Back-to-School apparel spend holds strong despite economic strain: Pwc
Clothing and footwear remain a key priority for parents. Sixteen per cent of back-to-school shoppers plan to spend over $500 on these items, while 29 per cent expect to spend between $251–500, and 27 per cent between $101–250. Only 17 per cent expect to spend less than $50, showing that most families are prepared to invest in new apparel for the school year, Pwc said in its report.
Despite economic pressures, American families are prioritising spending on back-to-school clothing and shoes, with many planning to spend the same or more than in 2024, according to PwC. While some are cutting back, essentials remain protected. Gen Z favours physical stores, and income influences shopping channels. Retailers managing supply and value well are set to benefit.
Yet not all shoppers are spending freely. Among those cutting back, clothing is one of the top categories being reduced, with 40 per cent choosing to limit apparel purchases. Still, essential buying in this category appears relatively shielded compared to discretionary goods.
As parents look to save, many are prioritising early shopping and discounts, with value-conscious habits such as reusing items also gaining traction. Income level plays a key role in shopping behaviour—households earning below $75,000 annually are more likely to shop in-store, while higher-income families show a greater preference for online shopping.
Notably, Gen Z parents are showing a strong preference for brick-and-mortar experiences, defying assumptions about their digital-first nature. This renewed interest in physical retail could shape merchandising and in-store promotions as retailers target this influential demographic, the report noted.
While tariffs and shipping disruptions from China have created inventory concerns, many retailers are expected to recover in time for peak season. Those who manage supply chains efficiently and communicate value effectively stand to gain in a market where consumers continue to invest in clothing and shoes, despite broader inflationary concerns, added the report.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
From Infosys to Akasa: Work-life balance dialogue continues
When Infosys, one of India's IT behemoths, recently sent an internal advisory urging employees not to overwork and to maintain a "balanced work-life schedule," the move surprised many, especially given the contrasting views held by its own founder. Just months earlier, Infosys co-founder N.R. Narayana Murthy had made headlines advocating a 70-hour workweek to boost India's productivity. His remark stirred intense debate in India Inc and beyond, pitting old-school hustle culture against a growing wave of wellness-first corporate as workplaces evolve in a post-pandemic, hybrid-working world, leaders across industries from tech and aviation to FMCG and consulting are redefining the boundaries of what work-life balance should truly mean. Here's a deep dive into what top CEOs are saying, and how their words are reshaping workplace cultures MURTHY, FOUNDER, INFOSYS - "70 HOURS A WEEK"In October 2023, Narayana Murthy stirred a national debate by saying young Indians should work 70 hours a week to lift the country's productivity levels. "India's work productivity is one of the lowest in the world. My request is that our youngsters must say, 'This is my country. I want to work 70 hours a week.'"- Narayana Murthy While some entrepreneurs praised his "discipline-first" stance, others called it tone-deaf in an era of rising burnout and mental health MANAGEMENT - "MIND YOUR HEALTH"advertisementContrary to Murthy's stance, Infosys itself recently issued a wellness advisory to employees urging them to avoid long hours and "maintain a balanced work-life schedule.""Please ensure your total work time does not exceed 9.15 hours per day Your health is important."- Infosys internal note, May 2025 The company also flagged that many employees were logging extra hours while working from home, pushing leaders to re-emphasize health and sustainable YARDI, CEO, CAPGEMINI INDIA - "LET'S NOT EMAIL ON WEEKENDS"In a bold and refreshing stance, Ashwin Yardi urged Capgemini's workforce to keep their workweek within 47.5 hours around 9.5 hours per day and avoid sending emails on weekends."Let's not glorify overwork. We must respect personal time and create a culture where people don't feel the need to prove productivity by long hours."- Ashwin Yardi, in an internal memo .Capgemini's move was widely appreciated for fostering a culture of respect, discipline, and boundaries, all while meeting performance expectations. VINAY DUBE, CEO, AKASA AIR - "IF I'M NOT DOING 70-HOUR WEEKS, WHY SHOULD THEY?"Vinay Dube delivered one of the most humanistic takes on the debate, rejecting the glorification of grind culture. Speaking at a conference, he said:"I don't work 70 hours a week myself, so I don't expect youngsters to. We must lead by example, not exhaustion."