Explained: What are the limits to the UN nuclear watchdog's oversight in Iran?
nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
, has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since Israel launched military strikes on its nuclear facilities on June 13. Below is an outline of the International Atomic Energy Agency's inspection powers.
DOES THE IAEA HAVE UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION?
No. The IAEA's oversight is limited to the 191 states that are signatories to the NPT, and other countries it has separate arrangements with. Iran is a party to the NPT and thus subject to
IAEA
oversight including inspections meant to ensure that no nuclear material such as uranium is "diverted" for use in atomic bombs. Israel is not a party to the NPT and is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not confirm or deny having them.
It has a limited safeguards agreement with the IAEA that provides for the agency to oversee some materials and facilities - a fraction of what Israel has and not any of what is widely believed to be its nuclear weapons programme. Iran, by contrast, has a Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (CSA) with the IAEA under which it must account for all its proliferation-sensitive nuclear material, including every gram of enriched uranium.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
CAN THE IAEA GO ANYWHERE, ANYTIME IN IRAN?
No. It is largely restricted to inspecting Iran's declared nuclear installations as provided for by its 1974 CSA - sites such as the three uranium enrichment plants at Natanz and Fordow that were operating until Israel bombed them on June 13.
It had regular access to those facilities until they were attacked. Since then, they have been "closed" and inspectors have not been allowed in, the IAEA has said, adding that it hopes its inspectors will return as soon as possible.
Live Events
HAS THE IAEA HAD GREATER POWERS BEFORE?
Yes. A 2015 deal between Iran and major powers placed strict limits on Tehran's nuclear activities but also extended the IAEA's oversight to parts of Iran's nuclear programme not covered by the CSA, such as its production and stock of centrifuges, the machines that enrich uranium.
It was the most comprehensive IAEA oversight of any country.
Much of that additional oversight came from Iran agreeing, as part of the 2015 pact, to apply the Additional Protocol, an add-on to countries' CSAs that the IAEA developed to strengthen its hand in preventing nuclear proliferation. Iran has signed but never ratified the Additional Protocol. One of the most important extra tools the Additional Protocol gives the IAEA is the power to carry out snap inspections - short-notice access to locations including ones that Iran has not declared to be nuclear-related.
WHY DOES IT NO LONGER HAVE SUCH SWEEPING POWERS?
In 2018, during his first term, President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of the 2015 nuclear deal, reimposing U.S. sanctions on Iran that had been lifted as part of the agreement.
In retaliation, as of the following year, Iran began pushing past the deal's limits on its nuclear activities but also scaled back the extra IAEA oversight introduced by the deal.
In February 2021 Iran said it would no longer carry out its extra commitments under the 2015 deal, including implementation of the Additional Protocol. It struck a deal with the IAEA to keep monitoring equipment like surveillance cameras added under the deal rolling, but ordered them all removed in June 2022.
WHAT WAS LOST WITH THE EXTRA OVERSIGHT?
Reducing the IAEA's oversight not only took away the important tool of snap inspections. It also left blind spots in the areas to which extra oversight had been applied.
The IAEA now says it has lost so-called "continuity of knowledge" for so many years that it will never be able to fully piece together what happened in areas including the production and inventory of centrifuges and certain key centrifuge parts, as well as Iran's stock of "yellowcake" - uranium that has not been enriched. The fact many centrifuges are unaccounted for means it cannot be ruled out that they will be used to enrich uranium in secret at an undeclared facility. Such a facility would be easy to hide in a relatively small building such as a warehouse.
The IAEA says it cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear activity is entirely for peaceful purposes but it also has no credible indications of a coordinated nuclear weapons programme.
WHAT IF IRAN PULLS OUT OF THE NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY?
Iran has threatened to pull out of the NPT, while at the same time saying it would not develop nuclear weapons if it did.
Tehran has complained that the treaty and non-proliferation regime failed to protect it from attack by a country with a nuclear arsenals, the United States, and another widely believed to have one, Israel.
The NPT allows for withdrawal by a party at three months' notice "if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country".
