Start Karimnagar-Jagtial road expansion work, Bandi urges Gadkari
Bandi Sanjay, who met Gadkari in New Delhi on Monday, discussed the Karimnagar-Jagtial road expansion work as well as the Central Road Infrastructure Funds (CRIF) sanction issues. He reminded that the Centre had prepared proposals with a fund of Rs 2151 crore before the last elections for the 4-lane expansion from Karimnagar to Jagtial road.
He apprised Gadkari that the tender process has not started yet.
Gadkari told Bandi Sanjay that the Karimnagar-Jagtial road expansion work has been hampered due to objections from the public and legal obstacles. All the obstacles have been overcome and the report has been sent to the committee and the expansion work will be started soon.
Bandi Sanjay submitted a petition seeking the release of Central Road Infrastructure Fund (CRIF) for the release of proposals for various road expansion works in Telangana.
He also submitted the pending road proposals in his parliamentary constituency to the Union Minister. CRIF proposals worth a total of Rs 113 crore were submitted to Gadkari.
These include the construction of a high level bridge over the Manair river as part of the Bavupeta-Khazipur road in Kothapalli mandal of Karimnagar district and the expansion work of Gundlapalli-Pothur road in Ganneruvaram mandal. In addition, there are proposals for the construction of bridges from Chandurthi to Motkuraopet
(km 5/0 to 8/450).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Conservationists' fight to protect ‘Perfect Unanimity', the British-era building on the Marina
The building housing the office of Director General of Police (DGP) on the Marina is called 'Perfect Unanimity.' But, about 30 years ago, it became the source of discord between the then AIADMK (All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam) government and a host of concerned residents of Chennai, as the former had planned to demolish the 19th Century heritage structure and raise a '10 storeyed and elegant' complex for the Police department. Thanks to sustained efforts of a band of dedicated conservationists, the authorities had eventually dropped their plan and gone about strengthening the Victorian-era building, which continues to serve as the headquarters of the Police department. The episode of the campaign to save the DGP office complex was recalled by many, while mourning the passing of veteran architect-conservationist Tara Murali in Chennai last week. She, along with a host of prominent residents of Chennai, had successfully fought hard in saving the building from demolition. It all began in April 1993 with the then Chief Minister Jayalalitha (as her name was spelt then) announcing, during her reply to the debate in the Assembly on the demands for grants to the Home department, her regime's plan to construct a new structure. At that time, she made only a brief reference to the plan. More details came three months later when she visited the DGP office, the first Chief Minister to do so after the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam's founder and her predecessor C.N. Annadurai. A news report in The Hindu on July 28, 1993 stated 'the new complex of the office of the Director General of Police, to be constructed at the existing site on the Marina here at a cost of about Rs. [ ₹] 15 crore will have all facilities and become a landmark for the city. At the same time, care would be taken to ensure that the building comes up in harmony with the existing natural surroundings.' A number of reports and articles published by this newspaper traced the origins of 'Perfect Unanimity.' Free Masons of Madras, as the city of Chennai was officially known in the 19th Century and most of the 20th Century, was the owner of the property. The Police department took the building initially on lease for seven years from July 24. 1865 at the monthly rent of ₹ 90. It was on June 11, 1874 that the government acquired the building for ₹ 20.000 and spent ₹ 10.000 more on additions and repairs. Alterations and extensions were made in 1909 to accommodate the CID (Criminal Investigation Department) wing of the overall Police department which was formed in 1906. The main reason adduced by the authorities then for the new building was space constraint in the 19th Century structure in view of the growth of the Police department. In Tamil Nadu, it was in 1979 that the post of DGP was created to head the department. [At present, as per the sanctioned executive strength of the department, there are 14 DGPs, 18 Additional DGPs, 44 IGs (Inspector General), 37 Deputy IGs and 173 Superintendents of Police, in addition to other ranks]. The opposition to the operation against the DGP office complex came in March 1994, when many prominent citizens including former Union Minister C. Subramaniam, former DGPs K. Ravindran and V.R. Lakshminarayanan, leading writer R.K. Narayan, veteran musician Semmangudi R. Srinivasa Iyer, ace tennis player Ramanathan Krishnan, film actor Kamal Hassan and journalist-writer S. Muthiah had appealed to the then DPG S. Sripal to withdraw the demolition proposal. Representatives of the Citizen consumer and civic Action Group (CAG), for which Tara Murali was an advisor, and the Environmental Society were also signatories of the appeal. Explaining in detail why the operation should be halted, the citizens had mooted the idea of converting the building into a museum of police history, if the building could not be used to suit the department. P.T. Krishnan, senior architect, said it should not be difficult