
Dozens of LA-area mayors demand Trump administration stop immigration raids
But there were no signs US President Donald Trump would heed their pleas.
About 500 of the National Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, the commander in charge said Wednesday. And while some troops have already gone on such missions, he said it's too early to say if that will continue even after the protests die down.
'We are expecting a ramp-up,' said Major General Scott Sherman, noting that protests across the nation were being discussed. 'I'm focused right here in LA, what's going on right here. But you know, I think we're, we're very concerned.'
Hours later, a demonstration in Los Angeles' civic centre just before start of the second night of the city's downtown curfew briefly turned chaotic when police in riot gear — many on horseback — charged at a group, striking them with wooden rods and later fired crowd control projectiles, including one that struck a woman who writhed in pain on the ground. After the curfew went into effect, a handful of arrests were made before the area cleared out and the evening quieted down.
ADVERTISEMENT
The LA-area mayors and city council members urged Trump to stop using armed military troops alongside immigration agents.
'I'm asking you, please listen to me, stop terrorising our residents,' said Brenda Olmos, vice mayor of Paramount, who said she was hit by rubber bullets over the weekend. 'You need to stop these raids.'
Speaking alongside the other mayors at a news conference, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the raids spread fear at the behest of the White House. The city's nightly curfew will remain in effect as long as necessary. It covers a 2.5-square-kilometre section of downtown where the protests have been concentrated in the city that encompasses roughly 1295 square kilometres.
'If there are raids that continue, if there are soldiers marching up and down our streets, I would imagine that the curfew will continue,' Bass said.
Those who have been caught up in the nationwide raids include asylum seekers, people who overstayed their visas and migrants awaiting their day in immigration court.
The administration has cited the protests in its decision to deploy the military.
Governor asks court to step in
ADVERTISEMENT
A man shouts into a megaphone outside City Hall during a protest on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in Los Angeles. (Source: Associated Press)
California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, has asked a federal court to put an emergency stop to the military helping immigration agents in the nation's second-largest city. This week, guardsmen began standing protectively around agents as they carry out arrests. A judge set a hearing for tomorrow.
The Trump administration called the lawsuit a "crass political stunt endangering American lives" in its official response today.
The military is now closer to engaging in law enforcement actions such as deportations, as Trump has promised in his crackdown. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement.
The president posted on the Truth Social platform that the city 'would be burning to the ground' if he had not sent in the military.
Some 2000 National Guard soldiers are in Los Angeles and are soon to be joined by 2000 more along with about 700 Marines, Sherman said.
Speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and ABC, Sherman initially said National Guard troops had already temporarily detained civilians in the Los Angeles protests over immigration raids. He later said he based his comments on photos and footage he had seen that turned out not to be a representation of Guard members in Los Angeles.
ADVERTISEMENT
Curfew continues in downtown LA
Police detained more than 20 people, mostly on curfew violations, on the first night of the curfew and used crowd-control projectiles to break up hundreds of protesters. But officers were more aggressive in controlling demonstrators Wednesday evening and as the curfew took effect, police were beginning to make arrests.
Los Angeles police have made nearly 400 arrests and detentions since Sunday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department.
There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against police officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine police officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injures. Some were transported to a hospital and released.
Protests have spread nationwide
A demonstrator with carrying a Mexican flag chants during a protest against deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in New York, June 11, 2025. (Source: Associated Press)
Demonstrations have also spread to other cities nationwide, including Dallas and Austin in Texas, and Chicago and New York, where thousands rallied and more arrests were made.
ADVERTISEMENT
In New York City, police said they took 86 people into custody during protests in lower Manhattan that lasted into Thursday. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said the majority of demonstrators were peaceful.
A 66-year-old woman in Chicago was injured when she was struck by a car during downtown protests yesterday, police said. Video showed a car speeding down a street where people were protesting.
In Texas, where police in Austin used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred demonstrators Monday, Republican Governor Greg Abbott's office said Texas National Guard troops were 'on standby" in areas where demonstrations are planned.
Guard members were sent to San Antonio, but Police Chief William McManus said he had not been told how many troops were deployed or their role ahead of planned protests tonight and Sunday. Officers with the Texas Department of Public Safety said the Texas National Guard was present at a protest downtown.
