High-level talks held on support for Ukraine a week after Trump said Europe will pay for weapons
The virtual meeting will be lead by British Defense Secretary John Healey and his German counterpart Boris Pistorius. Healey said U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and NATO leader Mark Rutte, as well as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, will attend the meeting of Ukraine Defense Contact Group.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Data Science
CXO
MCA
MBA
Management
others
Data Analytics
Degree
Digital Marketing
PGDM
Public Policy
Finance
Healthcare
Design Thinking
Leadership
healthcare
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science
Operations Management
Technology
Cybersecurity
Others
Project Management
Product Management
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Interpretation
Programming Proficiency
Problem-Solving Skills
Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT MSc in Data Science
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation
Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques
Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis
Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI
Duration:
8 Months
IIM Kozhikode
Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence
Starts on
Jun 26, 2024
Get Details
The talks come after Russia pounded Ukraine with some 300 drone strikes Saturday, Ukrainian officials said. Moscow continues to intensify its long-range attacks on Ukrainian cities, and analysts say the barrages are likely to escalate.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Knee pain prices might surprise you
Knee pain | search ads
Find Now
Undo
In an shift of tone toward Russia, the U.S. president last week gave Moscow a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face tougher sanctions.
Trump's arms plan, announced a week ago, involves European nations sending American weapons to Ukraine via NATO - either from existing stockpiles or buying and donating new ones. The U.S. president indicated discussions were partly focused on advanced
Patriot air defense systems
and said a week ago that deliveries would begin "within days."
Live Events
But last week various senior officials suggested no transfers had yet taken place.
NATO's Grynkewich told The Associated Press on Thursday that "preparations are underway" for weapons transfers to Ukraine while U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker said he couldn't give a time frame.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Thursday that Germany will finance two new Patriot systems for Ukraine and raised the possibility of supplying systems it already owns and having them replaced by the U.S.
But delivery could take time, Merz suggested because "they have to be transported, they have to be set up; that is not a question of hours, it is a question of days, perhaps weeks."
Other Patriot systems could come thanks to Switzerland, whose defense ministry said Thursday it was informed by the U.S. Defense Department that it will "reprioritize the delivery" of five previously ordered systems to support Ukraine.
While Ukraine waits for Patriots, a senior NATO official said the alliance is still coordinating the delivery of other military aid - such as ammunition and artillery rounds - which includes aid from the U.S. that was briefly paused. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Saturday that his officials have proposed a new round of peace talks this week. Russian state media on Sunday reported that no date has yet been set for the negotiations, but said that Istanbul would likely remain the host city. The Kremlin spokesman said Sunday that Russia is open to peace with Ukraine, but achieving its goals remains a priority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump to pull US out of UNESCO again, citing bias toward Palestine and China: ‘Totally out-of-step'
The United States will again withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), marking another reversal of President Joe Biden's multilateral approach, according to reports citing US and European officials. The move is part of President Donald Trump's renewed campaign to distance the US from international institutions he deems hostile or unaligned with American interests. 'President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from UNESCO — which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November,' said White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly, as quoted by The New York Post. The administration cited the agency's pro-diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and a perceived bias in favor of Palestine and China. A White House official told the news outlet that UNESCO 'has leveraged its influence to advance global standards favorable to Beijing's interests' and 'force through anti-Israel and anti-Jewish actions.' UNESCO, headquartered in Paris, is best known for designating World Heritage Sites. However, US officials have objected to some recent listings, accusing the agency of politicising heritage by designating Jewish holy sites as 'Palestinian World Heritage.' This is not the first time the US has parted ways with the agency. The country first withdrew from UNESCO in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan, citing mismanagement and anti-US bias. It rejoined in 2003 under President George W. Bush after reforms. Trump previously pulled the US out in 2017 on similar grounds, and Biden rejoined in 2021. The latest withdrawal comes as Trump reimplements a broader disengagement from global institutions. Since returning to the White House in 2025, Trump has already decided to quit the World Health Organization (WHO) and cut funding to the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA. 'This President will always put America First and ensure our country's membership in all international organizations aligns with our national interests,' Kelly added.
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Days after Trump claimed credit, Coca-Cola announces new cane sugar Coke. But classic recipe stays
Days after US President Donald Trump claimed he had convinced Coca-Cola to swap out high-fructose corn syrup for cane sugar, the company has confirmed it will release a new version of Coke made with US cane sugar—though its flagship product will remain unchanged. As per CNN, in its quarterly earnings report Tuesday, Coca-Cola said that as 'part of its ongoing innovation agenda,' it would launch a new cane sugar version of its cola in the fall, intended to 'complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences.' Some regional versions of Coke, such as the Mexican variant, already use cane sugar. Last week, Trump posted on Truth Social that Coca-Cola had 'agreed' to use cane sugar in its colas. However, the company's announcement clarifies that the traditional Coke recipe sold in the US will continue to include high-fructose corn syrup. The move aligns with a broader push from Trump's Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has publicly railed against high-fructose corn syrup. As per a report by CNN, in a September appearance on Dr. Jordan Peterson's podcast, Kennedy called it a 'formula for making you obese and diabetic,' as part of his ongoing campaign to eliminate artificial and ultra-processed ingredients from American foods. High-fructose corn syrup has long been used in US-made Coca-Cola because of its low cost and abundance, especially compared to cane sugar. Health experts warn, however, that neither ingredient makes soda healthy. While cane sugar may seem more 'natural,' nutritionists continue to flag sugar-sweetened beverages as major contributors to obesity, diabetes, and other chronic health conditions.
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India-U.S. trade deal: Deadlock over agri continues, but Trump surprise not ruled out
With the August 1 deadline approaching, agriculture continues to loom large as an impediment to a trade deal between India and the U.S. India continues to hold firm against opening up the sector to imports to protect Indian farmers, and the U.S. remains keen that the sector be opened up as such a deal would set the precedent for future deals it strikes with the EU and Japan. Officials, however, are not ruling out a last-minute surprise from U.S. President Donald Trump, similar to what happened with Indonesia and Vietnam. 'The Indian team is back from the U.S. and has left them with what India has to offer,' an official aware of the negotiations told The Hindu. 'Now, whether they accept the terms or not is up to them. Agriculture remains a major issue where there is lack of agreement.' India has been resisting the opening up of the agriculture sector to imports to protect domestic farmers. According to the official, however, opening up the Indian market to U.S. agricultural imports is not just about market access. 'India is one of the few countries that is pushing very hard for a deal,' the official said. 'So, it is likely a deal with India will be concluded before the U.S. concludes a deal with the EU or Japan. If agriculture is excluded from the India deal, then that could set the precedent for the EU and Japan deals, and the U.S. doesn't want to risk that.' However, according to another source, the bulk of India's negotiation points are now aimed at a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September or October this year, rather than a 'mini deal' before August 1. Yet, the government is prepared for a surprise deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump. 'See what happened with Indonesia and Vietnam; the U.S. President announced details of the deal that both Indonesian and Vietnamese negotiators said were not part of what they agreed to,' the second source said. 'This was done after a phone conversation between Mr. Trump and the heads of Indonesia and Vietnam, respectively. The same can always pop up with India; we have not ruled it out.' Both sources confirmed that, while agriculture and dairy remain hurdles from the Indian side, a key hurdle from the U.S. side is their reluctance to reduce import duties on automotive components to zero.
