How nearly ONE THIRD of a country's population have applied to get a visa in Australia because of an Albo program
Amost a third of citizens in the Pacific nation of Tuvalu are seeking a landmark visa in the context of climate change to live in Australia as rising seas threaten their palm-fringed shores, official figures show.
Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as 'the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world'.
More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian program – almost a third of the nation's population.
One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years, scientists fear.
Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves.
'Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region,' Australia's foreign affairs department said.
Australia and Tuvalu signed the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China 's expanding reach in the region.
Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu.
Already, there are signs the program will be hugely oversubscribed.
Official data on the program shows 3,125 Tuvaluans entered the random ballot within four days of it opening last week.
'This is the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen,' a spokesperson for Australia's foreign affairs department said.
Tuvalu is home to 10,643 people, according to census figures collected in 2022.
Registration costs A$25 ($16), with the ballot closing on 18 July.
The visa program has been hailed as a landmark response to the looming challenge of climate-forced migration.
'At the same time, it will provide Tuvaluans the choice to live, study and work in Australia,' Australia's foreign affairs department said.
But it has also fanned fears that nations like Tuvalu could be rapidly drained of skilled professionals and young talent.
University of Sydney geographer John Connell warned that a long-term exodus of workers could imperil Tuvalu's future.
'Small states do not have many jobs and some activities don't need that many people,' he said.
'Atolls don't offer much of a future: agriculture is hard, fisheries offer wonderful potential but it doesn't generate employment.'
The Falepili pact commits Australia to defending Tuvalu in the face of natural disasters, health pandemics and 'military aggression'.
'For the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to come to the aid of Tuvalu, upon request, when Tuvalu encounters a major natural disaster, a health pandemic or military aggression,' Tuvalu's prime minister, Feleti Teo, said at the time.
'Again, for the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to recognise the future statehood and sovereignty of Tuvalu despite the detrimental impact of climate changed-induced sea level rise.'
The agreement also offers Australia a say in any other defence pacts Tuvalu signs with other countries, raising concerns at the time that the Pacific nation was handing over its sovereignty.
Tuvalu is one of just 12 states that still have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing.
Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said last year that his country shared a vision for a 'peaceful, stable, prosperous and unified region'.
'It shows our Pacific partners that they can rely on Australia as a trusted and genuine partner.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
In Pictures: Glastonbury fans beat the heat as Kneecap and Kaiser Chiefs perform
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Thames Water court case shows there are alternatives to massive infrastructure
Britain is running out of water, we are told. Soon there will be curfews, banning people from turning on their taps, as happens in Italy. Standpipes will sprout on the side of parched roads where trees once stood. Rivers will run dry and rural communities will begin digging wells in response to a water apocalypse destined to arrive courtesy of the ravaging effect of climate change. The water companies argue that major investment is needed to cope with the changing weather patterns, with those funds primarily channelled into building massive new infrastructure. They are happy to carry out the work, as long as payment is charged directly to customers. It is what we might call the HS2 fallacy. Except that rather than build a high-speed line to increase the rail capacity between London and Birmingham when other much less sexy options were available at much lower cost, we find ourselves agreeing to construct reservoirs as tall as high-rise buildings. Importantly, the assets boost the balance sheets of privatised water companies, because while billpayers will have funded the projects, the shareholders will own the new infrastructure. Last week a group of experts took Thames Water to court to try to persuade a judge that an alternative to one reservoir, near Abingdon in Oxfordshire, is not only possible but presents a much more sustainable and cheaper option for customers, and that this needs to be tested in a public inquiry. At the heart of the argument is a dispute about how to manage Britain's water resources, with campaigners urging a move away from grands projets to something more humdrum, allowing for the money to be spent instead on cleaning up rivers polluted in the first place by Thames Water et al. However, what Thames and its consultant friends appear to want, like so many in the infrastructure game, is an edifice you can see from space. Nine new reservoirs are at the heart of this plan and some will have walls to hold in the water that are the height of the average house. The reservoir destined to replace farmers' fields near Abingdon will have walls 25 metres high. They are destined for the south and east of England, where population