
Just think what we could done with the cash wasted on the CalMac model
In comparison, council-owned monohull ferries operating on Shetland's frequent inter-island services have minimal shore-based, shift-working crews and operate efficiently for significantly longer hours daily than CalMac; likewise, privately owned Western Ferries, with one route, four ships and exemplary reliability and which incidentally also pays tax to support public services.
Mr Turbet finishes by extolling the virtues of 'the public model's ability to divert resources where they are needed', as compared with an operator serving just one route. Well, if CalMac's record of network capacity constraints and chaos is his desired model, I fear for the future of our island communities.
There is, however, a better way – catamarans, minimal shore-based crewing, multi-ship frequent crossings and gradually-introduced debundled route tendering, preferably to community-owned entities.
Roy Pedersen, Inverness.
Read more letters
What's the value of human life?
It is quite remarkable that an amendment to decriminalise self-abortions until birth in England and Wales was considered in the same week as new legislation seeking to decriminalise assisted suicide in the Westminster Parliament. Similar initiatives are also being examined in Scotland, as mentioned by Hannah Brown ("Labour MP calls for Scotland to decriminalise abortion", June 29). It is, therefore, appropriate to ask what is happening in our modern society; why have many members of the general public, and their representatives in Parliament, given up on the concept of the value of human life?
A societal paradox seems obvious. UK and Scottish government funding has been quite rightly provided to support extremely premature infants, while initiatives are considered to enable abortions until birth. Similarly, financial support is rightly being provided to prevent suicides, including amongst young persons, while new assisted suicide legislation is being considered.
In all this confusion, it is worth asking why human life should be valued. Certainly, from a purely scientific perspective, human beings have no value whatsoever since they are just made up of about 70 per cent water and a few other biochemical compounds.
Do human beings then have value because they have autonomy? But this would mean that some lives, such as the unborn and those with very serious mental disorders, are worthless. Moreover, how can the autonomy of persons, logically, give them any worth?
Maybe the value of a human life comes from the amount of pleasure or suffering it experiences. But why should the activation of certain sensory cells in the brains of individuals give them any greater worth? Moreover, if pleasure is all that mattered, it would mean that all persons in society would have lives of unequal value.
So where does the value of human life come from, including that of politicians who adjudicate (after a few hours of discussion) whether some of those around them have lives unworthy of life, which can be ended? But perhaps politicians in Parliament only exist to support the concept of a social contract where everyone should equally respect each other. But why then should the strong and powerful respect such a contract? And why should anyone care if no one has any value?
The only possible answer to the question of why human persons have worth, lies in the belief that every human person has immeasurable value. A belief that everyone should share in a secular society if it is to remain civilised and not descend into a jungle of barbarity.
In this regard, it was distressing to see so many MSPs disparage personal beliefs in the debates on assisted suicide in the Scottish Parliament. They ought to have realised that it is only because they, themselves, share the belief in the value and the equality of all human life, that democracy and the Scottish Parliament actually exist.
Dr Antony Latham (Chair); Dr Anne Williams (Vice-Chair); Prof Dr Robert Minns (Honorary Chair); Dr Calum MacKellar (Director of Research); Dr. Danielle de Zeeuw (Senior Researcher), Scottish Council on Human Bioethics, Edinburgh.
Why the EU is struggling
Ian McConnell's article rehashing tired Brexit regrets ("We're all still paying price for hard Brexit", June 29) does so in defiance of mounting evidence that the EU's internal contradictions are being brutally exposed.
Donald Trump's proposed high tariffs on EU exports are not reckless bluster – they are a response to long-standing covert trade barriers and regulatory protectionism that have helped the EU run persistently high surpluses. The irony? Britain experienced the same treatment, yet was told to accept a £121 billion goods trade deficit with the EU (2023) while paying £10bn net annually into the EU coffers.
And this wasn't a global pattern. The UK's goods trade with the rest of the world was broadly in balance, underscoring how structurally skewed our trade relationship with the EU had become. The bloc's protectionist barriers – and rigid regulatory alignment – consistently undermined British competitiveness.
Unlike Britain's previous passivity, the US has now acted decisively. And with Fortress Europe under pressure, countries like Italy, facing economic malaise and rising populism, may well look to strike their own deals with the US, bypassing Brussels entirely.
Germany, meanwhile, long enjoyed the advantages of an artificially weak euro, supercharging its export dominance. But that model is now unravelling: a struggling car industry, falling Chinese demand, and crippling energy policy are exposing deep vulnerabilities. A weaker Germany means a less cohesive EU.
