
Review: ‘Bust' at the Goodman Theatre begins with a leap of imagination
No one knows where he went. He didn't run off. He just seems to have vanished as if by magic, leaving the police officers scratching their heads, perplexed by what just happened.
When you watch that intriguing opening scene of Zora Howard's 'Bust,' an accomplished new play produced at the Goodman Theatre in concert with both the Alliance Theatre in Atlanta and the commercial producer Sonia Friedman, what shoots into your head is how skillfully this gifted writer has come up with a metaphor for a solution to this most vexing and dangerous of ubiquitous American confrontations; if one of what typically are two angry parties could immediately be transported out of the situation, as if by a 'Star Trek'-like teleporter, lives would be saved.
Mysteries deepen as 'Bust' progresses, and we learn that these magical disappearances are not limited to one occurrence. Before the end of this two-hour play, Howard has revealed the destination, too, evoking the famous 'Somewhere' number in 'West Side Story,' broadening her themes to explore not just a notable method of violence-interruption but the danger of pent-up anger and bottled-up feelings, all in service of the truth that shootings traumatize not just those directly involved, but the witnesses and the entire community. And that confrontations with unintended consequences create an endless cycle of repetition and pain.
That description makes 'Bust' sound like a heavy night of theater, which is not entirely incorrect. But Howard strives to leaven the experience with comedy, whether that flows from the exuberant spirits of Reggie (Ray Anthony Thomas) and Retta (the especially excellent Caroline Stefanie Clay) watching the confrontation, or the slew of mostly young high schoolers (variously played by Bernard Gilbert, Victoria Omoregie, Ivan Cecil Walks and Renika Williams-Blutcher) wondering about this disappearance thing, only to find that Reggie and Retta's grandson, Trent (Cecil Blutcher), might also be a candidate for finding his way to the other side.
'Bust' is one of several dramatic works (such as 'Pass Over' and the opera 'Blue') written about police shootings that were first developed during the pandemic, post-George Floyd era, a time of trauma and unrest when few Black writers in the nonprofit American theater felt inclined to be fair to police. And, indeed, the white officer here (played by Mark Bedard) is a stereotype of a racist Alabama cop, sans a reasonable bone in his body. His immigrant partner, Ramirez (Jorge Luna) is also somewhat stereotypically drawn, replete with concern for his large family, unease with his job and other standard-issue tropes that I'm not convinced most Latino cops would appreciate. The play's Black characters are drawn with diversity, vivacity and, above all, complexity.
I'd argue 'Bust' would be a yet better play if it threw out those stereotypes and created complex figures from those cops. For example, the play seems to either not know or not care how often police officers act out of fear, justified or not, for their personal safety, especially when they don't know someone's location. As any clear-eyed specialist in these matters will tell you, that often explains why things go so terribly wrong. 'Bust' just treats these cops as either expediently trying to keep their job (the Latino officer) or being aggressively racist (the white officer). What a play this would be if had the courage to eschew such melodrama. It might really have the capacity to make an even bigger impact.
Director Lileana Blain-Cruz's production is an exuberant and exciting affair, although the set sometimes gets in the way of the power of the work, sending the actors upstage or trapping them in a raised box in the work's most primal moments. The performances are very much present and alive and that serves to reflect the play's notion that vibrant Black life gets assaulted from without.
But when the scenes set in a familiar landscape feel so heightened as to not be truthful, which happens occasionally, that diminishes the power of the semi-mythical landscape the play posits as balm and a salve for the Black soul. It other words, too much of a departure from reality diminishes the crucial contrast with the other side, the somewhere, wherein lies Howard's most potent political observation and artistic longing lies.
That could and should be fixed. Act 2 of 'Bust' is mostly excellent, especially the scenes where the actor Keith Randolph Smith, who I've admired for decades, lays out the price always paid by Black Americans, whether engaged in an assaultive world or choosing to inhabit somewhere different, somewhere of their own design.
Therein, Howard really hits a chord: She's writing about anger and trauma, for sure, but also about the perennial dilemma as to whether to engage and struggle, politically and within a family, or disengage for greener personal pastures. Who has not wondered about that?
