US 'deeply concerned' over activists' treatment in Tanzania
NAIROBI: The United States expressed concern Saturday over the "mistreatment" of two east African activists in Tanzania, days after they were detained and reportedly tortured.
Prominent campaigners Boniface Mwangi of Kenya and Agather Atuhaire of Uganda travelled to Tanzania this week in solidarity with detained opposition leader Tundu Lissu ahead of his court hearing on charges of treason, which carries a potential death penalty.
But they themselves were detained before being deported and then found abandoned near the Tanzanian border.
Mwangi and rights groups allege that both were tortured while held "incommunicado" for days.
The US Bureau of African Affairs said on X it was "deeply concerned by reports of the mistreatment" of Atuhaire and Mwangi while in Tanzania.
"We call for an immediate and full investigation into the allegations of human rights abuses," it said, urging "all countries in the region to hold to account those responsible for violating human rights, including torture".
Atuhaire received in 2023 the EU Human Rights Defender Award for her work in Uganda and was honoured last year with the International Women of Courage Award by former US First Lady Jill Biden.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
축하드립니다! 임플란트 5월 할인 이벤트에 선정되셨습니다.
플란치과
더 알아보기
Undo
Mwangi is a longtime critic of the Kenyan government, frequently denouncing instances of alleged injustice and rights abuses.
Human rights groups say Tanzania and neighbouring Uganda have accelerated crackdowns on opponents and dissidents as they prepare for presidential elections in the next seven months.
But Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan has slammed what she called interference in the country's affairs and had urged security services "not to allow ill-mannered individuals from other countries to cross the line here".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's tariff deadline nears: Where US trade deals stand
With US President Donald Trump's August 1 tariff deadline approaching, the US has announced a series of trade deals. Originally rolled out in April, Trump's sweeping tariffs were twice postponed to allow time for negotiations. Now, with days left, pressure is mounting on nations to reach final agreements or face steep levies. 'The August First deadline is the August First deadline — it stands strong, and will not be extended,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Earlier in July, he'd described the date as 'firm, but not 100% firm.' But on July 9, two days before the original deadline, he signed an executive order pushing it to August 1. The initial plan included a blanket 10% tariff on nearly all imports and up to 50% for select countries. Formal warning letters were sent to over two dozen world leaders, with many tariffs echoing April's rates, but some were increased significantly. Here's where major US trade relationships stand: On July 30, Trump announced a deal with South Korea imposing a 15% tariff on its exports. In return, South Korea agreed to buy $100 billion in US energy products and invest $350 billion in US-controlled projects. These investments [are] 'owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as president,' Trump said, as per AP. A July 27 framework with the EU reduced a threatened 30% tariff to 15% on 70% of European exports, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and automobiles. The remaining 30% is still under discussion. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said both sides agreed to zero tariffs on certain 'strategic' goods. Trump cited $750 billion in European energy investments over three years, plus a nonbinding pledge of an additional $600 billion. On July 22, Japan agreed to a 15% tariff on its exports, down from a proposed 25%. Trump said Japan committed to investing $550 billion in the US and opening its market to American autos and rice. Japanese automakers, including Toyota and Honda, welcomed the relief after months of 25% tariffs on vehicles and parts. However, other nations fear it may give Japan a competitive edge. Following a July 22 meeting with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Trump announced a slight tariff cut to 19%, just below the earlier 20% threat. In exchange, US goods would face no tariffs in the Philippines. Marcos said his country was considering options , including a tariff-free regime for US cars, though full terms remain unclear. On July 15, Trump said tariffs on Indonesian goods would be lowered to 19%, while US exports would be largely duty-free. A White House fact sheet confirmed over 99% of US products would qualify. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said negotiations are ongoing to further reduce tariffs. Trump's July 2 deal with Vietnam allows US goods duty-free entry. Vietnamese exports will face a 20% tariff, down from a proposed 46%. Additionally, the US will impose a 40% 'transshipping' tax to block Chinese goods routed through Vietnam. A May 8 deal with the UK lowered US tariffs on British autos, steel, aluminum, and more, while the UK reduced duties on items like olive oil and wine. Implementation lagged until June, when Trump hiked global steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%. The UK was exempted from that hike but still faces a 25% tariff, making it the only country with partial relief. In May, the US and China agreed to reduce peak tariffs, 145% on Chinese goods and 125% on US goods, to 30% and 10%, respectively, during a 90-day truce. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said China pledged to ease restrictions on rare earth minerals vital to American manufacturing. China confirmed that the US would lift some 'restrictive measures.' On July 29, officials met in Stockholm to discuss extending the August 12 deadline for new tariffs. While extension plans were explored, no decision was announced. (With inputs from AP)
