Apple 在 WWDC 2026 上會專注介紹「確定」能在今秋推出的功能?
在這樣的前提下,Apple 如果想保持 WWDC 的話題度,可以選擇的一個辦法就是同時端出新的硬體,傳了很久的帶螢幕 HomePod 就是個不錯的選擇呢!
更多內容:
WWDC 2025 定檔 6 月 10 日凌晨,Apple 預計帶來改動極大的 iOS 19 和 macOS 16
緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠,追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台!
🎉📱 Tech Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/yahootechhk
🎉📱 Tech Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/yahootechhk/
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群:https://chat.whatsapp.com/Dg3fiiyYf3yG2mgts4Mii8
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va91dmR545urVCpQwq2D
🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道:https://t.me/yahootechhk

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia is on track to become the most valuable company in history
The AI chipmaker Nvidia's shares hit a new all-time high on Thursday, briefly giving the company a market capitalisation of $3.92 trillion (€3.33tn), the highest in history for any company. This surpassed Apple's record of $3.91tr set in December 2024, even though Nvidia's market capitalisation dipped once again below this level at market close. The chipmaker's shares traded as high as $160.98 at their peak on Thursday, before the price dipped below this level, placing the market capitalisation at around $3.89tr when daily trading wrapped up. Tech companies' shares benefitted from a better-than-expected nonfarm payrolls report in the US, an indicator of a resilient US economy. This optimism was boosted by forecasts that businesses would continue to spend on AI advances, boosting demand for AI chips. Related Nvidia shares surge as earnings beat despite chip export restrictions to China Nvidia expects $5.5bn revenue hit as US curbs chip exports to China Nvidia shares are up more than 50% in just less than two months. Analysts expect that the company will break the valuation record soon and retain its elevated share price by the close of the trading day. 'Chip giant Nvidia is on track to achieve a new closing high,' said Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell, adding that the 'AI revolution is still intact'. AJ Bell head of financial analysis Danni Hewson added that, 'After all the gloomy predictions that this might be the year the AI bubble bursts, Nvidia's found another gear. The chipmaker is on track to smash a coveted record and become the world's most valuable company ever.' The value of Nvidia currently is more than three times the total market capitalisation of the stock market in Spain and more than four times that of the Italian stock exchange. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple Inc. (AAPL) 'Cannot Get Out Of Its Own Way,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s shares have struggled quite a lot in 2025. The stock has lost 14.7% year-to-date on the back of concerns about the firm's China supply chain and market opinions about its AI products. Cramer has continued to defend Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) throughout 2025. He believes that the firm's product quality is unparalleled in the market, which lends it a stable demand for its smartphones in particular. The CNBC host has also outlined earlier that he will change his mind about Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) if the firm starts losing market share to Samsung. here are his recent thoughts: '. . .Apple, which cannot get out of its own way. And I think probably could go down to 25 times earnings. Which is a substantial decline. Apple's a share donor. It's a share donor. A wide view of an Apple store, showing the range of products the company offers. Earlier, Cramer discussed Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s troubles in China: 'Apple's pulling off something amazing, moving about 20% of their iPhone manufacturing to India, but the rest are still coming from China. Still, the White House doesn't care. They want those phones made in America, so they're threatening a 25% tariff on the ones from India… What a shame. Apple is a huge employer in China, and China's a huge market for Apple, but the White House is making them leave, and they're not even getting any credit for it. If Trump wants leverage with China, he should be doing everything he can to make Apple move its manufacturing literally anywhere else and not tariff them… You have to play with the cards you've been dealt. And for decades, our government did everything it could to encourage outsourcing to China. They left us with a pretty lousy darn hand, both Republicans and Democrats. Between NVIDIA and Apple, Trump has a lot of leverage, but he doesn't want to use it. Those two companies seem hostage to totally different agendas inside the White House.' While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio


Tom's Guide
37 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I put an iPhone, Samsung Galaxy and Google Pixel through a 6-round AI assistant face-off — and here's the winner
For those of us without a secretary, PA or underpaid intern to take care of research and admin on our behalf, the best we've got is the digital assistant on our smartphones. And with the ability to use generative AI and more personal data, these assistants can do way more than they could even just a couple of years ago. With Apple, Samsung and Google all heavily promoting their latest phones with the enhanced intelligence of their AI tools, it's had us questioning who has the most capable digital assistant as we hit the halfway point of 2025. Is the reinvented Siri and Apple Intelligence powerful enough to take on Google and Gemini? And where does Samsung's blend of Gemini and its proprietary Galaxy AI tools fit into all of this? That's what the following comparisons hope to answer. Using the same prompts, covering a number of common actions you may want to do on a daily basis, we'll show you which phone and which AI assistant does the best job of automating things and hopefully making your life easier. A simple prompt to start with: make a reminder so I don't forget to grab some groceries later on. It's something digital assistants were capable of even before generative AI came in, so we shouldn't see any of the phones struggle here. To nobody's surprise, the iPhone, Galaxy and Pixel are all able to do this easily. There are however some interesting limitations to note. For instance, Siri was only able to place the reminder in Apple's own Reminders app, not my usual TickTick app, nor Google Keep, nor even Apple Notes. Not a problem per se, but unfortunate if you were hoping to make Siri work with non-Apple apps. Gemini on the Pixel set up the reminder in Google Tasks, an app which any Google Account owner can use, but one which I didn't have downloaded on my phone. Tapping the reminder after setting it opens Tasks in a Chrome tab, which would be a fair compromise if Gemini had then actually set up a task as commanded. So make sure you download the apps you need before trying to get Gemini to take care of important reminders for you. It's a similar story on the Galaxy, except you can ask Gemini to place the reminder in either Google Tasks or Samsung Reminder. It can even transfer tasks between the two, albeit slightly clunkily by deleting one and recreating the same text and alert time in the other. