Meta to ban political ads in EU due to bloc's 'unworkable' rules
The EU has a bolstered legal armoury to rein in Big Tech, against which Meta has hit out with the support of the US administration under President Donald Trump.
"This is a difficult decision -- one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation," the company said.
Political, electoral and social issue advertising will no longer be allowed from October in the bloc, it said, because of "unworkable requirements" under the new rules.
"Unfortunately, the TTPA introduces significant, additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU," Meta added.
The EU says its political advertising rules seek to increase transparency in online advertising after Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal, which came to light in 2018.
Cambridge Analytica was a consulting firm that was found to have improperly accessed personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum.
The change is set to impact Meta's flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram, as well as WhatsApp -- which is largely ad-free but announced in June it would be introducing new advertising features in some parts of the app.
Meta said it was "not the only company to have been forced into this position".
Google last year announced it would also prevent political advertising in the EU from October 2025 because of the "significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties".
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been highly critical of European rules, accusing Brussels in January of "censorship" and equating EU fines against the company to tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
2 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
President Trump hits the links at Turnberry as Scotland reacts
President Trump Tees Off in Scotland as Locals React to Visit U.S. President Donald Trump spent the first full day of his visit to Scotland enjoying a round of golf at his luxury Turnberry resort on Saturday, while demonstrations were being organized across the country. Accompanied by his son Eric, President Trump emerged from the resort in the morning and waved to photographers before heading onto the course. He arrived in Scotland on Friday evening, landing at Prestwick Airport to a crowd of onlookers eager to see Air Force One and its high-profile passenger. Security was heightened in the usually peaceful southwest region. Roads around the resort were closed, police checkpoints were in place, and officers on horses, quad bikes, and on foot with sniffer dogs patrolled the area, including the famous course and surrounding beaches. Though President Trump has often expressed his admiration for Scotland—his mother was born there—his visit sparked mixed reactions from the local community, reflecting ongoing debate about his policies and business dealings in the country. Speaking briefly to reporters at the airport, President Trump weighed in on the issue of irregular migration in Europe. 'You better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe anymore,' he warned, saying migration was 'killing' the continent. Trump's remarks and presence drew strong opinions from locals. 'I don't trust him, and I know I'm not the only one,' said Graham Hodgson, a retired resident. 'He's full of himself, and his economic policies like the tariffs are damaging globally. He says it's for America, but even Americans are paying the price.' Despite the criticism, supporters also came out to show their approval. A young boy held a 'Welcome Trump' sign near the airport, while a man waved a flag bearing the slogan 'Make America Great Again.' 'He's not a typical politician, and that's what I admire,' said Lee McLean, 46, from Kilmarnock. 'He's focused on what's best for his country, and that's something we don't see often in world leaders.' President Trump's five-day UK visit continues, with both scheduled meetings and further protests expected in the days ahead.
Gulf Insider
4 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Travelers To US To Pay New $250 'Visa Integrity Fee'
The United States will begin charging a new 'visa integrity fee' when issuing visas to foreign nationals for admission to the country. The refundable fee was created by a new budget bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, that was signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4. It specifies that a minimum fee of $250 must be charged to all foreigners seeking a nonimmigrant visa to enter the United States. The Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to increase the fee and it is adjustable for inflation. The fee will not come into effect immediately. The government will have to initiate a rulemaking process to issue a regulation regarding the fee, which will entail a public comment period per the Administrative Procedure Act, a process that can take more than a year and is subject to legal challenges. The fee will raise the cost for visiting the United States but may be refunded subject to certain conditions. More than 10.9 million nonimmigrant visas were issued by the United States in 2024, which means the fee could affect millions of people and generate billions of dollars in revenue. The law specifies that all foreign nationals requesting a nonimmigrant visa must pay the fee. Nonimmigrant visas are a type of visa issued to most foreign nationals who visit the United States for temporary periods; the other type are immigrant visas, which eventually allow foreign nationals to permanently reside in the country. Business travelers and tourists, who are usually admitted to the United States on B-1/B-2 status, will be required to pay the fee, in addition to the existing non-petition visa fee of $185. The new fee is likely to be payable during the application process—made at a U.S. diplomatic or consular mission abroad—before the visa foil sticker is placed in an applicant's passport. The statute specifies that the fee must be paid 'at the time of … issuance' of the visa, which occurs before travel to the country. The same process may apply to nonimmigrant workers, who are usually admitted to the United States on a variety of statuses, including H-1B, H-2A, O-1, L-1, P-1, and others, in addition to the existing fee of $205. Likewise, international students who receive an F-1 or M-1 status, or exchange visitors and trainees admitted on J-1 status, will be required to pay the fee. Just as the principal applicants for these statuses may be charged a fee, so will any dependents who accompany them on dependent statuses, such as H-3, O-3, or L-3. Each person visiting the United States must receive their own visa, which means that each applicant will need to pay the fee. Though the fee will be required by almost all nonimmigrants to the United States, there are some notable exemptions. These are either foreigners who normally do not require nonimmigrant visas, or those who are special visitors. The biggest exemption will be for Canadian citizens, who normally do not require nonimmigrant visas to enter the United States even as they are admitted on various nonimmigrant statuses. Unlike the nationals of all other countries, Canadians may seek admission as nonimmigrant