Seattle players call for 'fair share' of Club World Cup prize money
Jun 1, 2025; Seattle, Washington, USA; Seattle Sounders FC forward Pedro De La Vega (10) wears a t-shirt to protest FIFA Club World Cup bonus sharing from MLS while during pregame warmups against the Minnesota United at Lumen Field. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images REUTERS
Jun 1, 2025; Seattle, Washington, USA; Seattle Sounders FC players wear t-shirts to protest FIFA Club World Cup bonus sharing from MLS while during pregame warmups against the Minnesota United at Lumen Field. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images REUTERS
Jun 1, 2025; Seattle, Washington, USA; Seattle Sounders FC goalkeeper Stefan Frei (24) wears a t-shirt to protest FIFA Club World Cup bonus sharing from MLS while participating in pregame warmups against the Minnesota United at Lumen Field. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images REUTERS
Jun 1, 2025; Seattle, Washington, USA; Seattle Sounders FC forward Pedro De La Vega (10) wears a t-shirt to protest FIFA Club World Cup bonus sharing from MLS while during pregame warmups against the Minnesota United at Lumen Field. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images REUTERS
Seattle Sounders players called for a bigger slice of the prize money for competing at the Club World Cup this month by wearing T-shirts emblazoned with "Cash Grab" and "Fair Share Now" ahead of a Major League Soccer match on Sunday.
Seattle are set to earn at least $9.55 million for competing at the June 14 to July 13 tournament in the U.S., where the total prize money runs to $1 billion, but under the MLS collective bargaining agreement (CBA) the players' share is capped at $1 million per club.
Seattle are one of three MLS teams that will compete in the expanded 32-team Club World Cup. Teams from North America are guaranteed almost $10 million just for participating and can earn more depending on their results.
MLS did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment after Seattle players warmed up in T-shirts with the phrases "Club World Cup Ca$h Grab" and "Fair Share Now" written on them ahead of their 2-3 home defeat by Minnesota United.
The MLS Players Association said in a statement on Sunday that players had "privately and respectfully invited the league to discuss bonus terms, yet MLS has failed to bring forward a reasonable proposal".
It added that the league was "clinging to an out-of-date CBA provision and ignoring longstanding international standards on what players typically receive from FIFA prize money in global competitions.
"It is the players who make the game possible. It is the players who are lifting MLS up on the global stage. They expect to be treated fairly and with respect."
Seattle are in Group B at the Club World Cup along with Brazil's Botafogo, UEFA Champions League winners Paris St Germain and LaLiga's Atletico Madrid. They face Botafogo in their opening game on June 15. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
10 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘It's not mentioned in the Grab app that we can't pay with coins' — Customer argues with delivery rider as she insists on fully paying in coins
SINGAPORE: A Grab food order customer found herself in the middle of a stormy exchange with a GrabFood rider, all over some shimmery little troublemakers: coins. The woman, who had opted for cash-on-delivery, insisted she had the full payment ready. The only catch was that it was entirely in coins. 'It's not mentioned in the [Grab] app that we're not supposed to pay in coins,' she said in a video posted to the PROFESSIONAL PHV DRIVERS SINGAPORE: G rab, Gojek, Tada n Ryde Facebook group and SGFollowsAll Instagram account, visibly annoyed when the rider refused to accept her shiny metallic offerings. The GrabFood rider, clearly not in the mood to play cashier, just declined the customer: 'I do not accept coins,' he said, adding that '[according to] the Singapore Currency Law, we can only accept up to 10 pieces of coins for any cash transaction… because you're not Singaporean, you don't know about this Singapore currency law.' Unimpressed, the customer shot back, 'Yeah, but is it mentioned in the [Grab] app?' before vowing to report the matter to Grab and check the law herself. 10 pieces of coins or 20? According to a Stomp report, the woman later claimed she went to do her homework and found that the Currency Act allows merchants to reject more than 20 coins of the same denomination, not 10. She also clarified that she had used mixed denominations, implying the rejection was unfounded. Online netizens poured into the comments section with opinions — and some spare change of their own. Many sided with the rider, saying customers should show more empathy for delivery workers who already face enough physical and mental challenges on the job. Ng Gan Poh, president of the National Delivery Champions Association, told Shin Min Daily News that such incidents happen once or twice a year. The most extreme case he personally encountered involved a customer who paid S$60 entirely in coins, which weighed up to three kilograms. 'I had to count it quickly and later find ways to spend it myself, because depositing coins in the bank comes with a fee,' Ng explained. That may sound like a weight-loss ad gone wrong, but it's a real burden for riders on the clock. While he acknowledged that small amounts (under S$20) are manageable, anything beyond that becomes a logistical pain, especially for riders with physical limitations. 'But if the customer has a genuine reason, we understand,' Ng said. Ideally, 'we hope customers and delivery riders can be understanding and avoid causing unnecessary inconvenience to one another,' he added. 'Most people mix notes and coins — not just coins!' Another seasoned rider, Zeng Guoshun, 52, echoed that sentiment. 