Children's pajamas recalled because they could catch fire
The safety agency says the sleepwear imported from China violates flammability standards.
The recall involves children's two-piece pajama sets set made up of a long-sleeved, button-up top and matching pants sold in children's sizes 3 to 12.
The pajamas have detachable feathers on the wrist and ankle, two front shirt pockets and buttons down the center seam of the shirt.
The following styles are under recall:
BK1105 (Sugar Berry)
BK1106 (Tartan)
BK1107(Frostbite)
BK1108 (Kris Kringle)
BK1109 (Prowl)
The size and 'BuddyLove' are printed on the neck label. The side seam label displays 100% polyester fiber content, washing instructions, the Style # and the descriptor 'Made in China.'
The about 940 pajama sets under recall were sold at BuddyLove and other boutique clothing stores nationwide and online at Buddylove.com from October 2023 through July 2024 for about $95.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission said the products haven't been linked to any injuries so far.
Children should stop wearing these pajamas immediately.
Instead, destroy the sleepwear by cutting them in half and email a photo of the destroyed garment to Recall@buddylove.com to get a full refund of the purchase price.
BuddyLove is also contacting all known buyers of these pajamas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
04-07-2025
- New York Post
Nanny state, for real: Feds won't even trust parents with a baby pillow
Imagine a new parent, soothing her baby at home, grateful for a moment of peace while her infant reclines in a cozy, contoured lounger beside her: It's soft and portable, designed specifically for a baby's supervised awake time — a helping hand amid the chaos of early parenthood. Now imagine the federal government declaring this item to be too dangerous to exist. That's exactly what happened with the Podster, a baby lounger made by Leachco, a small family-owned business in Oklahoma. Advertisement Designed to cradle infants while they're awake and with an adult, the Podster is not a sleeper, not a car seat, not a crib. It's a contoured cushion, a glorified baby pillow, meant to keep infants comfortably propped up while under a parent's watchful eye. Since its release in 2009 Leachco has sold over 180,000 Podsters. When used as intended, it has a perfect safety record. Advertisement But after three infant deaths linked to serious misuse of the lounger were reported, the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission labeled the Podster a 'substantial product hazard' and demanded a full recall. In one case, the infant was left unsupervised in a crib with the Podster for over an hour. In another, it was used in an adult bed, surrounded by pillows and bedding. In every case, the lounger was not being used according to its clear safety instructions. Advertisement There was no suggestion the Podster failed or malfunctioned. But the CPSC argued it was 'reasonably foreseeable' that some parents might ignore the warnings — making the product itself defective. That reasoning reveals a deeper problem. The CPSC was created in 1972 to protect Americans from dangerous products — items with clear, physical risks, like a too-small toy that poses a choking hazard or a battery-operated mobile that could overheat and catch fire. Advertisement It sets safety standards and can recall or even ban items it deems inherently hazardous. But the agency has drifted into overreach, defining 'risk' in increasingly abstract and paternalistic ways. Picture applying the Podster standard more broadly. Should we ban grapes because they're a choking hazard? Should we make backyard pools illegal because children can drown, or outlaw cars because some people don't wear seat belts? Obviously not — but that's the logic at play when the CPSC targets products like the Podster or the Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play, a once-popular baby sleeper. The CPSC linked over 30 infant deaths to that product — all in situations where babies weren't restrained or were placed in unsafe sleep environments, despite manufacturer warnings. These are devastating tragedies, but they're not necessarily evidence of a defective product. They're examples of what happens when products are misused. Advertisement Instead of educating parents about safe practices, the CPSC has leaned on the idea that any possible misuse is enough to justify a recall. That sets an impossible standard, and one that disproportionately hurts small businesses. Complying with federal safety regulations comes at a high cost. Big companies might absorb it. But small firms like Leachco, run by a husband-and-wife team, often can't. Advertisement Even a 10% increase in regulation can shrink the number of firms and reduce small-business employment, analysts have found. And when smaller players are pushed out, competition suffers — leaving us fewer options, higher prices and less innovation. Regulatory overreach has another cost, too: the products that are never created. 'Trying to preemptively plan for every hypothetical worst-case scenario means that many best-case scenarios will never come about,' says policy analyst Adam Thierer. Advertisement In the quest to prevent all harm, we paralyze progress. And for what? The CPSC's own data shows that most injuries linked to nursery products don't stem from defects. They happen when caregivers misuse them. High chairs, for example, consistently top the injury charts. But kids get hurt because they're climbing, wiggling or not strapped in properly, not because the chairs themselves are dangerous. Worse, eliminating products like the Podster doesn't eliminate risk — it just shifts it. Advertisement Parents still need somewhere to put the baby. Banning safe loungers leads caregivers to improvise with regular pillows or folded blankets, introducing new hazards in the name of safety. A zero-risk world doesn't exist. The Podster is the poster child for bureaucratic overreach: A well-intentioned agency attacking a safe, helpful product because someone misused it. Congress should step in. Lawmakers can direct the CPSC to define what counts as a 'product defect,' and can require the agency to distinguish between genuine hazards and issues of misuse. Clear, objective standards will protect consumers without punishing responsible parents or businesses. Parents deserve safe products, but they also deserve the freedom to make their own choices — without a nanny-state government treating them like they can't be trusted with a baby pillow. Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars and is a homeschooling mother of six in greater Washington, DC.
