
Pilot Calls Out Indian Men's Behaviour Towards Flight Attendants: "Secret Pics, Creepy Comments"
"I'm a pilot working for an international airline, and over time, I've heard this same complaint from cabin crew again and again that a lot of Indian men behave inappropriately towards female flight attendants. We're talking about things like secretly taking photos of them, making creepy comments, staring, or even trying to "accidentally" brush up against them. And sadly, more often than not, it's Indian men," she wrote in the post.
The pilot stressed that while not all Indian men exhibit this behaviour, it's common enough that crew members have come to anticipate it from Indian passengers. She expressed shame that their actions contribute to a growing negative stereotype of Indian male travellers globally, and lamented the bad reputation being created due to the actions of a few individuals.
"It's honestly embarrassing. I hate that we're building such a bad reputation because of the actions of a few, but it keeps happening often enough that crew members immediately recognise the pattern. I genuinely don't understand what goes through someone's head when they think it's okay to treat another professional. Whether it's entitlement, lack of exposure, or just plain disrespect, it's something we seriously need to talk about more openly," she added.
See the post here:
As a pilot, I'm embarrassed by how often Indian men disrespect flight attendants
by u/CupPleasant8812 in TwoXIndia
The pilot also called on Indians to speak out against such behaviour. The post resonated with many users, including flight attendants, who shared their own stories and experiences.
One user shared a similar experience, revealing that he had overheard flight attendants expressing dread about flying with Indian male passengers, particularly middle-aged ones, due to past experiences with inappropriate behaviour, unwanted touching, and drunken passengers causing unnecessary drama on flights from India to Thailand.
Another user commented, "I work for an international airline as a flight attendant and thank god for my company that we have strict rules in place in case a passenger behaves inappropriately. Indian aviation has such a pathetic approach to this, where you're expected to put up with anything just because the customer is 'god' It sucks how some people have ruined the experience of flying all in all because they have no decency and manners on how to behave on flights."
A third user wrote, "Indian men have the worst reputation globally. They should count their good luck that only Indian women, who have been conditioned to accept that they are allowed to have zero standards, put up with them."
A fourth added, "Knowing no repercussions will befall them is the reason why."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Jane Street Sets Aside $564 Million as India Probe Continues
(Bloomberg) -- Jane Street Group LLC has deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($564 million) in an escrow account to comply with an order from India's securities regulator, part of an ongoing probe into allegations of market manipulation by the US trading giant. While Indian authorities had previously indicated the deposit would allow Jane Street to return to local markets after a ban imposed on July 3, the regulator's statement on Monday didn't clarify whether the firm has a green light to resume trading. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has accused Jane Street of manipulative transactions involving local options and shares — allegations that the firm has denied. Jane Street doesn't intend to immediately return to India's options market, a person familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named as the information is private. The firm didn't reply to emails seeking comment. India's bombshell allegations against Jane Street have gripped the financial industry, pitting one of the world's biggest and most secretive trading firms against regulators in the largest equity derivatives market by volume. What happens next will hinge on the findings of SEBI's further probes into Jane Street's trading activity as well as the firm's decision on whether to officially file an appeal. In its initial order, the regulator said its investigation into the firm's trades in the options, cash and futures market will continue. The probes will include activity involving the flagship indexes of National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. and BSE Ltd., Bloomberg News reported earlier this month. On Monday, SEBI said the US firm has requested for 'certain conditional restrictions' imposed in SEBI's interim order to be lifted, the regulator said in a statement Monday. The regulator added that it is reviewing the request. Jane Street made about 365 billion rupees ($4.3 billion) in overall gains from trading in Indian derivatives and the cash market during the period between January 2023 and March 2025, according to SEBI. Jane Street told staff on July 6 that it strongly rejected the premise and substance of SEBI's interim order, and that it was preparing a formal response to the regulator and assessing legal options. The firm said that what the regulator called 'intraday index manipulation' was an example of basic index arbitrage trading, a practice common in financial markets. The New York-based quantitative trader's next move remains unclear. It can appeal SEBI's order before the Securities Appellate Tribunal, while also reserving the right to respond to the allegations within the 21 days of the order. If the regulator finds the response satisfactory, it may reverse its interim order. Otherwise, SEBI is expected to issue a confirmatory order outlining a timeline for its probe, before serving a so-called show-cause notice. SEBI said that Jane Street used its 'immense trading, financial and technological prowess' to illegally manipulate markets. It alleged that the company, on weekly index options expiry days, influenced prices in the futures and cash market, and earned huge profits on its options wagers mostly at the expense of individual traders. Jane Street also traded in India's cash and equity futures before the ban through a local arm and units registered outside the country, according to SEBI's order. The regulator in its order had directed stock exchanges to closely monitor any future dealings and positions of Jane Street and its units, to ensure that they do not directly or indirectly indulge in what it called 'manipulative activity.' Jane Street's absence has impacted India's derivatives market, with the value of options traded plunging to a four-month low at the expiration of Nifty 50 Index options on Thursday at NSE. On Monday, shares of BSE jumped as much as 4.5% in Mumbai, while those of Jane Street's local trading partner Nuvama Wealth Management Ltd. climbed 2.6%. Moneycontrol earlier reported that Jane Street had deposited the sum, citing people it didn't identify. (Updates with more context starting in second paragraph.) More stories like this are available on


