That's all, folks: there won't be another Nothing Phone (3) device
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Nothing Phone (3a)
Carl Pei has made it clear that with the Phone (3)'s release, now the family is complete:
Image source – X
On one hand, that's as logical as it gets. In the Phone (3) family, there's a high-end device, the Nothing Phone (3) , for those who don't mind paying the premium $800 price (on par with the Galaxy S25 in terms of cost). Then, there's the Phone (3a) duo for those on a budget or those who don't need a flagship-grade performance. These two are extremely similar devices, with the Pro just having a better zoom camera, but I'll get to detail in a moment.
The Nothing Phone 3. | Image by PhoneArena
So, we have a high-end device for power users and those who are not financially restrained and two more devices that lean towards the budget-friendly category. But do we? Sure, the Nothing Phone (3) is the flagshippest phone Nothing has produced to date, but is it a real flagship? Those who'll deny its flagship label will inevitably point out that the Phone (3) doesn't pack the top-shelf Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, but instead, packs the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. That's a powerful chip, nearly as fast as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (in my book, that's pretty decent!)It's not quite "best of the best", sure – but it's a massive leap over the Phone (2) and miles ahead of the midrange Phone (3a) duo.
The cameras finally feel flagship-worthy too: four 50MP sensors, including a big main lens, a periscope zoom with AI tricks, an ultrawide, and a selfie cam that shoots 4K. The rest of the hardware is solid. Ultra-thin bezels, a sharp and super-bright 6.67-inch AMOLED display, a beefy 5,150mAh battery (take that, Samsung!), and fast charging. On the software side, Nothing OS 3.5 on Android 15 keeps things smooth and stylish, with a promise of five years of updates – flagship territory.
The Nothing Phone 3a and 3a Pro. | Image by PhoneArena The Nothing (3a) duo, on the other hand, consists of two oddly similar handsets – similar to the point of having to wonder why they share the same timeline.In fact, were it not for the rear panel design, they're almost impossible to tell apart. Both feature a 6.77-inch 120Hz AMOLED display, Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset, 5,000mAh battery with 50W fast charging, and the signature transparent design with Glyph lighting and AI-driven Essential Key. The main differences? The Pro version adds a 50MP periscope zoom camera, a higher-res selfie camera, slightly more RAM and storage, and a circular camera island on the back. In essence, these two phones are nearly identical – one is just dressed up a little fancier.Nothing is now clearly focused on the next installment of its handset(s) – what's probably going to be called the Nothing Phone (4) series.
Fun fact of the day: if Nothing was a China-based company (and not a London-based one), it's likely the brand would have skipped the number 4 entirely. In Chinese culture, the number 4 is considered unlucky because it sounds similar to the word for "death" in Mandarin and Cantonese. Many Chinese smartphone makers, like OnePlus and Vivo, have avoided the number in model names to sidestep bad luck and negative perception. Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
No one's ready to replace Tim Cook — and Apple is fine with that
Apple is going through one of its biggest leadership changes in years, but don't expect CEO Tim Cook to go anywhere — at least not anytime soon. As thoroughly covered by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, even with recent setbacks in artificial intelligence and slower product innovation, Cook has full support from Apple's board and is expected to stay on for years to come. One of the biggest changes is the upcoming retirement of Chief Operating Officer Jeff Williams, who has been with Apple since 1998. He played a key role in product development and was widely seen as Cook's likely successor. With his departure, Apple loses a leader who helped shape the Apple Watch, health products, and core operations. Williams' responsibilities are now being split between several other executives. Sabih Khan, previously in charge of the supply chain, is now Apple's new COO. Apple's design teams will report directly to Cook, while health and Siri-related software will move under software chief Craig Federighi. Other areas, like AppleCare, are also being reassigned. This follows another recent change: CFO Luca Maestri has handed off his role to Kevan Parekh. Other veterans, including Dan Riccio and Phil Schiller, have also retired or stepped back. Many of Apple's top leaders are now in their 60s, and more exits are expected soon. Even with these changes, Cook is not showing signs of stepping down. He turns 65 in November, but many believe he could lead Apple for another five years or more. With no clear second-in-command after Williams leaves, hardware chief John Ternus is seen as a possible future CEO. However, his limited experience in finance and operations could make that path more difficult. Tim Cook has been with Apple with 1998 and was appointed as the new CEO by Apple's Board of Directors following the resignation of Steve Jobs in August 2011. | Image credit — Apple For now, Cook remains in full control. Some even believe he could eventually become chairman if Arthur Levinson retires from that is clearly entering a period of change, but leadership at the very top remains steady. Cook's continued presence may help keep the company stable, though the lack of a clear successor could raise concerns if an unexpected transition is needed. From my personal perspective, Apple is better off keeping Tim Cook in place for now. With so many top executives leaving and teams being reorganized, adding a new CEO into the mix would create too much disruption all at once. Cook brings stability, knows the company inside and out, and is still trusted by the board. Apple's real focus should be on fixing its current issues — especially in AI, design, and innovation — before thinking about a leadership handoff. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
4 hours ago
- Phone Arena
This was supposed to be the best foldable of 2025, so why doesn't it exist?
