Rome's ‘Hollywood on the Tiber' plans comeback despite Trump tariff threat
Cinecitta, the homonymous company that manages Rome's historic film studio, approved a five-year plan this week backed by the EU's post-COVID Recovery Fund, which includes building new high-tech sound stages and boosting production capacity by 60% by 2026.
'We want to lead the game,' said CEO Manuela Cacciamani. 'Cinecitta must be a factory that works at full capacity… with excellence as a minimum standard.' Founded in 1937 under Benito Mussolini's fascist rule, Cinecitta became known as the 'Hollywood on the Tiber'.
It has hosted over 3,000 films, attracting world-renowned directors such as Martin Scorsese, Federico Fellini and Francis Ford Coppola.
The company is targeting revenue of 51.9 million euros ($58.8 million) in 2029, almost double the 2024 figure, and aims to turn a 4.3-million-euro net profit after a loss of 11.6 million euros last year.
Trump has said he will impose a 100% tariff on movies produced outside the United States to save Hollywood from 'a very fast death', but has issued few details on how the levy would work.
The tariff plan threatens to disrupt the current industry set-up, in which big U.S. productions rely on the services of studios around the world that can provide expertise, cheaper costs and striking location scenery.
Trump's sweeping tariffs were temporarily reinstated by a federal appeals court on Thursday, a day after a U.S. trade court blocked them, ruling Trump had exceeded his authority.
'The Matrix is everywhere': cinema bets on immersion
Cacciamani told Reuters Cinecitta was monitoring 'with the utmost care' developments regarding the tariff threat.
'The hope is that two historic powers of cinema worldwide, (Italy and the U.S.) which owe so much to each other, will continue to cooperate,' she said.
Italy's tax credit of up to 40% for film production is 'among the most competitive worldwide', Cinecitta said, helping attract some of last year's international successes such as 'Emilia Perez' and the papal thriller 'Conclave'.
Among projects slotted for filming in Cinecitta this year is Mel Gibson's 'The Resurrection of The Christ', a sequel to his 2004 'The Passion of The Christ'.
Gibson is one of Trump's 'Special Ambassadors' in Hollywood, tasked with rescuing the U.S. film industry alongside actors Jon Voight and Sylvester Stallone.
His next film, being shot in Italy, would be exposed to the tariff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
How the attack on Iran has damaged NPT
The writer is an academic and researcher. He is also the author of Development, Poverty, and Power in Pakistan, available from Routledge Listen to article Rather than helping to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, the Israel-initiated 12-day war with Iran, which the US also joined, has seriously damaged the longstanding Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The NPT has thus far helped prevent 191 countries from joining the dangerous race to build nuclear arsenals, but the underlying rationale of this treaty has now been undermined. The UN formulated the NPT in the late 1960s to help avert the spread of nuclear weapons and simultaneously allow countries to harness the power of nuclear fissions. Iran signed the NPT in 1968, becoming one of its original members. While Iran has other sources of energy, it wants to reduce reliance on fast-depleting oil and gas reserves. Being able to harness the potential of nuclear energy has also become a matter of national pride for the ostracised state. Western, and other Middle Eastern powers, however, have been very suspicious of Iran's desire to harness nuclear power, fearing that its illiberal regime will use this knowhow to build a covert nuclear weapons program. Iran has submitted to IAEA inspections, despite being heavily sanctioned. The IAEA has suspected Iran to be in non-compliance a few times. However, Iran's trouble with the IAEA has arisen amidst a persistent Israeli shadow campaign to disrupt Iran's nuclear programme. The April 2021 attack on the Natanz enrichment facility, widely attributed to Israel, damaged underground centrifuge halls and disrupted Iran's enrichment timeline. Earlier incidents included the 2010 Stuxnet cyberattack and the targeted assassinations of key Iranian nuclear scientists. After years of negotiations, Iran did agree to a nuclear deal with the US in 2015, which aimed to drastically limit Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. However, in 2018, the first Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from this deal, and reimposed harsh sanctions. After the Israel-US attacks on Iran this past month, Tehran has now suspended cooperation with IAEA. If Iran withdraws from NPT, it would not be legally prohibited from acquiring nuclear weapons, nor would it be compelled to accept international monitoring. Iran has not been an ideal NPT member state. Its intentional opacity, its ambitious ballistic missile programme and its use of regional proxies have been legitimate causes of international concern. However, Iran is justified in claiming that the rules-based international order is selectively applied. Despite possessing dozens of nuclear warheads, Israel maintains a policy of deliberate ambiguity whereby it refuses to confirm or deny its arsenal. Yet, Israel enjoys immense support and aid from the US and European powers, despite its hostilities within the occupied territories, and in the broader neighborhood. This stands in stark contrast to the transparency demanded of Iran. The Israel-US attacks on Iran have damaged the NPT's credibility, which will have implications that reverberate far beyond Iran. The NPT is now widely perceived as failing to protect its signatories, which is increasing the risk of it losing legitimacy altogether. Other states might question whether their own restraint is worthwhile, especially if regional rivals are armed or shielded by powerful allies. For such states, owning nuclear weapons may seem a much more attractive option to help them avert external threats. Even the repressive and otherwise ostracised regime in North Korea has become immune to external aggression due to its nuclear capabilities. Conversely, Ukraine dismantled its Soviet-era arsenal in 1994 in exchange for security guarantees from the UNSC and the results of that are evident in the current aggression by Russia. Lasting proliferation compliance cannot be coerced. It must be fostered through credible diplomacy backed by robust verification mechanisms. Iran needs to be brought back to the negotiating table, and Israel must be restrained from further misadventures against Iran in the name of making the world a safer place, when in effect its actions produce the opposite impact.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
