Portland named among ‘cities on the rise' as Oregon falls in state business rankings
The professional networking platform unveiled its inaugural top 25 list of U.S. metro areas that have seen an uptick in roles and 'new talent' on Tuesday. The Rose City landed at No. 20.
Portland Fire to make blazing debut as new WNBA team in 2026
'A 'new' Portland is gaining momentum, fueled by local entrepreneurs and renewed optimism as foot traffic across the city center roars back, helping the city reclaim its reputation for livability,' .
The ranking shows that the Portland area's average income is $74,990, with an average home listing price is $787,530. It also lists manufacturing, professional services and healthcare as the top industries that are hiring — specifically listing Intel, Nike and Oregon Health & Science University as top employers.
But all employers have announced job cuts in recent years.
Intel layoffs ripple across Oregon economy
Just last week, it is laying off more than 2000 workers at its Hillsboro campus. laid off at least 740 employees from its Beaverton campus last year, while removed hundreds of positions amid its now-abandoned attempt to merge with Legacy Health.
Also last week, CNBC ranked Oregon as the 39th-best state for business. noted this was the state's lowest ranking in the history of the annual list.
And while the Rose City nabbed No. 20 on LinkedIn's inaugural report, the East Coast's less populous Portland metro area landed at No. 6.
Pearl District residents opposed to homeless shelter
'An expanding network of startups combined with steady growth in tourism is fueling economic momentum in this coastal city, where job seekers are also drawn to its vibrant food scene and working waterfront,' LinkedIn said of the Maine city.
Grand Rapids, Mich., Boise, Idaho, Harrisburg, Penn., Albany, N.Y. and Milwaukee, Wis., ranked as the top five metro areas for fast-growing professional opportunities.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Intel gets a boost from AI-enabled PCs as its foundries flounder
This story was originally published on CIO Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CIO Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Intel leaned on its PC and server division to offset losses in its foundry unit during the second quarter, executives said during a Thursday earnings call. The chipmaker reported $2.1 billion in operating income for its Client Computing Group segment and over $3 billion in operating losses for Intel Foundry in Q2 2025, which ended June 28. Revenue growth at the troubled legacy tech provider remained flat year over year for the second consecutive quarter even as its Data Center and AI unit revenue increased 4% to $3.9 billion and Intel Foundry grew 3% to $4.4 billion. Client Computing Group, which includes PC chipsets and processors, was the company's largest revenue generator despite a 3% year-over-year decline to $7.9 billion. The second quarter saw Intel initiate a major overhaul launched when industry veteran Lip-Bu Tan was appointed CEO in March. 'We are implementing a plan to reduce our headcount by approximately 15%, and we plan to end the year with a global workforce of about 75,000 employees,' Tan said in a Thursday letter to employees. A significant number of cuts, which included a 50% reduction in management layers, were completed in Q2, said Tan. Dive Insight: As the AI adoption race became a sprint last year, Intel quickly lost ground. The 57-year-old company ceded its leading position as the semiconductor industry's top revenue generator to Nvidia and fell into the third spot behind Samsung Electronics last year, according to Gartner. The shift was largely due to surging demand for graphics processing units to fuel a global AI infrastructure building boom and a spike in the memory chip market, Gartner VP Analyst Gaurav Gupta said in the report. While Intel held onto its dominant market position in central processing units that power traditional compute, the company overextended its manufacturing ambitions, Tan told investors Thursday. 'The capacity investments we made over the last several years were well ahead of demand and were unwise and excessive,' Tan said. 'I do not subscribe to the belief that, 'If you build it, they will come.' Under my leadership, we will build what customers need, when they need it, and earn their trust through consistent execution.' The company canceled plans for plants in Germany and Poland, slowed construction on an Ohio facility and will shift the assembly and testing operations to Vietnam and Malaysia from their current location in Costa Rica, Tan said. The Ohio manufacturing plant was one of several sites included in a $7.86 billion CHIPS and Science Act grant to Intel finalized in November, just days before CEO Pat Gelsinger retired and handed the reins to Tan's predecessors, interim co-CEOs David Zinsner and Michelle Johnston Holthaus. The federal grant was also directed toward Intel buildouts in Arizona, New Mexico and Oregon. As Intel restructured its foundry division, the sluggish PC market regained traction during the first half of the year. Shipments increased 4.4% year over year during the second quarter, fueled by enterprise demand and shifts in U.S. trade policy, according to a Gartner report published earlier this month. 'PC shipments are forecast to rise 2.4% in 2025, propelled by a tariff-driven front-loaded inventory surge in the first half of 2025 in the U.S. and ongoing Windows 11 replacement cycles,' Gartner Research Principal Rishi Padhi said in the report. Lenovo, HP and Dell, which together command almost two-thirds of the PC market globally, were among the major suppliers that deployed Intel's AI-capable Core Ultra processors in products last year. In December, Intel expanded its AI processor portfolio with enterprise-grade Arc GPUs and accelerator chips. Further AI upgrades are in the works, according to Tan. 'In the past, we approached AI with a traditional silicon and training-centric mindset without a cohesive silicon systems software stack and strategy,' he said. 'We recognize the need to move up the abstraction stack into system and software. This is the area where Intel has traditionally been weak or entirely absent.' Recommended Reading Few employees are confident in their generative AI abilities Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Nike Stock Just Popped