Outside the bloc, Britain is free to strike deals. Like, for example, trade deals with the US, India and the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership), which may be modest today, but they align us with the fastest-growing economies of this and the next generation. They represent flexibility and global engagement – exactly what Brexit was meant to enable.
The EU is now discovering how 'difficult to negotiate with' it has become – only this time, it's not Britain acquiescing but America swinging a hammer.
Ian Lakin, Aberdeen.
Debt worry for Scotland
The latest figures on Scotland's debt makes grim reading: average household unsecured debt is running at over £16,000 and more than 475,000 people are on benefits, while 810,000 16-64-year-olds are economically inactive.
There needs to be radical change to stimulate employment and a return to work in order to get us out of the financial rut that the SNP has allowed Scotland to sink into.
Dennis Forbes Grattan, Aberdeen.
Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump (Image: PA)
Please support these rabbis
It is tragic for humanity that two men have appeared on the world stage at the worst possible time and place.
One whom I am referring to is Benjamin Netanyahu. The government of which he is Prime Minister is responsible for murdering and injuring some 50,000 children (Unicef). That would keep most people awake at night. But no: he and his fanatical supporters press on, planning more suffering, more cruelty, more murdering of children, more clearing Palestinians off their land, destroying their infrastructure.
The other is Donald Trump. I do not need to list the ways in which he is singularly unfit to be 'leader of the free world'. I was however going to suggest he is unfit to be President of the United States, but that is a decision for the American electorate to make, once those who voted for him come to their senses.
I mentioned in my letter published on June 29 that one of the positive elements in this unfolding tragedy is the many Jewish Israelis 'who defy courageously their government by working for peace and justice'.
There are many such groups and I suggest that we can respond to their courage by providing them with financial assistance. I give one example only, that being Rabbis for Human Rights, who, driven by 'the profound Jewish values of responsibility for the safety and welfare of the stranger, the different and the weak, the widow and the orphan' provide aid for Palestinian communities facing state-backed settler violence and ethnic cleansing. There is a website for British Friends of Rabbis for Human Rights.
John Milne, Uddingston.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
'Glasgow is tired of being let down – and it deserves better'
We still walk the same streets riddled with potholes. We still wait weeks or months for hospital appointments. Our bins overflow, graffiti spreads, and fly-tipping piles up – all while city leaders insist we're "on the up." The disconnect between the Scottish Government, City Chambers, and the people who actually make Glasgow tick has never felt greater. This city, which should be the beating heart of Scotland, too often feels like an afterthought – neglected, ignored, and let down by those meant to stand up for it. Let's be honest. The SNP-run Scottish Government has slashed funding to Glasgow in real terms year after year. And Glasgow City Council – under Susan Aitken and her Green Party allies – appears more concerned with headlines and hashtags than with helping households. The rhetoric might be slick, but the results are sorely lacking. While the SNP obsesses over independence and pet projects – like challenging biological reality, taxing air miles, and hammering motorists – the basics are crumbling. Schools are stretched. GP practices are under siege. Cancer targets are missed. Waiting lists at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital keep growing. These aren't statistics – they're lives. Real people, real suffering, right here in Glasgow. At the same time, crime and antisocial behaviour are creeping further into the city centre. Local businesses and residents tell me they no longer feel safe. Police Scotland is stretched to the limit, expected to do more with less, while ministers look the other way. Instead of real leadership, we're served spin. When Glaswegians complain about rats and graffiti, we're told it's "no worse than any other city." That's not reassurance – that's resignation. And it's absolutely not good enough. Glasgow deserves more than complacency self-identifying as competence. It deserves more than half-hearted pledges about a "spruced-up" city, while the evidence on the streets tells a very different story. The people who pay the taxes to fund Susan Aitken's budget aren't asking for the world. They want the basics done right – here, in their own communities. No vanity projects, no funding pet causes in far-off places. Just the essentials: roads that don't wreck your car, pavements that don't trip you up, weekly bin collections, streets that feel safe again. And let's not forget Glasgow Southside's master of the SNP inner circle and her elusive estranged spouse of modest means but expansive motorhome tastes – well-fed, well-housed and well-insulated from scrutiny... until the polis come knocking. Now they expect you to pay his legal fees. We've yet to hear Susan Aitken question this entitlement. No doubt Nicola could write a book about this saga – and promote it on the taxpayers' dime. Call me old fashioned, but I'd rather see a city that works than a party chasing headlines – or disappearing behind the drapes in embarrassment. Fix the roads, for God's sake. Clear the rubbish. Back small businesses. Support our police. These aren't radical ideas, they're what most Glaswegians want. Scottish Conservatives believe in results, not rhetoric. We want a government that listens and a council that delivers. That starts with fair funding: give Glasgow its fair share of UK spending increases. Let local leaders plan for the long term, not lurch from one SNP budget crisis to the next. This summer, Glaswegians don't need another slogan from SNP HQ. They need real change. So here's the challenge to the SNP: stop the excuses. Stop the blame game. Start delivering. Because Glasgow is tired of being let down – and it deserves better.