to renovate the building which had no structural problem. However, a month later, Jayalalithaa told the Assembly that a sum of ₹3 crore had been allotted for construction of a new DGP office complex on the Marina. In the meantime, competitive designs were invited from archiects for the proposed building. In October 1994, the Chief Minister laid the foundation stone for the new complex. At that time, she did not touch upon the controversy but she said her intention was that the new building for the police headquarters should be a 'magnificent landmark,' which would adorn the sea front with matching beauty. She also observed that ' our emphasis must be on constructive correction rather than on destructive denigration.' A positive outcome of the demolition operation was that another heritage structure, the 18th-century Government House (Old MLAs' Hostel) on the Omandurar Government Estate received a facelift to accommodate the Police department temporarily. The DGP office had started functioning from the Government House mid-December 1994, the Tamil Nadu regional chapter of INTACH (Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage) organised a public meeting to demand the enactment of a law to protect heritage buildings. At the meeting, Tara Murali had moved a plea wherein it was stated that the move would violate existing building rules, set an undesirable precedent that would pose a threat to other heritage buildings and threaten the Marina, the only lung space left in the city. A number of leading personalities including the then Vice-Chancellor of Anna University M. Anandakrishnan took part in the meeting. It was around the time that the Madras HIgh Court stayed the demoliton operation, after being moved by the INTACH. As the legal battle went on, there was a regime change in the State in May 1996 when the DMK returned to power. Three months later, the then Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi announced in the Assembly that his government would not go ahead with the previous regime's decision of demolishing the DGP office building. Two years later, he declared open the renovated DGP building on the Marina. Subsequently, an annex was also built. When Jayalalithaa (by then adding an additional 'a' to her name) returned to power in May 2001, her government, in late 2003, announced that a new building for the DGP office would be built on the Film City complex in Taramani over 24 acres at a cost of ₹ 30 crore and the present building would be converted into a museum. However, nothing much was heard about this proposal. 'Perfect Unanmity' is still performing its traditional duty of providing accommodation to the Police department. The campaign, launched by conservationists including Tara Murali about 30 years ago, made it possible.
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Centre considering climate-friendly sectors as it looks to broaden capex in FY27
New Delhi: The Union government is considering expanding the scope of its capital expenditure (capex) in FY27 beyond traditional infrastructure to include emerging, climate-friendly sectors such as renewable energy and green technologies, two people aware of the matter said. Senior finance ministry officials will meet their counterparts across key ministries in the coming weeks and months to identify investment opportunities in sectors that are both future-ready and growth-supportive. 'The government is keen to sustain the growth momentum through targeted public investment, especially as private sector capex remains uneven," the first person mentioned above said, requesting anonymity. The person added that broadening the capex could also help align long-term development goals with sustainability imperatives. Meanwhile, for FY27, the government is likely to maintain its public capex at about 3.1% of GDP, similar to FY26, continuing its emphasis on capital spending as a key driver of economic expansion, the second person said, also requesting anonymity. "It's not just about boosting short-term growth, but about investing in the kind of infrastructure that will define the country's development over the next decades," the person mentioned above added. The government aims to sustain economic momentum through strong public investment in infrastructure at a time when private sector capex remains tentative and uneven. On 30 June, Mint reported that capital spending by large central public sector enterprises (CPSEs) and key infrastructure agencies could exceed ₹8.5 trillion in FY26, the highest in about a decade, following a renewed government push to accelerate investments this fiscal year. When combined with investments by infrastructure-focussed agencies such as the highways and power ministries, total public capex has more than doubled, from ₹3.11 trillion in FY16 to ₹8.07 trillion in FY25, according to data from the Department of Public Enterprises, under the finance ministry. The Union budget for FY26 earmarked ₹11.21 trillion for central capital expenditure, about 3.1% of GDP and nearly 10% higher than the revised estimates for FY25. This includes ₹1.5 trillion in 50-year interest-free loans to states, aimed at sustaining infrastructure momentum and driving economic growth. The central government, in its Economic Survey 2024-25, projected India's real GDP growth for FY26 to be between6.3% and 6.8%. