logo
Backlash over call to pull ‘confronting' subject from Aussie schools

Backlash over call to pull ‘confronting' subject from Aussie schools

Yahoo02-07-2025
Climate change is said to be scaring young children in Australia, and a leading expert has come up with a controversial solution — don't tell them about it. 'It's really difficult to see kids who are very fearful at such young ages in front of me who have sleep disorders, who have clinical ranges of anxiety over this,' psychologist Clare Rowe told Yahoo News.
She's the author of a controversial report published by conservative think-tank the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), which argues climate change should not be taught to primary school children. In response, 150 experts in mental health, medicine and education have published an open letter rejecting this claim, arguing that what's actually scaring children is their lived experience of environmental disasters, the failure of government to act, and adults not listening to their concerns.
There's no doubt that climate and the environment are worrying Aussie kids — a 2024 survey of 15 to 19-year-olds found it's their greatest concern after cost of living, with one in four respondents concerned about the issue.
One of the signatories of the open letter, the University of Tasmania's Dr Chloe Lucas, runs workshops that answer questions from school children about climate change. She argues kids 'don't live in a vacuum' and regularly absorb information from social media, the news, and their peers, so they need to have access to fact-based educators so they feel empowered.
'Climate change is part of public discourse, I don't think they can hide from it,' she told Yahoo.
'When I go into schools and talk to children, I'm told about them having to evacuate their homes because of a flood, or losing their house in a bushfire. Children will experience seven times more extreme weather events on average than their grandparents. We're living in a different world, and it's getting worse.'
The vast majority of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change. But when it comes to how it will impact the next generation, Rowe doesn't feel equipped to answer.
'It would be absolutely stepping outside of my remit as a psychologist and I would encourage every other psychologist to do the same and stick to our lane,' she said.
Unlike her critics, she argues kids aren't absorbing information about climate change through social media and friends. 'When we're talking about six, seven and eight-year-olds, it's what they're taught at school that's making them alarmed. They're not getting it elsewhere, not at that age,' she said.
The children Rowe treats in her clinic have presented with fear that they won't reach adulthood because they fear the world will be destroyed by climate change. She claims a primary reason for their distress is that the problem appears beyond their control, as they're being told to use less electricity, not ride in the family car, and to eat less meat.
'These are not empowered, hopeful minds. If we want to solve the issue of climate change. We are not creating young people who are motivated to do it,' she said.
They are anxious and they are paralysed by despair. With children of that age, it is appropriate to shield them from that information.'
The open letter has been signed by experts from the Black Dog Institute and universities and hospitals around the country. They agree that climate education must be improved because it is 'inconsistent' and not solutions-focused. But they argue 'safe' teaching is necessary and can be gradually introduced during primary and secondary school.
'Yes, climate change is confronting, but so are topics like death or illness, and we don't shield children from those,' the letter states.
'There is strong evidence that children, even in primary school, are capable of engaging with complex topics when supported by honest, developmentally appropriate teaching."
Details in satellite photos spark 'worrying' prediction about colony of thousands
Aussie kid's clever driveway idea raises $1,600 for critical cause
Grim underwater find prompts calls to make $43.9 million change in Victorian waters
Georgia Monaghan is a signatory to the letter and is the co-founder of ECOMIND, a company that aims to promote 'emotional resilience' in children in the face of climate change.
She doesn't believe climate change denial has the same traction it once did. Instead, she believes there's a push to 'disempower' the public by removing knowledge and education about the subject.
'We're seeing that particularly in the United States. Fossil fuel companies feel threatened by young voices, and so if you remove their education, you're stopping them from doing amazing work,' she said.
She argues climate distress is a 'very rational response' to the 'crisis' and that young people need to feel equipped to tackle the problem.
'We need psychologically safe, developmentally appropriate climate science that empowers and creates hope in young people. We have a lot of difficult things happening in the world right now, and the answer is not to just ignore them,' she said.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EPA administrator defends administration's move to revoke 2009 finding pollution endangers human health
EPA administrator defends administration's move to revoke 2009 finding pollution endangers human health

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

EPA administrator defends administration's move to revoke 2009 finding pollution endangers human health

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin on Sunday defended the Trump administration's move to repeal the so-called endangerment finding that planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels endangers human health 'To reach the 2009 endangerment finding, they relied on the most pessimistic views of the science. The great news is that a lot of the pessimistic views of the science in 2009 that was being assumed ended up not panning out,' Zeldin said on CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'We can rely on 2025 facts as opposed to 2009 bad assumptions.' The 2009 scientific finding that human-caused climate change endangers human health and safety, which has served as EPA's basis for many of its significant regulations aiming to protect the environment and decrease climate pollution. If successful, the repeal could strip away the federal government's most powerful way to control the country's planet-warming pollution and fight climate change. The text of the administration's proposal to repeal the 2009 endangerment finding said that while greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise in the atmosphere, that rise has been 'driven primarily by increased emissions from foreign sources,' and has happened 'without producing the degree of adverse impacts to public health and welfare in the United States that the EPA anticipated in the 2009 Endangerment Finding.' The US is the world's second largest emitter of greenhouse gases, and historically has emitted more planet-warming pollution than any other country. Many rigorous scientific findings since 2009 have showed both climate pollution and its warming effects are not just harming public health but killing people outright. In the nearly 16 years since the EPA first issued the Supreme Court-ordered endangerment finding, the world has warmed an additional 0.45 degrees Celsius (or 0.81 degrees Fahrenheit) to 1.4 degrees Celsius, according to climate scientist Zeke Hausfather. 'Both the scientific certainty around climate change and evidence of the dangers it is causing have grown stronger since 2009,' Hausfather said in an email. 'There is no evidence that has emerged or been published in the scientific literature in the past 16 years that would in any way challenge the scientific basis of the 2009 endangerment finding.' Pressed on whether he's skeptical of the scientific consensus that greenhouse gas emissions are the overwhelming driver of man-made climate change, Zeldin said, 'That might be your way to try to twist my words.' The EPA is in a public comment period on its proposal to repeal all greenhouse gas emissions regulations for motor vehicles, since they stem from the 2009 finding. 'We're going through a public comment period. We want to make the right decision afterwards. But for people who want to sum up the 2009 endangerment finding as if they study carbon dioxide as an endangerment on human health, they did not do that,' Zeldin told CNN. Asked whether the EPA should have a role in trying to combat climate change, Zeldin said that the Supreme Court 'made it very clear that I have to follow the law.' 'I have to follow the plain language of the law, and I can't get creative. So when you read through the 2009 endangerment finding, they say that where there's silence in the law, there's gaps that I should just be interpreting that as my own discretion. The Supreme Court has made it very clear that that is not what is a power that I have,' he said, adding that drawing up such a regulation should be left to Congress. CNN's Ella Nilsen and Andrew Freedman contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store