Judiciary a stabilising force in country as diverse as India: Justice Surya Kant
'It reinforces public trust and ensures that the lifeblood of democracy continues to flow unblemished," he said.
Justice Kant was delivering the first annual H L Sibal memorial lecture at the main Bar room in Punjab and Haryana High Court in Chandigarh on Sunday.
He also said democracy, like nuclear fusion, holds immense generative power. But as with any powerful force, it demands principled restraint, he said.
'In a country as diverse as ours, with democracy permeating every level, the judiciary serves as a stabilising force representing not vote banks but constitutional values," Justice Kant said.
'The Constitution serves as its containment chamber, shaping and guiding that energy and it is the judiciary that plays the role of the stabilising core, ensuring that this power does not fracture into chaos, but is channelled in service of constitutional order and justice," he added.
The SC judge reflected on the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional values, particularly through the power of judicial review.
'Another vital dimension of constitutional adjudication, and what I believe is one of the most fascinating aspects of our democracy, is the judiciary's role in safeguarding free and fair elections," he said.
In any democracy, 'elections are not merely procedural events; they are foundational to legitimacy and often vulnerable to misuse", he said.
'The power of judicial review to invalidate tainted elections and disqualify those who engage in electoral malpractice serves not only as a deterrent but as an important mechanism to uphold the integrity of our democratic process," Justice Kant said.
Among those present on the occasion included Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court; several high court judges, senior advocate and H L Sibal's son Kapil Sibal, Sartej Singh Narula, President of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association.
Earlier, in his address, Justice Kant described late H L Sibal as an unparalleled luminary of the law whose brilliance, multifaceted personality and humanity left an everlasting impression on all those who had the privilege of crossing his path.
'On a deeply personal note, Sibal Sahab was a mentor, a guide, and a dear friend to me during the transformative periods of my life, regardless of our substantial age difference. His wisdom shaped my thinking, his generosity uplifted me, and his quiet strength steadied me through pivotal moments in my journey," he said.
Justice Kant recalled H L Sibal completed his law education at Lahore, a city that, before Partition, was a centre of intellectual and legal ferment.
The era in which he began his legal career was volatile, marked by political upheaval, colonial repression, and the stirring of India's freedom movement, he said.
'As a young lawyer, Sibal Sahab quickly earned a reputation for fearlessly taking on controversial cases, not merely to defend his clients, but to uphold the fundamental values of free expression and to challenge the excesses of state power," Justice Kant said.
Though H L Sibal initially joined his family in Jalandhar after migrating from Lahore, he later shifted to Shimla in 1948, and eventually settled in Chandigarh in 1955, he said.
From there, he practised before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court for over six remarkable decades. To be precise, his legal career spanned an extraordinary 67 years, Justice Kant recalled.
During this period, he went on to serve as the Advocate General for the States of both Punjab and Haryana twice. PTI SUN VSD NB NB
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments
First Published:
August 04, 2025, 20:15 IST
News agency-feeds Judiciary a stabilising force in country as diverse as India: Justice Surya Kant
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bangladesh, a year after Sheikh Hasina's ouster
Bangladesh today is abysmally different from the trajectory promised to the people by Professor Muhammad Yunus when he was sworn in (August 8, 2024) as Chief Adviser of the Interim Government. Many myths have been shattered. The first myth that has unravelled is that Sheikh Hasina's ouster was the result of a 'spontaneous students' uprising'. It is now accepted that the 'meticulously designed' regime change operation was the handiwork of the Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI), the radical Islamist political party that fought against the creation of Bangladesh in 1971. In 2024, as in 1971, the JeI was strongly supported by Pakistan, backed by key external powers including the United States and China. The JeI is the power behind the Chief Adviser, controlling every decision. The second myth concerns the legitimacy and constitutional validity of the Yunus-led regime. On August 8, 2024 they took the oath of allegiance to the Constitution of Bangladesh. However, this Constitution has no provision for an interim government. Even though the Bangladesh High Court (on December 17, 2024) restored the system of caretaker government, the Yunus-led Interim Government cannot