Clashes break out in Togo's capital as protesters call for the President's resignation
A heavy police presence could be seen throughout the capital, where many businesses remained closed. Hundreds of protesters set up concrete block barricades in several neighborhoods of Lomé, with some burning tires and throwing projectiles at security forces.
Military jeeps were deployed as reinforcements in some areas. Police dispersed dozens of protesters with tear gas and arrested around 10 people in the Bè neighborhood, a stronghold of the opposition.
Civil society groups and social media influencers had called for protests on June 26, 27, and 28, after the government's clampdown on protests early this month.
A coalition of political groups known as 'Hands Off My Constitution' said in a Facebook post on Wednesday (June 25, 2025). It "strongly urges Faure Gnassingbé to immediately and unconditionally release all of the roughly one hundred political prisoners, and to take urgent measures to restore purchasing power to the population.
It called for an 'unprecedented peaceful demonstration.'
Togo's leader Faure Gnassingbé, who has ruled since 2005 after the death of his father, was in May sworn in as President of the Council of Ministers. The powerful role has not official term limits and he is eligible to be re-elected by parliament indefinitely.
Opposition politicians have denounced the move as a 'constitutional coup.'
Demonstrations are rare in Togo because they have been banned in the country since 2022 following a deadly attack at Lome's main market.
But the latest change in government structure has been widely criticized in a region threatened by rampant coups and other threats to democracy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
A look at the tensions with Cambodia that led to Thailand prime minister's suspension
BANGKOK: Thailand's Constitutional Court suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra from office Tuesday pending an ethics investigation over a leaked phone call with a senior Cambodian leader that followed a border row that erupted on May 28. The leaked call has set off political turmoil in Thailand as Paetongtarn faces growing dissatisfaction over her handling of the conflict. Here's what to know about the latest controversy and the dispute between the two Southeast Asian neighbors. What was said in the leaked call The phone call between Paetongtarn and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen was reportedly made on June 15 and was leaked days after. Hun Sen said on his Facebook post that he recorded the conversation and had shared it with at least 80 people. In the call, the two were heard talking through a translator discussing the tensions at the border, and about whether they should lift restrictions imposed after the deadly clash. Paetongtarn could be heard addressing Hun Sen as uncle. He is a longtime friend of her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, a popular but divisive former Prime Minister. She urged him not to listen to a Thai regional army commander who had publicly criticized Cambodia about the border dispute, and called him 'an opponent.' She also told Hun Sen to let her know what he wanted, and she would try to manage that. Critics said she went too far in appeasing Hun Sen, and that what she said, especially her comments about the army commander, damaged Thailand's interests and image. Paetongtarn has apologized but said she didn't do any damage to Thailand, arguing that her comments were a negotiating tactic.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Woman seeking help for medical treatment falls prey to online scam
UDUPI: A woman battling cancer fell victim to an online fraud after she sought financial assistance through social media. She allegedly lost Rs 30,000 after a fraudster, posing as a representative from a religious mutt, tricked her into transferring money. In a complaint, she stated that due to high treatment expenses, she appealed for financial help by sharing her bank account details on WhatsApp and Facebook. On July 1, around 10:00 AM, while she was at home, she received a phone call from a person speaking in Kannada, claiming to be calling on behalf of Swamiji from the Mantralaya Raghavendra Swamy Mutt. The caller said they were instructed by the Udupi Krishna Mutt to offer her financial aid of Rs 2.90 lakh. However, he told her she would need to first pay Rs 29,900 as tax. Trusting the caller, the complainant transferred the said amount via PhonePe to the number provided, and the remaining Rs 4,000 in two instalments of Rs 2,000 each using the PhonePe scanner. The accused then told her that the amount would be credited to her account by 11:45 AM and asked her to call him immediately afterward. However, the money never arrived in her account, she alleged Based on her complaint that she was deceived with a false promise of financial assistance, a case was registered at the Malpe Police Station under Sections 318(4) and 112 of the BNS 2023, and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Freedom Of Speech Doesn't Extend To Insulting The Prime Minister: Allahabad High Court
Last Updated: Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, while dismissing the bail plea of Asharaf Khan alias Nisrat, observed that such posts go beyond criticism. The Allahabad High Court recently denied bail to a man accused of sharing edited social media posts that mocked and disrespected Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stating that the constitutional right to free speech does not include the liberty to insult the nation's Prime Minister. Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, while dismissing the bail plea of Asharaf Khan alias Nisrat, observed that such posts go beyond criticism and amount to a threat to national harmony and dignity. 'Freedom of speech and expression does not stretch to permit a person posting videos and other posts disrespecting the Prime Minister of India," the court ruled. According to the prosecution, Asharaf Khan had posted heavily edited and objectionable videos on Facebook during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. One of the videos allegedly portrayed Prime Minister Narendra Modi walking beside a donkey pulling an aircraft cart. Another showed the Prime Minister seeking forgiveness from Pakistan. The posts were accompanied by captions mocking India's military position and praising Pakistan's armed forces. It was further shown that the Wing Commander of Indian Air Force, Ms. Vyomika Singh was sitting with Pakistan's Army Chief. The material, authorities claimed, also included disparaging references to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The state opposed the bail plea on the grounds that such content not only dishonored the country's leadership and armed forces but also had the potential to sow discord among communities. 'Such kind of post on social media creates disharmony among people of India and shows disrespect to the Indian Military," the state argued. In defense, Asharaf's lawyers contended that the posts were not authored or circulated by him. They argued that the material was found on his mobile phone but had originally been sent by someone named Shahrukh, who had asked others to share it further. The defense maintained that Asharaf was not involved in creating or forwarding the content and had been wrongly implicated. He has been in custody since May 13, 2025. The court, however, was not convinced. It warned of the increasing trend of misusing social media under the pretext of free speech to attack high constitutional functionaries. 'It has become a fashion among certain groups of people to misuse social media in the garb of freedom of speech and expression by making unfounded allegations against high dignitaries," the court observed. Stressing the seriousness of targeting the Prime Minister in such a derogatory manner, the judge held that posts of this nature not only undermine the respect for constitutional offices but also encourage the separatism and endangers the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. Thus, rejecting the bail plea, the court concluded that the objectionable content posted by the applicant did not warrant any leniency. 'This Court does not find a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage," the order stated.