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US Embassy warns: Visas can be revoked anytime for rule violations — What travellers should know
The US Embassy in India issued a stern reminder to visa holders, stating that violating US laws or immigration rules could lead to immediate visa revocation and deportation. The announcement, shared through an official post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), emphasised that US visa monitoring does not end after a visa is granted. 'U.S. visa screening does not stop after a visa is issued. We continuously check visa holders to ensure they follow all U.S. laws and immigration rules – and we will revoke their visas and deport them if they don't,' the US Embassy wrote. The warning comes in the wake of new measures rolled out under the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration, with visa vetting protocols becoming increasingly stringent. Social media under scrutiny A key part of the new tightening involves the monitoring of social media activity of non-immigrant visa applicants. The US Government has directed applicants under F (student), M (vocational student), and J (exchange visitor) visa categories to turn their social media profiles 'public' to allow for background checks. On Friday (July 11), a day before the deportation warning, the Embassy had posted another advisory, cautioning applicants not to falsify or omit social media information during the visa process. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Successful Way of Intraday Trading is "Market Profile" TradeWise Learn More Undo Read more: No more shoe checks: TSA updates airport screening rules; what flyers need to know Applicants are now required to disclose all social media handles used in the past five years on their DS-160 visa application form. 'Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit,' the embassy noted. Zero tolerance on visa fraud This is not the first time in recent weeks that the US Embassy has raised red flags about visa fraud. On June 28, it had issued a clear warning that those attempting to misrepresent or forge information during the visa process would be held accountable. The statement read: 'If you break US law, you will be punished with significant criminal penalties.' The cumulative message from the US administration is unmistakable: transparency, accuracy, and lawful conduct are non-negotiable when it comes to entering and remaining in the United States on a visa. What it means for Indian applicants India remains one of the top countries for student and work visa applications to the US. These latest announcements serve as a reminder for Indian applicants and visa holders to stay compliant with US immigration laws, avoid misrepresentation, and ensure that their social media activity does not raise concerns during background checks. Read more: 6 unmissable stops that make Chandigarh to Shimla hill tour worthwhile The embassy's travel advisory also highlights that the US reserves the right to reassess and revoke visas at any point if a violation is found. This means that receiving a visa is not a final clearance, and any future behaviour, online or offline, can affect one's legal status in the country. As the US intensifies its immigration scrutiny under current policies, applicants are urged to be truthful, diligent, and informed at every stage of the visa process.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Reddit user recalls rude encounter with women at Bengaluru bar that still haunts them
A Reddit user shared an unsettling experience at a bar in Bengaluru's Koramangala, where a rude encounter with two women left them feeling rather the post shared on the subreddit r/Bangalore with the title 'A small incident at a bar in Koramangala that still bothers me,' the user recounted the incident that occurred a few weeks ago when their brother visited them in with their brother, the Reddit user visited a bar in Koramangala and both had a good time discussing 'life, work, and everything in between'. Now, while their brother was going to the restroom, the user stepped out and noticed two women entering the bar. As they had already moved aside to give them space, they were stunned when one of the women rudely gestured and said "hutt" - a dismissive way of telling someone to move, commonly used in Hindi.'This was the first time someone had treated me like that, so casually and rudely and it genuinely shook me for a moment. I wanted to say something, maybe ask her what her problem was, but I stopped myself. I didn't want to create a scene or ruin a peaceful evening with my brother,' the user said in the the user considered confronting the woman, they ultimately chose to let it go to avoid a scene. However, the user did admit that the moment continues to weigh on them: 'But honestly, that moment still lingers with me. I think about it sometimes and still feel sad, not just because of how I was treated, but also because I didn't speak up. Should I have said or done something? Or was it better to just let it go?'Read the full post here: The post drew responses from several Reddit users offering varied perspectives - some empathetic, others philosophical.'Drunk people are not the epitome of civility,' a comment read, acknowledging that the user may have been too stunned in the moment to offered a more clinical angle: 'I think more than the incident itself, you are emphasising how that situation has stuck with you because the latter could pave way for a lot of questions.'Some suggested that the user made the right call by walking away: 'Letting it go was the right thing to do. The alternate would have just spoilt your evening and your brother's.'And then came the brutally direct advice: 'Move on mate. Don't give inconsequential people like these unnecessary time and space in your universe.'- EndsMust Watch