AP SSC Supplementary Result 2025 Declared, Direct link Here
The AP SSC supplementary exams took place from May 19 to May 28, 2025. The result includes details such as marks scored in each subject, total marks, grade, and pass status, with a grading system using grade points ranging from 3 to 10 based on marks scored.
Direct Link Here
AP SSC or Class 10th Supplementary Result 2025: How To Check Marks
Step 1: Visit the official websites: bse.ap.gov.in or manabadi.co.in.
Step 2: Locate the link that leads to the SSC Supplementary Exam Result 2025 page.
Step 3: Students must enter their credentials—roll number or hall ticket number—to log into the portal.
Step 4: Once you click on submit, the student's result will appear on the screen.
Step 5: Download result and save it.
The Board of Secondary Education in Andhra Pradesh announced the Class 10 or SSC final exam results on April 23, 2025, with an overall pass percentage of 81.14%. Out of approximately 6.14 lakh students who appeared for the exams in March 2025, around 4.98 lakh students passed. Although this marks a decline from the previous year's pass percentage of 86.69%, it remains higher than the pass rates recorded in 2022 and 2023. Notably, the Parvathipuram Manyam district topped with a pass percentage of 93.90%, and 1,680 schools achieved a 100% pass rate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Watch: Huge fireball erupts in sky as small plane crashes after take-off at Southend Airport
A small aircraft crashed shortly after take-off at London Southend Airport on Sunday, leading to a large fire and black smoke visible from the area. Emergency services rushed to the scene and remain at the site, according to the Associated Press (AP). The airport said in a statement on social media that the crash involved a 'general aviation aircraft.' Essex Police said they were called just before 4 p.m. to reports of a 12-metre-long plane going down near the runway. Authorities asked people to stay away while crews continue their work. 'We are working with all emergency services at the scene now and that work will be ongoing for several hours,' Essex Police said. The plane has been identified by tracking services as a Beech B200 Super King Air. According to Flightradar, the aircraft took off from Southend at 3:48 p.m. and was headed to Lelystad in the Netherlands. Crazy footage from the golf course, on which the plane taking off from Southend London airport appeared to — Phil (@phil_from_NG) July 13, 2025 A man who was at the airport with his family, John Johnson, said he saw the aircraft moments before the crash. 'We all waved at the pilots, and they all waved back at us,' he told AP. 'The aircraft turned 180 degrees to face its take-off, powered up, rolled down the runway. It took off, and about three or four seconds later, it started to bank heavily to its left. Then it inverted and crashed headfirst into the ground.' 'There was a big fireball,' he said, adding that he immediately phoned 999. 'I'd say we're pretty shaken up. I just feel sad for the people on the plane and their families. Our thoughts are with them.' Images and video shared on X showed plumes of black smoke rising from the airport, with fire engines and emergency vehicles on site. 🚨 BREAKING: A jet has just crashed at London Southend Airport, causing a MASSIVE fireball No word on casuaIties Pray for those on board! — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 13, 2025 Emergency services, including fire crews and ambulances, were seen rushing to the scene. Witnesses described seeing the aircraft bank sharply before hitting the ground and exploding into a fireball. No details on where the plane was heading or how many people were on board were immediately disclosed.
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Osprey came back from the brink once. Now chicks are dying in nests, and some blame overfishing
GLOUCESTER POINT, Va. (AP) — Stepping onto an old wooden duck blind in the middle of the York River, Bryan Watts looks down at a circle of sticks and pine cones on the weathered, guano-spattered platform. It's a failed osprey nest, taken over by diving terns. 'The birds never laid here this year,' said Watts, near the mouth of Virginia's Chesapeake Bay. 'And that's a pattern we've been seeing these last couple of years.' Watts has a more intimate relationship with ospreys than most people have with a bird — he has climbed to their nests to free them from plastic bags, fed them by hand and monitored their eggs with telescopic mirrors. The fish-eating raptor known for gymnastic dives and whistle-like chirps is an American conservation success story. After pesticides and other hazards nearly eliminated the species from much of the country, the hawk-like bird rebounded after the banning of DDT in 1972 and now numbers in the thousands in the U.S. But Watts has documented an alarming trend. The birds, which breed in many parts of the U.S., are failing to successfully fledge enough chicks around their key population center of the Chesapeake Bay. The longtime biologist blames the decline of menhaden, a small schooling fish critical to the osprey diet. Without menhaden to eat, chicks are starving and dying in nests, Watts said. Watts's claim has put him and environmental groups at odds with the fishing industry, trade unions and sometimes government regulators. Menhaden is valuable for fish oil, fish meal and agricultural food as well as bait. U.S. fishermen have caught at least 1.1 billion pounds of menhaden every year since 1951. Members of the industry tout its sustainability and said the decline in osprey may have nothing to do with fishing. But without help, the osprey population could tumble to levels not seen since the dark days of DDT, said Watts, director of the Center for Conservation Biology at The College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia. 'The osprey are yelling pretty loudly that, hey, there's not enough menhaden for us to reproduce successfully,' Watts said. 