After Blood Money Rejection, Nimisha Priya Still Has 5 Possible Ways To Avoid Execution
India is offering Nimisha Priya free legal aid, consular access, and visa support, while sending experts to Yemen and applying diplomatic pressure via Iran and Gulf allies
In a major setback for Indian nurse Nimisha Priya, the family of Yemeni murder victim Talal Abdo Mahdi has refused to accept blood money, demanding the death penalty instead.
Nimisha Priya's case dates back to 2017 and has since progressed through the local court and Yemen's Supreme Court, both of which upheld her death sentence. Originally scheduled to be hanged on July 16, the execution was postponed, and the next hearing is set for August 14. Efforts to secure blood money compensation continue, but with limited alternatives available, the situation remains dire.
What Are Nimisha Priya's Options?
Under Yemeni Sharia law, one prominent way to avert the death penalty is through blood money. However, with the victim's family's refusal, Nimisha Priya is now exploring other options:
What The Indian Government Is Doing
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs and the Indian Embassy are providing Nimisha Priya with legal assistance, visa support, and consular visits at no cost. A team, including legal experts and Sharia scholars, is being sent to Yemen. Additionally, diplomatic pressure is being applied through friendly countries in Iran and the Gulf.
How Much Influence Does India Have On The Houthis?
The Indian government's influence on the Houthi rebels is limited and indirect, but certain strategic and diplomatic channels still offer scope for dialogue or pressure. The Houthis, a Shia Zaydi rebel group, control large parts of northern and western Yemen and function as the de facto government in those areas. They are widely believed to be backed by Iran.
Can Iran Help?
Given Iran's strong influence over the Houthi rebels, it's possible that India could leverage its cordial ties with Tehran to open a diplomatic channel and seek a resolution. However, it remains uncertain whether Iran views this as a priority issue and would be willing to intervene on India's behalf.
view comments
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC stays Calcutta HC order on West Bengal OBC list
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Calcutta High Court's decision that had stalled the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the West Bengal government. 'Prima facie, the high court order seems to be erroneous,' said a bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria while hearing the appeal of the state government. On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the state government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. At the outset, the bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, and said, 'This is surprising. How can the High Court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function.' The state had prepared the new list after the high court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC order on West Bengal OBC list
The Supreme Court on Monday (July 28, 2025) stayed the Calcutta High Court's decision that had stalled the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the West Bengal government. 'Prima facie, the High Court order seems to be erroneous,' said a Bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria while hearing the appeal of the State government. On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the State government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. At the outset, the Bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the State government, and said, 'This is surprising. How can the High Court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function." The State had prepared the new list after the High Court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.
India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
JNU Vice Chancellor skips central universities meet, ministry seeks explanation
The Ministry of Education has sought a formal explanation from Jawaharlal Nehru University Vice-Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit for her absence from a high-level conference of Central University to government sources, the absence was recorded without prior approval, a move considered unusual for such a key national two-day conference was held in Kevadia, Gujarat, from July 10 to 11, and was part of a series of events marking five years of the National Education Policy (NEP) TAKES SERIOUS VIEW Sources noted that Pandit had not obtained formal clearance from the ministry to miss the conference, which was attended by other Vice-Chancellors and senior education officials."Her absence was viewed seriously. In such circumstances, Vice-Chancellors are required to take prior approval. There was a conference at JNU coinciding with the Vice-Chancellors' conference. But it should have been kept in mind that the invite for this conference was extended much in advance," a source it was pointed out that JNU was hosting another conference at the same time, the ministry believes this should not have conflicted with the NEP event, particularly as the invitation for the Kevadia conference had been extended well in OF THE CONFERENCEThe conference focused on the review of institutional progress under the NEP 2020 and allowed heads of Central Universities to discuss future academic and administrative was also intended to promote a unified approach to implementing the policy's goals, such as curriculum redesign, digital learning, research collaborations, and internationalisation of Indian higher Ministry of Education has not yet disclosed any disciplinary measures but has officially asked Pandit for a of now, there has been no public statement from the JNU Vice-Chancellor responding to the ministry's notice.(With inputs from PTI)- Ends
