logo
The Dollar Is Sinking: Here's Why

The Dollar Is Sinking: Here's Why

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. dollar is tumbling as President Donald Trump's economic agenda—at the executive and legislative level—takes full shape.
Economists told Newsweek this could advance Trump's goal of promoting American goods in foreign markets and strengthening exports, but warn that a weakened dollar comes with significant downsides, including the jeopardization of its status as the world's reserve currency.
The U.S. Dollar Index—which tracks its value relative to a basket of major foreign currencies—has declined by more than 10 percent over the past six months. This marks the steepest first-half slump, and the worst beginning for a presidential term, since its creation in 1973.
Achieving this milestone comes amid a period of flux for the U.S. economy. On Friday, Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which had been narrowly passed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives the day before. The sweeping budget reconciliation package contains new spending measures and an extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which, together, budget watchdogs believe could inflate the nation's already-sizable national deficit.
President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025...
President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, DC. MoreThis week will also see the expiry of the 90-day pause placed on Trump's reciprocal tariffs in April. While a handful of countries have secured trade deals, the president has suggested that nations who were unable to do so during the three-month window could be subject to even higher rates than those announced on "Liberation Day."
Experts who spoke to Newsweek emphasized a confluence of these economic factors, and their combined impact on America's fiscal outlook, in the dollar's recent decline.
"The dollar is depreciating because global investors are less confident in the United States providing stable policies geared toward macroeconomic growth and a strong financial system," said Ryan Monarch, a professor of economics at Syracuse University. "Recent policies such as extremely high tariffs, increased government debt, and worries about inflation have all contributed to the falling dollar."
Monarch, a former principal economist at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors' International Finance Division, added that the prospect of the central bank lowering interest rates to stimulate economic growth prospects, "has led to weaker demand for dollar-denominated assets, and thus further dollar depreciation."
Ryan Sweet, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, similarly noted that investors were "reassessing the outlook for the US economy" as a result of the tariffs. "Tariffs will slow the U.S. economy and reduce the expected return on investment for investors, pushing some away from the dollar," he told Newsweek.
Last month, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) cut its growth outlook for the U.S. economy to 1.6 percent from 2.2 percent in March; it said this reflected the "substantial increase" in import taxes, as well as "high economic policy uncertainty," declines in net immigration and reductions to the federal workforce.
"The strength of any currency depends on people's willingness to hold it, and the world now is skeptical of the future of the U.S., especially with the passage of the budget bill," said Peter Simon, a professor at Northeastern University's Department of Economics. "So people around the world are selling their dollars for other currencies: euro, pound sterling, yen, and yuan for more stability."
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty
What Are the Consequences of a Falling Dollar?
A sharp decline in a currency's relative value carries with it a host of economic effects. These impacts are especially pronounced for the dollar, given its status as the world's primary reserve currency and the trillions held in dollar-denominated assets abroad.
For Americans at home, a weakened dollar can increase the cost of imports, resulting in price inflation and the erosion of consumers' purchasing power. A declining dollar also makes it more expensive for Americans to travel abroad, where their dollars will translate into smaller sums of the local currency.
"A depreciation in the U.S. dollar is inflationary as it will, over time, increase nonfuel import prices," Sweet said. "The depreciation in the dollar increases the risks that tariffs boost consumer prices more than anticipated this summer and into the fall."
A falling dollar would also damage the national balance sheet of those countries who hoard stockpile it in reserves, while hurting foreign investors holding dollar-denominated assets such as Treasury bonds.
However, it could make America a more affordable, and attractive, location for international tourists. Sweet added that a declining dollar can also prove a "tail wind" for exporters, by making their goods more affordable in the global market.
This dual impact on imports and exports—reducing one while boosting the other—appears to align with one of Trump's stated tariff purposes: the reduction of trade deficits. His tariff announcements and their impact on the currency even led to speculation that deliberately "crashing" the dollar was a purposeful choice by the administration.
Many in Trump's cabinet have previously expressed concern over the implications of an overly strong dollar, and skepticism regarding its status as the world's reserve currency.
Vice President JD Vance, while still serving as an Ohio senator in 2023, said that the dollar's strength and centrality arguably represented "a massive subsidy to American consumers but a massive tax on American producers," given this resulted in floods of "mostly useless imports."
Stephen Miran—now chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers—wrote in November that trade imbalances and the handicaps faced by domestic industry were rooted in "persistent dollar overvaluation." In April, Miran said that a strong dollar had placed "undue burdens on our firms and workers, making their products and labor uncompetitive on the global stage."
However, others within his administration, notably Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have voiced their support for a strong dollar policy and safeguarding its dominant global position.
Trump has consistently expressed similar support. In nominating the Treasury secretary in November, the president-elect said Bessent would help him "fortify our position as the World's leading economy, center of innovation and entrepreneurialism, destination for capital, while always, and without question, maintaining the U.S. Dollar as the reserve currency of the world." Amid talk of the BRICS economic alliance considering introducing an alternative reserve currency, the president also threatened each of the members with "100-percent tariffs" should they moved forward with this plan.
However, Monarch said that the dollar's 2025 decline could make such a change more likely. "In the long run, the weakening dollar and less desire to hold U.S.-backed assets may strengthen efforts to design an international reserve system that is not just tied to the U.S. currency, but to other currencies around the world, including the Chinese renminbi," he added.
Simon added that, while no single national currency has the power and geopolitical backing to lead to full de-dollarization, "a reserve currency basket" made up of several could rival its dominance in the future.
The French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs (IRIS) found that the dollar still accounts for roughly 60 percent of global foreign exchange reserves, compared with around 20 percent for the euro, 5 percent for the Japanese yen, 4 percent for the pound, and only 2 to 3 percent for the yuan.
Regardless of its longer-term fate, experts said that the dollar will continue to feel downward pressure in 2025 and beyond.
Sweet said he expects the dollar to "stabilize in the second half of this year but resume its depreciation next year," given America's weakened growth outlook and persistent "fiscal sustainability concerns."
Monarch added that none of the factors that has contributed to its decline shows signs of reversing in the near future.
He said: "Trade deals to potentially lower tariffs have been delayed or underwhelming, recent fiscal policy moves appear likely to add significantly to U.S. government debt, and the effects of already-imposed tariffs on inflation are still uncertain."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact check: Debunking 11 of Trump's false claims at Cabinet meeting
Fact check: Debunking 11 of Trump's false claims at Cabinet meeting