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
25% tariff a negotiation tool; India must use August talks wisely: Anurag Singh
"Ultimately, the 25% tariff — half of it could be absorbed by Indian exporters, and the rest by American importers. So, again, it's manageable. I see it as a conscious decision by the Indian government, and one we should be okay with," says Anurag Singh , Managing Partner, Ansid Capital. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Analytics Project Management Operations Management Others Product Management CXO Design Thinking others healthcare Management Healthcare Data Science Leadership Data Science Cybersecurity Finance Public Policy Technology MBA MCA Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Our top story today — Trump slapping a 25% tariff on India . This move has surprised not just India but the rest of the world as well. If there was any country that could have struck a better deal, it was India. With this announcement, do you think this is some sort of pressure tactic — a way for Trump to push India into negotiating a deal on his terms? Is this perhaps more temporary in nature? Anurag Singh: I'm a little surprised by the notion that India was in the best position to strike a deal. Every other major trading partner among the top 10 with the United States has already struck a deal — except India. So, it was inevitable that some kind of tariff was coming. Threats only work to a certain point. Once a deadline is set, if Trump had deferred even this one, it would have looked weak on his part. So, in that context, it's not a big deal. This is a choice India made. Yes, it is a pressure tactic, of course. If tomorrow India agrees to what the US administration wants — say, opening certain sectors — then the tariff could be reduced from 25% to 20%, even down to 15%, depending on what India is willing to offer. But the problem is, it's not very clear what India was actually willing to put on the table. We've heard about India's red lines — what it wouldn't accept — but not much about what it would concede. In that absence, this decision doesn't feel like a big loss. If this is the choice India made, that's fine. We should accept it and move on. Live Events Ultimately, the 25% tariff — half of it could be absorbed by Indian exporters, and the rest by American importers. So, again, it's manageable. I see it as a conscious decision by the Indian government, and one we should be okay with. As you've pointed out, it seems to be a conscious choice. But India and the US have been in talks for a long time, and we've heard that the next round of discussions is expected in August when a US delegation visits India. With the 25% tariff announcement coming yesterday, do you think this signals a breakdown in negotiations, or is it simply a negotiating tactic? Anurag Singh: No, there's no breakdown here. Let's understand this — most countries already face around 20% tariffs. So India getting hit with 25% isn't out of the ordinary. Look at countries like the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam — even the European Union. The EU accepted a 15% tariff after essentially opening its economy to near free trade with the US. So in comparison, if India got 25% and didn't have to open much more of its economy beyond what it's already importing, that's not a bad outcome. That said, when the US delegation visits, the focus will likely be on addressing the $40 billion trade deficit the US has with India. India exports about $85 billion worth of goods to the US and imports around $45 billion — leaving a gap of $40 billion. I'm sure the US administration will push for India to buy more to help bridge that gap. Likely suggestions will include buying more aircraft from Boeing or more energy products. But the latter might not work, as US energy prices may not be competitive for India. So realistically, buying more aircraft or defense equipment is what's likely. And that's not unreasonable — India does need both. So if those purchases help balance trade, it could be a win-win.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Politicized prosecution': US calls Bolsonaro's trial violation of human right; sanctions Brazilian judge De Moraes for overseeing trial
Alexandre de Moraes, US President Donald Trump (AP) Diplomatic wires between Brazil and United States have been tense as US imposed sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes on Wednesday,accusing him of a politically motivated trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. 'De Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions — including against former President Jair Bolsonaro,' said US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a statement, reported AP. The sanctions were announced under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, a measure aimed at punishing individuals involved in human rights abuses and corruption. The action includes freezing any assets or property de Moraes may hold in the US. De Moraes is presiding over the criminal case against former Brazilian President Bolsonaro, who is accused of attempting to remain in power despite his 2022 electoral loss to current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The move follows earlier US visa restrictions announced on July 18 targeting Brazilian judicial officials, including de Moraes. Wednesday's order described Brazil's domestic policies and Bolsonaro's prosecution as an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to US national security, foreign policy, and economy. Eduardo Bolsonaro, son of the former president and a prominent right-wing politician, celebrated the sanctions on social media platform X, calling them a 'historic milestone' and warning that 'abuses of authority now have global consequences.' Eduardo, who relocated to the US in March, is under investigation in Brazil for allegedly collaborating with US authorities to impose sanctions on Brazilian officials.
