Tax hike fears mount after government borrowing jumps in May
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said borrowing surged to £17.7 billion last month, the second highest figure on record for May, surpassed only at the height of Covid.
May borrowing was £700 million higher than a year earlier, though it was slightly less than the £18 billion most economists had been expecting.
The higher borrowing came in spite of a surge in the tax take from national insurance after Chancellor Rachel Reeves increased employer contributions in April.
The decision, which was announced in last autumn's budget, has seen wage costs soar for firms across the UK as they also faced a minimum wage rise in the same month.
Experts warned the higher borrowing figures raised the chances of tax hikes to come in the budget later this year, with Ms Reeves under pressure to balance the books amid rising borrowing and her spending commitments.
Thomas Pugh, economist at audit and consulting firm RSM UK, said he is pencilling in tax increases of between £10 billion and £20 billion.
He said: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9 billion of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March.
'Throw in the tough outlook for many Government departments announced in the spending review and U-turns on welfare spending and the Chancellor will probably have to announce some top-up tax increases after the summer.'
Danni Hewson, AJ Bell head of financial analysis, said the borrowing figures 'will only add to speculation that the Chancellor will have to announce more spending cuts or further tax increases at the next budget if she wants to meet her fiscal rules and pay for her spending plans'.
'One big shock could wipe out any headroom Rachel Reeves might have, and there are still question marks about how much of GDP (gross domestic product) should be spent on defence and where the money is going to come from,' she added.
Borrowing for the first two months of the financial year to date was £37.7 billion, £1.6 billion more than the same two-month period in 2024, according to the ONS.
The data showed so-called compulsory social contributions, largely made up of national insurance contributions (NICs), jumped by £3.9 billion or 14.7% to a record £30.2 billion in April and May combined.
Rob Doody, deputy director for public sector finances, said: 'While receipts were up, thanks partly to higher income tax revenue and national insurance contributions, spending was up more, affected by increased running costs and inflation-linked uplifts to many benefits.'
While May's borrowing out-turn was lower than economists were expecting, it was more than the £17.1 billion pencilled in by the UK's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), in March.
The figures showed that central government tax receipts in May increased by £3.5 billion to £61.7 billion, while higher NICs saw social contributions rise by £1.8 billion to £15.1 billion last month alone.
Public sector net debt, excluding public sector banks, stood at £2.87 trillion at the end of May and was estimated at 96.4% of GDP, which was 0.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s.
The ONS said the sale of the final tranche of taxpayer shares in NatWest, formerly Royal Bank of Scotland, cut net debt by £800 million last month, but did not have an impact on borrowing in the month.
Interest payments on debt, which are linked to inflation, fell £700 million to £7.6 million due to previous falls in the Retail Prices Index (RPI).
But recent rises in RPI are expected to see debt interest payments race higher in June.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones insisted the Government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'.
'Since taking office, we have taken the right decisions to protect working people, begin repairing the NHS, and fix the foundations to rebuild Britain,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
12 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'
The comments follow speculation that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15. The Government is looking at options for reforms to Isas to get what it feels is the right balance between cash and equities, to help savers earn better returns, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the push for growth. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has previously said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Cash Isas are often a first port of call when people are starting out, and they'll often gradually move over into investments as they find their feet. 'If the speculation is accurate, it means they'll have less available to transfer into a stocks and shares Isa – effectively reducing investments rather than boosting them. 'This is an issue which requires a carrot not stick approach. 'We know through extensive research that the barriers to investing are behavioural, so it's through encouragement and increased confidence that we will all increase the number of retail investors. 'This week's announcement of radical changes to financial information, through targeted support and changes to the boundary between financial advice and guidance, is a major breakthrough in supporting people to find that confidence to make the first step.' The FCA set out proposals earlier this week to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments. The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics. Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at savings provider Moneybox, said: 'Over the last two decades since their introduction, Isas have grown to become a much loved and trusted tool by the British public and Isa wrappers have become synonymous with their £20,000 annual limit. 'The current speculation around potential changes to the cash Isa is undoubtedly already causing uncertainty and confusion for consumers, which will weigh particularly heavily on first-time savers and those with less financial confidence who will naturally be more hesitant to explore new products. 'Simply cutting the tax-fee allowance on cash Isas will not necessarily prompt equal inflows into investing products either. 'People opt to use cash Isas over their stocks and shares counterparts for a multitude of reasons, including risk aversion, and reducing the amount of money these savers can put into the cash Isa is unlikely to change this mindset. 'Cash Isas specifically are perfect for anyone looking to build up emergency savings and achieve their short to medium-term financial goals. 'Once people have the peace of mind and security that cash savings provide they are more likely to have the confidence to start investing for their future.' Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said: 'The days of peaks and troughs in the cash Isa market are long gone. 'We used to see a rush to make the most of the cash Isa allowance by savvy savers at the beginning and end of each tax year. 'Since the recent uncertainty around the future cash Isa limit, and with higher interest rates eating into the tax-free personal savings allowance, more savers have been topping up their Isa contributions every month.' He added: 'Changing limits around cash Isas would be a risky move for the Government – these accounts are extremely popular with millions of savers, many close to or in retirement who don't want the risk and uncertainty associated with investment in stocks and shares. 'The billions being saved every year are an indication of how tax policy can be really successful in encouraging people to save responsibly.' But Michael Healy, UK managing director of trading platform IG, said: 'We're calling for the cash Isa to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market. 'Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact.' In May, Ms Reeves confirmed she does not plan to reduce the overall £20,000 limit on the amount that can be put into Isas each year. In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, the Chancellor was asked whether, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now. Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year … we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.' The Financial Times reported this week that, according to a Whitehall figure, discussions were still taking place about the precise level for the cash Isas. While cash savings provide an important financial buffer, the Government also wants to see more consumers benefit from the long-term returns that investing can provide. Ms Reeves has said: 'It's really important that we support people to save, to achieve their aspirations. 'I'm not going to reduce the £20,000 Isa limit but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.'