CNN

time6 minutes ago

  • CNN

Fact check: Debunking 11 of Trump's false claims at Cabinet meeting

President Donald Trump again turned a Cabinet meeting into a wide-ranging conversation with reporters – and again uttered a whole bunch of false claims in the process. Trump's Tuesday remarks at the White House included inaccurate assertions about inflation, immigration, his tariff policy, the massive domestic policy bill he signed last week, China's use of wind energy, US and European aid to Ukraine, the US relationship with South Korea, and other subjects. Here is a fact check of 11 of the president's false claims. This is not a comprehensive list. Inflation: As he has repeatedly, Trump falsely claimed Tuesday, 'We have no inflation.' The US does have inflation – an annual inflation rate of 2.4% in May, an uptick from a 2.3% annual rate in April. That April rate was the lowest since early 2021, and lower than some economists expected for April after Trump imposed significant new tariffs, but it's not 'no inflation' whatsoever. (And on a month-to-month basis, US consumer prices increased 0.1% in May and 0.2% in April.) Tax on Social Security: Touting the new domestic policy legislation, Trump repeated his false claim that it achieves his campaign promise of 'no tax on Social Security.' It does not. The legislation does create an additional, temporary $6,000-per-year tax deduction for individuals age 65 and older (with a smaller deduction for individuals earning $75,000 per year or more), but the White House itself has implicitly acknowledged that millions of Social Security recipients age 65 and older will continue to pay taxes on their benefits – and that new deduction, which expires in 2028, doesn't even apply to the Social Security recipients who are younger than 65. Trump's tariff letters: Trump spoke of the letters he sent to various foreign leaders announcing the tariff rates he plans to impose on their countries beginning in August – and said, 'I just want you to know - a letter means a deal.' That's just not true. Multiple letters the White House revealed on Monday announced tariff rates Trump said he plans to unilaterally place on imports from foreign countries; those letters did not describe negotiated deals. Who pays tariffs: Trump repeatedly spoke of how his new tariffs mean other countries will have to 'pay' the US for the privilege of doing business in the US. Contrary to Trump's frequent assertions, it is the US importers who buy foreign products, not foreign countries themselves, who make the tariff payments to the US government. Tariff history: Trump repeated his regular false claim that the US was 'proportionately' at its 'wealthiest' between 1870 and 1913, when tariff revenue made up a much larger share of federal revenue before the reintroduction of the income tax. Trump didn't explain what he meant by 'proportionately' or 'the wealthiest,' but economists say that by any standard measure, the US is far wealthier today than it was in the early 20th century and prior; per capita gross domestic product is now many times higher than it was then. China and wind power: Trump, asserting that 'smart countries' don't use wind and solar energy, repeated his recent false claim that China, the world's biggest manufacturer of wind turbines, barely uses such equipment itself - wrongly saying, 'They don't have a lot of wind farms, I'll tell you; very, very few.' In reality, China is the world leader in the generation of wind power and has massive wind farms onshore and offshore; it continues to install additional wind capacity much faster than the US. California and energy: Trump, reviving a previous inaccurate complaint about California's use of renewable energy sources, falsely claimed: 'They have blackouts and brownouts every week.' The state simply does not; its power system has improved significantly since the rolling blackouts of a 2020 heat wave. Daniel Villasenor, a spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom, said in a Tuesday email that Trump is again 'lying about California.' Villasenor wrote: 'The state has not experienced any rotating outages since 2020 – and in the last three years, no Flex Alert calling to conserve power has even been issued. Not only has our grid been increasingly resilient, it's also cleaner than ever – clean energy provided for 100% of demand on our grid for at least some part of the day 167 out of the first 180 days of the year.' US and European aid to Ukraine: Trump repeated his frequent false claim that the US has provided 'far more' wartime aid to Ukraine that Europe has, saying the US is 'in there for over $300 billion; Europe's in there for over $100 billion.' Those numbers are not close to accurate. According to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank that closely tracks international aid to Ukraine, the US had committed about $139 billion in military, financial and humanitarian aid to Ukraine from late January 2022, just prior to Russia's full-scale invasion, through April 2025 – well short of about $298 billion committed by European countries and the European Union. The gap was much narrower in terms of aid actually allocated through April 2025 – about $183 billion for Europe to about $134 billion for the US – but even those figures clearly disprove Trump's claim. South Korea's military cost-sharing: Trump repeated his false claim that South Korea convinced former President Joe Biden to let it stop making payments to help cover the cost of the US military presence in South Korea, saying Biden 'cut it down to nothing.' In fact, Biden's administration signed two cost-sharing agreements with South Korea, one in 2021 and one in 2024, that included South Korean spending increases – meaning South Korea agreed to pay more than it did during Trump's first term. US troops in South Korea: Trump again exaggerated the US troop presence in South Korea, falsely saying, 'You know, we have 45,000 soldiers in South Korea.' Official Defense Department data, published online, says the US had 26,206 military personnel in South Korea as of March 31, 2025, with 22,844 on active duty. Migration and mental health: Trump falsely claimed that unnamed foreign countries 'released their insane asylum – the insane asylum population into our country.' Even Trump's own presidential campaign could not produce any evidence for his frequent claims, which he has repeated for more than two years, that foreign countries deliberately emptied their mental health facilities to somehow get patients to migrate to the United States.

