Chinook 1994 helicopter crash families criticise MoD for ‘losing moral compass'
RAF Chinook ZD576 crashed on the Mull of Kintyre on its way from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to Fort George in Scotland, and all 25 passengers and four crew members were killed in the incident.
A verdict of gross negligence against the pilots, flight lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, from a review into the incident by two senior RAF officers in 1995 was overturned by the Government in 2011 after a 16-year campaign by the families.
Relatives have now written to the Prime Minister to intervene and are seeking a judicial review in the High Court.
Chris Cook, whose brother Richard was one of the pilots killed in the disaster, said: 'In the BBC documentary that was shown early last year, what came to light was that the official documents to do with the accident have been sealed for 100 years by the Ministry of Defence.
'We weren't aware of that. There was news to me when I watched the programme.
'And so it seems rather suspicious to us that the documents are going to be locked away for such a long time.'
He added: 'We campaigned for 16 years to clear the pilots' names and so many times we were given indications that information didn't exist.
'Based on the experience we had in our campaign, they wanted us to go away – simple as that.
'But my late father always said justice has no expiry dates.
'Sadly, he passed away before we cleared Rick's name.
'He never got to see that, he died six years beforehand.
'But those words mean an awful lot, it means don't give up.
'You know if you think that an injustice is being done, you keep fighting for it.'
Mr Cook says there are 47 individuals that lost their fathers in the crash, most of whom were children and some not yet born, who have lived their whole lives without answers.
Jenni Balmer Hornby, daughter of Anthony Hornby who was killed in the disaster, said: 'It was a week before my 10th birthday when the crash happened and so obviously I wasn't old enough to go to any of the earlier inquiries, but my mum went to those.
'For some time she felt that it was an accident because of these inquiries.
'But now we know that the full information wasn't given, so we know over time that these inquiries were completely ineffective.
'I think it's very clear to myself and everyone in the campaign that the MoD have lost their moral compass – I'm so certain now that the MoD is hiding something.
'I can't go another 31 years not knowing what happened to my father.
'Him and his colleagues risk their life for their country and in return, we have just been dismissed and fed lies for three decades and we all deserve a lot better.'
Andy Tobias, who was just eight when his father John Tobias went on board RAF Chinook ZD576, has branded the response from the MoD as a 'betrayal'.
He said: '(It's been) really tough.
'My brother and myself have not had a father, he's not been around to direct us through the challenges that you face in life.
'You never get over it but you learn to live with it.
'For us, the MoD have really let us down as families.
'It's been a complete betrayal to all of those men who boarded that flight and gave their life and service.
'If my father knew that his family were fighting so hard to get answers and to get the truth, he would be turning in his grave.
Sue Sparks, whose husband Gary was killed in the crash, said: 'I think it would give us closure.
'Over the 30 years, we were led to believe it was an accident, which it wasn't.
'It could have been prevented.
'The helicopter was declared unairworthy and they were made to fly in it.
'It makes us feel angry and not treated properly by the MoD.
'As a war widow, I feel very, very let down by the Government and the MoD.'