Key Points JPMorgan analyst Matthew Boss just upgraded Nike stock to buy. Nike's capable of growing earnings 20% a year over the next five years, says this banker. That's nearly twice the rate of growth most analysts forecast for Nike. 10 stocks we like better than Nike › Nike (NYSE: NKE) ran up 3% through 10:05 a.m. ET Monday morning after JPMorgan analyst Matthew Boss upgraded the stock to overweight and raised his price target on the shoes and sportswear star to $93 a share. Why JPMorgan likes Nike Citing its own "fieldwork" on the stock, as well as conversations with management and SEC filings, Boss is raising his earnings forecasts for Nike in 2026 and 2027. He's predicting the company will grow earnings in the "high-teens to 20%" over the next five years, reports Management, says the analyst, is seeing "accelerating momentum within global wholesale orderbooks" and is aligning its inventory levels to support sales-growth trends. This should be completed by halfway through 2026. Boss also cited multiple trends that should result in stronger average selling prices in the running, global footwear, basketball, and training markets, leading to potentially a doubling of operating profit margins (to 10%) by 2028. Longer term, Boss sees a path to Nike regaining pre-pandemic profit margins of 12% and even 13%. Is Nike stock a buy? Nike's not a bad business. To the contrary, it's a steady performer, and most analysts predict Nike is capable of growing earnings at least 11% annually over the next five years. The problem is that, at its current valuation of 35 times earnings, 11% growth might not be enough to justify such a high valuation. JPMorgan's analyst holds out the hope, though, that Nike might grow nearly twice as fast as that -- 20%. Problem is, even 20% growth on a 35x-earnings stock works out to a price-to-earnings ratio of 1.75. That's still too high a price to pay for Nike. Even if this analyst is right about Nike's growth prospects, I think the stock is still a sell. Should you invest $1,000 in Nike right now? Before you buy stock in Nike, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nike wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 28, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nike. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Nike Stock Just Popped was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Entrepreneur
11 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Annual Workforce Plans Are Costing You Millions — Fix It With This Shift
By taking a continuous approach to workforce planning, companies can match their people with business goals and changing economic conditions. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. For companies, workforce planning isn't about to get any easier. Just ask Intel, which is laying off up to 20% of employees from its chip-making division, after slashing 15% of its workforce last summer. Tens of thousands of roles were eliminated in a matter of months. This kind of dramatic shift is increasingly the rule, not the exception. AI is a key culprit, causing headcounts to plummet in some areas and surge in others. Geopolitics and tariffs are also increasingly a factor. My company works with an exercise equipment manufacturer whose prices spiked 40% overnight, turning its workforce plans upside down. All of these points point to a stark conclusion: The way most companies approach workforce planning is no longer viable. Any business that still relies on a rigid annual plan is asking for trouble. In fact, businesses are expected to suffer a staggering $8.5 trillion in unrealized annual revenue by 2030, partly thanks to poor workforce planning. It doesn't have to be that way. By taking a much more dynamic approach to workforce planning, companies can match their people with business goals and changing economic conditions in real time. And as it turns out, AI is a key part of the solution. Here's why sticking with the status quo is so risky, and how businesses can break free. Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success. The high cost of an outdated workforce planning If you work at a company where workforce planning is a yearly exercise, you're far from alone. Traditionally, that's how businesses have anticipated their workforce needs. Managers identify sales and revenue goals, then work backward to set budgets and headcounts across different departments. Because yearly planning is a guessing game, it isn't very effective. I know this firsthand from coming up through the software industry, where workforce plans often morph as quickly as they're written. This kind of episodic approach to workforce planning has a number of serious drawbacks: The typical cadence of workforce planning is ill-adapted to the pace of modern work. Almost 40% of companies create 12-month plans. But digital transformation has already compressed business cycles, and AI is now accelerating change at an even faster pace. Plans made last month may already be obsolete. People planning tends to be rudimentary and superficial. Only about one-third of HR leaders say their organization is good at using data for workforce planning, while more than two-thirds said their workforce planning is limited to headcount alone, with no analysis of underlying capacity. More than half of companies lack a clear picture of their employees' current skills and the roles that are likely to face disruption. Planners are still thinking strictly in terms of butts in seats versus a more nuanced assessment of discrete skills needed. What is the consequence of all that? Companies often end up with way too many people, or way too few. This translates either to bloated payrolls or, even worse, inability to serve surging demand. When we surveyed leaders, three-quarters said talent shortfalls left them unable to meet business objectives. Domino effects of poor planning include diminished productivity, burnout