Newsom blasts Trump during South Carolina tour as California governor stokes 2028 speculation
Newsom blasts Trump during South Carolina tour as California governor stokes 2028 speculation

CNN

time6 minutes ago

  • CNN

Newsom blasts Trump during South Carolina tour as California governor stokes 2028 speculation

California Gov. Gavin Newsom embarked Tuesday on a two-day swing through rural South Carolina as the high-profile Democrat seeks to position himself as a leader for a party in rebuilding mode while simultaneously stoking fresh speculation about a potential 2028 presidential bid. Newsom alternated between defiance toward President Donald Trump and familiarity with voters in the early primary state during his roughly 15-minute address at a stop in Bennettsville, sharply criticizing the administration and referring to the opening of Trump's second term as 'an alarming six months.' 'It's not what happens to us, it's how we respond to it. And our opportunity presents itself anew. In 18 months, you have the power to end Donald Trump's presidency,' Newsom said, to loud applause from the full room. 'We'll have to deal with the tweets, we'll have to deal with the attacks and the bullying. But the legislative agenda is effectively over,' Newsom continued. 'You have that power in these midterms.' Throughout his remarks, Newsom touted his own efforts to stand up to the Trump administration and help rebuild the Democratic Party. He made repeated references to his efforts to support the Democratic presidential ticket in 2024 and promoted California as 'the most un-Trump state,' while also slipping in the occasional 'y'all' in a nod to the South. He commented on several recent news developments, including the Trump administration's latest immigration crackdown in his state and the tragic flooding last week in Texas, taking both opportunities to lambaste the president's leadership. 'Donald Trump,' Newsom said of the immigration raids in Los Angeles, 'decided to send hundreds and hundreds of military troops into the park, into the playground, in the middle of the day, where kids this old were at summer camp.' Newsom went on, 'Not one arrest was made. But what he was doing – he wanted to make a point. Cruelty is the point. Cruelty is the point.' And commenting on Texas, Newsom continued criticizing Trump's leadership. 'Do you remember his response to the disaster in California? He blamed every single person – not a peep of blame in Texas,' Newsom remarked, referencing his clashes with the administration during severe wildfires that devastated Los Angeles earlier this year. Speaking at the White House on Tuesday, Trump didn't mention Newsom by name but called him 'one of the worst governors in our country, who I used to get along with, actually.' Trump also defended the federal response to the wildfires. 'If we didn't step in, Los Angeles would have been burned to the ground,' he said. At one point, while invoking his support for former President Joe Biden, Newsom noted that included the 'not so easy' role of being a surrogate on the night of the first presidential debate hosted by CNN in June 2024. 'I say this with love in my heart – with love in my heart – but love for my party and love for my country.' Newsom also touted his recent defamation lawsuit against Fox News, drawing applause from the audience. 'Lies. Myths. And misrepresentations. You think I'm lying? Take a look at what I did last week – I sued Fox News,' he remarked. The California governor's visit to the key presidential primary state is the latest in a series of moves laying the groundwork for a potential 2028 campaign, with several high-profile contenders already making visits to longtime early primary states. Attendees at Newsom's midday event in Marlboro County underscored the anticipation. 'I came to see the next president of the United States, who should really be the current president, if we are being honest,' said Samantha Sherman, who drove from her home near the state line with her 10-year-old son Patrick to see Newsom. Ken Stroman, a Bennettsville native, told CNN he didn't know much about Newsom coming into Tuesday's visit. 