
Gwyneth Paltrow and Serena Williams are both fans of neuromodulation – but what is it and how does it work?
For most, the idea that you might don a headset to zap your depression away or use electromagnetic pulses to sharpen your cognition seems better placed in a science fiction novel from the 1930s than modern neuroscience, but these kinds of treatments are more common than you might think.
In fact, you can now buy 'vagus reset' gadgets to practice what's broadly referred to as 'neurostimulation' or 'neuromodulation' at home – Instagram and Tiktok are awash with ads for them. And for more intense forms of this kind of technology, a quick online search will deliver a range of private clinics offering 'repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation' to treat depression and anxiety.
Tennis legend Serena Williams and Goop founder Gwyneth Paltrow are among those who've checked into a private facility to undergo a treatment like this. The athlete recently shared a sponsored Instagram post about her 'ExoMind' journey, describing the treatment as a form of self care. Wellness magnate Paltrow posted a similar story on her Instagram, showing a glowing device attached to her head while she lay on a table.
The company responsible for ExoMind describes the treatment as 'a workout for your mind. An FDA-cleared for the treatment of depression'. The company also offers treatments that use electric pulses to tone and strengthen muscles all over the body – from the stomach to the pelvic floor.
But naturally, both Williams' and Paltrow's Instagram posts have prompted some confusion about possible uses for neuromodulation, delivery methods and who should be using technology like this. Do we need to be nudging our brains with electrical stimuli for improved 'mental fitness'? Or should we just stick with mindfulness apps and fish oil supplements for better brain health?
Furthermore, is stimulating the brain actually a serious cure for depression? Do you need to visit a clinic or will an at-home headset deliver the same results? And most importantly, is this all safe?
What is neurostimulation?
Neurostimulation is the act of stimulating the brain, spinal cord or peripheral nerves to modulate neuronal activity. There are a variety of ways to do this and types of neurostimulation vary. For example, a headset that you can buy online without a prescription that promises to 'reset your vagus nerve' is not the same as an in-clinic transcranial stimulation session delivered by a qualified practitioner.
The Flow headset, for example, sends the equivalent current of an AA battery directly to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, 'targeting depression at its source to help relieve symptoms'. Rival company Neurosym claims that its device emits precise electrical pulses for 'safe stimulation of vagus nerve fibres'. The company isn't clear on how this approach differs from Flow's, but it does claim that the device activates the parasympathetic nervous system to 'effectively manage chronic pain, fibromyalgia, gut problems, long-covid symptoms, inflammation, POTS symptoms, fatigue, sleep issues, HRV issues, ADHD symptoms, stress, anxious and depressive thoughts and more'. Quite the list of claims.
Pulsetto, another headset that you can use at home, also describes itself as a 'vagus stimulator'. Pulsetto technology uses the lowest form of bluetooth energy – ultra low radiofrequency energy (ULRE) – which according to the brand, 'passes safely into the body to biohack your parasympathetic nervous system'.
'These headsets have great branding but in reality you don't know the exact effects that treatment is going to have on you,' says Adam O'Hagan, specialist rTMS practitioner and coordinator at Priory Wellbeing Centre Harley Street.
'The do-it-yourself kits have shown to be effective but not as much as in controlled settings. Some headsets use rTMS in low levels but they're very different to what we do. They can be more cost effective but use different technologies and these can be significantly less effective.'
The kind of treatment offered at Priory differs vastly from headsets like Flow and Neurosym – technologies that you can easily buy online albeit for a high price point. Technically, all treatments fall under the umbrella of neurostimulation, but there are significant differences when it comes to the technology and frequencies used, and the applications and results.
The idea with both in-clinic treatments and do-it-yourself headsets is to nudge the areas of the brain that are responsible for emotional regulation, cognitive function and self-control. These areas can often become under-active and this lack of activity is associated with low mood, anxiety, depression and behavioural disorders. Neurostimulation devices generate magnetic pulses to induce electrical currents in the brain, stimulating under-active brain regions.