The MoD has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taxpayer could face £1bn compensation bill for Afghan leak victims
Afghans secretly relocated to the UK after a data breach are suing the Government in a compensation case that threatens to cost taxpayers almost £1 billion. A vast data breach involving the details of 18,800 soldiers, along with about 6,000 of their family members, was revealed on Tuesday after a superinjunction was lifted by the High Court, allowing The Telegraph and other national newspapers to expose the scandal. It can now be revealed that a law firm is suing the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on behalf of at least 1,000 Afghans who claim they were affected by the breach. Manchester-based Barings Law hopes to claim £50,000 from the MoD for each individual involved in the breach, sources have said. If all 18,800 soldiers make a successful claim, the compensation bill could be as high as £940 million. That sum could grow if any of the Afghan soldiers' family members join the legal claim, taking it towards £1 billion in total. Hidden from the public The breach occurred in February 2022, when a Royal Marine emailed a group of Afghans, accidentally including a spreadsheet containing the identities of nearly 25,000 Afghans – soldiers who had worked with the British Army, as well as their family members – who were applying for asylum. The leak came to light in 2023, when an anonymous Facebook user posted extracts of the data on the social media site. MoD officials contacted Meta, the company that owns Facebook, and the posts were deleted within three days. However, the Government decided it had no choice but to offer asylum to the Afghans affected because the leak had left them at risk of reprisal attacks from the Taliban. The breach has only just come to public attention after an unprecedented superinjunction was lifted by the High Court. Adnan Malik, head of data protection at Barings Law, said: 'This is an incredibly serious data breach, which the Ministry of Defence has repeatedly tried to hide from the British public. 'It involved the loss of personal and identifying information about Afghan nationals who have helped British forces to defeat terrorism and support security and stability in the region. 'Through its careless handling of such sensitive information, the Ministry of Defence has put multiple lives at risk, damaged its own reputation, and put the success of future operations in jeopardy by eroding trust in its data security measures.' To date, the leak is understood to have cost £400 million to relocate victims of the leak. A further £850 million has been set aside to complete the resettlement of those affected, but it is not believed that this includes any potential compensation costs. The MoD was fined £350,000 for a very similar – but separate – data breach in 2023 that came to public light. The details of 265 Afghans were accidentally leaked two years before, in 2021, after an email was sent copying in a list of addresses in the 'to' field of the message rather than the 'bcc' field, which hides other recipients. Regulators from the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) handed down the penalty in December 2023. Court papers seen by The Telegraph indicate that the ICO was made aware of the far larger Afghan data breach in 2023, but were sworn to secrecy.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
MoD could face ‘substantial' compensation claims over data breach, lawyer says
The Government could face 'strong claims for substantial compensation' from those affected by a massive data breach of the personal information of Afghans who supported British forces, a lawyer has said. Sean Humber, a specialist data breach lawyer at law firm Leigh Day, who acts for Afghan citizens affected by previous data breaches of their personal data by the Ministry of Defence (MoD), said the department 'seems institutionally incapable of keeping information secure'. It follows an unprecedented superinjunction being lifted on Tuesday, which had prevented the media from reporting that a dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024, which is understood to have cost around £400 million so far and could cost up to £850 million once completed. The Government originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses. Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients. Following the superinjunction being lifted, Mr Humber said that those affected could sue the Government over the 'inevitable anxiety, fear and distress' caused by the breach. He said: 'Given the extreme sensitivity of the information and the numbers affected, plus the vulnerability of those affected due to the dangers they already face from the Taliban, this data breach can only be described as catastrophic. 'Those affected are likely to have strong claims for substantial compensation against the Government for failing to keep the information secure and for inevitable anxiety, fear and distress this has then caused. 'Unfortunately, this is just the latest in a long line of data breaches by the MoD of personal data of Afghan citizens who had previously worked with UK armed forces. 'Frankly, the MoD seems institutionally incapable of keeping information secure. 'There is now an urgent need for a thorough and independent review of the MoD's whole data-processing policies and practices in order to try and prevent yet further breaches. 'We have already been approached by Afghan citizens who had applied, with their families, for relocation to the UK under the Arap scheme and who are now extremely concerned to find that their personal information may have been disclosed without their knowledge or consent. 'They are particularly concerned at the risks posed by their personal information now being in the hands of the Taliban, who continue to imprison, torture and kill those suspected of previously assisting international forces, as well as the risks of fraud and identity theft.' The superinjunction prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest-ranging of its kind. Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a ruling on Tuesday that he was lifting the order following a review conducted by a retired civil servant for the Ministry of Defence. He said that this review concluded that the Taliban 'likely already possess the key information in the dataset' and that it was 'unlikely that individuals would be targeted simply because of their work for the UK'. He continued that one of the 'many remarkable features' of the case was that there had been no mention of the data breach while the superinjunction was in force, which he said was 'very much to the credit of the media organisations and individual journalists involved'. Defence Secretary John Healey offered a 'sincere apology' for the breach in the Commons on Tuesday, and said that the MoD has 'installed new software to securely share data'. Erin Alcock, a human rights lawyer at law firm Leigh Day, who has previously assisted hundreds of Arap applicants and family members, said that there had been 'rumours circulating of an incident of this kind for some time'. She said: 'The news today is extremely concerning. 'We have been aware of rumours circulating of an incident of this kind for some time and have been concerned about any potential risks posed to our clients, particularly those remaining in Afghanistan. 'Sadly, this incident represents a catastrophic failure by the Government to protect the personal information, and therefore the safety, of what is an extremely vulnerable group of individuals. 'We will be urgently seeking clarification as to which of our many clients may have been affected and confirmation that all necessary precautions have and will be taken to mitigate any risk of harm to them.'
