logo
Dark energy discovery changed understanding of universe: Nobel laureate

Dark energy discovery changed understanding of universe: Nobel laureate

Dark matter pulls the universe and dark energy pushes, both mysteries that endure. And the discovery that a majority of the universe is made up of stuff that makes gravity push rather than pull was a gamechanger, says Nobel laureate Brian Schmidt.
The US-born Australian astronomer along with Adam Riess and Saul Perlmutter from the US discovered the stuff, later termed dark energy, in 1998. The three won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2011.
Explaining the significance of their discovery that changed the understanding of how the universe functions, Schmidt told PTI, "Dark energy is really saying (that) there is energy tied to space itself.
If we didn't have dark energy, the universe would be curved and the universe wouldn't accelerate -- and that changes how cosmic objects, such as galaxies, looks. It really makes a difference," the astronomer, who was visiting Ashoka University for the Lodha Genius Programme, added.
The term dark energy is intentionally similar to dark matter.
Dark matter refers to particles in the universe that hold galaxies and other structures in space (the cosmos) together. It is said to have peculiar properties, such as being invisible, as it does not interact with light.
However, while "dark matter and atoms (that make up ordinary matter) are pulling the universe, dark energy is pushing the universe. There's a balance at any given time of who's winning the war -- dark energy has won the war, it seems now and is pushing the universe apart", Schmidt explained.
That's because dark energy had a density set at the time of the Big Bang, said the 58-year-old former president of the Australian National University and currently a distinguished professor of astronomy.
The Big Bang, believed to have given birth to the universe, happened some 13.8 billion years ago. Dark matter is among the particles formed immediately after the event, gravity exerted from which is said to produce a slowing effect on the universe's evolution.
"And (dark energy) stayed at that density. But as the universe expanded, and the density of atoms and dark matter dropped over time, the two crossed about 6.5 billion years back -- and that crossing meant the dark energy could take over and accelerate the universe," Schmidt said.
Work on the discovery that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and that dark energy is the driving force began in 1994.
Schmidt and colleagues intended to look at distant objects and measure how fast the universe was expanding in the past, and then look at nearer objects to see how it slowed down over time.
"And if we measured the universe slowing down really quickly, then we'd know that the universe was heavy and you're gonna get a Gnab Gib -- the Big Bang in reverse. But if the universe was slowing down slowly, then we'd know the universe is light and it's gonna exist forever. So that's what we were going to do." Three and a half years later came the answer.
What we saw was the universe was expanding slower in the past and it sped up. So instead of slowing down, it's actually the other way -- it's speeding up," the Nobel laureate said.
In 1917, physicist Albert Einstein first imagined dark energy as a concept -- only he did not think of it in those exact words but instead accounted for it in his equations of general relativity as a 'lambda' term.
Einstein is said to have considered the lambda term irrelevant, even denouncing it as his greatest blunder.
"When we made our discovery of the acceleration (of the universe), it was the only sensible way of making it happen. So that thing (the lambda term), that he (Einstein) brought in 1917 and then later discarded as being irrelevant, that seems to (be validated from) what we discovered," Schmidt continued.
"In 1998, cosmology was shaken at its foundations as two research teams presented their findings...," states the press release dated October 4, 2011, announcing the recipients for the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2011.
The 1998 model has since been scrutinised through experiments, mainly aimed at understanding the nature of dark energy -- is it constant or does it vary? "We put in some extra knobs in the model of 1998, where we allow dark energy to change over time. The models with the most recent data seem to prefer a dark energy that changes," Schmidt said.
But he is sceptical.
"I'm not saying they're wrong. I'm saying I need better data to be convinced they're right. He said he is also glad that someone else is working on it.
Schmidt leads the 'SkyMapper Telescope Project' for which he conducted a survey of the southern sky as seen from Australia, focussed on looking at the "oldest, first stars in the galaxy".
"We could see essentially what the chemistry of the universe was back really close to the Big Bang -- because if a star was formed right after the Big Bang, it's made up of the stuff that was in the universe at the time.
"And so, we found the most chemically pure stars that have ever been discovered, ones that were almost certainly not formed from the remnants of the Big Bang, but from a single exploding star after the Big Bang. That just gives us a sense of what the first stars look like," said Schmidt, who has published his findings in several journals, including Nature.
Schmidt, who addressed high schoolers and others on science as a potential career at the university, advised them to get the skills that seem useful for life by working on something that interests them.
Not knowing what to do in life and the fact that he enjoyed astronomy made Schmidt pursue the field.
"In learning astronomy, I'd learned math, I'd learned physics, I'd learned computing, I'd learned some engineering. And (while) I didn't think it was likely that I would get a job to be an astronomer, I knew math, engineering, physics, and computing liable to give me a good job doing something. And of course, I did end up being an astronomer," he said.
"You don't really know how all of this is going to come together in your life, but if you work on something you're interested in, with a set of skills that seem useful for life, then don't overthink your life, don't overplan your life," Schmidt said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big Bang Boom Solutions on a mission to build India's future combat systems
Big Bang Boom Solutions on a mission to build India's future combat systems

New Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Big Bang Boom Solutions on a mission to build India's future combat systems

What inspired the creation of Big Bang Boom Solutions? While BBBS was officially founded in 2018, the seed for it was planted decades earlier. I grew up deeply fascinated by the Indian Armed Forces, always wondering how I could contribute meaningfully. During my bachelor's degree in computer science, I became deeply drawn to applied research. That led me to pursue a master's degree and PhD in nanoscience and nanotechnology, working on everything from brain-computer interfaces and magnetic storage devices to nano-polymers and targeted drug delivery. Multiple post-doctoral fellowships in India and abroad followed until the entrepreneurial bug bit. Praveen and I met in university and went on to start our first venture, an edtech startup focused on revolutionising academic R&D. While it was commercially successful and even went public, I realised academia often prioritised patents over real-world impact. I wanted to solve problems that directly saved lives, and defence felt like the natural next step. In 2018, we founded BBBS with a clear mission: to frugally develop deep tech for the defence sector. Our first focus area was autonomous drones and anti-drone technologies, a field we believed would explode in importance over the coming years. How did you arrive at the name 'Big Bang Boom'? We wanted a name that reflected our ambition and stood out. The 'Big Bang' represents disruptive innovation, while 'Boom' nods to the defence sector and impact. It aligns with our core focus on three verticals: electronic warfare, AI & autonomous systems, and materials science & nanotechnology. Defence is traditionally a tough sector with high entry barriers, but we were determined to make a big bang both metaphorically and literally with innovation that leaves a lasting impact. You're building unmanned tanks with an information bus. How does that work? Think of the information bus as the tank's digital nervous system. It's a high-speed data backbone that links all the critical subsystems — sensors, weapons, navigation, communications, and power management. This architecture allows the tank to function not just as a remote-controlled machine but as an intelligent, networked combat platform. It enables real-time sync with drones, infantry units, and command centres — leading to faster, smarter decision-making on the battlefield.

How did Indian universities fare on the QS ranking list?
How did Indian universities fare on the QS ranking list?

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

How did Indian universities fare on the QS ranking list?

The story so far: For the first time, in the international ranking of universities published by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), a company specialising in higher education analysis based in the U.K., Indian universities have more than 50 spots in the top 1,500. The highest rank among Indian universities goes to IIT Delhi (Rank 123), closely followed by IIT Bombay, IIT Madras, IIT Kharagpur and IISc Bengaluru. This number has increased from 11 in 2015 to 54 in 2026, with eight universities, including Ashoka University in Haryana and Shiv Nadar Institute of Eminence in Greater Noida, getting featured for the first time. What are the parameters? The 2026 ranking is based on a whole range of parameters which include the learning environment on campus, academic reputation (30%), impactful research (citations for research papers count for 20%, and international research network 5%), diversity (student diversity, international faculty and students count for 10%), student outcomes (employer reputation counts for 15%, while student placements 5%) and campus sustainability (5%). Has higher education improved? These rankings reflect how Indian universities are increasingly adapting to the norms followed by universities worldwide, and are thus becoming comparable to international universities. For instance, the average undergraduate student to faculty ratio in Indian universities is 19. In order to be internationally competitive, this number needs to be between 10-15. At Ashoka University, for instance, over the last year for about 3,000 undergraduates, the ratio was 11.5. These undergraduates come from 20 countries, which enhances the score for international diversity. Most universities in India have few international students, and most public universities cannot employ international faculty, which results in low scores in these categories. Moreover, over the last few decades, Indian universities have not put much emphasis on original research carried out by faculty and students. For STEM subjects especially, the research is traditionally done in research institutes. This is in sharp contrast to global practices, as universities are the primary institutions where creation of knowledge takes place, in addition to its transmission to students, worldwide. However, this is now changing. More and more universities, particularly IITs/IISERs and new private sector universities, are paying particular attention to research. With the advent of the National Education Plan, 2020 (NEP), which emphasises on research in universities, more and more Indian institutions will take their place on international ranking lists. Public universities used to pay very little attention to the employment opportunities of students, but professional institutes such as the IITs and IIMs have always had placement cells and employers' fairs. Now, even for large central universities, this is an important consideration. All this is crucial to international ranking lists such as the QS. How can universities fare better? As more and more universities begin to build research networks across the world, and hire quality faculty who can do research along with the necessary teaching of students, we will see the rise of Indian universities in these ranking lists. India needs to encourage international students and faculty to become part of its educational institutions and to closely work with industry in identifying potential employment destinations for students. Particular attention to environmental aspects and sustainability in campuses will also earn points for universities aspiring to be among the top educational institutions. Somak Raychaudhury is Vice-Chancellor and Professor of Physics, Ashoka University, Delhi-NCR. All opinions are personal.