'An in-clinic session can last about 30 minutes and is typically recommended for treatment-resistant depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, significant eating disorders and anxiety symptoms. The intensity of the machine used is much higher and the treatment is administered by a trained professional,' explains O'Hagan.
'During an rTMS session, electromagnetic coils are placed on your scalp in order to deliver magnetic pulses to your brain. The treatment specifically targets areas of the brain that are involved in mood control, which means it can help to alleviate the symptoms of your mental health conditions and improve wellbeing.'
'The side effects are extremely minimal compared to other treatments such as medication, so it's a much safer and less invasive solution. Some patients can see results after five sessions or around the halfway mark in the treatment plan,' he adds.
It's worth noting that rTMS is very different to electroconvulsive therapy, or ECT, which sends a seizure-inducing current through the brain. Doctors have used ECT for almost a century, and though it's still used in some cases, it remains a controversial and rudimentary treatment.
Mental fitness and biohacking the vagus nerve
At the other end of the neurostimulation spectrum are home devices – headsets that deliver a mild electrical current to the brain and that can be worn daily on the head or neck. These devices offer 'improved mental fitness' – a catch-all term that seems to comprise several indicators of good health such as boosted mood, lower anxiety levels, improved memory and cognition, and better focus.
The biohacking and longevity crowd are especially keen on the idea of fitness for your mind – Bryan Johnson wears a Pulsetto headset in his Netflix documentary Don't Die. However, Dr Faye Begeti, practising neurology doctor at Oxford University Hospitals and author of The Phone Fix, explains that the term mental fitness is actually quite vague if we're discussing the true benefits of these devices.
'The term 'mental fitness' allows companies to market these devices without clear scientific backing,' she says. 'While some biohackers report subjective benefits, scientific evidence supporting any substantial long term improvement from these devices is weak.
'Established good brain habits such as adequate sleep, regular exercise, learning new skills to build cognitive reserve, and stress management have stronger evidence for improving brain function over time. Expecting dramatic improvements in memory, focus, or productivity from neurostimulation devices is likely unrealistic.'
But as mental health issues such as anxiety and depression continue to affect large swathes of the UK population, people are looking for alternative sources of support – particularly within biohacking and functional medicine. So despite scant evidence that at-home devices can help – and their hefty price tags – neurostimulation headsets have become incredibly popular.
This might have something to do with the fact that social media is currently flooded with instructional videos on 'how to reset your vagus nerve'. These techniques range from simple massage and acupressure to recommendations for headsets like the Neurosym or Pulsetto.
'The vagus nerve 'reset' trend is a mix of science and misinformation,' explains Dr Begeti. The vagus nerve plays a key role in the parasympathetic nervous system, which helps regulate stress, digestion and heart rate. Activities like spending time in nature, meditation, and breathing exercises can stimulate vagal tone, which may have calming effects – but calling it a 'reset' or a ' detox ' is misleading. The nervous system is not something that needs 'resetting' in the way social media often suggests.'
'The issue is that social media often oversimplifies complex neuroscience, making it seem like a single technique is a quick hack for mental health. Instead, it's important to have multiple tools in your toolkit for managing difficult emotions while also seeking professional advice when needed,' she adds.
The verdict
As Dr Begeti says, there's no one trick to eliminate mental health issues. A healthy diet of gut-friendly foods, regular exercise, quality sleep and other techniques like breathwork, yoga and time in nature can all have a positive impact on the brain and nervous system when combined. In isolation, a neurostimulation device won't make much difference if you're not taking good care of yourself.
However, the most recent studies on the effects of clinical rTMS are promising. 'We are witnessing a growing mental health crisis,' explains O'Hagan. 'Depression is treatable, but for some people, medication and psychotherapy do not provide relief. In such cases, rTMS is a really incredible new tool.'
The important thing is not to downplay the intensity of a treatment like this. Though it's akin to tickling your brain, one should be aware of the risks. Various studies have shown that neurostimulation can help improve mood, but a small number of patients have experienced long term effects like tinnitus, cognitive impairment, behavioural changes and short term memory loss.