be considered a caretaker government. The Yunus regime has violated the mandated neutrality and non-party requirements of the caretaker government. Members of the Hizb-ut Tahrir, Islami Andolan Bangladesh, and Hefazat-e-Islam have been included as advisers in his regime. In a tweet (now deleted), one of the advisers expressed their desire to establish a caliphate in Bangladesh based on Sharia law, and even spoke about a civil war to achieve this goal. The strongly Islamist ideological leanings and objectives of those who hold the reins of power in Bangladesh have alienated them from the people. An election delaying tactic The third myth relates to the raison d'etre of any interim government. Its mandate can only be to ensure that free, fair and inclusive elections are organised within the specified 90-day period, with the participation of all registered political parties. An interim regime is not authorised to take any major decisions, especially those with constitutional significance or implications. Such decisions can be taken only by an elected parliament. Instead of preparing for elections, the Yunus-led interim regime has initiated a reform process, insisting that this must be completed before the elections. It has set up reform commissions for the Constitution, for electoral reforms, and for police reforms, among others. The JeI is the key protagonist of these reforms, which it hopes will boost its vote share far above the meagre 5% to 10% it has been receiving. This so-called reform process is merely an excuse to delay the elections, a step strongly opposed by the Army and by major political parties such as the Bangladesh Nationalist Party which are insisting that elections be held by December 2025. This issue is now rapidly coming to a head, and election dates may be announced very soon. Led by the JeI, the interim regime is unleashing unspeakable violence on the people. Prime targets are the non-Muslim minorities (Hindus, Christians, Buddhists) as well as Muslim religious minorities (Sufis and Ahmadiyyas). Equally vicious has been the violence unleashed against Awami League members and their supporters. Every statue, every building, every institution associated with the Liberation War of 1971 has been destroyed. Over the months, as this violence has continued unabated, with varying degrees of ferocity, a huge backlash has built up among the people. Awami Leaguers have been jailed in large numbers or just brutally slaughtered. In May 2025, all Awami League activities were banned. While Sheikh Hasina is being tried on charges of ordering attacks on students (during the unrest of July-August 2024), there is deliberate amnesia about the burning and looting (by the mobs) of 400 police thanas across Bangladesh, followed by the killing of policemen in the hundreds, even thousands, using these looted weapons. The decision by the interim regime to indemnify itself and all 'the students and people who actively took part in the mass uprising of July-August' against harassment or arrest has been sharply criticised within and outside Bangladesh. A party, its disconnect The 'students' party, the National Citizen Party (NCP), formed in February 2025, is dubbed the King's Party, owing direct allegiance to Mr. Yunus. So far, the party has no legal status since it is not registered with the Election Commission. At first it included erstwhile members or sympathisers of the Islami Chhatra Shibir (students' wing of the JeI) and claims 'it was established to fight for the rights of the student community'. Yet, it has little or no following among university students. On July 16, 2025, NCP leaders held a rally in Gopalgunj, the hometown of the Father of the Nation, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, with the reported intention of desecrating his mausoleum in Tungipara. The NCP was strongly resisted by the local people, staunch supporters of the Awami League. The Bangladesh Army is said to have supported the NCP by firing on unarmed civilians, resulting in the loss of several lives. The Gopalgunj incident has caused a furore, with dissatisfaction against the NCP and the Interim regime reaching new highs. A complaint has now been filed with the United Nations, describing this as a genocidal attack on the people of Bangladesh. Important institutions of state such as the judiciary, the central bank and even the media have been compromised. In August 2024, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Governor of the Bangladesh Bank were surrounded by mobs and forced to resign. This pattern of mobocracy soon became the norm. Strict media control has been ensured by peremptorily taking over media houses. Journalists have been imprisoned since the early days of the interim regime, many on charges of murder. Many have lost their jobs, and face penury. This massive clampdown on an otherwise vibrant and comparatively free media has allowed the interim regime to peddle its own version of events to the global media. Economic distress, a patient India However, it is difficult to hide the overwhelming economic distress being faced by the people. Growth rates have halved from