and diminished morale, and loss of business to the competition. Related: Why Workforce Efficiency Isn't Just Code for Layoffs How companies can embrace continuous planning Imagine a nationwide bank in the throes of an AI makeover. That's exactly what's happening at JPMorgan Chase, which plans to use AI to shrink its workforce by 10%. With more than 300,000 employees, how can JPMorgan plan and adapt on the fly? Here's where continuous workforce planning comes in. A marked departure from annual exercises, this approach incorporates real-time data to create a flexible plan that can be reconfigured in response to changing conditions. Surging demand? Challenges with retention? A spike in costs? Continuous workforce planning adapts instead of waiting to catch up. The key to that flexibility? Gaining insights into how people drive business results in real-time. Historically, accessing and understanding the information needed to make that happen has been an obstacle. People analytics platforms change everything by breaking down silos between departments, unlocking data previously trapped in spreadsheets and hard drives. Plus, AI can now connect the dots to business outcomes, while making those insights instantly accessible in plain language. For companies looking to embrace continuous workforce planning, there are three important steps: Know who your people are and where they work. People data, which covers things like headcount, seniority, engagement, training and pay, is often surprisingly hard to access. Start by leveraging the latest people analytics tools to weave together data from disparate human capital management systems, as well as email, chat, calendar and other employee apps — providing a clearer picture of your team. People data, which covers things like headcount, seniority, engagement, training and pay, is often surprisingly hard to access. Start by leveraging the latest people analytics tools to weave together data from disparate human capital management systems, as well as email, chat, calendar and other employee apps — providing a clearer picture of your team. Know how your people work. The next step is to connect that people data with business data, which includes metrics like revenue, profitability and customer satisfaction. Which sales teams generate the most revenue? What's our least profitable division? What kind of training translates to improved customer retention? This shows how employees are contributing to actual business goals. New platforms enable connecting the dots between people and business results, providing a clearer picture of overall productivity. The next step is to connect that people data with business data, which includes metrics like revenue, profitability and customer satisfaction. Which sales teams generate the most revenue? What's our least profitable division? What kind of training translates to improved customer retention? This shows how employees are contributing to actual business goals. New platforms enable connecting the dots between people and business results, providing a clearer picture of overall productivity. Harness those insights to build a dynamic workforce plan. AI-powered workforce planning tools enable companies to continuously model scenarios and adjust resources based on shifting demands. To hit next year's financial targets, what workforce mix do we need? Given the impact of tariffs on the bottom line, how should we adjust our headcount? What's the most cost-effective way to fill current talent gaps? New platforms use real-time data and predictive capacity to guide companies toward the best plan. Related: Here's What Leaders Need to Try Before Resorting to Layoffs Continuous workforce planning in action Done right, continuous workforce planning can be a game-changer for companies: One of our clients, a financial services firm with 50,000 employees, needed a plan to navigate changing customer expectations and volatile markets. It was also juggling a mix of in-house employees, remote workers and contractors. Breaking workforce planning out of its silos, the company adopted a more dynamic model that gave it a holistic picture, aligned with business goals and enabled it to react to market fluctuations. Another customer is a healthcare provider that used our workforce planning tool to forecast job vacancies accurately. By proactively hiring some 2,000 caregivers with the right skills at the right time, it ultimately saved more than $3 million. Getting the most out of continuous workforce planning When it comes to continuous workforce planning, I've seen so many companies struggle to get over a few critical obstacles. Here are some key tips to bear in mind: Continuous planning isn't possible until you overcome siloed thinking, too. Whether it's finance, marketing or HR, executives are often stuck in their own departments. The question they should ask: How can I get a holistic view of understanding people and how they work?} Whether it's finance, marketing or HR, executives are often stuck in their own departments. The question they should ask: How can I get a holistic view of understanding people and how they work?} Not all businesses can turn on a dime. Ability to change course varies by industry, with manufacturing moving much slower than, say, software. For example, Donald Trump might want Apple to build iPhones in the US, but moving only 10% of its supply chain stateside could take three years. Ability to change course varies by industry, with manufacturing moving much slower than, say, software. For example, Donald Trump might want Apple to build iPhones in the US, but moving only 10% of its supply chain stateside could take three years. It's important not to confuse plans with reality. As helpful as workforce plans are, they do have limits. So resist the temptation to over-plan and get into the weeds. The best plans are a continually evolving model, not an exact picture of conditions on the ground. In a time of AI and economic uncertainty, agility is the only option. By shifting from static to continuous workforce planning, businesses can improve their odds of not just surviving but also thriving in turbulent times.
