Row erupts as opposition councillors brand VE Day decorations ‘dismal'
A row has erupted about VE Day 80th displays in and around Bolton Town Hall which have been described by some opposition councillors as "abysmal".
Bolton Conservatives posted images of decorations and commemorations in the town centre to mark today's anniversary.
They show a poppy display which sweeps down the town hall steps and small Union flags which have been placed in flower beds and herbaceous borders.
The cam net poppy display outside Bolton Town Hall placed to mark the 80th anniversary of VE Day (Image: Supplied) But Labour and independent councillors defended the displays and criticised people trying to political point score as "the lowest of the low".
In a Facebook post, the Conservative group, said: 'Bolton Labour had planned nothing to mark the 80th Anniversary of VE Day and are now scrambling to put up these dismal displays.
'Do you think that Bolton deserves better?'
The Tories' new leader on Bolton Council, Cllr Nadim Muslim called the display "embarrassing".
Bolton Conservatives have branded the display around the town hall 'embarassing'
He said: 'A sad indictment of Bolton Labour. No care for Bolton, whatsoever, but they were more than happy to do a full event for the socialist International Workers' Day.'
Cllr Hilary Fairclough echoed those views.
She said: 'This 'show' is abysmal, and an insult to those who lived through the dreadful war years, many of whom didn't make it to see VE Day.'
However, Cllr Ryan Bamforth, an independent councillor representing Horwich North and Bolton Council's armed forces champion, has defended the displays and called those criticising them "disrespectful".
Cllr Bamforth, himself a veteran having served 20 years in the army, said: 'Let's remember, I and other veterans didn't fight and for some, die for this country for decorations, displays or gratitude.
'We served because it was the right thing to do.
'To attempt to use this occasion as a political boxing glove is nothing short of disrespectful, disgraceful and vile.
'We deserve better than what some are putting on display, politics is a vile environment at times, keep the armed forces out of it.
'Respect those that gave all for your freedoms, they didn't die for your political parties, they died for the freedom of the people, for the Victory in Europe and this week we should be celebrating that, nothing less, nothing more.'
Cllr Bamforth said he "loved the simplicity of the cam net with poppies" on display and the town hall.
He added: 'They are symbolic of war, sacrifice, peace and the freedoms we have today, but more importantly, they help us remember those that gave all.'
Council leader, Labour's Nick Peel, said: 'Politics has its place but for some people to slate our poppy display to score a point, is the lowest of the low.'
The closing event of the borough's celebrations will be a civic church service and beacon lighting at Bolton Parish Church at 7.30pm on Thursday, May 8.
Military standards will be on parade, the mayor of Bolton will lay a wreath on behalf of the people of Bolton, and Bolton Hoover Band will perform both wartime and military songs.
At 9.30pm, Bolton will join communities across the UK and the Commonwealth in lighting a beacon from the top of the church tower.
Attendance is free and free refreshments will be served in the church afterwards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Faces a Major Test With Welfare Overhaul Vote
Good morning. Keir Starmer faces a major test today. The EU is said to accept Donald Trump's 10% tariff, but wants exemptions. And the latest Jurassic reboot may have you wishing you were extinct. Listen to the day's top stories. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is girding for what could be the most consequential vote of his premiership, with Labour rebels warning that the government's welfare overhaul still risks defeat despite huge concessions to push it through parliament. Read about how the party's 'Starmtroopers' mounted a rebellion against their leader. The EU is willing to accept Donald Trump's 10% universal tariff, but wants lower rates for drugs, alcohol, chips and planes. The bloc is also pushing for quotas and exemptions to effectively lower Washington's 25% levy on automobiles and car parts as well as its 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, according to people familiar. Separately, European policymakers struck a new trade deal with Ukraine.
