The third Day of the Arab Media Conference Commences in Baghdad
Baghdad-INA
The third day of the Arab Media Conference in Baghdad, hosted by the Iraqi Media Network(IMN), began this morning, Friday.
The head of IMN, Karim Hamadi, confirmed yesterday, Thursday, that the holding of 4th Arab Media Conference in Baghdad represents an important milestone in Iraq's openness to its Arab and regional surroundings, noting that Baghdad has once again become a center for Arab media.
"With great pride and honor, we celebrate today the convening of the Fourth Arab Media Conference on the land of Baghdad, to once again become a center for Arab dialogue, a platform for meetings, and a stage that reflects the history, the depth of the present, and the aspirations of the future,' The head of IMN said in his speech during the Fourth Arab Media Conference in Baghdad, attended by a reporter from the Iraqi News Agency (INA).
'Baghdad's hosting of this major media event, with the participation of more than 150 Arab media professionals and journalists, reflects the growing confidence in the role played by IMN as a national institution that seeks to establish a realistic media discourse that reflects the prosperous image of Iraq and its aspirations for a better future," He explained .
"Iraq has witnessed significant transformations in recent years in the political, economic, and urban aspects, and the media, led by IMN, played an active role in keeping pace with this journey, highlighting achievements, and conveying a balanced and responsible image of the reality of the country,' He added.
Prominent figures from Arab thinkers, media professionals, and decision-makers flocked to Baghdad, unanimously affirming that the media is no longer just a tool for conveying news, but has become a central actor in shaping public opinion and formulating public policies, especially on issues such as the environment, regional stability, and sustainable development.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Memri
4 days ago
- Memri
The Plain Truth (Even If Frustrating To Some)
Despite President Donald Trump's most daring and historically unique military operation against Iran's military nuclear facilities – a move for which Western civilization is morally indebted to him for preventing the destruction of an entire country, Israel – the Iranian regime is still not defeated. Following the war, the bare reality emerges: Trump's goals are: A. Stability in the non-stop turbulent Muslim world, preferably through regional dictatorships and reaching a deal with them (rather than seeking to eradicate them), be it the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir, (a jihadist who recommended Trump for a Nobel Prize for peace…) Saudi Arabia's Muhammad bin Salman, the United Arab Emirates Muhammad Bin Zayed, and Egypt's Abd Al-Fattah Al-Sisi (to name just a few.) B. Low and stable oil prices. C. Recognition of his leadership through the Nobel Prize. D. Succeeding in the mid-term elections, without which he might become politically paralyzed, (and that success demands all of the above.) Another goal is the need to solve the public affairs wound of Gaza, which all Arab countries and Europe demand of Trump. President Trump is not interested in a replay of the Neo-Conservatives' experiments in exporting democracy that ended with jihadist control in Afghanistan and Iranian control in Iraq. President Trump will have no business with the repressed ethnic minorities nor with anti-regime Persians because this will only create chaos and a rise in oil prices. Such an uprising is not even possible as it would require leadership, weapons, money, and food. All are unavailable. Let alone the fact that exporting Western values – such as democracy, freedom, etc. – is a recipe for disaster. Europe joins Trump in this understanding and in the focus on stability and on low and stable oil prices that can only be guaranteed through dictators with whom Europe works well. At this point in time Khamenei is granted immunity and Israel cannot touch him because President Trump does not want chaos now or ever. Since Khamenei is accepted and protected, so will be Hamas, whom America has already recognized and talked to. If they do not come up with crazy demands, they will continue to rule Gaza and, in time, Israel will be forced to withdraw and will be allowed to take military action when a threat is imminent just like before the war. If Netanyahu stands in the way, Israel will not get warplanes and ammunition, so he cannot do much in opposition to the above. In the coming months, Iran's prevailing within the Muslim world will be clear. Their threat to the oil of the Middle East will make them hegemonic in the region. KSA and UAE will slide gradually toward Iran's hegemony.