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
MoD could face ‘substantial' compensation claims over data breach, lawyer says
Sean Humber, a specialist data breach lawyer at law firm Leigh Day, who acts for Afghan citizens affected by previous data breaches of their personal data by the Ministry of Defence (MoD), said the department 'seems institutionally incapable of keeping information secure'. It follows an unprecedented superinjunction being lifted on Tuesday, which had prevented the media from reporting that a dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024, which is understood to have cost around £400 million so far and could cost up to £850 million once completed. The Government originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses. Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients. Following the superinjunction being lifted, Mr Humber said that those affected could sue the Government over the 'inevitable anxiety, fear and distress' caused by the breach. He said: 'Given the extreme sensitivity of the information and the numbers affected, plus the vulnerability of those affected due to the dangers they already face from the Taliban, this data breach can only be described as catastrophic. 'Those affected are likely to have strong claims for substantial compensation against the Government for failing to keep the information secure and for inevitable anxiety, fear and distress this has then caused. 'Unfortunately, this is just the latest in a long line of data breaches by the MoD of personal data of Afghan citizens who had previously worked with UK armed forces. 'Frankly, the MoD seems institutionally incapable of keeping information secure. 'There is now an urgent need for a thorough and independent review of the MoD's whole data-processing policies and practices in order to try and prevent yet further breaches. 'We have already been approached by Afghan citizens who had applied, with their families, for relocation to the UK under the Arap scheme and who are now extremely concerned to find that their personal information may have been disclosed without their knowledge or consent. 'They are particularly concerned at the risks posed by their personal information now being in the hands of the Taliban, who continue to imprison, torture and kill those suspected of previously assisting international forces, as well as the risks of fraud and identity theft.' The superinjunction prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest-ranging of its kind. Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a ruling on Tuesday that he was lifting the order following a review conducted by a retired civil servant for the Ministry of Defence. He said that this review concluded that the Taliban 'likely already possess the key information in the dataset' and that it was 'unlikely that individuals would be targeted simply because of their work for the UK'. He continued that one of the 'many remarkable features' of the case was that there had been no mention of the data breach while the superinjunction was in force, which he said was 'very much to the credit of the media organisations and individual journalists involved'. Defence Secretary John Healey offered a 'sincere apology' for the breach in the Commons on Tuesday, and said that the MoD has 'installed new software to securely share data'. Erin Alcock, a human rights lawyer at law firm Leigh Day, who has previously assisted hundreds of Arap applicants and family members, said that there had been 'rumours circulating of an incident of this kind for some time'. She said: 'The news today is extremely concerning. 'We have been aware of rumours circulating of an incident of this kind for some time and have been concerned about any potential risks posed to our clients, particularly those remaining in Afghanistan. 'Sadly, this incident represents a catastrophic failure by the Government to protect the personal information, and therefore the safety, of what is an extremely vulnerable group of individuals. 'We will be urgently seeking clarification as to which of our many clients may have been affected and confirmation that all necessary precautions have and will be taken to mitigate any risk of harm to them.'