- Vinay Dube at India Economic Conclave advertisementHis comments resonated deeply with Gen Z and millennials who are increasingly prioritizing flexibility and fulfilment over traditional definitions of success. SINDHU GANGADHARAN, MD, SAP LABS INDIA - "OUTCOMES, NOT HOURS"The head of SAP Labs India and Chairperson of Nasscom, Sindhu Gangadharan, weighed in with a balanced view, advocating outcome-based work instead of time-clocked performance."We should be moving from inputs to outcomes. What matters is what gets done, not how many hours you sit in front of a screen."- Sindhu Gangadharan at an industry panel discussionSAUGATA GUPTA, CEO, MARICO - "BALANCE IS KEY"Saugata Gupta offered a more nuanced take, accepting that leadership sometimes requires odd hours, but emphasized that employees shouldn't be expected to follow suit."As leaders, we may have to work late sometimes, but it's our job to create an environment where our teams can switch off."- Saugata Gupta in media interactions S.N. SUBRAHMANYAN, CEO, LARSEN & TOUBRO - "WORK 12 HOURS A DAY"advertisementOn the other end of the spectrum, S.N. Subrahmanyan said Indian workers should be clocking 84 to 90 hours a week, including Sundays, to compete globally."The young must work 12 hours a day for six days a week. That's the only way to build the country."- S.N. Subrahmanyan quoted in Financial TimesHis comments attracted sharp criticism and triggered widespread debates on toxic hustle culture, particularly in the engineering and infrastructure sectors.A CULTURAL RESET IN PROGRESSFrom Infosys's U-turn to Capgemini's weekend email embargo, corporate India is slowly shifting toward a healthier relationship with work. While titans like Murthy and Subrahmanyan still see long hours as essential for national progress, many modern CEOs are proving that productivity need not come at the cost of well-being. In the end, the debate isn't about 70-hour weeks or 9-to-5 shifts, it's about trusting employees, measuring impact, and respecting human limits. The narrative is evolving, and so are the expectations, from both leadership and the workforce.- Ends
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Coaches hired to teach workplace manners to Gen Z workers in San Francisco
San Francisco employers are bringing in etiquette coaches to train their Gen Z staff on workplace behaviour. Frustrated by what they see as informal or inappropriate conduct, companies are turning to professionals to teach everything from hygiene to email to a report by The San Francisco Standard, managers say many Gen Z employees treat the workplace like their bedrooms. Complaints include turning up in revealing clothes, ignoring grooming standards, and setting unrealistic expectations for quick promotions. Some young employees reportedly even involve their parents during job interviews or 2024 survey by revealed that 12.5% of employers had encountered Gen Z candidates who brought their parents to interviews -- a clear sign for many that soft skills training is urgently ARE BROUGHT IN TO RESTORE PROFESSIONALISM Experts like Rosalinda Randall, a Marin-based etiquette coach, and Melissa Franks, the founder of On Call COO, have been hired to teach workplace norms. Their sessions focus on fundamental skills such as eye contact, listening, handshakes, and appropriate employers are even displaying hygiene reminder posters in office toilets or organising team-building events to foster respect and Z PUSHES BACK ON TOXICITY, BUT WANTS GUIDANCEWhile older generations complain, many Gen Z employees feel they're misunderstood. A young Salesforce engineer told The Standard, 'No cap. My manager Slacks me at 10 p.m.' — showing frustration at blurred work-life asked, 'Why should I pretend to care about people who don't care about me?'Etiquette coaches believe Gen Z isn't lazy -- rather, they're unsure how to behave in a changing world. According to Melissa Franks, many just need someone to explain how their behaviour is perceived in a professional SEE VALUE IN TRAININGThe World Economic Forum reported in January that 77% of companies believe soft skills training boosts productivity. As such, firms like Salesforce and even institutions like Stanford Research Park are now investing in coaching workshops, aiming to better integrate Gen Z into existing workplace arts organisations like Yerba Buena Center for the Arts are seeing value in etiquette coaching, noting that some younger hires were unfamiliar with name-tag placement or meeting norms.- Ends
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk's dream of a third party could disrupt US politics