[1] What Trump seems to be committed to is preventing the nuclear threat, which constitutes a problem not only for Israel. But the Iranian regime could still buy elements of these weapons from the U.S. "ally," Pakistan. The other Iranian threats – missiles, terrorism by its proxies, and cyberattacks – will continue. Israel will continue to have to fight for its life. With regard to the long-range missiles, which can reach Europe, Israel will have some European support. The few past anti-regime disturbances that occurred in Iran in the last decade were inconsequential. For the foreseeable future, the reality created in the last decades by the Islamic revolution will prevail.[2] The only hope for a possible change is if the Sunni world rebels against the hegemonic ambitions of the Shia. But even if that happens – it probably will not – it is not clear how that could be of any benefit to the West, since it will be led by Islamist powers hostile to the West, such as Turkey and Qatar. *Yigal Carmon is Founder and President of MEMRI
Memri
4 days ago
- Memri
Saudi News Portal Posts Articles By Iranian Oppositionists Calling To Topple The Iranian Regime
In the recent months, the Saudi news portal Elaph posted many articles by Iranian opposition figures in exile that slammed the Iranian regime. The writers, some of them members of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI),[1] decried this regime's oppression of and violence against the Iranian people, its pursuit of nuclear weapons, its support for terrorism and its actions to destabilize the region. They also criticized the international community's impotence in the face of the regime's conduct and argued that the futile negotiations with it will not lead to any change in its positions. According to the articles, the regime's pursuit of nuclear weapons and its export of terrorism are meant to guarantee its survival. Therefore, as long as this regime exists, it will not stop advancing these aims, although the Iranian people are unwilling to sacrifice themselves to this end. The authors of the articles stressed that Iranian people, which suffers the regime's tyranny, now feels it has a historic opportunity to achieve freedom and justice. Therefore, it will not cease its struggle until the regime is overthrown and Iran is established as a free and democratic state. "The time has come for the Iranian regime to collapse," said the writers, and called on the international community to support the people's struggle. Iranians in Europe protest against the regime (Image: April 25, 2025) The following are translated excerpts from these articles: Iranian Oppositionist: As Long as the Iranian Regime Exists, It Will Not Cease Its Repression, Terror And Pursuit Of Nuclear Weapons; The Solution Is For The People To Replace It In an article published on June 16, 2025, three days after Israel launched its offensive against Iran, Iranian oppositionist Nezam Mir Mohammadi stated that, as a result of this attack, the Iranian regime is now facing an existential threat. He urged the international community to take a firm stance against it, and to understand that it will never stop its terror and repression, so that the only choice is for the Iranian people to replace it. Mohammadi wrote: "The Iranian regime is at a dangerous turning point in light of escalating international and regional tensions. The resolution by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors,[2] as well as Israel's military strike on the Natanz nuclear facility [and its elimination of] senior Iranian officials, have placed the regime in an embarrassing situation. Now it is trying to buy time and maneuver to avoid [further] confrontation, but it is facing unprecedented pressures that threaten its continued existence... "For over four decades the Iranian regime has relied on instigating wars by means of its proxies in the countries of the region, which turned it into a major source of chaos and instability. By politicizing [various] religious and Islamic-Arab causes, this regime managed to impose its influence on the region's countries and to embroil them in long-term conflicts… "The regime tries to use these tensions [in the region] to mobilize the Islamic countries and peoples to support it, but after 46 years of deception and concealment, the world now realizes the truth about it. This strategy, which was effective in the past, no longer works because the world [now] sees the regime turning against the interests of the region and of the Iranian people itself. "The Iranian regime currently faces two options: either succumb to the international demands by dismantling its nuclear program and [thus] lose one of its sources of strength, or continue the escalation, which will lead to a military confrontation that sources have called 'military suicide.' The Israeli attacks, as well as the exposure of the secret nuclear program by the [Iranian] opposition,[3] increased the regime's isolation in the international arena. Its insistence on continuing its policy of deception and of instigating crises left it at an impasse, for its mask has slipped, exposing its true face as a threat to the