These outcomes are far less likely with an at-home treatment as the power generated by a wearable isn't comparable to an in-clinic rTMS treatment. However, there are still risks associated with using one. You are, after all, giving your brain a buzz, regardless of the dose.
'The biggest concern is that many brands do not disclose the exact stimulation parameters, making it difficult to know what effect the device is actually having. Additionally, improper use – such as applying stimulation to the wrong area of the brain – could lead to unintended effects,' says Dr Begeti.
She advises researching the frequency and intensity used in detail and checking if the device has been tested in peer-reviewed studies, rather than relying on general research. She also recommends checking for FDA approval or CE certification for specific medical conditions, as opposed to general wellness claims, and reading the instructions thoroughly.
'For low mood, anxiety and issues with feeling dysregulated, a headset could help,' says O'Hagan. However, the best course of action is to use a wearable in conjunction with other healthy habits. These devices are definitely not a magic bullet and O'Hagan recommends using them alongside other interventions like talking therapy and daily self care routines.
'Typically I wouldn't recommend them for people with clinical depression,' he says. But this is where a treatment like clinical rTMS might make a difference, particularly if you've tried other treatments and found them inconsistent or unhelpful.
Our collective understanding of mental health issues is progressing as we find new ways to support and foster good mental health and to treat chronic life-altering problems. Hacking the brain with electromagnetic pulses is clearly just the beginning. But if you're keen to become a brain biohacker yourself, be sure to cast a critical eye over claims you see online, consult with experts and always do your research before trying a new treatment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I'm a nutritionist - here are three foods you need to eat to boost your sex drive
Many factors can affect sex drive, but what you eat can be more important than you think when it comes to getting steamy in the bedroom. Oysters, pumpkin seeds and chickpeas are the ultimate foods to boost your libido, a leading nutritionist has revealed. 'Sexual appetite is closely linked to overall health, and certain foods can help support normal hormone levels, blood flow, and energy—all key factors in maintaining a healthy sex drive,' says Lily Keeling, a nutritionist for healthy meal delivery firm Green Chef. So if your love life is feeling a little lacklustre, your diet could be to blame. Zinc-rich foods like oysters, pumpkin seeds, and chickpeas are especially important, as the nutrient is essential for testosterone production. And it's not just men that need to prevent their testosterone levels from getting low, the hormone is also key for women wanting to increase sexual desire. Zinc is also thought to increase dopamine levels, which can enhance feelings of pleasure. Oysters are famously an aphrodisiac and contain omega-3 fatty acids. This can improve blood flow to the sexual organs, which can help with issues like erectile dysfunction. Pumpkin seeds also contain the essential fat as well as magnesium which make for an added bonus for increasing your blood flow. They are packed with antioxidants like vitamin E which help protect sperm and the prostate from cell damage. Meanwhile, chickpeas can boost sex drive due to its B6 properties. The vitamin is known to regulate testosterone, but it also produces the 'feel-good' hormone dopamine which can increase desire and arousal. It also contains a plant-based chemical known as phytoestrogens, which is said to mimic the effects of estrogen. This can be especially helpful for menopausal women who experience low sex drive as a symptom of their declining estrogen levels.


Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Apprentice star axed from show in anti-Semitism storm is selling £29 sick notes on demand despite being suspended doctor
He also claimed people are "sick of feminism" in the West DOCTOR SHAME Apprentice star axed from show in anti-Semitism storm is selling £29 sick notes on demand despite being suspended doctor AN APPRENTICE star who was axed from the show after a string of complaints over anti-Semitic comments is now peddling £29 sick notes on demand. Disgraced Dr Asif Munaf was also suspended from the medical register after a series of anti-Semitic and sexist social media rants. Advertisement 4 Dr Asif Munaf was also suspended from the medical register after a series of anti-Semitic and sexist social media rants Credit: Instagram 4 Dr Asif was dropped by the BBC in 2024 after the comments emerged Credit: PA 4 His now defunct University of Masculinity website also came under fire for its controversial postings and retweeting posts by Andrew Tate Credit: Instagram/@drasifofficial He now runs Dr Sick Ltd, a company that offers same-day sick notes for as little as £29. Without any face-to-face or phone consultation, his company sold sick notes enabling customers five months off work for Covid, six weeks for anxiety over a sick pet, and four weeks of home working to enable them to go on holiday abroad. All requests were granted within a few hours, according to The Telegraph. The axed Apprentice star, 37, told the newspaper: "I don't issue the medical notes – I run the business. Advertisement "Dr Sick Ltd is an ICO-registered, UK-based digital service with a team of five fully GMC-registered UK doctors who issue fit notes in accordance with HIPAA-aligned guidelines." Because he has been suspended by the GMC, he is not allowed to practise medicine or present himself as a medical doctor. In 2024, The BBC took the decision to drop the former NHS doctor turned wellness business owner and aspiring online 'guru' from the Apprentice after receiving complaints about his conduct from the Board of Deputies of British Jews. The Sun previously revealed how the Sheffield-born doctor had come under fire for anti-Semitism and accusations of misogyny before the series kicked off. Advertisement Complaints had been sent to the BBC, including directly to Director General Tim Davie as well as its chairman, Samir Shah, over a social media post. Dr Asif made reference to a "godless, satanic cult [of Zionists]" before asking his followers: "Have you ever met even a semi-average looking Zionist? Aren't they all odiously ogre-like?" The BBC are understood to have discovered his shocking comments after filming on The Apprentice had completed. His now defunct University of Masculinity website also came under fire for its controversial postings and retweeting posts by Andrew Tate. Advertisement In one vile post about women, he reportedly asked: 'Have you ever met a beautiful feminist?' While a video on his Instagram account is said to have been titled "Don't Trust What Women Say." The former NHS doc launched University of Masculinity — Muslim Passport Bros to pair 'professional brothers of the UK' with women in North Africa. It emerged a week after he was accused of anti-Semitic comments online. Advertisement He said in a video: 'A lot of brothers have got sick of feminism in the West generally. "Being in the corporate world as a woman all of your life, you are going to rub shoulders with a lot of men. "That is osmosis — you are going to absorb a lot of masculine ideals in terms of competitiveness, being blunt — it is a real problem in the UK." Responding - before the series began - to concerns about Asif's postings, a spokesperson on behalf of The Apprentice said: 'After filming had taken place, we were made aware of concerns over social media posts that Asif had made after he had left the process. As soon as we were alerted, we took immediate action and spoke to Asif in detail on this. Advertisement 'Asif took part in specialised training to understand why his posts may cause offence. We are committed to providing an inclusive environment on and off screen.' Dr Asif said at the time: 'I apologise for any offence caused by my online content/social media. "It was not my intention to offend anyone, and I am of course open to all views. The beliefs I hold and have shared are based on the values that I was brought up with.' 4 Dr Asif Munaf, Paul Bowen and Phil Turner on the Apprentice Credit: PA


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Who is in charge at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?