'I knew people described him as a potential front-runner. Now I see why,' said Stroman. 'I don't know if he will be the nominee, but if he is, I could support him.' 'The way Trump has treated California, we get that. Poor Black people in the South, that is how we are treated. He sees that.' Trump improved his performance in Marlboro County in each of his three campaigns. In 2016, he lost it to Democrat Hillary Clinton by about 16 points. Four years later he cut his deficit to less than 11 points against Biden. Last November, he lost it by less than 3 points against former Vice President Kamala Harris. South Carolina Republicans responded to Newsom's trip on social media by mocking him and the state of California. 'Gavin Newsom in South Carolina today is like a kale salad at a Waffle House — confused, unwelcome, and about to get sent back,' said Republican Rep. Russell Fry on X.

Senate GOP preps vote on the first judge of the second Trump era
Senate GOP preps vote on the first judge of the second Trump era

Politico

time7 minutes ago

  • Politico

Senate GOP preps vote on the first judge of the second Trump era

House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington says Republicans shouldn't give up on advancing certain priorities that were cut out of their 'big, beautiful bill' for not complying with Senate rules, telling reporters Tuesday that lawmakers will try again in follow-up budget reconciliation packages. 'There may be a longer list of things that were kicked out by the Senate parliamentarian as non-compliant with the Byrd rule — I think we should make another run at that and look for ways to structure the provisions so that it's more fundamentally budgetary in impact and policy,' the Texas Republican said during the press call Tuesday afternoon. 'I suspect that's why they were kicked out.' The so-called Byrd rule limits what provisions can be included in a bill moving through Congress through the reconciliation process, which allows lawmakers to skirt the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Arrington specifically pointed to one provision stripped in the Senate from the House-passed megabill that would have prohibited Medicaid coverage for gender affirming surgeries, and another that would have banned noncitizens from tapping into Medicaid resources. 'I think those — we need to spend more time' crafting the provisions to pass muster with the parliamentarian, Arrington said. 'I don't think we spent enough time to look for a pathway to success on them, and that's sort of the landscape, as I see it, of the opportunities in another reconciliation bill.' Echoing Speaker Mike Johnson 's recent comments, Arrington said he suspects GOP leaders will attempt to do two more party-line packages in the 119th Congress, with the next one slated for the fall. Arrington added members would likely demand that those additional measures be drafted under circumstances where both chambers adhere to the same budget framework, avoiding a repeat of the most recent scenario where House and Senate Republicans each gave their committees different deficit reduction targets. He lamented the fact that the Senate did not comply with the House's aggressive instructions for writing iits version of the megabill, but credited fiscal hawks for helping secure $1.5 trillion in savings in a final product, and noted that it was not 'feasible' to expect the full magnitude of cost savings would be acheived in a single reconciliation bill — 'politically, at least.' As it currently stands, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law over the weekend, is 'front loaded with costs and back-end loaded with savings,' which Arrington said should compel Republicans to make sure the administration follows through in 'mak[ing] sure the savings actually happen.' 'That was a concern among conservative budget hawks,' Arrington said. 'When I think about the Budget Committee's role going forward, one of the things that we need to do … is keep the pressure on the Senate, on the House and the administration to be diligent in implementation and enforcement.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store