region's security… "The international community must reassess its policy toward Iran, with focus on [taking] a firm stance that will ensure the region's stability and security. Continuing its present policy could bring the [Iranian] regime to a disastrous confrontation, not only with the world but also with its [own] people. "The clerics who rule Iran have a rich record of deception and concealment, and were it not for the [information] exposed by the Iranian opposition over the past 34 years, they would have obtained nuclear weapons long ago. This regime has never met its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) or under UN Security Council Resolution 2231,[4] and has always used negotiations to buy time and [to try] to complete its nuclear program. "Obtaining a nuclear bomb, exporting terror and sparking foreign wars served this regime as a strategic [way to] guarantee its survival. Due to the great failures suffered by the regime and its proxies in the region over the past year, the nuclear program became even more vital to it. Experience proves that, as long as this regime exists, it will not cease its oppression, terror, export of extremism, instigation of wars and [advancement of] its nuclear program. The ultimate way to eliminate this terrorist tyranny, [that seeks to be] armed with a nuclear bomb, is for the Iranian people and opposition to replace this regime. And as thousands of lawmakers, leaders and senior political figures in various countries have declared, the international community must recognize the right of the Iranian people and the Iranian opposition to fight this regime and replace it."[5] Iranian Oppositionist: The Iranian People Will Continue Its Struggle Until The Regime Falls And A Free, Democratic Iran Is Established In an April 22, 2025 article, NCRI member Mehdi Oghbai noted that the renewal of nuclear negotiations between the Iranian regime and the West was frequently accompanied by a surge in the regime's execution of dissidents. He explained that this phenomenon stems from the regime's fear of a domestic uprising against it, and stressed that, despite the danger, the Iranian people will continue their struggle until they achieve their liberty. Oghbai wrote: "Amid the internal and external crises faced by the Iranian regime, there is a close and conspicuous connection between a rise in the number of executions and the start of new rounds of nuclear negotiations. This link is no coincidence. It is a calculated strategy [on the part of the regime] aimed at repressing the Iranian people and preventing the outbreak of a popular uprising as a result of the regime's weakness in these negotiations. In 2024 there was a significant surge in executions by the Iranian regime. By February there were 124 [executions], six times as many as in February 2023 (21 cases)… "The Iranian resistance renews its call for the UN, the EU countries and all the international organizations that defend human rights to condemn these barbaric executions and take immediate measures to save the lives of the prisoners sentenced to death, especially the political prisoners. "In his Eid Al-Fitr sermon, [Iran's Supreme Leader Ali] Khamenei revealed his real fears, saying that the biggest threat [to Iran] was internal rather than external, namely, the possibility of popular revolutions and uprisings. This fear causes the regime to increase the rate of executions, especially of political prisoners, in order to intimidate the people and prevent any protest activity. The Iranian resistance, which represents the voice of the people yearning for liberty, underscores that these executions are a desperate attempt by the regime to survive amid the increasing pressures it is facing. "Khamenei himself described the nuclear negotiations as 'dishonorable,' which indicates that he realizes he will have to make concessions. These concessions, which reflect the regime's weakness and helplessness, are a clear message to the Iranian people, who are preparing to take this opportunity to rise up. This is why the regime resorts to executions as a means of repressing the public, in an attempt to stem the wave of protests it thinks may come… Suffering under the tyranny and oppression of this regime, the Iranian people see this moment as a historic opportunity to attain liberty and justice. "In sum, these developments reveal the distress of the Iranian regime, which is trying in vain to extinguish the embers of popular resistance. History teaches that no oppression, no matter how cruel, can stop a people determined to achieve its freedom. The Iranian resistance, which enjoys the support of the people, will keep struggling until this regime falls and a free and democratic Iran arises."