'Most people mix coins and notes. It's rare to see someone pay entirely in coins,' Zeng said, as it's understandable that it may slow things down between deliveries. Delivery riders operate on tight schedules — especially during peak hours — and even a short delay caused by coin-counting can lead to cold food, late deliveries, and angry customers in the next queue. So… what does the law really say? According to Singapore's Currency Act, as reported by Mothership , it states that 20 coins per denomination per transaction in total are allowed. Therefore, a seller is only legally obligated to accept up to: 5 cents (20 pieces) = S$1 10 cents (20 pieces) = S$2 20 cents (20 pieces) = S$4 50 cents (20 pieces) = S$10 S$1 (20 pieces) = S$20 Total: S$37 So that's 100 coins in total across all five coin denominations that are limited for transactions. Beyond that, it's legal for the seller — in this case, the rider — to refuse. Apps like Grab do not always list payment guidelines in this level of detail, but many platforms reserve the right to allow their delivery partners discretion in accepting cash payments, especially in extreme or inconvenient scenarios. How can riders and customers work things out with some common 'cents' What started as a payment scuffle became a teachable moment for many — about mutual respect, basic courtesy, and knowing the limits of your spare change. For customers: Just because you can pay in coins doesn't mean you should. Just because you can pay in coins doesn't mean you should. For riders: Be kind, but don't carry someone else's baggage — or their piggy bank. As the debate continues, one thing is clear: loose change isn't just a wallet issue. It's a weighty matter in more ways than one. In other news, when a Tada passenger calmly asked the driver, 'So you will not increase the air-con for us?' did not get any hope for a breezy resolution and were quickly snuffed out instead. The driver—clearly not in the mood for thermostat negotiations—responded with a sharp: 'Go ahead and get out!' You can read about what happened next in this fiery exchange Tada-ride drama over here: 'Get out! Get out! This is my car, I'm asking you to get out!' — Tada driver ejects passenger for asking to 'increase air-con speed'
Independent Singapore
2 days ago
- Independent Singapore
When love in Singapore starts to feel like paying rent: Singaporeans talk dating and money
SINGAPORE: In the city-state's animated dating scene — think café-hopping along Tiong Bahru, spur-of-the-moment weekend excursions to JB, and treating each other to sumptuous dinners and Grab rides — romance frequently comes with a price tag. While spending on a partner is a normal chunk of contemporary relationships, a question gradually emerges: How much is too much? One Redditor recently opened a Pandora's box with an honest post about his own experience: 'My ex gradually started treating my money like it was her own… almost like she was entitled to a monthly allowance. It got to the point where I felt more like a provider than a partner. It became mentally and financially draining.' That post struck a chord with many netizens. Some weighed in to say the answer isn't as straightforward as a dollar amount; context matters. 'Spending $500 a month is very different for someone earning $3,000 versus someone earning $10,000,' one Redditor pointed out. It's not one-size-fits-all One frequent idea in most of the comments was that relationships, like finances, should revolve around what's sustainable for the individual. 'There's no 'right' amount. Just spend what you're comfortable with. Your partner shouldn't be your provider, but you shouldn't be stingy either,' another netizen shared, then concluded with 'Spend within your means.' For many Singaporeans who are navigating love in a city known to be extremely expensive means finding a pace that works for both partners, whether to pay separately, take turns, or balance costs based on individual strengths and contributions. One commenter shared her approach: 'Whoever picks up the bill just pays and doesn't ask for money back. I usually handle groceries, and he pays for meals out or car maintenance. We don't track who's paying more — it just feels natural.' The unspoken currency Notwithstanding the different arrangements, one general truth surfaced. Open communication is key. Outlooks around or about money can change as relationships develop, and when they're not responded to, bitterness grows. 'Just because someone is okay with a financial dynamic at the start doesn't mean they'll feel the same way a year later,' one Redditor said. 'It's important to check in and realign expectations.' Another commenter shared how she and her partner steer differences in financial aptitude with emotional intelligence and support: 'I'm not able to contribute much financially right now, so I make up for it with household chores and other ways. People express love differently — some with money, some with acts of service.' Financial boundaries – start early, stay clear For some duos, clarity came early and on purpose. One female commenter shared how she and her now-husband laid the foundation during the dating stage: 'He was upfront about his financial boundaries from day one. We did a 50/50 split for dates and discussed money openly once we got serious. Now that we're married, we keep our finances separate but divide expenses fairly — he tracks shared costs, and I cover my spending. We agreed on how to split things like the HDB loan and bills.' When giving becomes too much But what happens when one partner is giving too much, for too long? That's when the bond risks shifting from partnership to dependency — or worse, entitlement. The original poster's narrative is a tale of unclear boundaries. What began as lavish acts of romance gradually turned into tacit expectations. It didn't take long before he felt love was more like a transaction — one that left him emotionally washed out and financially stressed. The bottom line In a city like Singapore — where the cost of living can clamber fast — dating isn't just about fondness and love; it's also about alignment. The strongest relationships aren't demarcated by who pays for what, but by how willingly partners talk about it, and how equitably they manage it together. Whether you're ordering bubble tea or making reservations for a Bali getaway, the real investment is in shared respect and communication. After all, love might be priceless, but planning for it certainly isn't.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Real Madrid's request to postpone LaLiga opener denied, report says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Real Madrid will begin their LaLiga campaign with a home game against Osasuna as scheduled after Spain's federation (RFEF) rejected their appeal to postpone the August 19 fixture on Thursday, local media reported. Real had requested a longer rest period and pre-season after playing in the Club World Cup in the U.S., where they lost to Paris St Germain in the semi-finals on July 9, according to the report. Reuters has contacted the RFEF and Real for comment. An RFEF judge ruled that in order to preserve the integrity of the competition only a case of force majeure would warrant a change to the official calendar, and that Real's case did not justify an alteration, Europa Press news agency reported. "Finally, it should be added that although the requesting club claims to have the agreement of the opposing party, CA Osasuna, there is no record of this entity having responded to the request made by this judge," the sole judge was quoted as saying in his ruling by the Europa Press. REUTERS