I've been a fan of this phone brand ever since its inception, which coincided with the start of my employment here at PhoneArena. Ever since then, through the ups and downs, great releases, and disappointing launches, I've always enjoyed using devices made by this specific brand. It probably hasn't grown to be the household name its founders intended, but it is definitely one of the more recognizable Android makers around that still provide steady competition to Samsung, Google, and Apple. And it simply refuses to make the phone that would easily sweep the competition in the US. The brand is OnePlus, and the dream phone in question is none other than the OnePlus Open 2, which doesn't exist, but I'd have been on cloud nine if it did. At the time of its launch, the first OnePlus Open was one of the better foldable phones available in the US, a very decent and appealing alternative to the Galaxy Z Fold and the Pixel Fold. Looking back at it in hindsight from mid-2025, it is a bit rough around the edges and had a lot of potential for steady improvements but was still among the best phones you could get in late 2023, either foldables or not. The blessing and the curse of the OnePlus Open is that it wasn't a terribly original phone, so to speak. The phone used the design blueprint of parent company Oppo's Find N3 foldable and combined superb hardware with OnePlus' pretty decent OxygenOS, which is still among the cleaner custom Android skins around. The OnePlus Open had a decent camera, a small display crease, and lots of other redeeming qualities, with the only "downside" being its fairly high price (which was still more affordable than the Galaxy or the first Pixel Fold ). Overall, a successful translation of an excellent Oppo phone to a superb OnePlus flagship, which at the time felt like a formula that would be easily perfected in the future. I mean, the only thing OnePlus had to do was get Oppo's next foldable, rebadge it, throw in its own interface, and call it a day. However, the hopes of getting a successor to the OnePlus Open , likely styled after the exceptional Oppo Find N5, were sadly crushed with the announcement that OnePlus won't be releasing a foldable phone in 2025. Ah, what woe! With the risk of sounding melodramatic, I still remember the day when I read that news, and ever since, I've had the blues when I think of OnePlus, as the OnePlus Open 2 was probably my most anticipated device of the year, the one that could have easily stolen the spotlight in 2025. It would have been an outstanding phone: below 9 mm in thickness when folded, with super-bright OLED displays, the Snapdragon 8 Elite, a large 6,000 mAh silicon-carbon battery, and a great camera, as well as all the other exceptional bits and pieces that make the Oppo Find N5 such an impressive device of its own. The OnePlus Open 2 would have been the perfect foldable phone (Image by PhoneArena) Well, sure, in all but name the Oppo Find N5 is essentially what the OnePlus Open 2 should have been. However, while it went global, the phone isn't available in some key markets like the USA, and it might not support all the bands of your carrier, so even if you go out of your way to import the device, there's always the risk that it won't work properly, as a OnePlus phone would. This makes it a curiosity that only phone reviewers, YouTubers, and die-hard foldable or Oppo fans would want to use, less so the average person who's browsing the phone section at Walmart, T-Mobile, or Best Buy. There are also some small but important differences in the interface. Despite the most significant difference between OxygenOS and ColorOS being the name itself, the interface that OnePlus uses has an extra sprinkle of attention to detail. Color OS, while mostly similar, just feels off. Another phone that could have helped OnePlus stay in the conversation more is a hypothetical OnePlus 13 Ultra, and that's yet another device that doesn't exist. The OnePlus 13 is mostly a slightly downgraded version of the Oppo Find X8 Pro, lacking the nice periscope camera and the quick camera button, for example. Well, the China-only Oppo Find X8 Ultra, which I really wanted to use as a daily driver, would have served as a very impressive foundation for a hypothetical OnePlus 13 Ultra, a phone that could have easily intermingled with all the top flagships in the US and potentially come out on top. Sadly, like the OnePlus Open 2 , it seems OnePlus is slowly getting pushed out of the premium segment. Not from an outside factor or a rival, but from within, from Oppo's market strategies themselves. Due to the geopolitical situation, it seems that Oppo is wary of spending too many resources on the US market, and while the global versions of all its phones and OnePlus itself are still mostly good to go in the US, this year's toning down of the flagship and high-end effort is likely a sign of the things to come. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
GSM Arena
5 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, Z Flip7 or Z Flip7 FE?