The only country to announce its withdrawal from the NPT is North Korea in 2003, which expelled IAEA inspectors before testing nuclear weapons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
21 minutes ago
- India Gazette
India refutes claims about White House denying Jaishankar's request to meet Trump
New Delhi [India], July 4 (ANI): India on Friday refuted claims that External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's request to meet US President Donald Trump was denied by the White House due to his busy schedule, terming it as 'fake news.' In a post on X, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) Factcheck unit stated, 'CLAIM: White House denies Indian FM Jaishankar's request to meet Donald Trump due to busy schedule. This is FAKE News. This CLAIM is false.' MEA's statement comes after a user on social media platform X claimed that the White House denied Jaishankar's request to meet Trump due to his 'busy schedule.' Jaishankar was on an official visit to the US from June 30 - July 2 at the invitation of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. During the visit, he participated in the Quad Foreign Ministers Meeting (QFMM). In a post on X, Jaishankar stated, 'Just finished a very productive meeting of Quad Foreign Ministers in Washington DC. Discussed how to make Quad more focused and impactful on contemporary opportunities and challenges. Today's gathering will strengthen strategic stability in the Indo - Pacific and keep it free and open.' Jaishankar met with Rubio on the sidelines of QFFM and discussed bilateral partnership between both countries in the field of security, critical technologies, connectivity, energy and mobility. In a social media post, he said that he 'shared perspectives on regional and global developments.' Jaishankar also held a meeting with FBI Director Kash Patel in Washington DC on Wednesday (local time) and expressed appreciation for cooperation between India and the US in countering organised crime, drug trafficking and terrorism. In his meeting with US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Jaishankar said that the duo had a 'good exchange' with her on the global situation and bilateral cooperation. On Tuesday (local time), Jaishankar held a meeting with US Energy Secretary Chris Wright in Washington, DC and spoke about the energy transformation underway in India. The two leaders discussed opportunities for a deeper energy partnership between the two nations. The External Affairs Minister also held discussions with US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and held discussion on advancing defence partnership between two nations, building on growing convergences of interests, capabilities and responsibilities. Before arriving in Washington, DC, Jaishankar was in New York, where he inaugurated an exhibition at the United Nations on 'The Human Cost of Terrorism,' highlighting the need to expose state sponsorship of terrorism. (ANI)
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Equities still worth a bet, but tread lightly: Richard Harris
"It is a lot of cash to find for American buyers because, of course, they are the ones who are going to be paying at the end of the day. So, you have to think that that is going to have a detrimental effect on trade and a detrimental effect on growth that will counteract all the positive features that the big beautiful bill was intended to have," says Richard Harris , Port Shelter Investment . Is it the magic of liquidity which is blinding everybody? Richard Harris: Well, I am not sure it is blinding everybody, but it is definitely having a big impact on what is happening. Clearly, the big beautiful bill or ugly bill, as you might call it, is going to have quite a big impact. That is going to put trillions of dollars into the economy. And as we know, if you put that sort of money into the economy, it ends up in asset prices. So, I think that equities are taking some strength from that. But one of the biggest reasons why we have seen prices move up recently is because Trump comes in with a scary figure or scary announcement such as the 2nd of April tariff increases. And what have we seen since then are roll backs from them. So, the market has seen each little roll back as a victory, as good news. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo So, bit by bit, it is priced things back up again and that is what we are seeing at the moment that we are actually seeing small pieces of good news. But if you look at the good news, you can sort of say, well, tariffs in China were going to be 145%. Now, they are going to be 50%, maybe they will be lower. Vietnam 48% or something, maybe they will be 20%, that all seems to the market to be good news. But in reality, that 20% is still very high. It is a lot of cash to find for American buyers because, of course, they are the ones who are going to be paying at the end of the day. So, you have to think that that is going to have a detrimental effect on trade and a detrimental effect on growth that will counteract all the positive features that the big beautiful bill was intended to have. So, just wondering, now that 9th July approaches closer and closer, what can we hear on the tariff front? Richard Harris: Well, the extraordinary thing if you do a survey of how much people have been searching for the word tariff, it has gone down pretty well solidly from April 2nd. And what we have had over the last couple of weeks, we have had a lot of news about Iran, a lot of news about global politics, what is going to happen to oil we have been talking about. Most recently, we have been talking in the last week about what has happened to the big beautiful bill. Well, that was strong armed through. Now, the markets are going to start focusing on tariffs. But they have really not paid much attention to it since April the 2nd, thinking that Trump is going to chicken out. Well, we will have to see if that happens. But on those countries that have signed deals with the US already, tariffs are an awful lot higher than they were at the beginning of the year. So, I think that that is really the factor that we should be looking at not the fact that we have had good news coming because some of these very high tariff levels have been reduced. Live