Implant can offer relief to people with spinal cord injuries
The news is welcome for 59-year-old Ciaran McCarthy, who experiences pain more than two decades after suffering a spinal cord injury while playing rugby on a sodden playing surface.
'On the January 27th, 2002, I became a paraplegic as a consequence of playing rugby. I'm an avid rugby fan to this day. I don't blame rugby at all. I do blame a waterlogged pitch.'
McCarthy got stuck in the mud, he said, and as a ruck collapsed on top of him he heard two fractures occurring in his back.
READ MORE
'There was this dissipation of sensation from the midsection down and out my body. That was when I knew I was in trouble.'
'The diagnosis was initially devastating,' said McCarthy, aged 35 at the time of the injury. 'Doctors believed the cord was entirely severed, requiring metal insertion to stabilise the vertebrae.'
Ciaran McCarthy. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw
Adult spinal cord nerve cells in humans don't regenerate after injury, but scientists working in collaboration at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) and Trinity College Dublin have found that applying an electrical charge can encourage nerve regrowth.
The RCSI tissue engineering group and the Research Ireland Centre for Advanced Material and Bioengineering Research (Amber) reported their findings on Tuesday in Advanced Science.
'Our group is developing electrically conducive biomaterials that could channel electrical stimulation across the injury, helping the body to repair the damaged tissue,' said Prof Fergal O'Brien, professor of bioengineering and regenerative medicine at the RCSI.
'Every single spinal cord injury is completely unique,' said Prof O'Brien, the lead scientist on the implant project. 'Our fundamental goal isn't about enabling walking, but dramatically improving daily quality of life for patients.'
The researchers developed a new material to precisely engineer implants, to tailor them to individual patient needs.
The origins of the project stem from a scientific conference where Dr Ian Woods, a research fellow at RCSI, noticed similarities between tiny nano-material structures and human protein fibres.
This sparked a collaboration between researchers at the RCSI and Amber – a respected centre for advanced materials research.
'We can now create implants that precisely channel electrical signals with an unprecedented level of resolution,' said Dr Woods.
The scientists came up with a way to control the pattern, density and orientation of conductive materials inside the implant, to determine how, where and when electricity is delivered to cells.
The implant materials are also biodegradable, acting like a scaffold that supports tissue regeneration before gradually dissolving.
Spinal cord injury is a life-altering condition that can lead to paralysis, loss of sensation and chronic pain. There are more than 2,300 people living with spinal cord injury in Ireland and no treatment exists to effectively repair the damage.
Worldwide, the impact of spinal cord injuries is huge, said McCarthy, with 200,000 new cases each year in the USA alone.
The poor prognosis McCarthy received after his injury shifted when he regained some movement. The injury was then classified as incomplete and provided a glimmer of hope.
After extensive period of rehabilitation, he returned home to an adapted house, and an adapted car which he drove to work.
Like many patients with spinal cord injuries, McCarthy lives with sharp, persistent pain.
He got involved in research through the IRFU Charitable Trust – which supports 36 players in Ireland living with spinal cord injury and helped integrate them into the scientific research process.
McCarthy became a 'patient public involvement researcher' offering his views as a patient to the scientists. One view he conveyed was that some patients were more concerned about getting benefits to their daily quality of life than with walking again.