The protests began Saturday after federal immigration raids arrested dozens of workers in Los Angeles.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
44 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Trump administration targets Harvard's foreign student programme in latest investigation
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Trump launched an investigation into Harvard's visa sponsorship programme. Photo / Getty Images US President Donald Trump's administration has launched an investigation into Harvard University's ability to sponsor visiting students and academics, part of a continuing crackdown on the elite institution. Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly accused Harvard and other top US universities of having a 'liberal' bias, accusing some of 'antisemitism' to cut federal funding and demand greater oversight. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the latest investigation would examine whether the university was complying with regulations in the Exchange Visitor Programme. That included probing whether the university was 'conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States'. 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' he said in a statement.


NZ Herald
44 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Analysis: Both men are constrained by a shared need to please conservative Americans
Another host, Greg Gutfeld, said Democrats were secretly 'relieved that the golden age is here'. The war Trump is waging against Murdoch over the Journal's coverage, including a US$10 billion ($16.6b) lawsuit he filed last week, has been billed as a Battle of the Titans. Given their stature atop conservative politics and media, it is certainly that. In suing Murdoch, Trump, who has extracted multimillion-dollar settlements in suits against ABC News and CBS News, is taking on the most battle-tested, self-assured, and politically astute mogul in media. But the continued affection for Trump among Fox News hosts makes it clear that while this is a fight between giants, it is like nothing found in the works of Homer or Hesiod. That's because the two men are constrained by the one thing that has kept them linked across 10 years of personal comity and conflict: their shared need to please conservative Americans. For Murdoch, those conservatives are the most important constituency of his empire. They provide a committed base audience for Fox News — his leading revenue generator — and they expect the network to mirror their own loyalty to Trump in return. It explains why Fox News largely avoided repeating the Journal's scoop or saying much about Trump's lawsuit against the Journal. Although loyalty to Trump among Fox viewers has appeared unshakable, Trump clearly wants to keep it that way. They are his core voters, many of them glued to Fox more than to the Maga multiverse of social media and podcast influencers who make up the harder-edged, ideological wing of his movement. Trump's appreciation for the Fox audience has been evident in his decision to populate his new Administration with former Fox hosts and contributors. It has also shown up in the many Truth Social messages he has posted since he sued Murdoch, directing his followers to watch Fox News segments. Trump's ire is exclusively trained on Murdoch and the Journal for moving ahead with what Trump called a 'fake' story, according to a person with knowledge of Trump's views about the feud. The article focused on a 'bawdy' birthday message the Journal said Trump sent to Epstein in 2003. Trump, this person said, considers Fox News — and for that matter, the New York Post, another business owned by Murdoch — to be in a separate, friendlier category, where he has warm relations with various personalities. That helps explain why even as Trump filed his lawsuit he wrote on Truth Social: 'Everybody should watch Sean Hannity tonight. He really gets it!' What Hannity got that evening: Trump's was 'the single most consequential, transformational presidency in our lifetime.' Hannity, who is happy to acknowledge his admiration for his friend, has avoided mentioning the Journal article on his show. But another Murdoch-world friendly, Miranda Devine at the New York Post, went so far as to call the article a 'nothingburger'. The relationship between Trump and Murdoch has always been complicated. When Trump first told Murdoch he was running for president, at a lunch at Murdoch's New York offices, Murdoch didn't hide his scepticism. Murdoch did not see Trump as a president. The Fox News audience thought otherwise, Murdoch soon discovered. And as someone who built his empire by giving his customers what they want, he came on board as network hosts rallied to help place Trump in the White House in 2016. An awkward friendship blossomed, as both came to enjoy gossiping and comparing notes over the phone — satisfying Murdoch's thirst for access to the Oval Office and Trump's craving for acceptance from his fellow billionaire conservative. The 2020 election wedged them apart anew. Trump was furious at Murdoch for refusing to block Fox News' projection that Trump had lost the pivotal state of Arizona. Murdoch was furious at Trump's stolen-election conspiracies, which drew sympathetic coverage among some Fox hosts and resulted in a US$787.5 million payout to settle a defamation suit from Dominion Voting Systems, a company at the centre of the false narrative. The two did not speak for a long period after the election as Murdoch's