[6] Iranian Oppositionist: The Time Has Come for the Iranian Regime to Collapse; The People Are Fed Up With It Just As They Were Fed Up With The Shah Following the attacks on Iran by Israel and the U.S., Iranian oppositionist Mahmoud Hakimian, a member of the NCRI's Foreign Affairs Committee, called on the international community and the countries of the region to help the Iranian resistance topple the regime, which, he said, has spent four decades waging war in the region and deceiving the world at the negotiating table, and is now continuing on this destructive path. He wrote: "For the past four decades, the region has experienced wars and conflicts that have left a negative mark on the people who live there… The indisputable fact is that they all occurred following the establishment of the regime of the Islamic Republic, which is based on the extremist ideology of the Rule of the Jurisprudent. "The positive diplomatic efforts and the contacts held by the countries of the region and the international community with the Iranian regime did not prevent the outbreak of the wars [instigated by Iran]. Worse, with the passage of time these [wars] became much more bitter, destructive and dangerous to the peace and security of the region and the world… "Against the backdrop of the series of wars in the region, which ended with the fall of the Syrian regime and the curtailment of Hizbullah's military role in Lebanon, the most recent confrontation between Israel and the Iranian regime erupted in the context of Iran's nuclear program. This is a very grave confrontation that is likely to bring the region to the edge of an abyss. No matter what has been said or written about the circumstances of this confrontation, [it is clear that] the central and significant motivation for it is the policy of the Iranian regime and its [stubborn] adherence to its plans and its dubious path. Even if we assume that this confrontation will end, there is no guarantee that another war won't break out as long as this regime exists and adheres to its path. "No agreement with this regime, including a nuclear agreement, can influence its aggressive nature, now or in the future. When this regime rows weak, it keeps silent and presents itself as innocent; but if it senses that it has the upper hand and that the conditions are right, it will revert to its familiar pattern in the region and the world. [Then, the region and the world] will not be safe from its evil unless they support the legitimate struggle of the Iranian people for freedom, for a [new Iranian] regime that believes in human rights and coexistence, and for a non-nuclear Iran that maintains a separation between religion and state."[7] In an earlier article, Hakimian argued that today's popular resistance against the Iranian regime closely resembles the opposition against the Shah's regime in 1978, just before its collapse. He stated that the Iranian people, who have paid a heavy price for the regime's nuclear program, are tired of this and are no longer willing to do so, and that the time has come to overthrow the regime and to reforge Iran as a democracy. Hakimian wrote: "The rapid events and developments of the situation in Iran, especially the domestic developments, are reminiscent of 1978, the year preceding the fall of the Shah's regime, when everything was at an impasse. The regime [at that time] did everything in its power to ensure its survival, and even agreed to unprecedented concessions in order to stop the spread of the growing popular resistance. But [eventually], what happened, happened... and the regime had no choice but to face its bitter fate and collapse. "The similarity between 1978 and 2025 lies in the popular sense of rejection and hatred toward the regime, which have reached their peak… However, it is important to note that, in addition to the regime's acts of oppression [against its own people], which have crossed [every] line, the regime's foreign policy has also turned Iran into a source of terror that instigates wars and crises [abroad], thus harming Iran's reputation and standing in the international arena. This [too] has caused the people to be fed up with this regime and regard it as unfit to rule… "The main demand in Iran right now is for a regime change that will not allow the return of dictatorship. That is why the popular protests are increasing significantly, as well as the operations of the Resistance Units,[8] which the regime can no longer hide… The Iranian people, who became fed up with the previous regime [of the Shah] and saw no choice but to overthrow it, are now taking a similar stance toward [the current regime]… "What is clear is that the Iranian people, who suffered greatly because of the nuclear program and continue to suffer because of it, are not willing to sacrifice for a dubious program that has brought nothing but negative consequences for them and for Iran. This regime, which is heading for a disconnect with the world, is doing the same thing vis-à-vis its [own] people, who will apparently not allow it to remain. It is time for the Iranian regime to collapse. This is the moment to replace it, to support the Iranian people and resistance in overthrowing this terror-sponsoring regime, and to establish a democratic and popular government."[9]