Who is in charge at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)? The answer is more complicated than it may seem. With no confirmed or acting CDC director, Robert F Kennedy Jr has direct control over the agency, allowing him to sign off – or not – on vaccine recommendations, according to legal experts. Yet Kennedy, the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), testified before a Senate committee in May that someone else is running the agency – creating confusion that could lead to legal challenges. 'There's not a CDC director or acting director. Essentially, RFK Jr is the director of the CDC,' said Paul Offit, professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. Kennedy now has 'a lot more opportunity to actually influence the outcome of these decisions and to take actions in the absence of a Senate-confirmed director', said Renée Landers, professor and director of the health law program at Suffolk University Law School in Boston. The dismissal of 17 independent vaccine advisers and their replacement with less experienced advisers, some of whom have histories of anti-vaccine activism, is 'very concerning', especially given Kennedy's rejection of germ theory and his own anti-vaccine activism, Landers said. On Thursday, the independent vaccine advisers appointed by Kennedy voted to ban thimerosal, a preservative (also known as thiomersal) with a demonstrated safety record, from 4% of flu vaccines in the US. The remaining 96% of flu vaccines, as well as all other childhood vaccines, were already free of thimerosal out of an abundance of caution, despite decades of research indicating the preservative's safety. The move will make it harder for some people to access the flu vaccine. The recommendation would normally be taken up by the CDC director, either to reject, or to implement as official, guidance from the agency. But for now, those decisions go directly to Kennedy, who has already exercised these capabilities before. On 13 May, 'with pending confirmation of a new CDC Director', the health secretary adopted the recommendations for Chikungunya vaccines to be officially recommended by the CDC, according to the agency's website. Kennedy did not sign off on the committee's votes for two other vaccines against RSV and meningitis. Those vaccines, recommended in April by the independent advisers whom Kennedy dismissed this month, still have not gotten official CDC recommendations; it's not clear whether or when they will. Kennedy also recently directed the CDC to change its Covid vaccine recommendations, softening the recommendation for children and ending it for pregnant people entirely, despite strong evidence that pregnancy is a major risk factor for severe illness and death. 'It is concerning that the power vacuum leaves open his ability to make these decisions that are inconsistent with scientific consensus,' Landers said. Congress introduced a new law in 2023 that directors of the CDC must now undergo Senate confirmation. This appointment is the first time the CDC director has gone through the process. 'It is a little bit of uncharted waters,' Landers said. David Weldon was first nominated and then withdrawn hours before his Senate confirmation hearing in March. Susan Monarez served as acting director from 23 January until she was nominated on 24 March, at which point she stepped down. Once someone has been nominated for director, they cannot serve as acting director. Monarez testified in her Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, but it's not clear when lawmakers will vote on the nomination, In the absence of an acting director, the head of HHS has control of the agency, according to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. Signing off – or not – on CDC recommendations cannot be 'delegated down' to other officials under the vacancies act, said Anne Joseph O'Connell, a professor at Stanford Law School; 'it can only go up' to the HHS secretary. 'What's unusual about this situation is that we generally think having exclusive duties go 'up' to the agency head when there is a lower-level vacancy is a good thing. But here many don't trust the secretary on these matters,' O'Connell said. Kennedy put forth a different name for who is in charge of the CDC in May testimony before the Senate's health, education, labor and pensions committee. 'Who is the acting CDC director?' Lisa Blunt Rochester, the Democratic senator from Delaware, asked. 'The acting director was Susan Monarez, but she is now up for permanent director, so she's been replaced by Matt Buzzelli,' Kennedy said, describing Buzzelli as 'a public health expert'. But there's no indication that Buzzelli, a lawyer who is listed as chief of staff in the office of the CDC director, is acting director, nor is he qualified for the position. 'Buzzelli cannot be the acting CDC head,' O'Connell said. He's not the first assistant to the CDC director, he's not Senate-confirmed, and he did not serve 90 days in the year before the last director of the CDC left, O'Connell said: 'There is no wiggle room.' The lack of clarity is compounded by the Trump administration's non-compliance with information requirements, experts said. The CDC, along with other agencies, is required to update each year an office of personnel management site about who holds which jobs, a deadline the agencies missed in March. Buzzelli 'has been carrying out some of the duties of the CDC Director as the Senior Official, as necessary, and is surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate', Andrew Nixon, HHS director of communications, told Stat News in May. (HHS did not respond to the Guardian's media inquiry.) Such actions could open the officials up to legal challenges. Without official documentation naming Buzzelli and other decision-makers to official positions, they would not have the designated authority to make certain decisions, which means their actions could be challenged. For instance, they may not be authorized to enter into new contracts or end prior agreements early with state, local, tribal and territorial governments – potentially opening up any such actions to lawsuits. 'The person who takes the action has to be someone lawfully appointed to the position. To the extent that agencies try to skirt that kind of requirement, it does leave the decisions vulnerable to legal challenge,' Landers said.