Approaching 60, McCarthy said he is 'convinced' scientists will completely solve the spinal cord injury problem in his lifetime. 'I expect to be alive when the clinical breakthrough occurs,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Inside the insourcing industry: The multimillion euro business within our public hospitals
In a presentation to a conference on the future of healthcare a couple of years ago, an anaesthetist from Cork urged that 'innovative thinking' was needed to tackle the perennial problem of patients waiting long periods for hospital treatment. This involved 'thinking up something new or to think about something old in a new way'. Ken Walsh told the Health Summit conference that in the regular health system there were roadblocks to progress on dealing with the waiting list, such as staff availability, sick leave, absenteeism, pay and funding issues, as well as restrictions under the European Working Time directive. READ MORE However, he suggested there was an alternative that would incentivise staff to work additional hours within the limits of European employment laws. The overall concept was relatively straightforward. With a growing and ageing population, demand for care was likely to surge and the ability of the public system to cope was limited. The State had been outsourcing patients on long waiting lists to private hospitals for years. But what about spare capacity in public hospitals? These had highly trained staff and expensive equipment, largely funded by the exchequer. But routine or non-urgent care was primarily a Monday-Friday, regular working hours operation. Unlocking unused capacity at night-time and weekends could allow tens of thousands more patients to be treated. Hospitals already offered regular overtime to staff. But this new 'third party' insourcing would mean private companies putting together teams of doctors and staff who would be paid premium rates to work in their public hospitals, outside of core hours. This 'third party insourcing' may have proved effective in getting more patients treated but it was also highly lucrative for those involved. And behind the scenes, it generated strong concerns about potential conflicts of interest, perverse incentives and governance and oversight shortcomings. [ Waiting list initiative suspended at Naas after concerns consultants paid directly Opens in new window ] Around teatime on Friday of last week, the Health Service Executive sent a report to an Oireachtas committee on how much such insourcing companies had been paid. Over 27 months to March 2025 three had, between them, received more than €70 million. One, EHF 29 Limited, received €54.636 million. Official filings showed it was largely owned by two doctors, Ken Walsh and Clodagh Ryan. Accounts for 2023 show that EHF 29 Limited had recorded an annual profit of €2.39 million. The company declined to comment this week but its website sets out the scale of its operations. It had carried out more than 70 waiting list projects in 22 acute public hospitals. From a small start in 2020 it assisted in the provision of treatment for 5,500 patients in 2021, 46,000 in 2022 and approximately 79,000 in 2023. Its accounts for 2023 say that the average monthly number of people employed, including directors, was 576. Among projects on which it has worked are day case surgery at St James's in Dublin, vascular surgery at Cork University Hospital, plastic surgery in Galway, breast clinics in Galway and Letterkenny, endoscopies in Ennis, Limerick and Wexford, and a pathology initiative in Waterford. It is understood as part of its operations, it recruits 'suitably qualified staff' from the HSE. Another company, Rosata Recruitment, received €10.3 million in the 27 months to March. This company's accounts list Ronan Corrigan as director and its report for 2023 said it had a monthly average of 29 doctors employed. It reported profits close to €500,000 for that year. The company says it has been 'providing a wide range of insourced surgical/outpatient/diagnostic/endoscopy waiting list initiatives since 2020″. The HSE said another firm, Totally Healthcare, received €5.9 million in the 27 months for insourcing projects. The company says it works with hospitals across the United Kingdom and Ireland. Last year, it announced a 12-month insourcing contract for oral and maxillofacial outpatient and day surgery cases with HSE hospitals in the west of Ireland. [ HSE paid one firm €54m over 27 months for services to tackle waiting lists in public hospitals Opens in new window ] 'All procedures will be delivered during weekends when hospital facilities are not otherwise in use', it said. Sinn Féin health spokesman David Cullinane described the HSE funding report as 'staggering' and warned that insourcing presented risks. However, it was official policy. And while supporters of the idea, such as Dr Walsh in Cork, may have had a vision, it could not have been implemented without political backing. Governments for years had struggled with waiting lists. Taoiseach Micheál Martin as minister for health 20 years ago had established the National Treatment Purchase Fund to buy care for those waiting longest. But after the Covid-19 pandemic there were serious problems. In February 2022 the then minister for health Stephen Donnelly said months of disruption during the pandemic had left more than 730,000 queuing for treatment. The year before, Donnelly had introduced a short-term plan from September to December, which, he said, had provided care to an additional 40,000 people. After Covid, Donnelly now had more money at his disposal than any of his predecessors and he now effectively turbocharged the drive on waiting lists. Initially, in 2022, he launched a €350 million plan, which became a permanent feature in subsequent years. Overall, the sums involved in tackling waiting lists were vast. Over four years, about €1.6 billion was provided. Some of this allowed the HSE to directly hire more staff, more went to the National Treatment Purchase Fund to buy treatment in private hospitals. But significant amounts went on insourcing arrangements. Although regular overtime continued, third-party insourcing became increasingly common. The