Chris Jones is a Tribune critic.
cjones5@chicagotribune.com
When: Through May 18
Where: Goodman Theatre, 170 N. Dearborn St.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Former NASCAR Driver Danica Patrick Reacts to Sydney Sweeney Ad Backlash
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former NASCAR and IndyCar driver Danica Patrick gave her take on the Sydney Sweeney controversy stemming from the actress's American Eagle ad campaign. Sweeney's commercials are perceived by some as coded with racism and eugenics because of a play on words regarding "jeans" and "genes." Patrick posted a story on her Instagram account on July 30, reading, "Hilarious. Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the new AE ads?! Very confused." Also, she shared a video from content creator Kaylor Betts, which addressed the controversy. Danica Patrick looks on from the drivers parade prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Mexico at Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez on October 27, 2024 in Mexico City, Mexico. Danica Patrick looks on from the drivers parade prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Mexico at Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez on October 27, 2024 in Mexico City, Mexico. Photo by Jared C. Tilton/Getty Images "We have to boycott American Eagle," Betts said in the video playfully. "If you haven't heard of this yet, brace yourself. This is a trigger warning. You're not going to believe it. They had Sydney Sweeney in one of their ads. And if you don't know Sydney, she's a white girl." Patrick found humor in the controversy surrounding Sweeney's ad, but the temperature has been much higher online, with people both attacking and defending the actress. Why are people upset about Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle collaboration? Sweeney's campaign with American Eagle is titled "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans." While on its face the title seems harmless, people claim the commercials refer to the "Euphoria" star's genetics as a white, blue-eyed American in a way that is coded with references to Nazism or white supremacy. "My body's composition is determined by my genes," Sweeney said as the video pans her entire body. "Hey, eyes up here." "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color," Sweeney says in another ad. "My jeans are blue." Sydney Sweeney x American Eagle, oh my god. — Sydney Sweeney Daily (@sweeneydailyx) July 24, 2025 Considering the backlash, many expected American Eagle to pause the collaboration, but Ashley Schapiro, the brand's vice president of marketing, said that the campaign was meant to be provocative. "During a Zoom call with Sydney, we asked the question, 'How far do you want to push it?' Without hesitation, she smirked and said, 'Let's push it, I'm game,'" Schapiro wrote in a LinkedIn post. "Our response? 'Challenge Accepted.' Infusing our own personal cheeky energy and making us as we envisioned how the world would experience the launch. "A desire to stretch beyond anything we had done before. The ideas kept building. The stunts topping themselves. Exploring media innovation that could feel like it was invented just for Syd's Jeans?"


Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
Seven Reads for a Summer Weekend
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. On your Sunday, explore stories about the one book everyone should read, what McKinsey did to the middle class, and more. Teens Are Forgoing a Classic Rite of Passage Fewer young people are getting into relationships. By Faith Hill The One Book Everyone Should Read The Atlantic 's staffers on the books they share—again and again By The Atlantic Culture Desk Why South Park Did an About-Face on Mocking Trump The show's creators once said they had nothing more to say about the president. What changed their minds? By Paula Mejía A Defense Against Gaslighting Sociopaths If you can recognize their signature move, then forewarned is forearmed. By Arthur C. Brooks 10 'Scary' Movies for People Who Don't Like Horror You can handle these, we promise. (From 2022) By David Sims How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class Technocratic management, no matter how brilliant, cannot unwind structural inequalities. (From 2020) By Daniel Markovits Homes Still Aren't Designed for a Body Like Mine Why is it so hard for disabled people to find safe, accessible places to live? By Jessica Slice The Week Ahead Greetings From Your Hometown, a new album by the Jonas Brothers (out Friday) People Like Us, by the National Book Award winner Jason Mott, a novel about two Black writers trying to live a world filled with gun violence (out Tuesday) Ted Bundy: Dialogue With the Devil, a new Ted Bundy docuseries that features newly uncovered interviews and recordings (out Thursday on Hulu) Essay Memoir of a Mailman By Tyler Austin Harper 'Delivering the mail is a 'Halloween job,' ' Stephen Starring Grant observes in Mailman: My Wild Ride Delivering the Mail in Appalachia and Finally Finding Home. 'An occupation with a uniform, immediately recognizable, even by children.' What to call Grant's book is harder to say. It is an unusual amalgam: a pandemic memoir, a love letter to the Blue Ridge Mountains, a participant observer's ethnography of a rural post office, an indictment of government austerity, and a witness statement attesting to the remarkable and at times ruthless efficiency of one of our oldest federal bureaucracies. Not least, Mailman is a lament for the decline of service as an American ideal—for the cultural twilight of the Halloween job: those occupations, such as police officer, firefighter, Marine, and, yes, postal worker, whose worth is not measured first and foremost in dollars but in public esteem. Or should be, anyway. More in Culture Catch Up on The Atlantic Photo Album Included in The Atlantic 's photos of the week are images of a freestyle-motocross trick, a robot-boxing match in Shanghai, a performing-dog show in Canada, and more. Rafaela Jinich contributed to this newsletter.

Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Revising the reputation of the most reviled man in rock 'n 'roll history
He wasn't American. Born in the Netherlands, in 1909, he twice stowed away on ships sailing to the United States (the first time he got sent back) and never became a US citizen. Colonel Tom Parker, left, and Elvis Presley on the set of "Wild in the Country." © Graceland Archives True, he was show business, and a manager. But he wasn't rock 'n' roll, which was problematic since his most celebrated client was Elvis Presley. It was their relationship that made Parker a legend. More to the point, it was Parker's management that helped neuter Presley artistically. Or so conventional wisdom has it. Advertisement That view might be a further example of Parker not being as he seemed. In his new book, 'The Colonel and the King,' Peter Guralnick shows a Parker far more complex and creative than commonly understood. Yes, the bald, rotund, cigar-chomping Parker looked the part of the onetime carny he'd been: more folk villain than folk hero. Yet he was also much more than that, a latter-day Gatsby, a classic case of American self-invention – as was Presley. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Each of them believed in the other,' Guralnick said in an interview last month. 'Each of them believed there were no limits to what the two of them could achieve together.' Colonel Tom Parker, left, Elvis Presley, and Ed Sullivan. © Graceland Archives Guralnick, 81, knew Parker. He also knew Sam Phillips, who discovered Presley. He's written biographies of Phillips, the singer Sam Cooke, and, most famously, a two-volume life of Presley. Of the first volume, 'Last Train to Memphis,' Bob Dylan said, 'This book cancels out all others.' A revisionist view of Parker from someone else might make readers shake their heads. From Guralnick, it promises to open their eyes. Advertisement On Wednesday, Guralnick will be in conversation at the Cambridge Public Library with his friend Peter Wolf, of J. Geils Band fame. Admission is free, but Last month, Guralnick sat at the dining-room table in the 18th-century house where he and his wife, Alexandra, have lived since 1971 and talked about the new book, half of which is a standard biography and half a collection of Parker's letters. From left to right, Peter Guralnick, Colonel Tom Parker, and Sam Phillips at Parker's 80th birthday party. Sally Wilbourn/courtesy © Peter Guralnick Q. The two most reviled figures in rock 'n' roll history, whether fairly or not, are Yoko Ono and the Colonel. A. Sure, okay, absolutely. Q. Do you think you're going to catch a lot of flak from people who'll see you as an apologist for him? A. The likelihood is that I will. I'm not trying to dictate what their conclusions will be, but I think if they read the book and they leave themselves open to seeing the truth of what lies there in the pages then I hope they'll change their minds some. Colonel Tom Parker, left, and Elvis Presley on the set of Presley's first movie, "Love Me Tender." AP Photo Q. The book didn't begin as a biography. A. It evolved, in a sense, from a book that was going to be a book of letters, 30 years ago, and it never occurred to me to do a biography and that the letters would provide an entry point. Q. What was the motivation for the book in that first stage? Advertisement A. Alexandra and I get into the [Graceland] archives. We're there amidst all these trunks, travel trunks, you know, the trunks every trouper would carry on the road, and these battered old file cabinets. And we see these letters that he's written, from every stage of his life. Our reaction was immediate: This is not the Colonel that people think they know. I said to Jack Soden [head of Elvis Presley Enterprises], we've got to do a book of Colonel's letters. Then I proposed it to Colonel. 'You're a great letter writer,' I told him. 'I know I am.' he said. Q. 'Last Train to Memphis' came out a few years before he died. Do you know if he read it, and if so -- A. Oh, yeah, he read the book carefully. He talked to me about it. He had all these ideas for how I could market it. A review came out in the Los Angeles Times that I wouldn't call a rave, but it was a lot of space, and he said, 'How did you get them to run that big an advertisement?' Peter Guralnick in his West Newbury home. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Q. What do you think he would have thought of this book? A . Oh, he'd wag his finger at me, 'You should not have written anything if you didn't know how it was completely.' And I'd say back to him, as I did in life [ laughing] , 'But, Colonel, if you'd told me how it was then I would have a perspective on how it was exactly. But you can't expect me not to write about something simply because you withhold the information.' Overall, I think he would be very pleased, because he took himself seriously and he recognized that he couldn't make the claims for himself that I made. Advertisement Q. An important point to clarify: It's 'Colonel' not 'the Colonel.' A. Right, Colonel took the place of his first name, although he was 'Tom' to many of his old friends. If you want to reference the dignity of his position it's 'the Colonel.' But for Colonel there was no dignity to the position. He referred to himself again and again as a phony colonel and laughed about it. At the same time, although he carried himself with great élan , dignity, whatever, there was also insecurity. So I think to some extent having people call him by this title [countered that] but it did not outweigh the sense of extreme irony that he felt at the title and at the foolishness of the title. Colonel Tom Parker, c. 1955. Keystone Features/Q. The Colonel business helped give him a persona, and the humorousness of the title, the foolishness of it, furthered that persona. A. Absolutely. Colonel was a fabulator. He was a mythmaker. That was part of his creative bent. He was an extremely creative person, if not in the forms that you think of ordinarily. He spent his whole life developing the persona -- you know, the way he looks, the way he acts. Throughout the industry, he was taken very seriously, but it served his purpose to say, I've made up this persona, I've cast myself in this role, it saves me all this time. Colonel didn't believe in an afterlife. He didn't believe in organized religion. He didn't believe in salvation, I think. He believed in process, and that's what he was caught up in, the process. Advertisement Q. He believed in Elvis -- A. He totally believed in Elvis. Q. -- but he didn't believe in rock 'n' roll, and his not believing in rock 'n' roll is a lot of what people hold against him and why they see him as ultimately having betrayed the promise of Elvis. A. He believed in Elvis as a figure in the firmament of show business. He believed in show business. He loved show business. With Elvis, he saw someone for whom there were no limits, and it was because of both Elvis's creative imagination and his own. And I think that's something they shared. I think he would have seen a belief in rock 'n' roll or any one thing as being a limiting factor. But I'll go back to what you said. I don't think anybody saw Colonel in the way that he came to be seen after Elvis's death until probably the late '60s. I think until that time he was [considered] an entertaining sideshow. It was when people began to perceive Elvis as stumbling. That took place, really, in the 70s, but before then there were signs of it. Q. A. The movies, but most of all it just -- he was not Elvis. And it was at that point that Colonel. . . . You know, you could say he deserved the blame, but he was prepared to take the blame. Q. If you loved Elvis but you didn't love what he was presently doing, you could blame the Colonel. A. Yes, yeah. Q. You've done four major biographies, two of people you never met, Elvis and Sam Cooke, and two of people you knew, Sam Phillips and Colonel. Was there a difference? Advertisement A. It's not that different, for me, whether you know the person or you don't know the person. How well do you ever know anybody? Was it [the French novelist] TOM HANKS as Colonel Tom Parker in Warner Bros. Pictures' drama 'ELVIS.' Hugh Stewart Q. Tom Hanks played Colonel in A. John Goodman could. Tom Hanks could be cast [again]; he'd just need different direction. When I spoke to the guy who read the audiobook, I said, 'You want to get a sense of whimsicality. You want to get a sense of self-amusement.' It's not that that's the whole thing, by any means. There are plenty of sober moments in the book. But Colonel, you know, was so playful. Sam Phillips said to me [when Guralnick was writing his biography], 'I just want it to be another swinging day at the fair.' And, you know, that just seemed so perfect. This is even more applicable to Colonel's story. It's another swinging day at the fair. Interview has been edited and condensed. Mark Feeney can be reached at