the robust 6% and more per annum, that was the norm under Sheikh Hasina. Factories have shut down due to poor supply chain management, resulting in joblessness and hyper-inflation. In July 2025, Bangladesh Bank highlighted continuing macroeconomic challenges due to 'persistent inflation, uncertainties associated with the forthcoming elections, slowing economic growth and stagnant private investment'. The economic distress is, in many ways, the direct result of the foreign policy goals set by the Yunus regime. As can be expected, the JeI is not averse to the moniker, 'client state of Pakistan', that is increasingly used for Bangladesh. The events of July-August 2024 were preceded and accompanied by vicious anti-India propaganda. Harsh criticism of Sheikh Hasina as a 'fascist dictator' was invariably followed by blaming India for the state of affairs in Bangladesh. The mutually beneficial trade and economic partnership between these two neighbouring countries was criticised as being one-sided and unfair. One year of this unrelenting barrage has now boomeranged on the Yunus regime. Public opinion has turned against it because, except for words, it has provided no succour to the people of Bangladesh. Across the nation, the shared refrain openly describes the 'earlier times' as 'being better', including the benefits to Bangladesh of their strong economic, trade and investment links with India. India has shown a lot of patience in dealing with the interim regime. In August 2024, India had conveyed its willingness to continue with and build upon its links with Bangladesh. In April 2025, during the bilateral meeting with Mr. Yunus, Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated India's support for a democratic, stable, peaceful, progressive and inclusive Bangladesh, enunciating India's people-centric approach to the relationship. Unfortunately, the hand of friendship was rebuffed. Now, a new grouping of China, Pakistan and Bangladesh is sought to be created. Bangladesh must have early free, fair and inclusive elections under a new caretaker government. India is confident that the new elected government, one that truly reflects the wishes of the people of Bangladesh, will work to re-establish a cordial and mutually beneficial relationship with India. Veena Sikri is a former High Commissioner of India to Bangladesh
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Deesa fire tragedy: Kin move SC, seek Rs 2 crore compensation per victim, probe outside Gujarat
The family members of the April 1 Deesa fire tragedy — during which at least 21 workers, including seven children, were killed and six others were injured after a blast, involving a massive blaze, destroyed a firecracker warehouse — have moved the Supreme Court seeking a compensation of Rs 2 crore per victim and also directions to transfer the case probe to police officers from outside Gujarat. While moving the top court, the victims' kin mentioned the infringement of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees 'protection of life and personal liberty'. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the respondents, including the Chief Secretary of Gujarat, returnable on September 26. The Supreme Court Division Bench of Justice Surya Kant, Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh issued the notice to the respondents on July 31, after admitting the petition filed by Chandar Singh Nayak, from Madhya Pradesh's Devas village, who works as a labourer in Ahmedabad, and has lost six family members in the tragedy. The State of Gujarat, through the Chief Secretary as well as the Home Secretary as well as the Regional Fire Officer of Gandhinagar, District Collector of Banaskantha and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Deesa are respondents to Nayak's petition before the SC. On April 1, when a fire broke out in the illegal firecracker manufacturing facility, comprising six warehouses in Deesa, Nayak lost his daughter, son-in-law, siblings of son-in-law, and mother-in-law of his deceased daughter in the incident. In his petition, filed through Advocate Utkarsh Dave, Nayak has informed the court that the firecracker warehouse ran without proper licensing, sale permissions, fire safety equipment and regulatory insights. 'A majority of the deceased migrant workers, who were brought by the warehouse owners from the neighbouring state of Madhya Pradesh, worked in the firecracker factory without any formal contract, with no or minimal safety measures and equipment,' the petition states, enlisting four similar incidents that have occurred in Gujarat since 2023, including the April 20, 2023 blaze in a firecracker factory in Aravalli, in which four labourers were killed as well as a fire in Bapunagar godown storing firecrackers without permission in Ahmedabad on May 10, 2023, that caused injuries to some persons. The petition also lists the death of two persons in a blast in a firecracker factory in Ahmedabad's Vanch on April 21, 2024 that killed two as well as the May 25, 2024 Rajkot TRP gaming zone fire. 