framework on which this worked was a dynamic purchasing system introduced by the HSE. This allowed hospitals operating a non-recurring initiative to conduct a mini-competition open to providers on the dynamic purchasing system. A multimillion-euro private industry was about to develop inside the country's public hospital system. [ The Irish Times view on hospital waiting lists: Straining to stand still Opens in new window ] There were concerns about insourcing from early on. But they were mainly behind the scenes. Officially, the initiatives were working, particularly in bringing down the length of time people had to wait. Donnelly told the Cabinet last November that since September 2021, there had been a 58.5 per cent reduction in the number of patients waiting over 12 months, equating to over 169,000 people. But in the background, there were concerns. In recent weeks, The Irish Times received documents which suggested that within Children's Health Ireland (CHI), the group that runs children's hospitals in Dublin, there had been particular unease about insourcing. CHI paid €5.66 million to EHF 29 between 2023 and March 2025. It ceased insourcing initiatives in June. However, some in the health system maintain that concerns existed more widely and the documents represented attempts to rehabilitate the image of CHI in the wake of recent controversies. But nonetheless, CHI seems to have pursued its concerns about insourcing, albeit in private, including a meeting with the Health Service Executive in June 2023. Children's Health Ireland said in a statement that its board 'raised concerns regarding the concept of insourcing and the potential conflict of interest for staff, with HSE colleagues on several occasions'. [ Almost €100m spent on companies that use HSE facilities and staff to cut waiting lists after hours Opens in new window ] The HSE said that in 2023, a meeting was convened between it and Children's Health Ireland representatives, including members of the CHI board, to discuss the provision and use of insourcing. 'CHI expressed concerns at the meeting, which were shared by the HSE. It was agreed that insourcing was necessary as a short-term measure to address waiting list backlogs,' the HSE said in a statement. Children's Health Ireland said it reiterated its concerns on foot of a HSE memorandum (on insourcing) issued in February 2024 but agreed to continue with the initiative 'in view of the challenges to patient waiting times and with HSE assurance'. The HSE did not say whether it had alerted its board or the Department of Health to the concerns raised by Children's Health Ireland. However, within the HSE internal auditors began looking at insourcing arrangements in 2023 and early 2024. In September 2024 The Irish Times reported auditors had found that two companies which received more than €1.5 million between them at University Hospital Limerick without a competitive procurement process were owned or part-owned by employees. Over recent weeks more controversies emerged involving CHI, Beaumont Hospital and Naas in Kildare. [ Beaumont Hospital has NTPF waiting list funding suspended Opens in new window ] At the end of June HSE chief Bernard Gloster urged Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill to phase out insourcing within a year. He said 83 serving or former health staff were acting as directors in 148 companies providing insourcing and outsourcing arrangements. Carroll MacNeill is expected to decide on the future of the multimillion-euro insourcing industry within the next few weeks.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Rachel Fehily: Why are the experiences of people born, like me, in Temple Hill forgotten?
I spent the first three months of my life in a contested space: Temple Hill in Blackrock , Dublin, commonly known as St Patrick's Infant and Dietetic Hospital. It is contested because there is a fundamental disagreement as to its historical purpose: there are two different retrospective interpretations of its function. To this day the Government insists that it was a hospital; but in reality, it was an adoption home for infants and babies . It was stated in a parliamentary question in the Dáil by Sinn Féin TD Claire Kerrane last year that: 'Temple Hill does not qualify for supports, redress or recognition because it was a hospital, yet babies were adopted and paid for on foot of newspaper advertisements. Many children went to America. I have never heard of a hospital that does that.' Despite the indisputable fact that many children were adopted from Temple Hill through the former adoption society St Patrick's Guild, and some were resident for lengthy periods of time, it is one of at least four institutions excluded from the Mother and Baby Institutions payment scheme as it was not on the initial list of homes investigated by the Commission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes. The fact that it was not an institution within the meaning of the terms of the commission and no mothers resided there with their babies (apparently they were taken from them at the door) kept it out of its terms of reference. READ MORE I am not seeking a payment under the scheme or looking for redress personally, because I left Temple Hill with my adoptive parents at the age of three months. I was fortunate to grow up with six siblings – five adopted, also from the same location – in a stimulating and supportive environment, but I am advocating for people who have been left out. The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission has stated that the official commission report was flawed because many institutions were excluded. Its remit was too narrow. In an 'alternative report', a team including survivors, activists and eminent academics wrote that its 'text excluded significant cohorts of affected people' and that 'it is regrettable that the Commission did not request to modify its terms of reference to permit deep engagement with a wider range of organisations'. Minister for Children, Disability and Equality Norma Foley will have a chance to review the operation of the scheme within six months of its second anniversary, by September 2026. Many of the now-ageing adults who were resident