been carried through the streets of West Linn, Oregon, on the shoulders of cheerleaders. Then the drug test results would have come back and it would have all come crumbling down. It's hard to imagine what that would have been like. Even in defeat, Sonnen's hearing before the California commission was a live-streaming event in an internet age when relatively few things crossed that threshold. Still, it would have undermined Silva's legacy. The result gets changed to a no-contest and he, what, gets his belt back by decree of the state athletic commission? Deeply unsatisfying. And while Sonnen sat out a suspension, Silva would have been unable to do anything about it. I suspect fans would have at some point turned their ire upon him in misdirected frustration. Even with the same lopsided win in the rematch, the whole thing would have diminished him somewhat. So I guess what I'm saying is, we owe Silva a debt of gratitude for pulling off that choke and making the whole thing easier on us. And himself. @shadore66: I swear I'm not high: Why is the octagan a chain link fence instead of being see-thru through plexiglass? This would eliminate toes / fingers / grabbing the fence and allow in-arena fans to see the fights better. What am I missing? They actually considered this possibility when dreaming up the idea for the original UFC event. Then they stopped and asked themselves what would happen to the viewing experience both live and on pay-per-view TV once sweaty and/or bloody bodies were repeatedly pressed against the plexiglass. And that was that. @weaite_: Who wins in an open weight boxing match between Dricus Du Plessis and Naoya Inoue "DDP" gets soundly thrashed and looks stiff and slow and awkward and then somehow wins anyway. Afterward we all shake our heads and say, 'OK fine, but the next openweight boxing match he will surely lose.' You know I'm right about this. @EyeofMihawk: Are you ready for Caio Borralho to become champion when Khamzat inevitably pulls out Khamzat Chimaev absolutely, positively cannot pull out of this one. Surely he knows that. If he pulls out of the Dricus Du Plessis fight he might as well pull all the way out of Earth's atmosphere and seek his fortune on some other planet, because he'll be all done on this one. @mickeysanto: Has there been any traction in actually booking Kayla Harrison v. Amanda Nunes? Or is this going to be another 'super fight' that never materializes? This feels like one that will become a reality, if only because both sides are very into it and neither seems inclined to ask for a pay raise to match the magnitude of the fight. The whole thing might be proof that the UFC can still make these kinds of superfights as they long as they spring forth fully formed and require no additional money or effort from the promotion itself.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Jailton Almeida: Ciryl Gane has other life priorities, loses to Tom Aspinall at UFC 321
Jailton Almeida has questions about Ciryl Gane's mindset heading into a third UFC title shot. Gane (13-2 MMA, 10-2 UFC) challenges heavyweight champion Tom Aspinall (15-3 MMA, 8-1 UFC) in the UFC 321 headliner on Oct. 25 from Etihad Arena in Abu Dhabi. "Bon Gamin" is a former interim champion, but fell short twice in his pursuit of the heavyweight title against Francis Ngannou and Jon Jones. Almeida (13-2 MMA, 10-2 UFC), who was heavily campaigning for a title shot, confidently predicts an Aspinall win. "I'm pretty sure that Aspinall beats Gane," Almeida said on "The Ariel Helwani Show" through an interpreter. "It seems like Gane has other priorities in his life right now, and once you're fighting at this level there can't be no other priority. "If you're fighting at this level, if you're fighting for the heavyweight crown of the UFC, you have to be all in, and it doesn't seem like that's the case for Gane right now. I get it that he's taking it because who's not going to take another title fight for the heavyweight belt? But I think his priorities are in a different place now." Almeida is hoping to secure the No. 1 contender spot when he takes on Alexander Volkov (38-11 MMA, 12-5 UFC) on the same card as Aspinall vs. Gane. He explains why he's the one who can give Aspinall his toughest test. "I'm very strategic, I'm probably more explosive than anybody that he's faced, especially on the grappling side of things," Almeida said. "I think it would probably develop as a grappling fight. He is a BJJ black belt, but there's levels to being a black belt. I think that I'll be able to take him into deep waters once we get to the grappling side of things."
USA Today
41 minutes ago
- USA Today
Reinier de Ridder: Khamzat Chimaev an easier guy to prepare for than Dricus Du Plessis
Despite Khamzat Chimaev's dominance, Reinier de Ridder sees him as an easier fight to prep for than Dricus Du Plessis. De Ridder (21-2 MMA, 4-0 UFC) emerged as a top contender when he edged out former middleweight champion Robert Whittaker (26-9 MMA, 17-7 UFC) in Saturday's UFC on ABC 9 headliner at Etihad Arena in Abu Dhabi. De Ridder awaits the winner of the upcoming middleweight title fight between champion Du Plessis and Chimaev, which headlines UFC 319 on Aug. 16 in Chicago. De Ridder expects to face both fighters down the line, but explained why Chimaev (14-0 MMA, 8-0 UFC) wouldn't be difficult to get ready for. "He would be an easier guy to prepare for," de Ridder told ESPN MMA. "Not that he's an easier fight, but he's more of a typical style. I can bring a couple of Dagestanis and a couple of Chechens who wrestle pretty similar to Khamzat. He boxes pretty cleanly. It's not that special in a sense that it's not as weird as Dricus is. It would be harder to prepare for (Du Plessis), but if (Chimaev) wins, he might be the bigger name." As for Du Plessis (23-2 MMA, 9-0 UFC), de Ridder says the champion gave him an interesting look in sparring that's hard to mimic. "If there's one guy who's hard to study, it's him," de Ridder said of Du Plessis. "He doesn't do the same thing twice. He's so awkward, so unpredictable. I need more time studying him. He does a lot of awkward stuff, and I sparred him a couple of years ago at Kill Cliff, and what really stands out is the way he kicks. "His kicks come from such a weird angle with the knees slightly in. It was very hard for me to judge where it was going to go – if it was going to be a middle, high, or low kick. So, it's going to be very hard to find a guy to emulate him. There's nobody else who moves like that."