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Greens should be open to alliance with Jeremy Corbyn party
Polanski is challenging Green MPs Adrian Ramsay and Ellie Chowns for the leadership of the party during an election this summer, and has been endorsed by around 100 councillors for the top job. He has been the deputy leader of the Green Party of England and Wales since 2022. The London Assembly member said he was open to a pact with anyone who could challenge the rise of Nigel Farage's Reform UK. READ MORE: How UK media are covering up British spy flights for Israel 'We have an increasingly unpopular Labour government that not only doesn't know how to handle it, but is actively making the conditions that are spurring on Nigel Farage even worse,' Polanski said in The Times. 'So I will ally myself with anyone who shares my and the Green Party's values.' Corbyn announced the launch of a new party, which does not yet have a name, last week. The Islington North MP and former Labour MP Zarah Sultana are set to 'co-lead the founding of a new party', with a leadership election to follow once it has been set up. Several independent MPs are expected to join Corbyn and Sultana in the new party. (Image: Stefan Rousseau/PA) Corbyn said: 'The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. "Discussions are ongoing - and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve.' Elsewhere, a source told The National that a small group of left-leaning Scots have been working behind the scenes to prepare the Scottish arm ahead of the Holyrood election. However, with the party not yet fully-fledged, how many, if any, candidates it will stand is still up in the air. READ MORE: New poll predicts Reform Westminster win with no Scottish MPs Collective Scotland said in a statement it was looking to build "a full-fledged electoral alliance of the Scottish left" for next year's Holyrood election. While the statement did not mention Corbyn or Sultana directly, it said that "as the left across Britain comes together to form a new political party, the Scottish left now has a similar opportunity to unite". We previously told how Polanski said he could understand why Scots want independence after 'decades of neglect' by Westminster.

The National
an hour ago
- The National
CalMac looking to recover repair costs for MV Caledonian Isles
The Caledonian Isles was taken out of service in January of last year for substantial work which was estimated to cost £5 million, with its return to the route between Ardrossan in North Ayrshire and Brodick on the Isle of Arran expected last June. But its return has been considerably delayed, with CalMac chief executive Duncan Mackison saying last month it is 'impossible to say' when it will return. A hull deformity was discovered after repairs were done by Cammell Laird in Birkenhead near Liverpool, which has had a knock-on effect which has prompted CalMac to begin proceedings to recover at least some of the money spent. READ MORE: Scotland weather to hit 'up to 28C' amid heatwave across country In a statement, a spokesman for the operator said: 'Following an investigation into the cause of the hull deformity, action is under way to recover costs. 'As this is commercially sensitive and subject to legal proceedings, we cannot comment further.' The long-running saga of the Caledonian Isles is yet another issue which has hit transport to Scotland's west coast islands in recent years, along with the major delays and cost overruns to two ferries being built at the Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow. The Glen Sannox entered service in January, while the Glen Rosa is not expected until next year, with projected costs rising from £97m when the contract was signed to more than £400m. The loss of the Caledonian Isles has also meant there have been no sailings from Ardrossan in six months. While the MV Isle of Arran has been re-shuffled to take over the route from Monday for the next two weeks, both the Glen Sannox and the Glen Rosa are too big for the port in the North Ayrshire town and as such have been sailing from Troon, further down the coast. READ MORE: Devolved relations reset with Labour has 'failed', says SNP official Locals fear the impact of losing the ferry service on the local economy, while islanders on Arran have also expressed concerns about getting to medical appointments on the mainland. The Scottish Government has said it is looking at buying the port from operator Peel Ports to make necessary upgrades to allow the ferries to dock there, but talks are said to have stalled.