an hour ago
Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
LONDON -- British Prime Minister Keir Starmer marks a year in office this week, fighting a rebellion from his own party over welfare reform and reckoning with a sluggish economy and rock-bottom approval ratings. It's a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer's center-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government. In the last 12 months Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading U.S. President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on U.K. goods. But at home his agenda has run onto the rocks as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised. Inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer's personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy. John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said Starmer has had 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.' On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers. Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030. After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill, the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change. It pledged to consult with disability groups about the changes, and do more to help sick and disabled people find jobs. Some rebels said they would back the bill after the concessions, but others maintained their opposition. The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk. 'It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,' said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. 'I can't think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.' It also makes it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes. The government estimated the welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it's only likely to save about half that amount. The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers' rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system. But it has also raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular. In recent days Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told the Sunday Times that he was 'heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East' while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure,' he said. Starmer's struggles are all the more ignominious because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers. But British politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support – and some of Labour's – shifted in this year's local elections to Reform U.K., a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage. Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls, ahead of Labour and pushing the right-of-center Conservatives into third place. If the shift continues it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties. Starmer's key asset at the moment is time. He does not have to call an election until 2029. 'There's still plenty of time to turn things around,' Ford said. But he said the Labour lawmakers' rebellion 'will make things harder going forward, because it's not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he's going to have to make in government. 'Barring some magical unexpected economic boom … there's going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,' he said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
MPs to vote on welfare bill as unrest rumbles on
MPs will vote on the government's planned reforms to welfare later - with dozens of Labour MPs still planning to vote against them, despite concessions from ministers. The Conservatives have said they will oppose the plans as they are not "serious reforms". The rebellion's scale has ebbed and flowed. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have killed the proposals outright, an extraordinary threat of defeat for a government with a landslide majority. Now a replacement amendment, supported by disability charities, has attracted around 35 Labour MPs. It suggests that last-minute concessions may have reduced the potential for a government loss - but not comfortably. A number of MPs have expressed concerns about a promised review of personal independence payment (Pip) assessments, after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced on Monday that it would only report back around the same time that the proposed changes were introduced. Labour Chief Whip Sir Alan Campbell reportedly told a regular meeting of the parliamentary party last night that they should "act as a team" and government efforts at persuasion are expected to continue up until the vote itself, which is due this evening. Under the current government concessions people who currently receive Pip or the health element of universal credit will continue to do so. But future claimants will still be affected by the reforms. Chris Mason: Labour still has a big persuasion job ahead Welfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes? 'Disability welfare reforms could leave us worse off' The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, told the BBC her party would vote against the measures "The benefits bill is too high," she said. "It was 40bn just before Covid. It is now projected to be a 100bn by 2030. And what Labour is doing is not making any savings at all. It's just reducing the rate of increase. That's why we are not supporting it." Other criticism of the government proposals has been diverse, with some saying the reforms will not be as effective as the government hopes. "I strongly believe that these kind of punitive measures of cutting welfare are not going to have the outcomes that we've been told they will," said Olivia Blake, Labour MP for Sheffield Hallam, who is disabled and opposes the reforms. "I think it will just be about saving money but will actually move spending into areas such as housing services, the NHS and social care," she told BBC Newsnight. Blake added that some MPs were still considering their vote, saying the rebellion would be "more significant than maybe people realise". Kendall defended the bill in the House of Commons on Monday, saying it aligned with MPs' shared values around providing support to those that could work while protecting those that cannot. Modelling published by Department for Work and Pensions suggested around 150,000 people might be pushed into poverty by 2030 because of the welfare cuts - lower than the original 250,000 figure estimated before the government made the concessions. Sir Stephen Timms is slated to conduct the report that was among the concessions. He told BBC Newsnight that the net effect of the government's policies would reduce poverty - including the measures to help people into work. He also stressed the need to make Pip sustainable in the future. The Conservatives have criticised the cost of the bill while the Liberal Democrats have called for proposals to be suspended so they can be further looked at. The government had hoped to save £5bn a year by 2030 before the concessions. These are now likely to cost around £3bn, according to the Resolution Foundation think tank. What has been driving the rise in disability benefit claims? Labour MPs press Kendall on rollout of benefit changes Welfare U-turn means we are in 'better position', says Streeting
