Trump Backtracks on Booting Out Mullahs After Ceasefire
As tensions continue to simmer over the risk of retaliation against the US, the president also suggested that his predecessor, Joe Biden, was to blame for Iranian sleeper cells entering America.
'There was gross incompetence, and among everything else, he let a lot of super (sleeper) cells in, many from Iran. But hopefully we'll take care of them,' Trump claimed on Tuesday.
The comments came as Trump travelled to the Netherlands for a NATO summit, hours after brokering what he insisted would be a lasting ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
But despite musing over the weekend about a potential regime change in Iran, contradicting assurances from his top Cabinet members that toppling the Islamic Republic was not the administration's goal, Trump on Tuesday told reporters: 'I don't want it. I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible.'
'Regime change takes chaos, and ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos. So we'll see how it goes,' he added.
He also told reporters that he had spoken by phone to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, demanding that he bring back military aircraft and not continue to bomb Iran.
After speaking to Netanyahu, he then posted a message on his social media network insisting that Israel would comply with his request.
'All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly 'Plane Wave' to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he said.
Trump's NATO trip comes after a stunning few days in the Middle East conflict, which began on Saturday when America launched B-2s to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, and culminated on Monday evening when Trump declared a ceasefire had been reached between Israel and Iran.
But things quickly took a turn when it appeared that both sides had violated the agreement, prompting an expletive-laden tirade from Trump as he left the White House en route to the Netherlands.
'They don't know what the f---- they're doing,' he said.
It is also still not clear how much highly enriched uranium Iran was able to move to a secret location before the U.S. was able to bomb its three known nuclear facilities.
This has prompted fears that the regime could still have the capacity to build a nuclear bomb in the future, even though the weekend strikes severely damaged its enrichment program.
'Tehran had ample time prior to the strikes to remove its stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium to a covert location, and it's likely that they did so,' said Kelsey Davenport, the director of non-proliferation policy at the Arms Control Association.
'The containers that this material is stored in are small canisters, something on the size of a scuba tank, for reference, so they're quite easy to conceal and difficult to track. So it's not surprising that the United States has even admitted that it does not know where all of the material is.'
Trump, however, insisted that having a nuclear weapon was 'the last thing' on Iran's mind now.
'They're going to get on to being a great trading nation,' said. 'They have a lot of oil and they're going to do well, but they're not going to have a nuclear weapon.'
Meanwhile, in the U.S., the conflict has once again sparked concern about sleeper cells–groups of terrorists who are already in the country but operating under the radar, waiting to be activated.
While authorities say there is no credible evidence of a sleeper cell, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection warned in a memo to be vigilant as the threat of a sleeper cell or sympathizer acting at the behest of Iran had 'never been higher.'
Asked about the issue aboard Air Force One, Trump blamed his predecessor.
'He had no idea what he was doing,' the president said of Biden.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Senate and the Supreme Court
The Senate narrowly passed Republicans' sprawling bill to slash taxes and social safety net programs. Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote, after three Republican senators — Susan Collins, Thom Tillis and Rand Paul — voted no. The bill extends roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term and increases funding for border security and the military. It cuts about $1.1 trillion from health care programs, mainly Medicaid, which experts estimate will cause nearly 12 million Americans to lose coverage. The bill, which could affect millions of Americans, is a major political gamble, Carl Hulse writes. The House must now decide whether to pass the Senate's version of the bill or try to reconcile it with its own. Any delays could mean that Congress misses the July 4 deadline that Trump set. The Morning's readers were interested in the bill yesterday (it was our most-clicked link). Here's more from Times reporters who were in the Capitol: In all, senators voted 49 times during a 27-hour marathon session. They wore fluffy blankets and pullover sweatshirts inside the chilly chamber. Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, cast a deciding vote for the bill after winning carveouts for her state. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told NBC News afterward. 'But I tried to take care of Alaska's interests.' Trump and Elon Musk returned to jousting on social media about the legislation. The bill's policies could inflict major financial pain on poor Americans. Republicans have insisted that the policy package will help seniors and the middle class. Here's a fact check. Covering the court The end of June is some combination of Christmas and Tax Day for Adam Liptak, who has covered the Supreme Court for The Times since 2008. That's when the justices release a dizzying array of rulings: This term's major cases, some of which were decided earlier in the year, touched on guns, porn, police tactics, religion, citizenship, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, vapes and TikTok. How the Supreme Court voted in the last two terms Last term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 This term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 Last term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 This term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 Note: Chart shows nine-person decisions that were orally argued and signed. Sources: Lee Epstein and Andrew D. Martin, Washington University in St. Louis; Michael J. Nelson, Penn State from the Supreme Court Database By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Tax Bill Faces GOP Resistance Ahead of House Vote
President Donald Trump's multitrillion-dollar tax bill is meeting resistance in the House as Republican lawmakers threaten to defy Trump and sink his domestic agenda. Tyler Kendall reports on Bloomberg Television. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Donald Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. What Trump has said Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures" that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' A temporary tax deduction But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. White House touts impact Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits," going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. Economic effect The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054" and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall.
