logo
Can Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remove lawmakers who left the state?

Can Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remove lawmakers who left the state?

Yahoo12 hours ago
The Texas Legislature attempted to meet Monday to consider a redistricting plan that would favor Republicans, but Democratic members who left the state over the weekend did not return, denying the quorum needed to convene the session. Gov. Greg Abbott vowed to take steps to remove those lawmakers from their seats, and Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he had signed civil arrest warrants for the absent Democrats.
Republicans "can make idle threats, but as long as they are out of state, there's really nothing that they can do," said Mark Jones, a Rice University political science professor.
More than 50 Texas House Democrats left the state on Sunday, leaving the chamber short of the two-thirds quorum needed to bring a vote to the floor. Democrats are protesting the President Trump-led effort by Republicans to redraw the state's U.S. House congressional map, which could net the GOP up to five more seats.
"We are fighting for representative democracy, and whether or not that will continue, and so we're willing to face whatever consequences may come our way," Democratic state Rep. James Talarico told CBS News.
"This House will not sit quietly while you obstruct the work of the people," Burrows said Monday.
To assist Burrows, Abbott said Monday that he had ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to "locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans." But the Texas DPS does not have jurisdiction to arrest them out of state.
Rep. Ann Johnson, a Houston Democrat, told CBS News' Ed O'Keefe in an interview Monday that "a quorum break is written into the Texas Constitution," and "the threat of arrest is something that should be an alarm for a lot of folks."
Abbott claimed Monday on Fox News that the Democrats could face bribery charges if their costs while out of state are being covered by others.
"I think based upon comments made by legislators themselves, they face a possibility of facing bribery charges, which is a second-degree felony in the state of Texas, there's one way to cure that, and that is if they get back to the state of Texas and make quorum today at a hearing that we have at 3 o'clock, they can cure themselves of any quid pro quo that would subject them to potential bribery charges," Abbott said.
But Jones noted that "Texas, compared to other states, has very loose ethics laws."
"The governor is certainly welcome to make that argument, and theoretically it has a limited level of potential to move forward, but at the end of the day, if you look at Texas ethics law and look at all of the things that are allowed under Texas ethics law … we would rank receiving money to pay a fine at the lower end at the potential for an ethics violation, let alone things that are illegal," Jones said.
Abbott said Sunday that if members didn't return by 3 p.m. CT Monday, he'd "invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House."
Abbott was citing a 2021 opinion from Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, which was written after a previous walkout when Democratic lawmakers left the state to protest a change in the voting laws. The opinion, which is nonbinding, says a "district court may determine that a legislator has forfeited his or her office due to abandonment and can remove the legislator from office, thereby creating a vacancy."
But Jones noted that the only legal ways to remove a Texas lawmaker is either for the person to be expelled by a vote of two-thirds of the Legislature — which happened when legislators voted to expel Republican Rep. Byron Slaton over misconduct in 2023 — or by voters at the ballot box.
Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain posted on social media Monday that he would file a bill to declare a seat vacant if a legislator missed seven consecutive days of a session. But since there is no quorum, that bill can't receive a vote — at least for now.
Abbott called a special session last month to take up the redistricting effort, along with 17 other issues, including relief for Texas flood victims, a review of the flood warning system and emergency preparedness, and a THC ban. Congressional redistricting, however, was to be considered first.
Texas has a part-time legislature which meets for 140 days every other year. The governor has the right to call a 30-day special session to address certain topics. The current special session started on July 21.
Abbott can call as many special sessions as he wants, which means that if Democrats run out the clock on this special session, he could call another one as soon as it ends.
How safe is our Social Security safety net?
Full Interview: 3 Democratic Texas lawmakers on fleeing state amid GOP redistricting push
Number of butterflies decreasing across U.S.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting
"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting

Former CNN host Jim Acosta faced backlash on Monday after sharing what he called a 'one-of-a-kind interview' with an AI version of Parkland school shooting victim Joaquin Oliver, a bot created by his parents to honor their son on what would have been his 25th birthday. The interview — shared to Acosta's SubStack page — depicts Oliver, one of 17 who died in the 2018 massacre, remarking on the cause of death and stressing why it's 'important' to talk about gun violence in schools. The AI — when asked for its 'solution' to gun violence — emphasized a need for a mix of stronger gun-control laws, mental health support and community engagement. Related: The bot of Oliver proceeded to speak in a noticeably higher tone before discussing the late teen's interests in the Miami Heat and Star Wars. Acosta — who declared that the technology left him 'speechless' — called the conversation 'so insightful,' telling the late teen's father, Manuel Oliver, that it felt like the first time he really got to know his son. 'I felt like I was communicating with him, which is just so remarkable,' Acosta said. 'People say, 'Well, AI, you know, it could be bad, it could cause all these destructive things.' This is an example of how it might actually do some good, it might help some people who have suffered tremendous losses like your family have a way to hold on to who this person was, which I think is a beautiful thing.' @JimAcosta Related: Manuel Oliver and his wife, Patricia Oliver — co-founders of the gun-control advocacy group Change the Ref — have been involved in other projects that demand action against gun violence, including a school shooting video game, a play and a site that uses AI to recreate victims' voices for calls to Congress. Manuel Oliver — in a video shared to X, formerly Twitter — acknowledged that the AI was his and his wife's idea, adding that Acosta shouldn't be blamed for 'what he was able to do' in the 'interview.' 'If the problem that you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem,' he said. 'The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago. So if you believe that that is not the problem, you are part of the problem.' Related: While Acosta restricted those who could reply to his posts on X, it wasn't the same case on his BlueSky account, where a number of critics were stunned by the AI move. 'Hey Jim. Quick question. What the fuck is wrong with you,' replied one user. And, naturally, users on X had a lot to say regardless. Check out what users said on Bluesky and X below. Related: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:

Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof
Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof

Ever the developer-in-chief, President Donald Trump made a surprise appearance on the White House roof above the briefing room in an apparent effort to inspect future construction. The press, which had been pushed significantly down the driveway, attempted to figure out what was going on. "Mr. President, what are you doing up there?" MORE: Trump is building a new $200 million ballroom at the White House "Just taking a little walk," he shouted back. "What are you building?" "It goes with the ballroom, which is on the other side," he said. Pressed again by reporters, Trump said "Something beautiful," while pantomiming with his hands. Trump said it was "Just more ways to spend my money," adding "Just more ways to spend my money for the country." "Anything I do is financed by me," he stressed. Asked if he was considering an addition or a second story, Trump wouldn't say. The president was accompanied by a small group of aides and Secret Service. The group included architect Jim McCrery, who has been commissioned to add Trump's ballroom to the White House. The two men appeared engaged in intense conversation as they surveyed the grounds with lots of animated pointing. Trump then went out of camera range for several minutes, presumably to look out toward the South Lawn. When he returned, reporters again tried to get more information. "What are you trying to build?" one reporter shouted. "Missiles," Trump responded, presumably joking. "Nuclear missiles," he repeated while making the gesture of a rocket launching. Trump then ignored a question on Gaza and walked back inside.

Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty
Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty

Linamar executive chair Linda Hasenfratz is urging Ottawa to defend the CUSMA trade pact, warning that any move to impose tariffs on auto parts could severely disrupt the industry's deeply integrated North American supply chain. Automakers have been hit hard by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war due to tariffs on exported vehicles and metals, which have negatively impacted their bottom lines. Yet, within the automotive industry, the vast majority of products crossing the border, particularly parts, are CUSMA-compliant and operating under zero duties. Still, there's a risk that could change. Hasenfratz, board chair of the Association of Equipment Manufacturers, is urging the federal government to work hard to maintain the CUSMA agreement, warning that dismantling it would have a devastating impact on the economy. 'While its spirit and substance have been undermined by the Trump administration, the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement has thus far been key to Canada's perceived safety net,' said CIBC Capital Markets economist Avery Shenfeld. Canada's advantage from the CUSMA carve-out is only as strong as the agreement itself, which will lapse in 2026 unless all parties agree to renew it, he says. 'The cloud of uncertainty will hang over capital spending plans in a broad range of Canadian export sectors,' Shenfeld added, noting that Canada could lose its special exemption at any time. 'I still believe that if they put tariffs on parts, it would bring the industry to its knees because it's such an integrated supply chain of parts going back-and-forth the border multiple times,' Hasenfratz said. Trying to apply a tariff on each of those crossings would be enormously expensive, she says. After decades of free trade, trying to 'unscramble the eggs,' as many people have said, would be difficult, costly, and wouldn't create value, she adds. 'Let's address the concerns that exist and make sure that people are feeling comfortable with the trade agreement we have in any areas that are felt to be lacking,' Hasenfratz said. If CUSMA stays intact, Linamar stands to benefit as its customers look to onshore products currently sourced from Asia and Europe. With new international trade deals in place, clients are comparing tariff costs, and that's prompting many to consider localizing their supply chains. 'I see this as a real opportunity for us to potentially get some new business and we're quoting on such opportunities.' Hasenfratz is optimistic that Canada's automotive sector will remain a pillar of the economy. Suppliers, she notes, play an essential role and are poised for growth. She also believes Canada will continue to be a home for vehicle assembly due to its productivity, talent pool, and green, low-cost energy. These fundamentals are how one should decide where to manufacture, Hasenfratz says. 'Don't make long-term decisions on short-term tactics. Make long-term decisions on long-term fundamentals, and that's something Canada has in spades.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store