No more insulin shots? This 3D-printed scientific leap could change diabetes treatment forever
No more insulin shots? This 3D-printed scientific leap could change diabetes treatment forever

Time of India

time12 hours ago

  • Time of India

No more insulin shots? This 3D-printed scientific leap could change diabetes treatment forever

In a medical breakthrough that could change the lives of millions, scientists have successfully developed 3D-printed pancreatic islets that may one day eliminate the need for daily insulin injections. The innovation, reported by Cosmos and led by an international research team, could revolutionize how Type 1 diabetes is treated, moving the conversation from lifelong insulin dependence to bioengineered self-regulation. Diabetes: A Global Health Challenge Currently, over 8.4 million people live with Type 1 diabetes, a number projected to more than double over the next two decades, according to studies published in The BMJ. In this autoimmune condition, the body's own immune system attacks pancreatic islets — the clusters of cells responsible for producing insulin. With this natural system disrupted, patients must rely on insulin therapy through injections or pumps to maintain glucose levels. However, this form of management is far from perfect. The constant monitoring, potential for user error, and long-term health complications make insulin therapy a cumbersome and often stressful burden. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo A Bioengineered Pancreas: Printed, Not Donated In a striking advance, researchers have used 3D bioprinting technology to create functional human pancreatic islets. These islets, developed using real human cells (not animal surrogates), were printed using a custom bioink designed to mimic the pancreas's natural extracellular matrix. This bioink, a mix of alginate (a carbohydrate found in brown algae) and cellular components from the pancreas, provides a scaffold that delivers nutrients and oxygen to keep the transplanted islets alive and functional. You Might Also Like: How a 14-year-old's medical treatment in 1922 revolutionized diabetes care and led to a historic four-way Nobel Prize split Dr. Quentin Perrier, the lead researcher from Wake Forest University's Institute for Regenerative Medicine, emphasized the significance of the work in an interview with Cosmos: 'This is one of the first studies to use real human islets instead of animal cells in bioprinting, and the results are incredibly promising. It means we're getting closer to creating an off-the-shelf treatment for diabetes that could one day eliminate the need for insulin injections." In a striking advance, researchers have used 3D bioprinting technology to create functional human pancreatic islets. (Image: Cosmos) How It Works? Unlike traditional islet transplants — which are expensive, donor-limited, and prone to rejection — these 3D-printed islets are designed for better integration into the body. Implanted under the skin, the new islets respond to glucose fluctuations and begin producing insulin in real time, offering a more natural and automated regulation process. Early tests revealed that the printed islets remained viable and fully functional for at least three weeks, a major improvement over past transplantation methods that often fail due to tissue damage and immune response. 'Our goal was to recreate the natural environment of the pancreas so that the transplanted cells would survive and function better,' Dr. Perrier explained. 'We used a special bioink that mimics the support structure of the pancreas, giving islets the oxygen and nutrients they need to survive.' You Might Also Like: Woman with diabetes says goodbye to insulin after one treatment. But why can't every diabetic do it? A Promising Future While the science is groundbreaking, the treatment is still in its early stages. The bioprinted islets must undergo clinical trials before becoming a viable option for patients. But for millions managing diabetes daily, this development signals a hopeful future. As the technology matures, 3D-printed cell therapies may redefine how we treat not only diabetes but a range of chronic diseases. Until then, the medical community — and diabetic patients around the world — are watching closely. This isn't just about better treatment. It's about restoring a sense of normalcy, independence, and quality of life. And for many, that's worth more than any cure. You Might Also Like: IITian-nutrionist warns: Your morning bed tea habit could be making you fat and insulin resistant

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store