Yahoo
03-07-2025
- Yahoo
Can my kid use fireworks in Delaware on July Fourth? Know these fireworks laws in Delaware
The Fourth of July falls on a Friday, and parents will need to know Delaware's stringent fireworks laws before allowing their kids to set off any fireworks over the long holiday weekend. And your child's safety is at stake as well, as the U.S. Consumer Product and Safety Commission notes 15- to 19-year-olds had the highest estimated rate of emergency room visits related to fireworks injuries. Here's what parents in Delaware should know. According to the Delaware State Fire Marshall, your teen will need to be at least 18 years old to purchase and set off specific fireworks in Delaware. Your child will be able to set off ground-based displays, sparklers and other fireworks that are federally regulated fireworks and aren't airborne or explosive. Several fireworks are banned in Delaware, and you'll be able to use the legal fireworks on July 4 only. July Fourth is one of four days when fireworks use is legal in Delaware, along with third day of Diwali, New Year's Eve and New Year's Day. "The use of consumer fireworks such as firecrackers, bottle rockets, aerial mortars, and anything that leaves the ground is and has always been prohibited to possess or use in the State of Delaware," read a recent fireworks alert from the Delaware State Fire Marshall. "Novelty items such as sparklers and ground-based fountains are only permitted to be used on July 4. "Consumer fireworks are frequently advertised by mail, radio, television, and billboards for retail sale to Delaware residents to purchase and use. These advertised consumer aerial fireworks are prohibited to possess or discharge." Damon C. Williams is a Philadelphia-based journalist reporting on trending topics across the Mid-Atlantic Region. This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Can my kids use fireworks on July Fourth in Delaware? What to know
USA Today
02-07-2025
- USA Today
Do you even like fireworks anymore? Should we ban them? Take our poll.
My neighborhood has been setting off Fourth of July fireworks for a week. Should we ban them or make them legal everywhere? Take our poll below. It's not even the Fourth of July, and already I've had my fill of fireworks. My neighborhood began setting them off in late June, creating the kind of pop and crackle that lights up platforms like Nextdoor with endless posts and debate about 'were those firecrackers or gunshots?' This time of year, as well as Christmas, New Year's Eve and those precious moments our sports teams actually win, it's always fireworks. And I'm over it. For many, watching the sky light up amid thunderous booms is one of the core memories of childhood. I share that same nostalgia: Setting up lawn chairs, necks craned toward the sky, delighting in all the dazzling designs and colors. Lighting the fuse on a bottle rocket and running for cover, all 10 fingers fortunately still intact. But maybe it's because I'm older now and value a good night's sleep – or because I've come to understand just how detrimental fireworks are to our environment, our pets, the wildlife around us and, yes, even our health – that I've found myself sympathizing, and maybe even agreeing with, the 'ban fireworks' contingent. At the very least, maybe we can leave the pyrotechnics to the professionals and stop shooting them off in every neighborhood in the city. (Don't agree? Scroll down to vote in our poll.) The harmful effects of fireworks Because the thing is, fireworks cause very real harm to the very people who have fought to protect our freedoms. The flashes of light, burning smells and smoke are known triggers for veterans and others with PTSD. Fireworks are likely causing fear and anxiety – and even physical pain and distress – in your pets, too. Studies have shown that half of dogs express fear at the noise. Birds and wildlife experience the same fear and disruption at the sound of fireworks, often resulting in them fleeing in panic, and sometimes dying as a result. What does being an American mean to you? I'm not sure what being a patriot means in Trump's America. Are you? Tell us. | Opinion Forum And the damage doesn't just happen during nightfall: The debris left from fireworks – the plastic and chemicals and pollutants in the powder that cause such awe-inspiring explosions – can be a choking hazard and toxic. It's hurting your lungs, too. According to the American Lung Association, a 2015 study found air pollution levels increased by an average of 42% on the Fourth of July. Still convinced you'll escape unscathed? The Consumer Product Safety Commission's annual report shows a 38% increase in firework-related deaths and a 52% increase in injuries – more than 14,700 total – in 2024. About 20% of those injuries required hospitalization. You know what doesn't send you to the hospital? A drone show. Should we ban fireworks or make them legal everywhere? What do you think? Should we ban fireworks altogether? Leave it to the professionals, but limit private use? Or make them available to everyone, everywhere? Take our poll below. And have a safe Independence Day! Janessa Hilliard is the director of audience for USA TODAY Opinion and Opinion at Gannett.