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also expects India's FY26 GDP growth forecast at6.5%. With GDP growth likely to meet its target, the Centre will need to raise capex for maintaining a similar nominal GDP growth target for the next fiscal year, with public capex expected at around 3.1% of GDP. A finance ministry spokesperson didn't respond to emailed queries. Experts believe the Centre's strategy to maintain capital expenditure at about 3% of GDP, while making directional shifts towards future-ready sectors, is a step in the right direction. "Directional shifts are also called for as the need for expanding conventional infrastructure like roads and ports would be fulfilled in the near future and given the changing scope of new technologies, public investment would be called for linking of rivers, emphasis on renewable energy including hydro power, space, exploitation of rare earth minerals and artificial intelligence-related infrastructure," said D.K. Srivastava, chief policy advisor at EY. Srivastava said central capex is expected to remain crucial over the medium to long term and should ideally be financed under the golden rule, allocating all central borrowing towards capital creation, with additional support from non-debt capital receipts. "Central capex should focus on both maximizing its multiplier effects and filling up shortfalls in new areas of infrastructure, including production of defense capital assets, where private sector investment may not be able to fill up the gap," he added. Rishi Shah, partner and economic advisory services leader, Grant Thornton Bharat, said the pivot toward climate-friendly capex is economically astute—research shows green spending multipliers are larger than traditional spending. "This reallocation optimizes public capital efficiency through higher domestic content and labour intensity," he said. "Given India's $400-billion renewable financing requirement by 2030, strategic government leadership can catalyze private investment through demonstration effects and de-risking," he added.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Commercial enterprise': HC slams plea seeking Rs 1cr relief in 2010 Mirchpur violence
Chandigarh: Rejecting a plea seeking more monetary compensation for those killed injured in the 15-year-old Mirchpur caste violence case of Haryana, the Punjab and Haryana high court has observed that the entire exercise "now appears to have become a commercial enterprise". "The review petitioners have sought compensation of Rs 1 crore in case of death and Rs 25 lakh in case of injury. This court is, therefore, constrained to observe that the entire exercise appears to have become a commercial enterprise," the HC held in its order released on Tuesday. Referring to crores of rupees spent by the state govt in the past 15 years on the rehabilitation of families of the Valmiki community, including lakhs of rupees paid as compensation, construction of houses in the village, jobs, govt houses and security personnel to victim families, the court recorded that most families who migrated from Mirchpur village returned and never complained about any threat or violence in the village. In its detailed order, the HC recorded the date and year-wise money spent by the state authorities on the victims for rehabilitation. The petitioners, however, failed to rebut or counter the same. With regard to some villagers who are living in the farmhouse of a mining contractor, Ved Pal Tanwar, near Hisar, the court observed that they seemed to have preferred to live in the vicinity of Hisar city due to chances of better earning. On a plea made by the review petitioner that 15 victims had not yet been allotted plots, state govt placed on record the complete record of allotments. On this, petitioners could not reply and their contentions were recorded to be "incorrect" by the bench. The division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Nidhi Gupta passed these orders while disposing of a review petition filed by Jaswant Singh and others. The review petitioners in this case mainly emphasised that the rehabilitation of victims was incomplete as there were still some victims remaining who had not been allotted plots, that no employment or any kind of compensation had been given to the victims. Responding to the petition, the home department of Haryana submitted that after the April 2010 incident, 40-45 families continued to reside in the village of Mirchpur. Only 33 families migrated from Mirchpur, who also subsequently returned to the village, and these families never made any complaint against any co-villager regarding any threat or violence. On April 21, 2010, a large number of upper-caste residents attacked a dalit locality in Mirchpur and burnt houses, resulting in the death of 70-year-old Tara Chand and his physically challenged daughter Suman. The violence broke out after a dalit's dog barked at youths belonging to upper castes. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi visited the village after the caste violence made headlines in the national and international media. Over 150 Dalit families allegedly fled the village after their houses were torched. In Dec 2010, the Supreme Court transferred the trial of the case to Delhi to ensure a fair trial on a plea by families of victims. On Oct 31, 2011, three persons were sentenced to life imprisonment, five to imprisonment for varying periods up to five years, and seven for one year for their alleged involvement in the incident. On February 1, 2011, the court ordered the deployment of CRPF at Mirchpur village to protect prosecution witnesses. In Dec 2016, the paramilitary forces were removed by the central govt after incurring around Rs 20 crore in expenses.