'Several persons lost their lives and many others suffered serious injuries to their person and property in these incidents due to the repeated failure of the State authorities who failed to keep a check on these illegal activities and, therefore, are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the kin of the victims and injured persons… In such cases, the state must see that the victims do not remain in the constant state of suffering and despair…' the petition states. Seeking a higher compensation of Rs 2 crore each for the families of the deceased victims and Rs 50 lakh to the injured victims, the petition states, 'It is submitted that the Central Government and the State Governments of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh announced paltry compensation amounts of Rs 2 lakh, Rs 4 lakh, and Rs 2 lakh respectively to the next of kin of the deceased persons and Rs 50,000/- each for the injured by overlooking the fact that a majority of the victims were the sole bread earners of their respective families…' The petition seeks 'directions' for the state government to 'immediately locate and carry out an inspection of all the firecracker manufacturing units in the State of Gujarat in respect of compliance with applicable fire safety norms' under prevailing laws.' Advocate Dave said that the petition seeks investigation into the role of the state officials, who have 'shown extreme administrative lethargy and even complicity despite judicial interventions'. Dave said, 'Gujarat has seen several tragedies in the past that have caused loss of lives due to negligence of authorities and repeated failure of the officials working in state government. Our petition is seeking that the amount of compensation should be enhanced, which can bring a life of dignity to the kin of the victims, if not closure in the matter… In the specific case of Deesa, we have sought that the investigation should be conducted by officers from outside the state of Gujarat so that the state government officers responsible for the tragedy are not given scope to escape the law. A total of 21 people had lost their lives in the tragedy. The warehouse owners were illegally manufacturing fireworks in the said premises. An FIR was lodged in the case in Deesa Rural police station.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Fadnavis hails SC order reconfirming 27% OBC quota in Maharashtra local body polls
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Monday welcomed the Supreme Court directive on conducting elections under the new ward structure with 27 per cent reservation for the Other Backward Class (OBC) of 2017. This has paved the way for holding the long-due polls to the municipal corporations, municipal councils, zilla parishads, and other local bodies in Maharashtra. CM Fadnavis said, 'The Supreme Court directive regarding OBC reservation has two meanings. In the previous decision, the court had said that elections should be held as per the old OBC reservation, the same direction has now been confirmed. Therefore, the OBC quota will be applicable in the upcoming local, and civic body elections. The Supreme Court has also said that elections will be held as per 2017 ward structure, not as per of the year 2022. Therefore, both the demands of the state government have been accepted.' Former president of Ausa municipal council Afsar Sheikh had approached the court, seeking to conduct elections as per 2022 ward structure. The process for new ward formation is already underway and is likely to get over within a month and the court has refused to stay the same. NCP minister Chhagan Bhujbal said the ensuing local and civic body elections will be held with this 27 per cent OBC reservation and new ward structure. 'In its judgment on May 6, 2025, the Supreme Court had ruled that elections will be held with 27 per cent reservation. In today's ruling, the apex court has confirmed its earlier judgment saying the elections will be held with new ward structure. The Supreme Court has clearly said that composition of wards and its structure is entirely the prerogative of the state government, which has enacted a law in this regard. There is no stay on that. Therefore, today's apex court order has paved the way for holding local and civic body elections in the state with 27 per cent OBC quota and with new ward structure,' he remarked. NCP SP legislator Jitendra Awhad also hailed the apex court order. However, he accused the Mahayuti government of wasting three years due to vested interest. In Maharashtra, the local body polls will be nothing less than mini-assembly polls. In urban areas, out of 29 municipal corporations (Jalna and Ichalkaranji newly formed), all are run by administrators and are without an elected body. The state has 248 municipal councils and all have administrators. Out of 147 nagar panchayats, administrators — i.e. expired and newly formed nagar panchayats are 42, where elections will be held. In rural Maharashtra, out of total 34 zilla parishads, 32 have administrators, except for Bhandara and Gondia whose term will end in May 2027. In case of panchayat samitis, out of total 351 panchayat samitis, 336 have administrators where elections will be held.