Elon Musk's dream of a third party could disrupt US politics (AP Image) It appears the world's wealthiest person has set his mind to a new startup: his own political party. As the ongoing public fracturing of the relationship between the US President Donald Trump and his top election financier continues to play out in public, Elon Musk has again vented his opposition to the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," a tax and spending bill, which he believes undoes the efficiency mantra he sought to instill in Washington. Musk has gone as far to warn Republican lawmakers who pass the bill that he'll run candidates against them in next year's primaries. And he also threatened the broader US two-party system with the promise he'll form a faction of his own. "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day," he wrote on X. "Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE." A genuinely competitive third party would upend more than a century of Democrats-Republicans dominance at all levels of government. Yet few have come close, despite dozens of minor parties operating across the US for decades. The Libertarian Party, established in 1971, is the third biggest in America. Campaigning for free markets, small government and personal freedoms, it had its best presidential election performance in 2016 with candidate Gary Johnson, who won 3.27 percent of the nationwide vote. But that's a long way from the tens of millions of votes needed to win the White House, a governorship or even a state legislature seat. The Green Party is another long-running party that has run candidates in state and federal races. Like the Libertarians, it too holds no seats in government. US politics: Money, grassroots movement essential The very nature of the American political system is the "winner takes all" principle through the widespread use of a "first past the post" voting system. This delivers victory to candidates with the most votes — almost always a Republican or Democrat. There are other factors hampering success, according to Bernard Tamas, a political scientist at Valdosta State University, US, who has written extensively on the subject. Tamas said it's fundamental for a third party to tap into popular unrest — a large number of people who are dissatisfied with the current political options — and build a groundswell grassroots movement. "One of the biggest problems with the parties that have emerged is that they're not really tapping into that anger," Tamas said. Upstart parties instead "tend to be more wishy-washy and [are] not really focusing in on that strong urge for change." If tapping into grassroots is essential, so is money. Parties spend billions of dollars to get their candidates elected. According to donations watchdog OpenSecrets, nearly $16 billion (about €13.58 billion) was spent across the 2024 presidential and congressional races. Musk himself was the biggest donor in the 2023-24 election cycle. He gave more than $291 million to Republicans across all races. Massive campaign war chests help parties "get out the vote" — buying the advertising and campaigning materials that expose candidates to the public and earn their vote. It doesn't guarantee a win — the Democrats spent more than the Republicans in 2024 — but it certainly helps. "You need money for things like ballot access and a number of other things, but no third party would ever have enough money to compete against the Republicans and Democrats on their own terms," said Tamas. Third party in US unlikely Could a genuine third party supplant the Democrats or Republicans? It's unlikely in Tamas's view. Instead of winning seats and building long-term success, Tamas said they instead "sting like a bee." "They emerge very quickly, they run a bunch of candidates all over the country and then they cause one or both major parties major pain," Tamas said. "They basically are pulling away votes." This is called the "spoiler effect", where protest candidates leech votes away from an often ideologically similar mainstream candidate. In some cases, they could pull away enough votes that a frontrunner loses the lead and falls to second place. It's the fear of a third party groundswell that causes the major parties to alter their policies to appease these voters. Once the change is achieved, like a bee that's stung its victim, "it dies." "The most successful third parties in America last about a decade. Once they become too much of a threat, the major parties start stealing their rhetoric, their ideology," said Tamas. Do Americans want a new party? Not all Americans are happy with their options. Donald Trump's net approval rating is in negative territory and YouGov's latest polls found almost 3 in 5 Americans view the Democratic Party unfavorably. In 2022, a Pew Research analysis found overall support for more parties in the political system. But it doesn't mean a new party would succeed. A study by two US political scientists in May 2024 found "disaffected partisans" — Republicans and Democrats unsatisfied with their own parties — were less likely to vote for a third, more centrist alternative. Tapping into popular anger and frustration with the status quo, Tamas said, is the fastest pathway to success. For a person like Musk, he might do well to look towards the "Fight Oligarchy" movement of left-wing opponents like Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders currently touring America, or the original MAGA movement, if he wants to start a party. "These are very good examples to follow… the tapping into people's grievances is really it," Tamas said. "They force the [major] parties to respond by threatening their careers and their livelihood."