ICJ's climate ruling
Listen to article The International Court of Justice's landmark advisory opinion that states are obligated under international law to tackle climate change is a seismic shift in the global fight against climate catastrophe. By unequivocally declaring that states failing to curb fossil fuels and protect the climate system commit an "internationally wrongful act", the world's highest court has transformed moral rhetoric into legal obligation. For vulnerable nations, the ruling is a vindication of their long-running complaint that developed countries owe the rest of the world for causing the climate crisis. The ICJ opens the door for affected states to seek restitution, compensation, and restoration of their ecosystems. While proving direct causality remains complex, the court insists it is not impossible. The opinion also explicitly names fossil fuel subsidies, exploration licences and corporate deregulation as potential violations, making the transition to renewable energy a requirement, rather than an optional policy. The court also notes that "a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is a precondition for the enjoyment of many human rights", which means that, at least in theory, countries that fail to address climate change are human rights violators. Unfortunately, any law is only as strong as its enforcement mechanism, even more so for international law, where violators such as the US and Israel routinely walk out of treaties, rather than accept adverse decisions. Even before the US withdrew from most climate-related agreements under President Trump, it had long disregarded international laws that conflicted with "American interests", whether related to climate, conflict, or commerce. Still, at the bare minimum, the non-binding opinion should push the EU and countries that claim to hold human rights in high esteem into increasing their investment in climate change mitigation, while strengthening the case for some form of reparations, whether direct cash transfers or some form of preferential treatment for the worst-hit countries.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Iran defends ‘unshakable' right to enrich uranium ahead of key talks
TEHRAN: Iran on Thursday reaffirmed its right to enrich uranium, saying it was 'unshakable', on the eve of key talks with European powers threatening to reimpose nuclear sanctions. Friday's meeting, set to take place in Istanbul, will be the first since Israel's mid-June attack targeting key nuclear and military sites in the Islamic republic sparked a 12-day war. The United States joined its ally Israel in the offensive, striking three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight between June 21 and 22. 'Especially after the recent war, it is important for them to understand that the Islamic Republic of Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue,' said Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. 'We will not give up this right of the Iranian people,' he said, quoted by Tasnim news agency. The hostilities between Iran and Israel broke out just two days before Tehran and Washington were set to resume negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme. Britain, France and Germany – alongside China, Russia and the United States – are parties to a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which placed major restrictions on its atomic activities in return for the gradual lifting of UN sanctions. No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defense chief says However, in 2018, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the agreement during Donald Trump's first term as president and reimposed its own sanctions. Britain, France and Germany maintained their support for the 2015 accord and sought to continue trade with Iran, meaning UN and EU sanctions were not reinstated. But they have since accused Tehran of failing to uphold its commitments and are threatening to reimpose sanctions under a clause in the agreement that expires in October – something Iran is keen to avoid at all costs. 'Inaction by the E3 is not an option,' a European source said of the three powers, noting that Tehran would be reminded during the meeting that the snapback window closes this autumn. The source said Europeans were preparing to trigger the mechanism 'in the absence of a negotiated solution' and called on Iran to make 'clear gestures' regarding uranium enrichment and the resumption of cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. The IAEA says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 percent – far beyond the 3.67 percent cap set by the 2015 accord. That is a short step from the 90 percent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Western powers, led by the United States and backed by Israel, have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons. Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production. Tehran and Washington had held five rounds of nuclear talks starting in April, but a planned meeting on June 15 was cancelled after Israel launched its strikes on Iran.