numbers are increasing and dry summers scorch the earth. Politicians have backed the plans, and it is easy to see why. Britain has failed to build reservoirs over the last 40 years, and who doesn't like a nice lake to look at? Reservoirs are cheap and easy to build when they are situated in a valley and the river that runs through it is capped at one end. The ground should be impermeable, which usually means clay sits under the water. Unfortunately at Abingdon there is what can only be described as a puddle of clay, which is why the reservoir must sit on top, with skyscraper walls all around. A reservoir planned for Lincolnshire will likewise have 13-metre walls because the clay layer there is so thin. Much of the south is dominated by chalk and gravel, so is unsuitable for reservoirs. Land that has clay that has already been built on – London, for example. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion What the south boasts is chalk and underground aquifers. The anti-reservoir campaigners say this aquifer water, and that of the slow-moving lower reaches of rivers that feed the Thames, such as the Lea, can be extracted with no environmental harm. The problem for CPRE, formerly the Council for the Protection of Rural England, and the campaign group Saferwaters, which are backing the campaign, is that Thames Water is working with the grain of people's emotions. Reservoirs good, aquifers and river extraction bad. Climate change, though, means wetter winters and drier summers. So aquifers fill up in the winter and suffer little evaporation in the summer, while reservoirs suffer huge losses during hot days, especially when the new ones must pump water uphill from nearby rivers, are relatively shallow and with a large surface area. Thames Water relies on forecasts that show 2 million more people will live in London and the south-east by 2050, and when taking into account the depletion of other water sources from climate change, it will need to find an extra 1bn litres of water every day. The Environment Agency's figures, though, show a steep decline in water use, much of that related to the switch from water-hungry oil, gas and coal power stations to renewables such as solar power. Again, we might have an attachment to old-fashioned ways of generating energy, but renewables have many benefits, including water use. Another arrow in the campaigners' quiver relates to leakages. Why, they ask, is Thames being asked to cut its leakage rate by 50% to 11.4% by 2050 when water suppliers in Germany have already cut the rate to about 7%? Reservoirs let Thames off the hook. The company should be spending money plugging leaks amd preventing sewage spewing into rivers. Instead, it is asked to embark on projects paid for by customers that boost its asset base. What's not to like, from the water company's point of view? The government should be more sceptical. There is a price to be paid and voters will not be kind when higher bills fall through their letterbox.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
EU plans to add carbon credits to new climate goal, document shows
BRUSSELS, June 28 (Reuters) - The European Commission is set to propose counting carbon credits bought from other countries towards the European Union's 2040 climate target, a Commission document seen by Reuters showed. The Commission is due to propose a legally binding EU climate target for 2040 on July 2. The EU executive had initially planned a 90% net emissions cut, against 1990 levels, but in recent months has sought to make this goal more flexible, in response to pushback from governments including Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic, concerned about the cost. An internal Commission summary of the upcoming proposal, seen by Reuters, said the EU would be able to use "high-quality international credits" from a U.N.-backed carbon credits market to meet 3% of the emissions cuts towards the 2040 goal. The document said the credits would be phased in from 2036, and that additional EU legislation would later set out the origin and quality criteria that the credits must meet, and details of how they would be purchased. The move would in effect ease the emissions cuts - and the investments required - from European industries needed to hit the 90% emissions-cutting target. For the share of the target met by credits, the EU would buy "credits" from projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad - for example, forest restoration in Brazil - rather than reducing emissions in Europe. Proponents say these credits are a crucial way to raise funds for CO2-cutting projects in developing nations. But recent scandals have shown some credit-generating projects did not deliver the climate benefits they claimed. The document said the Commission will add other flexibilities to the 90% target, as Brussels attempts to contain resistance from governments struggling to fund the green transition alongside priorities including defence, and industries who say ambitious environmental regulations hurt their competitiveness. These include integrating credits from projects that remove CO2 from the atmosphere into the EU's carbon market so that European industries can buy these credits to offset some of their own emissions, the document said. The draft would also give countries more flexibility on which sectors in their economy do the heavy lifting to meet the 2040 goal, "to support the achievement of targets in a cost-effective way". A Commission spokesperson declined to comment on the upcoming proposal, which could still change before it is published next week. EU countries and the European Parliament must negotiate the final target and could amend what the Commission proposes.