Events So, what should one do, I mean that is the most important question whatever we are discussing is well known? It is a strategy what you adopt at an all-time high which essentially will differentiate the portfolio return. If you sell now, well you miss on the uptick. If you do not sell now, well, you regret because this market already is looking bloated. Richard Harris: Well, what is basically happening is that there is a big delay in numbers. The big factor that has confounded economists, of course, is how is it that we have seen the economy stay fairly strong despite all these potential features of bad news coming around. Well, a lot of the bad news has not hit yet. Higher tariffs have not necessarily hit. Issues with the deficit have not necessarily hit. But generally, the bad news has not really hit yet, that is further down the line and it is going to be the same with the big beautiful bill. The tax cuts are going to happen soon. The benefit cuts are going to happen later and over time. So, initially, the markets will still stay pretty buoyant because they would not have an awful lot of reason to sell off. So, if you have to, let us say, punch in one trade, only one trade, you allowed only one for rest of the year, what will that trade be? Richard Harris: I think equities, maybe less weighted, less highly weighted than they have been previously, but equities will still continue because bull markets die hard.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bihar polls: ECI lists 11 documents for voter roll update, Aadhaar not included; check what's required
Photo: Generative AI NEW DELHI: A fresh controversy has erupted in poll-bound Bihar over the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of the state's electoral rolls, a process the Election Commission of India (ECI) insists is legally mandated, even as opposition parties allege it could end up deleting "tens of lakhs" of genuine voters, especially the poor, migrants, and those on the margins. While the EC said that the revision, happening after 22 years, is in line with the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act, opposition parties claim the timing is suspiciously close to the assembly polls and could "skew the voter base". "There is nothing more transparent in a democracy than the law. 'Despite apprehensions of some persons, SIR will ensure that all eligible persons are included,' Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar told TOI. As part of the roll-revise process, voters may be asked to submit documents to support their claims, not just for themselves, but also for their parents if their names are mentioned. Each document must be self-attested and submitted separately for the individual, father, and mother. However, there's one major relief: If a person's name appears in the Bihar electoral roll dated January 1, 2003, that alone will be treated as sufficient proof, no additional documents will be needed in that case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Lodha Panache: Step Into Hinjewadi's Most Elite 2/3/4 BHK Lodha Panache Get Info Undo Here's the list of documents to be submitted: Any identity card/Pension Payment Order issued to a regular employee/pensioner of any central or state government or a Public Sector Unit (PSU). Any identity card/certificate/document issued in India by the government/local authorities/banks/post office/LIC/PSUs prior to July 1, 1987. Birth certificate issued by the competent authority. Passport. Matriculation/educational certificate issued by recognised boards/universities. Permanent residence certificate issued by the competent state authority. Forest right certificate. OBC/SC/ST or any caste certificate issued by the competent authority. National register of citizens (wherever it exists). Family Register, prepared by state/local authorities. Any land/house allotment certificate by the government. Highlighting the exclusion of Aadhaar from this voter revision process, Congress's in charge of Bihar Krishna Allavaru accused the EC of "acting under government pressure". "Whenever the government faces a crisis, its agencies begin such actions," he said. "It is strange that the very voters who elected this government are now being asked to prove their identity. By excluding Aadhaar from this voter revision process, eight crore people are being asked to submit documents they don't have," the Congress leader added. EC uploads 2003 rolls, says most voters need not worry Trying to calm nerves, the EC clarified this week that 4.96 crore out of Bihar's 7.89 crore registered voters won't need to submit parental documents during the revision. This includes those already listed in the 2003 electoral rolls or born to such electors. To make things smoother for booth level officers (BLOs) and voters alike, the EC has uploaded the 2003 Bihar rolls on its website for easy access. Opposition says revision targets the poor, migrants On Wednesday, leaders from 11 opposition parties, including Congress, RJD, TMC, DMK, SP, JMM, and Left parties, met the Election Commission, calling the revision "disastrous". They warned that the EC's guidelines on verifying if someone is "ordinarily resident" in a constituency may disqualify large sections of migrants, who form a major chunk of Bihar's electorate. The opposition argued that a revision this close to elections casts doubt on the EC's intentions. But interestingly, despite their public opposition, these parties have joined the ground-level process, appointing thousands of booth level agents (BLAs) to keep watch. Massive on-ground push by all parties Contrary to their protests, opposition parties have gone all in. The RJD has deployed 47,143 BLAs, second only to BJP's 51,964. Congress has appointed 8,586, while Left outfits like CPI(ML), CPM, and CPI have sent in their own agents. On the NDA side, JDU, LJP, and RLSP have mobilised more than 30,000 BLAs in total. The election commission claimed it was determined to follow Article 326 of the Constitution, which mandates that only Indian citizens aged 18 or above and ordinarily resident in a constituency should be enrolled. 'SIR is in line with Article 326. It's a straight question (to the parties criticising SIR): Do you agree with Article 326 or not?" a senior EC official said.