South Wales Guardian
12 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'
The comments follow speculation that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15. The Government is looking at options for reforms to Isas to get what it feels is the right balance between cash and equities, to help savers earn better returns, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the push for growth. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has previously said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Cash Isas are often a first port of call when people are starting out, and they'll often gradually move over into investments as they find their feet. 'If the speculation is accurate, it means they'll have less available to transfer into a stocks and shares Isa – effectively reducing investments rather than boosting them. 'This is an issue which requires a carrot not stick approach. 'We know through extensive research that the barriers to investing are behavioural, so it's through encouragement and increased confidence that we will all increase the number of retail investors. 'This week's announcement of radical changes to financial information, through targeted support and changes to the boundary between financial advice and guidance, is a major breakthrough in supporting people to find that confidence to make the first step.' The FCA set out proposals earlier this week to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments. The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics. Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at savings provider Moneybox, said: 'Over the last two decades since their introduction, Isas have grown to become a much loved and trusted tool by the British public and Isa wrappers have become synonymous with their £20,000 annual limit. 'The current speculation around potential changes to the cash Isa is undoubtedly already causing uncertainty and confusion for consumers, which will weigh particularly heavily on first-time savers and those with less financial confidence who will naturally be more hesitant to explore new products. 'Simply cutting the tax-fee allowance on cash Isas will not necessarily prompt equal inflows into investing products either. 'People opt to use cash Isas over their stocks and shares counterparts for a multitude of reasons, including risk aversion, and reducing the amount of money these savers can put into the cash Isa is unlikely to change this mindset. 'Cash Isas specifically are perfect for anyone looking to build up emergency savings and achieve their short to medium-term financial goals. 'Once people have the peace of mind and security that cash savings provide they are more likely to have the confidence to start investing for their future.' Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said: 'The days of peaks and troughs in the cash Isa market are long gone. 'We used to see a rush to make the most of the cash Isa allowance by savvy savers at the beginning and end of each tax year. 'Since the recent uncertainty around the future cash Isa limit, and with higher interest rates eating into the tax-free personal savings allowance, more savers have been topping up their Isa contributions every month.' He added: 'Changing limits around cash Isas would be a risky move for the Government – these accounts are extremely popular with millions of savers, many close to or in retirement who don't want the risk and uncertainty associated with investment in stocks and shares. 'The billions being saved every year are an indication of how tax policy can be really successful in encouraging people to save responsibly.' But Michael Healy, UK managing director of trading platform IG, said: 'We're calling for the cash Isa to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market. 'Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact.' In May, Ms Reeves confirmed she does not plan to reduce the overall £20,000 limit on the amount that can be put into Isas each year. In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, the Chancellor was asked whether, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now. Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year … we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.' The Financial Times reported this week that, according to a Whitehall figure, discussions were still taking place about the precise level for the cash Isas. While cash savings provide an important financial buffer, the Government also wants to see more consumers benefit from the long-term returns that investing can provide. Ms Reeves has said: 'It's really important that we support people to save, to achieve their aspirations. 'I'm not going to reduce the £20,000 Isa limit but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.'
The National
28 minutes ago
- The National
Promises broken by SNP are clearly not forgotten by Scotland's voters
Nothing hurts as much as a broken promise – either on a personal or a political basis. It destroys forever the credibility of the person making the promise. In the case of Nicola's power company promise, it was made in a keynote conference speech which was televised live and ended with a standing ovation from the hundreds of SNP members in the hall. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: SNP must treat the Holyrood lists as the most important votes If the power company concept was not as 'straightforward' as it first appeared, perhaps the then first minister should have done a little more homework before even mentioning the subject. She had of course a small army of civil servants who could have carried out the work for her. The really sad part in all this is that back in 2017 there was a window of opportunity to turn the concept into a reality. That window has now closed, probably for all time. Stan also mentions the 'possibility of replacing the Council Tax' and claims the situation is 'more complex that one would initially suspect'. In their 2007 manifesto, the SNP promised to abolish Council Tax and replace it with a local income tax set at 3% of earnings. The plan was dropped in 2009. In 2011, they said Council Tax was unfair and committed to 'consult with others to produce a fairer system based on ability to pay'. That ultimately led to the Commission on Local Tax Reform, which recommended a replacement property tax, a land value tax or a local income tax. Instead Nicola Sturgeon announced an increase in Scotland's four highest Council Tax bands. READ MORE: Poverty levels in Scotland below UK for 20 years, graphs show The party's 2021 Holyrood manifesto had them 'committed' to reforming Council Tax 'to make it fairer". This would involve a citizens' assembly to come up with a way forward. That did not happen and the Council Tax remains in place and will no doubt rise again in March 2026. Attempts by Graeme McCormick to get the SNP to even consider the possibility of replacing the Council Tax, and other taxes, with an annual ground rent have been completely ignored. While on the subject of broken promises, I very distinctly remember Nicola Sturgeon, at a Covid press conference, promising she would not, and could not legally, delete her WhatsApp messages. She later admitted she had done just that. Back in 2017 the then health secretary Shona Robison told GPs at a special BMA conference that the Scottish Government would aim to increase the number of GPs in Scotland by at least 800 over the next decade. 2027 is now not far away and the number of GPs has absolutely no chance of increasing by 800 by then. Let us not mention the promised free bikes and free laptops for our children. In the years between 2017 and now, SNP membership has halved, the party's representation at Westminster has been reduced to a rump, and its support at recent by-elections is at a level probably last seen at the October 1974 General Election. Broken promises clearly register in the minds of the electorate. John Baird Largs