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Fortunately, unlike the Pixel, Samsung Reminder is automatically installed on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, meaning no weird Chrome shenanigans like on the Pixel. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra A good AI assistant should be able to accurately identify things on-screen or through your camera lens. So I opened up an image of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge on each phone, and then asked what device I was looking at. On the Galaxy and Pixel, the optimal way to do this is to call up Circle to Search and draw around the item you're interested in. And sure enough, with a tap and a swirl of your finger, Circle to Search was able to ID the phone, providing some basic detail and lots of matching images. I did try to use Gemini and a screenshot on the Samsung to ID the phone as well. This didn't go well, with the chatbot declaring the phone was in fact a flash drive. Siri needed to tag in ChatGPT to find an answer to my question. This is normally effective, but relying on an alternative service when you could simply have opened up ChatGPT yourself is a bit of a cop-out. But unfortunately for the iPhone, the short response and limited context of the image lead Siri to tell me it's a different Samsung phone. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra/Pixel 9 Pro XL Knowing oneself is perhaps the hardest thing, including for smartphone assistants. So we checked which of our testing phones could tell us how to change the brightness of the device's screen, or even take care of it for us. The only one that was able to complete the task in full was, surprisingly, the iPhone. While it doesn't come across in the screengrab, my brightness was on about 50% before asking, and 75% afterwards, with Siri also popping up a slider so I could adjust things more precisely myself. The Galaxy and the Pixel both gave the same response — that Gemini couldn't help me directly, but could provide a link to the relevant Settings page. That's still pretty useful, especially if you wanted full manual control over the brightness, but it's not as full a response as Siri could iPhone 16 Pro Max It's only natural to change your mind sometimes, so I wanted to see how well our candidates would adapt to a command with an update midway through, specifically one about setting a timer. Everyone misreads the cooking time in recipes sometimes. Siri and the Gemini twins both took this in their stride when I updated my request partway through making it. So as an additional test, I tried to see what would happen if I wanted to modify a timer. This showed some interesting differences in capabilities. On the iPhone, Siri deleted the one-hour timer and then started a 30-minute one instead. The Galaxy phone produced an error, perhaps because Gemini doesn't have the means to make a change like this in Samsung's Clock app, only the Google-made one. This seems likely since the Pixel was able to complete the same request in full, updating the one-hour timer so that it still had its original name while running for a different length of time. You could consider this a draw for Apple and Google or a win for the Pixel depending on which outcome you personally prefer for overwriting timers. But either way, Samsung loses here. Winner: Google Pixel 9 Pro/iPhone 16 Pro Max As we reach the end of our comparisons, it's time to see how Apple Intelligence, Galaxy AI and Gemini handle multi-part requests. This is a recently advertised addition to Gemini's capabilities, and could be a powerful time-saver if it works properly. This two-action prompt should give me the date of the next Crystal Palace soccer game (against Liverpool in August at the start of the next Premier League season) and add that to my calendar, ideally my Google one since I use that more, but I would have accepted an Apple Calendar invitation as a compromise from the iPhone. Unfortunately for the iPhone, it failed to recognise that I'm asking it to add a calendar event, not asking about one I already have. When I split the prompt into two, Siri offered up a link to Google Search results, which didn't directly tell me the date of the match, or to a ChatGPT response, which offered me the date of Palace's last game, not the next one. Disappointing all around. This works flawlessly on the Galaxy S25 Ultra and Pixel 9 Pro XL, thank to Gemini's Cross-App Actions capability. Both parse the command in one go, reading out the date to me and setting up a Google Calendar event. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra/Pixel 9 Pro XL I've saved the most complicated task for last, one that requires finding and passing information between at least three different apps. This took a couple of tries for all three phones, and none of them did exactly as I asked. But in the end, there was a clear winner. The iPhone only offered a ChatGPT response to the question. With the help of the third-party AI, Siri was the only assistant to ask what kind of gluten-free meal I wanted (I picked dinner to match the others). It then provided a transcribed recipe and method, but admitted it couldn't make a note or message with this information. It also didn't provide a link to the source of the recipe, which is a rough deal for whoever came up with it, but an unfortunately consistent problem with all AI chatbots. The Pixel initially only tried to send a link to my work number, rather than creating a note as well. When I asked it to add a Google Keep note before sending the message, it was not able to do so. Breaking the tasks down into two separate prompts eventually got me the required result. It was the Samsung that got the closest, setting up a Google Keep note (after asking if I wanted a Keep or Samsung Notes note) and a message to my work number with a recipe link. My only complaint was that the link that Gemini used in this instance was to the Gemini conversation, rather than to the website itself. The message link was to the actual recipe, which is more important for sharing purposes. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra I began my testing assuming that Siri was going to come in dead last in this comparison, with Samsung and Google, both using the same underlying Gemini chatbot, would be joint winners. But as we've found, things are more complicated. Siri is not great at dealing with multi-part commands, and is obviously still tied firmly into Apple's app ecosystem. However, it was just as competent at understanding my more complicated queries as Gemini was on the other two phones, even if it couldn't always deliver or had to run to ChatGPT for help. Gemini, be it on a Pixel or a Galaxy, is definitely the better AI assistant, with the Galaxy version perhaps slightly better overall due to it offering support for Samsung apps as well as Google ones. It also seemed to understand my multi-part queries better too, although that could be down to luck of the draw with the way Gemini happened to understand my queries at a given moment.