with no visa in their passport—either without any prior approval entirely (in the case of B-1/B-2 visitors), or with USCIS paperwork such as notices of approval of status petitions for H-1B workers, F-1 students, and J-1 physicians, and more. Additionally, most visitors to the United States from Europe and a few other countries that are part of the Visa Waiver Program will not be required to pay the fee. The Visa Waiver Program is a program that waives the requirement of a B-1/B-2 visa to visit the United States for certain non-Canadian foreign nationals, who may visit the United States for up to 90 days after obtaining an 'Electronic System for Travel Authorization' approval of their waiver online, paying a $21 fee to do so. Citizens of the United Kingdom, most countries in the European Union—except Bulgaria, Cyprus, and Romania—Switzerland, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, Brunei, Qatar, and Singapore who are eligible for the Visa Waiver Program will be exempt from the fee. Furthermore, visitors who are admitted for official purposes—such as diplomats and consular officials on A-status, international organization officials on G-status, and NATO military officials on NATO-status—may not be required to pay the fee. Though the statute specifies that no waivers or reductions are permitted, diplomatic considerations may lead to their personal exemption from the fee. For such visitors, the foreign government or organization that sends them to the United States endorses their presence, meaning they are unlikely to overstay their status in the country and violate U.S. law. Separately, all immigrants to the United States will be exempt from the fee. Those who receive immigrant visas are authorized to enter the United States to live and work. An immigrant visa is not necessarily a 'green card' (or Lawful Permanent Resident status) but all typically lead to a green card. Fiancées (and their dependents) of U.S. citizens who enter on K-status are may not be charged the fee, even though they receive a K-status nonimmigrant visa. This is because they are considered intending immigrants who will adjust status to permanent residency within the United States, an intention that is normally prohibited when a nonimmigrant seeks admission. It is unclear whether asylum seekers or refugees will be subject to the fee. These people are considered nonimmigrant, but they do not ordinarily receive visas to enter the United States after being granted lawful status in the country. The law specifies that the Visa Integrity Fee may be refunded under certain conditions. The word 'may' indicates that the government is not required to refund the fee, though it is permitted to do so. Two conditions are outlined for a refund: The first is that the foreigner must have 'complied with all conditions of such nonimmigrant visa, including the condition that an alien shall not accept unauthorized employment.' In order words, they must obey all the laws of the United States while in the country and cannot work for income without approval from USCIS. B-1/B-2 visa holders are prohibited from employment in the United States, while other nonimmigrant may be employed with restrictions. The second condition is that a foreign national must depart from the United States within five days after their period of admission expires. A 'period of admission' is different from the length of validity of a nonimmigrant visa, as some statuses only permit the foreigner to remain in the country for short periods of time—for example, 10-year B-1/B-2 visa holders may only remain in the United States for a maximum of 180 days on any given visit. Hence, any foreign national who remains for five days after such a period expires will be ineligible for a refund of the fee, which acts as an incentive to leave the U.S. in a timely manner. However, the law specifies an exemption for certain foreigners who change their nonimmigrant status—for example, F-1 students who receive H-1B status—or who adjust their status to that of permanent residents—such as O-1 workers receiving 'green cards'—usually by petition to USCIS. Even though these people may remain in the United States beyond the duration of their admission period, such as when waiting for a petition's approval, they may receive a refund of the fee. There is no current timeline on when the fee will come into effect. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security told The Epoch Times that 'the visa integrity fee requires cross-agency coordination before implementation.'
Gulf Insider
5 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US Will Engage Russia On Nuclear Disarmament Treaty, Trump Says
President Donald Trump on Friday responded to a question posed by a reporter for the Russian TASS agency during a press conference on the White House lawn regarding nuclear weapons. The US expects to formally engage with Russia soon on prospects for nuclear disarmament, Trump indicated, as the last remaining landmark nuclear arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow, known as New START, is in its last year. The full name is Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms. 'That's not an agreement you want expiring. We're starting to work on that,' he told reporters outside the White House. It's expiring 'in about six months,' the TASS reporter had reminded Trump. 'It's a problem for the world,' the president said continued in reference to its upcoming expiration of early 2026. 'When you take off nuclear restrictions, that's a big problem.' He reiterated that he would like to see the US and Russia to cut their nuclear weapons stockpiles. Trump has since entering into office for his second term signaled repeatedly that this is an aim of his which would be good for the world and for humanity. In March 2021 the two sides renewed New START for a period of five years, and it will expire in February 2026 if it is not continued – an increasing possibility given US-Russia relations have deteriorated so fast over the Ukraine war that they hover near complete breaking point. Trump has made clear he wants to improve bilateral relations, despite also expressing frustration that peace talks haven't produced fruit thus far. There could even possibly be a future face-to-face meeting with President Putin. The New START treaty is intended to limit and reduce nuclear arms on either side, setting a limit of no more than 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 missiles. START I began in 1991, with New START signed under the prior Obama and Medvedev administrations in 2010 as a successor agreement. Trump's Friday remarks in response to a question on New START: Donald Trump: The imminent expiration of the New START treaty is a problem for the entire START is the Treaty on the Reduction of Strategic Offensive Arms. It is a bilateral agreement between Russia and the United States aimed at limiting and reducing strategic… — Webuildhome (@webuildhome_org) July 25, 2025 The past couple years have seen the terms of the treaty essentially become inactive or de facto suspended, given each side has accused the other of violating its terms over not allowing inspectors to properly investigate stockpiles on their respective soils.
