How Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' will affect American education and students
US President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump's much-touted 'Big Beautiful Bill' – officially titled the American Prosperity and Freedom Act – promises sweeping changes across taxes, welfare, and national security.
But buried within its 940 pages lies an ambitious, controversial overhaul of education policy that could reshape American classrooms, college debt, and the ideological fabric of curricula for years to come.
Cuts to Federal Education Funding
At its core, the bill slashes Department of Education discretionary spending by nearly 20% over five years. Programmes such as Title I grants, which support schools in low-income districts, and IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) funding face deep cuts.
Impact:
Schools in poorer areas may struggle to maintain staff, special education programmes, and after-school support. States and districts will be forced to compensate for lost federal funds or reduce services, increasing educational inequality.
Push for School Choice and Vouchers
True to Republican priorities, the bill champions school choice initiatives, including a national tax credit scholarship programme. This allows corporations and individuals to receive federal tax breaks for donations funding private school tuition.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Laku keras kat Guardian! Umur 40-an pun tak perlu kolagen dah
URUHIME MOMOKO
Undo
Supporters argue that it empowers parents with options, drives competition, and improves standards. Critics warn that it drains funds from public schools, accelerates stratification, and undermines public education's egalitarian role.
Student Loan Reforms: Reduced Forgiveness, More Private Sector Role
The bill revokes Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) for new borrowers starting next year and curtails income-driven repayment schemes. Instead, it encourages private sector partnerships to manage student loans, aiming to reduce government liability.
Impact: Future teachers, nurses, and public interest professionals lose incentives under PSLF.
Monthly repayment burdens will increase for millions, particularly low-income graduates relying on income-based plans. Private lenders gain a larger market share, reviving pre-Obama-era student debt structures.
Patriotic Education Initiatives
Echoing his first-term 1776 Commission, Trump's bill earmarks $500 million for 'American Values Curriculum Grants.'
Key features include:
Teaching US history with an emphasis on 'exceptionalism and national pride.'
Funding teacher training programmes to align with these new curricula.
Critics decry it as ideological indoctrination undermining academic freedom and critical thinking, while supporters see it as necessary to counter what they perceive as 'anti-American bias' in schools.
Higher Education Research Cuts
The bill reduces federal university research grants by 12%, targeting social sciences and environmental studies in particular, while protecting STEM funding linked to defence and strategic industries.
Impact:
Research programmes in climate change, sociology, and public health face contraction.
Universities reliant on federal grants may cut PhD slots, reduce lab positions, or reorient towards defence-driven research.
The Bigger Picture: Education as Cultural Battlefield
Trump's Big Beautiful Bill frames education as not just an economic or social good but a cultural battlefield. The combination of funding cuts, private sector incentives, and ideological curriculum shifts reflects the administration's broader push to reduce federal influence while steering education towards nationalist narratives and market-driven models.
What's Next?
Implementation hurdles
: States dependent on Title I and IDEA funding are lobbying Congress to restore partial funding.
Legal challenges
: Civil rights groups are preparing lawsuits over voucher schemes potentially violating public education mandates.
Political impact
: As Republicans hail the bill as a conservative landmark, Democrats warn of generational damage to equality of opportunity.
Bottom Line
The Big Beautiful Bill's education reforms extend Trump's legacy beyond MAGA rallies and tax cuts. They represent a strategic attempt to reshape the minds of future generations, alter the financing of learning, and rewire the relationship between government, schools, and society.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
33 minutes ago
- Economic Times
As national pride plunges, Trump's America looks less 'great' than ever, Gallup poll data reveals
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Just days before the Fourth of July , a new Gallup poll has delivered a jolt to America's patriotic spirit: only 58% of U.S. adults now say they are 'extremely' or 'very' proud to be American, marking a dramatic 9-point plunge from last year and the lowest level ever recorded by Gallup since the survey began in 2001. This historic dip is driven by a collapse in the number of Americans who describe themselves as 'very proud,' which tumbled from 26% in 2024 to just 17% this year, while the percentage who are 'extremely proud' held steady at 41%.The Gallup Poll is a nationally recognized public opinion survey conducted by Gallup, Inc. , using scientifically selected random samples to measure the attitudes and views of U.S. adults on a wide range of political, social, and economic drop is most pronounced among Democrats , with only 36% expressing strong national pride—an astonishing 26-point fall from 62% just a year ago, and the lowest figure Gallup has ever measured for the group. For comparison, 92% of Republicans now say they're 'extremely' or 'very' proud to be American, up 7 points from 2024 and continuing a two-decade trend of high GOP patriotism. Independents also showed a decline, with just 53% reporting strong pride, down from 60% last divides are equally stark. Only 41% of Gen Z adults (born 1997–2012) say they're 'extremely' or 'very' proud to be American, compared to 58% of Millennials and over 70% of Gen Xers and Baby Boomers. Jeffrey Jones, Gallup's senior editor, notes, 'Each generation is less patriotic than the prior generation, and Gen Z is definitely much lower than anybody else. Even among older generations, patriotism is declining—primarily driven by Democrats within those age groups'.National pride in the U.S. peaked in the early 2000s, with 87% of Americans expressing strong pride in 2001, a figure that hovered in the high 80s and low 90s for several years before beginning a steady decline. The current 58% is a new low, surpassing the previous record of 63% set in 2020. The Gallup survey, conducted June 2–19 with a sample of 1,000 adults, carries a margin of error of 4 percentage points.
