Germany's Merz blames migration for 'imported' rising anti-Semitism
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said migration is a significant factor behind the rise of anti-Semitism in Germany, calling it a "terrible challenge" for the country.
"We have a sort of imported anti-Semitism with the big numbers of migrants we have within the last 10 years," Merz said late on Thursday in an interview with US broadcaster Fox News.
The phrase "imported anti-Semitism" has stirred controversy in Germany. It suggests that anti-Semitism is mainly a result of immigration, a view often echoed in right-wing circles.
Critics say the term unfairly targets Muslims and migrants, while downplaying anti-Semitism within broader German society.
Anti-Semitic incidents in Germany surged sharply in 2024, according to figures published by a monitoring organization on Wednesday.
The report from the Federal Association of Departments for Research and Information on Antisemitism (RIAS) documented 8,627 anti-Semitic incidents — a 77% increase compared to the previous year.
Of these, 5,857 cases were classified as "anti-Semitism related to Israel" - meaning incidents in which Jews living in Germany are held responsible for the actions of the Israeli government, or where Israel's right to exist is disputed.
The figure was more than twice as many as recorded in 2023.
A total of 544 cases were attributed to right-wing extremist views, a record since RIAS began documenting cases nationwide in 2020.
"We are doing everything we can to bring these numbers down," Merz said, adding that Germany was prosecuting those who break the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jesse Watters' New Nickname For Zohran Mamdani Makes Him Sound Ridiculously Cool
Fox News host Jesse Watters has unveiled a new nickname for New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani — and people can't help but notice it makes him sound really, really cool. Over the past few days, the commentator has referred to the progressive rising star as 'Zohran the Destroyer,' or simply 'the destroyer,' multiple times. In a viral screenshot from Thursday's episode of 'Jesse Watters Primetime,' a chyron reads, 'ZOHRAN THE DESTROYER WRECKS DEM PARTY.' The segment touched on angst from some Democrats over Mamdani threatening the status quo. The democratic socialist beat former New York Gov. and accused sexual harasser Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday in a stunning upset. 'What's Zohran the Destroyer got going for him?' Watters asked in a monologue that trashed Mamdani's policy proposals and mocked his supporters. He also called him a 'smooth-talking assassin.' On 'The Five' on Friday, Watters mused, 'Zohran the Destroyer is about to give Karl Marx a woke makeover, if Democrats can't stop him from becoming the next mayor of New York City.' On social media, people joked about how awesome the moniker made Mamdani sound. They're giving him cool nicknames now — pokey pup (@Whatapityonyou) June 27, 2025 Problem? — Austin MacNamara - Gremloe (@gremloe) June 28, 2025 omw to Join the Praetorian Guard of Zohran the Destroyer — Estrie⚢🔆 (@AdorableEstrie) June 28, 2025 I'm sorry @ZohranKMamdani, but I will only be referring to you by your full name from now on: Zohran The Destroyer. — Deliver The Food (@deliverthefred) June 27, 2025 They try to make him sound scary and just make him sound like a hero."Hither came Zohran, black-haired, bright-eyed, sword in hand, a reaver, a billionaire-slayer, with gigantic melancholies and gigantic mirth, to tread the jeweled thrones of the Earth under his sandaled feet." — Josiah Hawthorne (@JosiahHawthorne) June 27, 2025 Zohran Mamdani Stuns Andrew Cuomo In NYC Mayoral Primary Marjorie Taylor Greene And Tucker Carlson Offer Surprising Praise For Rising Dem Star Democrats Hope They Can Replicate Zohran Mamdani, Just Without The Socialism
Indianapolis Star
43 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's refusal to enforce TikTok ban is his most lawless presidential act
The first several months of Donald Trump's second presidential term have been marked by controversy and charges that he's a lawless president. However, the most brazen example of Trump's lawlessness is his refusal to enforce the TikTok ban, which has been passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court. On June 19, Trump extended the deadline for TikTok to shut down by another 90 days, marking the third time he has done so. The TikTok ban is the law of the land, and Trump's refusal to enforce it is a dereliction of his duties as president. Those who are silent on it should put aside their own personal motives and bring more attention to this fact. Many forget that a TikTok ban was originally Trump's idea, and that many Democrats wrote the idea off as just another piece of his anti-China agenda. However, things have changed. Trump seemingly developed a soft spot for TikTok because he believes it helped him win reelection. Still, in the time between Trump's original stance and his change of heart on the issue, a law banning TikTok passed the House and Senate and was signed in 2024 by then-President Joe Biden. The Supreme Court even upheld the ban, against the arguments of TikTok's lawyers. The law banning TikTok does have a provision that allows for the president to delay the deadline for TikTok to cease operations or agree to a sale. Still, the criteria allowing for