and abused in institutions and identify themselves as 'survivors' in need of the supports offered by the scheme are currently left in limbo. I had the pleasure of meeting the Irish artist Bernard Canavan, a recipient of the prestigious Presidential Award for his contribution to Irish culture in the UK at the Irish Cultural Centre in Hammersmith, London. He recently held an exhibition at The United Arts Club in Dublin entitled Theocracy. His paintings represent the trauma that he and others endured in institutions. He was a long-term resident of the same Temple Hill in Blackrock, more than 25 years before me. Despite evidence of his abuse, neglect, lengthy period of residency at Temple Hill, and his advanced age, he is excluded from the payment scheme because of 'contested' definitions. The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) has set up a comprehensive curriculum resource on 'mother and baby homes' for the Junior Cycle. It developed it in collaboration with groups involved in advocating for survivors of 'historic' institutions. This is an important and worthwhile initiative. The list of related literature for the English curriculum is comprehensive and impressive, including the novel Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan and the play An Trial by Máiréad Ní Ghráda. The curriculum has input from many survivors and is all the better for it. However, the framing of the curriculum comes directly from the NCCA, a statutory body of the Department of Education. At the launch, Minister for Education Helen McEntee said: 'It is vital that our young people learn about the history of this State in every aspect, and in order to provide this teaching and learning, teachers must be supported with resources such as this one.' One of the resources for Junior Cycle teachers - a series of slides, maps, a list of the homes included in the Commission's report - omits the contested homes. Much of the lengthy reading list that goes with the teacher supports comprises 'official' reports. Searching through the voluminous reading list, I eventually found an alternative ' List of Institutions, Agencies and Personnel Involved in Separating Unmarried Mothers from their Children .' It is collated by Claire McGettrick and the Justice for Magdalenes Research and Adoption Rights Alliance. The database includes St Patrick's Infant Dietetic Hospital (aka Temple Hill). It is vital that students understand how our Government and legal system operates to include and exclude people from access to justice. These nuances matter. If school children are taught to think critically they might be driven to question as to whether their history curriculum is in fact 'history' or 'current affairs'? In Fintan O'Toole's excellent recent article on the excavation of the Tuam site , he writes that: 'This is making history in a double sense – doing something that has never been done before while simultaneously reshaping a country's understanding of its own recent past. And, hopefully, of its present.' It seems ironic that the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four has been removed from the Senior Cycle curriculum for 2026 by the Department of Education, while Greta Gerwig's film Barbie has been deemed worthy of inclusion. Leaving Certificate students won't have to read George Orwell's text or consider one of its most memorable lines: 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' But they will have a chance to consider this dialogue by Weird Barbie: 'That Ken of yours, he is one nice looking little protein pot … I'd like to see what kind of nude blob he's packing under those jeans.' Rachel Fehily is a barrister, lecturer in literature and justice at UCD and is engaged in interdisciplinary creative-based doctoral studies supported by Research Ireland
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Cern decision by Cabinet opens up particle research opportunities for Ireland
Ireland's long journey to membership of Cern , one of the world's largest centres for scientific research, has reached its destination following a Cabinet decision. It opens up opportunities for Irish companies, scientists, students and wider society to reap the benefits of working in the world's most famous particle laboratory in Switzerland. The European Organisation for Nuclear Research (Cern) is home to the Large Hadron Collider, a huge underground ring in which protons – one of the constituent particles of an atom – are accelerated close to the speed of light and collided into one another. It was used to discover the Higgs boson, the so-called 'god particle', which gives matter mass and holds the physical fabric of the universe together. [ Q&A: It promises to boost research, industry and education. So, why has it taken so long for Ireland to join Cern? Opens in new window ] Many technologies developed at Cern have gone on to have applications in medicine, space, energy and ICT, such as the world wide web and touch-sensitive technology in smartphones. READ MORE 'Associate membership of Cern will demonstrate Ireland's commitment to science and reaffirm our reputation as a centre for scientific investment,' said Tánaiste Simon Harris after the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. 'It will create opportunities for Irish researchers, students and industry to join world-class teams at Cern, and it will give Cern access to Ireland's talent and expertise.' 'Having personally advocated for Ireland's associate membership of Cern for a long time, it is a pleasure to officially announce [we] will join Cern in October this year. Today's Cabinet approval is a milestone which authorises the final legal steps,' said Minister for Science James Lawless . University College Dublin, whose physicists have been involved in Cern research for many years, said it is to expand its particle research capacity following Ireland's decision to become a member country. UCD vice-president for research, innovation and impact, Prof Kate Robson Brown said: 'This is a very important step for Ireland, to take our place in Europe's largest scientific organisation, which enables collaborations with the best researchers, institutions and companies all over the world.'