Shafaq News
4 days ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's raid on secret Baathist cell and the persistent shadow of Saddam
Shafaq News/ The Arab Socialist Baath Party, long banned in Iraq and synonymous with dictatorship and war, has once again cast its shadow over the country. In a recent high-profile security operation, Iraqi forces raided a clandestine meeting of senior Baath figures in al-Sulaymaniyah province. From Power to Prohibition The Baath Party emerged in the 1940s, grounded in Arab nationalism and socialism. It reached its apex in Iraq following the 1968 military coup led by Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr, before Saddam Hussein assumed full control. Over decades in power, the party waged catastrophic conflicts, including the eight-year war with Iran (1980–1988) and the 1990 invasion of Kuwait. The latter triggered an international military response and ushered in a crippling economic blockade that persisted until 2003, when US-led forces removed Saddam's regime. Enshrined in Iraq's 2005 constitution, the party remains banned, accused of crimes against humanity and severe rights violations. Precision Strike A security source told Shafaq News, 'The operation targeted a meeting planned weeks in advance, attended by key figures attempting to rebuild the party's structure in Iraq.' According to the source, 'Accurate intelligence enabled the operation's perfect timing, leading to the arrest of several members, including former military and political officials.' The source further noted, 'Over the past period, the National Security Service has detained multiple Baath Party members across provinces such as Baghdad, Saladin, and Kirkuk, dismantling cells aligned with the banned party.' Jamal Mustafa Abdullah Sultan, previously a presidential office officer and Saddam's son-in-law, evaded capture during the raid. 'He had already been listed among the 55 most wanted by US forces and spent several years in detention before his release,' the source explained. Baath's Evolving Objectives Experts argue that while the party's remnants no longer pose a significant political threat, they seek to exploit Iraq's political, economic, and social crises to foster sympathetic environments, particularly in areas with security gaps or poor services. Political analyst Shamil Imran told Shafaq News, 'These cells' reemergence reflects attempts to capitalize on popular frustration and a lack of justice, but they remain futile amid widespread public rejection and vigilant security efforts.' He added, 'Iraq's intelligence agencies have dismantled numerous Baath-linked networks in recent years, executing all arrests under judicial warrants. The constitution explicitly criminalizes any attempt to revive this party.' Imran emphasized, 'The Baath's crimes targeted all Iraqi communities—Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds—leaving behind mass graves and forced displacement. It is highly unlikely that this party will find any fertile ground for a comeback.' No Ground for Return Security expert Mazen al-Jubouri commented, 'The Baath's role as a coherent, influential force ended in 2003. What remains are scattered remnants operating through limited networks seeking survival.' He told Shafaq News, 'Security forces are tracking these efforts meticulously, and so far, they have successfully prevented any real threat. The concern lies with possible external actors or agendas that might exploit this issue for political or regional purposes.' Observers say the operation could spark a new wave of arrests and legal pursuits, especially as the identities of the meeting's attendees are being confirmed. The crackdown is also expected to bolster public confidence in Iraq's security institutions, despite lingering fears about the resurgence of Baathist rhetoric in new forms. The 2005 constitution's Article 7 explicitly criminalizes any activities, promotion, or financing related to the Baath Party, mandating legal consequences for violators. Voices of Rejection In Baghdad and al-Sulaymaniyah, Iraqi citizens expressed unequivocal opposition to any Baath revival. Ali Khudair, a government employee, told Shafaq News, 'It is unfortunate that some still dream of reviving this party that destroyed Iraq and engaged in disastrous wars.' He added, 'This party devastated the country and paved the way for its occupation by US forces. Its leader's emergence from the hole was a fitting testament to the regime's end.' Nisreen Jamil, another resident, stated, 'Names like Saddam Hussein remind us of repression, fear, and mass graves. We never want this nightmare or even the mention of its fascist party that committed crimes against the Iraqi people. This past cannot be erased from Iraq's memory.' She urged authorities to 'pursue anyone promoting this bloody ideology that pushed Iraq into dark historical eras through wars.'