Peter, 13 July 2025 They are here – Samsung launched its next-gen foldables this week. This includes a new Fold and a new Flip model and, for the first time, a cheaper Flip FE. Do you have your eyes set on a particular model – and if yes, which one? The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is significantly thinner than its predecessor – it went from 12.1mm/5.6mm to 8.9mm/4.2mm when folded/unfolded. It's lighter too, 215g vs. 239g. That's 3g less than the S25 Ultra! However, Samsung had to make some sacrifices: the battery capacity stayed the same (4,400mAh) as did charging (25W/15W) and S Pen support has been removed. Both displays have gotten bigger – 6.5' cover display (up from 6.3') and 8.0' inside (up from 7.6'). This comes with increased dimensions, though, a folded phone now measures 158.4 x 72.8mm, compared to 153.5 x 68.1mm before. For what it's worth, the vanilla S25 is 70.5mm wide and the Edge is 75.6mm, so the Z Fold7 is still usable one-handed. The phone now boasts a 200MP main camera and other upgrades – check out the camera samples we took out and about in New York. One change that may prove less popular is that Samsung removed the under-display camera inside and replaced it with a 10MP punch hole camera – it offers better quality, sure, but now there's a hole in the 8' display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 has slimmed down as well – from 14.9mm/6.9mm on its predecessor to 13.7mm/6.5mm (the weight is essentially unchanged at 188g). However, this model brings a bigger battery – 4,300mAh isn't huge, but surprising to see given the slimmer build (and since Samsung couldn't increase the capacity of the Z Fold7 battery). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 This one also has bigger displays inside and out – an edge-to-edge 4.1' cover display and a 6.9' inner display. However, the only notable change in the camera setup is the 10-bit HDR video support (also available on the Z Fold7). That means no dedicated zoom lens, so you'll have to make do with 2x in-sensor zoom from the 50MP main. Check out our camera samples to see what that looks like. Don't miss our Galaxy Z Fold7 and Z Flip7 hands-on if you want to know more about these foldables. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is kind of a re-release of the Z Flip6. Here's the comparison – long story short, last year's Exynos 2400 (from the S24 series) replaces the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy. The performance is about the same, but efficiency is a concern. The S24+ (Exynos 2400, 4,900mAh battery) scored 12:30 in our Active Use test, while the S24 Ultra (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 5,000mAh) lasted longer and scored 13:49. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE The FE has the same battery capacity as the Z Flip6, 4,000mAh, despite being thicker than the Z Flip7. Also, it has less RAM, 8GB vs. 12GB. And if that wasn't enough, the Z Flip7 FE is not available from US carriers (retailers do sell unlocked units, though). While we're on the topic of chipsets, we should note that the premium Galaxy Z Flip7 is powered exclusively by the Exynos 2500 – yes, even in the North American market. Have a look at the pricing. The Z Flip7 FE starts at $200/£200/€200 less than the Z Flip6 did last year, but you can still find Z Flip6 units – and they often cost less than the FE. As for the other two, the Z Fold7 got pricier, while the Z Flip7 costs the same as the Z Flip6 did at launch. Samsung's new foldables Has the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 won you over with slimmer and lighter design or has it turned you away with its price hike? Or was it the removed features? Vote below and leave a comment with your thoughts. What about the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7? It fixes most of the major complaints we had with the Z Flip6, other than the camera and charge speed. What do you think? The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is necessary – foldables can be quite expensive! But it's still more than something like a Motorola Razr or Razr+. How do you feel about the FE? Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 256GB 12GB RAM $ 1,999.99 $ 1,999.99 512GB 12GB RAM $ 1,999.99 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 256GB 12GB RAM $ 1,099.99 $ 1,099.99 512GB 12GB RAM $ 1,099.99 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G 128GB 8GB RAM $ 899.99 $ 899.99 256GB 8GB RAM $ 899.99