such an extension are nowhere close to being fulfilled. Briggs: Jim Banks would let Trump commit any crime you can imagine The text of the ban allows for the president to extend the deadline a single time for 90 days, so long as TikTok is close to reaching a deal with an American company to sell. There is no indication that's the case, and Trump's arbitrary executive orders are flagrantly illegal. Even Trump's guise in refusing to enforce the law – the idea that he is attempting to give TikTok time to broker a deal − doesn't make sense. Nothing would be more compelling for TikTok to sell the app to an American company than the ban going into effect. An app that cannot run is useless to its owners, and their best course of action would be to sell. The president does not have discretion over which laws he would like to enforce and which he would like to ignore. Trump's decision to arbitrarily extend TikTok's lifespan does exactly that. The president, along with the rest of the executive branch, has an obligation to enforce the laws of the nation that have been passed by Congress and signed into law. A president's job is to enforce the law, whereas Congress' job is to decide what the law is. When a president can choose which laws he is to enforce, he is deciding what the law is, in a sense. Hicks: The middle class isn't disappearing. It's just spending money differently That's why Trump's refusal to enforce the ban is his most lawless action as president. Sure, there's the constitutionality of his deportation schemes and his reinterpretation of birthright citizenship, but those instances had judicial checks. In no other area is Trump as actively derelict in his duties as president without repercussions as he is in relation to the TikTok ban. For all the talk about Trump being a lawless president, Democrats and Republicans have both been relatively quiet about this single worst example of Trump acting as such. Republicans should be wary about the next administration of Democrats that comes along refusing to enforce a certain law because they disagree with it, or they simply don't feel like it. If Democrats were the ones refusing to enforce the ban on TikTok, it would be the only thing Republicans talked about. I'm sure that the outrage would be far louder if Trump were refusing to enforce other statutes, such as parts of the National Firearms Act, the tax code, or any other number of statutes that Democrats are sympathetic to. However, because it concerns a popular social media platform remaining in service, the complaints are rather quiet. Refusal to enforce laws is not a path Americans want our presidents to travel. That slippery slope can take us to some very dangerous places.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Leaders React to Report Gaza Food Aid Seekers Being Shot by IDF Soldiers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Political and aid leaders are reacting to a report by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz in which several Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers and officers said they were ordered to deliberately fire on Palestinians at aid distribution sites in Gaza. One soldier reportedly described the scene as a "killing field" adding, "Our form of communication is gunfire." Israel's leadership has rejected the report with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz saying the article includes "malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the world." Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. State Department and the IDF for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters The ongoing Israel-Gaza war has led to mass destruction, death, and famine in the enclave for 20 months. At least 1.9 million people—about 90 percent of the population in Gaza—have been internally displaced by Israeli bombardments, according to the United Nations. Israel's ground and air attacks have killed more than 55,300 Palestinians, per the Gaza Health Ministry. Last weekend, the U.S. joined Israel in its war against Iran by bombing three nuclear sites. The U.S., Israel's top diplomatic and financial ally, provides more than $3.8 billion in annual military aid, with an additional $17.8 billion authorized since Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed around 1,200 people and took 250 as hostages. In late-May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli and U.S.-backed group, began distributing aid in the enclave that the World Food Programme warns is on the brink of famine. The group has received international criticism from various aid groups and leaders over its approach to distribution, which has resulted in hundreds of Gazans killed while waiting for aid. Israel controls the flow of aid into Gaza. Palestinians line up to receive a hot meal at a food distribution point in Gaza City on June 27, 2025. Palestinians line up to receive a hot meal at a food distribution point in Gaza City on June 27, 2025. BASHAR TALEB/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The Israeli newspaper's graphic report relied on several IDF soldiers and officers, who remained anonymous for security reasons. The report opens with the sentence: "Israeli soldiers in Gaza told Haaretz that the army has deliberately fired at Palestinians near aid distribution sites over the past month." The report found that commanders allegedly ordered soldiers to fire on crowds of