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Not Talking To Them Since We...': Trump Says Not Open To An Deal With Iran
US President Donald Trump said Monday he was not offering Iran anything nor talking to it "since we totally obliterated" the country's nuclear facilities. "I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "Nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities." The statement comes as Iran's deputy foreign minister told the BBC that talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran. Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. "We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality," said Takht-Ravanchi. "Right now we are seeking an answer to this question. Are we going to see a repetition of an act of aggression while we are engaging in dialogue?" The US needs to be "quite clear on this very important question", he said. The two countries were in talks over Tehran's nuclear programme when Israel hit Iranian nuclear sites and military infrastructure this month, with the US joining by bombing three nuclear sites -- Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan -- on June 21. The deputy minister revealed to the BBC that the US had signalled it did "not want to engage in regime change" by targeting Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Takht-Ravanchi also said Iran should still be allowed to enrich uranium. "The level of that can be discussed, the capacity can be discussed, but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment, and if you do not agree, we will bomb you, that is the law of the jungle," he said. Israel claims that Iran's nuclear programme is close to producing a bomb, whereas Tehran says it is for peaceful purposes. It is not clear yet how much damage the strikes inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities, which Trump has said were "totally obliterated". UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said Iran would probably be able to begin to produce enriched uranium "in a matter of months". Takht-Ravanchi said he did not know how long it would take. Under a 2015 deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium below 3.67 percent purity for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran responded by producing uranium enriched to 60 percent -- above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Session court grants bail to 68 Nagpur riots accused
Nagpur: A Nagpur Sessions Court on Monday granted bail to 68 individuals accused in March 17 Nagpur riots. Riots erupted in city's Mahal area over a controversy surrounding Mughal emperor Aurangzeb's tomb in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district. This decision follows June 25 order by the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court, which granted bail to nine others in the same case. All 68 were granted conditional bail with a surety of Rs1 lakh each. Conditions include reporting to the local police station twice a week and fully cooperating with the investigation and trial. Many of the accused had not received physical copies of the order by Monday evening. Additional sessions judge AR Kulkarni cited similarities with the HC's observations to approve the bail applications. The 68 accused argued that their arrests were based solely on unverified intelligence inputs without corroborative evidence. However, the bail hearing for Faheem Khan, identified as the key conspirator in multiple FIRs filed across various police stations, is scheduled for July 4. "We were arrested without any concrete proof. The police acted on mere confidential tips and we were not even identified in the test identification parade," the accused contended in their bail applications filed through counsels Asif Qureshi, Rafiq Akbani, Ashwin Ingole, and Shahbaz Siddiqui. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Adidas Three Shorts With 60% Discount, Limited Stock Available Original Adidas Shop Now Undo They also claimed they were not members of the WhatsApp group 'Sunny Youth Force', which is allegedly linked to riot mastermind Faheem Khan. The prosecution argued that the applicants formed an unlawful assembly at Bhaldarpura square, armed with deadly weapons and stones, and attacked police personnel. They were accused of using petrol bombs, hurling abuses at officers, and causing damage to public and police vehicles parked on the road. Earlier, the Bombay HC's Nagpur bench had granted bail to Mohd Raheel Zakir Khan and eight others. Building on that precedent, 68 additional individuals, including Mohd Harish Mohd Ismail, Mohd Shahnawaz Shaikh, Mohd Yusuf Shaikh, and Naseem Salim Shaikh, sought relief from the sessions court. District government pleader Nitin Telgote said Ganeshpeth police had booked the accused under various provisions of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including rioting, Arms Act, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, Maharashtra Defacement of Property Act, and Maharashtra Police Act.