outlets lined up behind a would-be challenger to Trump, Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida. But the audience still wanted Trump, forcing the two back together last year. Murdoch was on the dais at Trump's second inauguration and appeared with the President before cameras inside the Oval Office in early February. Even then, though, there were some signs of the tension that has exploded into view in the past week. Speaking with reporters as Murdoch sat nearby, Trump called the media mogul one of the 'most talented people in the world'. Then a reporter in the room asked the President about an editorial in the Journal that accused him of starting 'The Dumbest Trade War in History'. It was one of many critical editorials the Journal, whose opinion page has long favoured free trade and an opposition to tariffs, has published on the Administration's economic policy and other topics. Trump grimaced and said of Murdoch: 'I'm going to have to talk to him about that'. He added, 'I've been right over the Wall Street Journal many times'. In the weeks that followed, the Journal's editorial board expressed numerous other criticisms of the Administration, even as it offered praise at times, too. It called Trump's decision to pull security for several former national security officials 'a new low'; gave him a new name, 'Tariff Man'; asked if he would 'please take a summer vacation for the good of the nation'; and suggested the Federal Communications Commission was operating as Trump's 'personal protection racket'. The two men continued to talk on the phone throughout, trading information and gossip. A pivotal interaction, though, came last week, with the Journal's reporting on Epstein. Trump has said he directly asked Murdoch to spike the article, arguing that it wasn't true. Murdoch, in Trump's telling, said he would 'take care of it'. Murdoch's representatives declined to comment on that assertion. Murdoch, though, has shown a pattern of refusing to intervene to kill his journalists' stories. Dow Jones, the Journal's parent company, expressed 'full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of our reporting' and vowed to 'vigorously defend against any lawsuit'. That leaves many progressives and First Amendment advocates looking to an unlikely protagonist. 'Is this what we have come to,' Tina Brown, the author and former top magazine editor, wrote this week, 'depending on Rupert Murdoch to stand up for press freedom?' She predicted he would, but the ultimate outcome may depend on the viewers-slash-voters who are so central to Murdoch's and Trump's power. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Jim Rutenberg Photograph by: Hiroko Masuike ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
EU heading towards 15 percent tariff deal with US, EU diplomats say
By Philip Blenkinsop , Reuters Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski The European Union is heading towards a trade deal with Washington that would result in a broad 15 percent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, avoiding a harsher 30 percent levy slated to be implemented from 1 August, two EU diplomats said on Wednesday. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the United States struck with Japan . Officials from the European Commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the 27-nation bloc, briefed EU envoys on the state of talks with their US counterparts. US President Donald Trump would ultimately make any final decision on a deal, however. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 percent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under 5 percent. There could also be concessions for sectors like aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. Washington does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 percent tariff on steel, they said. The Commission said earlier on Wednesday that its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome to avert the threatened 30 percent tariffs. At the same time it planned to submit counter-tariffs on €93 billion (US$109 billion) worth of US goods to EU members for approval. A vote is expected on Thursday, though no measures would be imposed until 7 August. Germany supported the EU readying countermeasures, a government representative said. If Trump's 30 percent tariffs are implemented, EU diplomats also said there was broad support among European governments to activate wide-ranging so-called "anti-coercion" measures, which would allow the bloc to target US services and other sectors. The EU appears to be following in the footsteps of Japan, whose agreement with the United States is the most significant Trump has struck since launching his tariff offensive in April. European shares climbed around 1 percent, led by automobile stocks, following the US-Japan announcement. One stand-out feature of that deal was that the same 15 percent rate applies to cars, compared to the current US tariff of 27.5 percent, something the EU may want for its own auto exports. The US imported vehicles and automotive parts valued at more than US$55b from Japan last year. EU exports were €47.3b (US$55.45b). Far fewer US cars were sold into the EU or Japanese markets. EU officials say Washington has shown little sign of budging on car tariffs, but the Japan deal could hint at flexibility. "Whatever the Japanese got will become the minimum for the EU negotiating objectives," said Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School. - Reuters