Gazans awaiting food aid to drive them away or disperse them, even though they posed no threat. Between 400 and 550 people have been killed and thousands wounded near aid centers and in areas where residents are waiting for food trucks since late May, according to the Health Ministry in Gaza and the U.N. There are currently four GHF food distribution sites in Gaza, three in the south and one in the center, with limited time frames for aid collection, often leading Gazans to line up early. An IDF soldier reportedly told Haaretz, "It's a killing field." The soldier continued, "Where I was stationed, between one and five people were killed every day. They're treated like a hostile force – no crowd-control measures, no tear gas – just live fire with everything imaginable: heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, mortars. Then, once the center opens, the shooting stops, and they know they can approach. Our form of communication is gunfire." The soldier added that "there's no danger to the forces," and noted that the individual is "not aware of a single instance of return fire. There's no enemy, no weapons." Last year, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza amid Israel's war with Hamas. The report comes a day after the European Council called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, unconditional release of all hostages, and a permanent end to all hostilities. Palestinians gather at an aid distribution point set up by the privately-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), near the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on June 25, 2025. Palestinians gather at an aid distribution point set up by the privately-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), near the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on June 25, 2025. EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a joint statement Friday: "The State of Israel absolutely rejects the contemptible blood libels that have been published in the Ha'aretz newspaper, according to which 'IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid.' These are malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the soldiers of the IDF receive clear orders to avoid harming innocents – and operate accordingly..." United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres told reporters on Friday that the GHF is "inherently unsafe," and "it is killing people." He added: "People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence." A GHF spokesperson told Reuters on Friday: "It is unfortunate the U.N. continue to push false information regarding our operations. Bottom line, our aid is getting securely delivered. Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome the UN and other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza." Doctors Without Borders, also known as Medicins Sans Frontiers (MSF) said in a Friday statement: "The Israeli-US food distribution scheme in Gaza that was launched one month ago is forcing Palestinians to choose between starvation or risking their lives for minuscule amounts of system is a slaughter masquerading as humanitarian aid, and it must be immediately dismantled. Aid must not be controlled by a warring party to further its military objectives." The European Council said in a Thursday statement: "It deplores the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the unacceptable number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation. The European Council calls on Israel to fully lift its blockade on Gaza, to allow immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale into and throughout Gaza and to enable the U.N. and its agencies, and humanitarian organizations, to work independently and impartially to save lives and reduce suffering." J Street, a nonprofit who identifies as "pro-Israel, pro-peace, pro-Democracy America," wrote in an X, formerly Twitter, post on Friday: "This is a deeply troubling report, and a painful read for all who care about Israel's moral standing and Jewish values. These incidents demand thorough and transparent IDF as well as independent investigations into potential war crimes." George Conway, an attorney and co-founder of the anti-Trump Republican group The Lincoln Project, wrote in an X post on Friday: "...a chilling report from Haaretz that everyone should read. Even if only a fraction of this (and some of the paper's previous detailed reporting on possible war crimes) is true, we should all be deeply saddened and sickened, as I am right now." Kenneth Roth, former Human Rights Watch executive director, wrote in an X post on Friday: "Israeli officers and soldiers report being 'ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near food distribution sites in Gaza, even when no threat was present.' Hundreds of Palestinians were killed. The military prosecution seeks review of possible war crimes." Piers Morgan, who hosts Piers Morgan Uncensored wrote in an X post on Saturday: "Then the Israel govt should let international journalists into Gaza to verify that the IDF is indeed utterly blameless and behaving in the most moral way of any army in history, as it keeps insisting. The ongoing ban suggests it doesn't want the world to know the truth." What Happens Next? The fate of GHF is unclear, as several international human rights and aid organizations have called for its end as a "privatized, militarized" form of aid delivery.