'And we should be listening to them to be more informed fully on the fisheries side, and we should take precaution on the fisheries management side. But that hasn't won the day at this point.' Watts, who has studied osprey on the Chesapeake for decades, has backed his claims of population decline by publishing studies in scientific journals. He said it boils down to a simple statistic — to maintain population, osprey pairs need to average 1.15 chicks per year. Osprey were reproducing at that level in the 1980s, but today in some areas around the main stem of the Chesapeake, it's less than half of that, Watts said. In particularly distressed areas, they aren't even reproducing at one-tenth that level, he said. And the decline in available menhaden matches the areas of nesting failure, Watts said. Also called pogies or bunkers, the oily menhaden are especially important for young birds because they are more nutritious than other fish in the sea. Osprey 'reproductive performance is inextricably linked to the availability and abundance' of menhaden, Watts wrote in a 2023 study published in Frontiers in Marine Science. Conservationists have been concerned for years, saying too many menhaden have been removed to maintain their crucial role in the ocean food chain. Historian H. Bruce Franklin went so far as to title his 2007 book on menhaden 'The Most Important Fish In The Sea.' Menhaden help sustain one of the world's largest fisheries, worth more than $200 million at the docks in 2023. Used as bait, the fish are critical for valuable commercial targets such as Maine lobster. They're also beloved by sportfishermen. The modern industry is dominated by Omega Protein, a Reedville, Virginia, company that is a subsidiary of Canadian aquaculture giant Cooke. The company pushed back at the idea that fishing is the cause of osprey decline, although it did acknowledge that fewer menhaden are showing up in some parts of the bay. Federal data show osprey breeding is in decline in many parts of the country, including where menhaden is not harvested at all, said Ben Landry, an Omega spokesperson. Climate change, pollution and development could be playing a role, said Landry and others with the company. Blaming fishing 'just reeks of environmental special interest groups having an influence over the process,' Landry said. The menhaden fishery is managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, an interstate body that crafts rules and sets fishing quotas. Prompted by questions about ospreys, it created a work group to address precautionary management of the species in the Chesapeake Bay. In April, this group proposed several potential management approaches, including seasonal closures, restrictions on quotas or days at sea, and limitations on kinds of fishing gear. The process of creating new rules could begin this summer, said James Boyle, fishery management plan coordinator with the commission. The osprey population has indeed shown declines in some areas since 2012, but it's important to remember the bird's population is much larger than it was before DDT was banned, Boyle said. 'There are big increases in osprey population since the DDT era,' Boyle said, citing federal data showing a six-fold increase in osprey populations along the Atlantic Coast since the 1960s. To a number of environmental groups, any decline is too much. This irritates some labor leaders who worry about losing more jobs as the fishing industry declines. Kenny Pinkard, retired vice president of UFCW Local 400's executive board and a longtime Virginia fishermen, said he feels the industry is being scapegoated. 'There are some people who just don't want to see us in business at all,' he said. But Chris Moore, Virginia executive director for Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said the country risks losing an iconic bird if no action is taken. He said Watts's studies show that the osprey will fail without access to menhaden. 'Osprey have been a success story,' Moore said. 'We're in a situation where they're not replacing their numbers. We'll actually be in a situation where we're in a steep decline.' Whittle reported from Portland, Maine. ___ This story was supported by funding from the Walton Family Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX crash: Boeing's last minute settlement with Canadian man whose family died in disaster; avoids trial
Rescuers work at the scene of an Ethiopian Airlines plane crash (AP) US aviation giant Boing reached a settlement on Friday with a Canadian man whose family was killed in a 737 MAX crash in Ethiopia, avoiding the federal trial in connection with the deadly event set to begin on Monday, reported news agency AP. A jury trial in Chicago's federal court was set to determine the compensation owed to Paul Njoroge, whose entire family perished in March 2019 when Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed en route to their hometown in Kenya. The Boeing aircraft malfunctioned shortly after takeoff, killing all 157 passengers on board. Njoroge, 41, was set to testify in a Chicago federal court about the emotional and psychological trauma he has endured since the tragedy. He has been unable to return to his family home in Toronto, citing the overwhelming grief, and has struggled to find employment. According to his legal team, he also faced criticism from relatives for not traveling with his wife and children at the time of the crash. 'He's got complicated grief and sorrow and his own emotional stress,' said Njoroge's attorney, Robert Clifford. 'He's haunted by nightmares and the loss of his wife and children.' A spokesperson for Clifford Law Offices, the firm representing Njoroge, confirmed that 'the case has settled for a confidential amount.' Robert Clifford, a senior partner at the firm, added: 'The aviation team at Clifford Law Offices has been working round-the-clock in preparation for trial, but the mediator was able to help the parties come to an agreement on behalf of Paul Njoroge.' Njoroge also lost his mother-in-law in the crash, making the tragedy even more devastating for the family. Legal proceedings in the lawsuit filed were not expected to delve into the technical aspects of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, Boeing's bestselling jet that has remained at the centre of controversy since two fatal crashes within five months. The crashes, one in Ethiopia in 2019 and another in Indonesia in 2018, claimed the lives of 346 people, including passengers and crew members. In 2021, Chicago-based Boeing acknowledged responsibility for the Ethiopian Airlines crash through a legal agreement with victims' families. The deal allowed families to file individual claims in US courts, bypassing legal systems in their home countries. Citizens from 35 countries were among the deceased. While many families have since reached settlements, the financial terms of those agreements have not been disclosed publicly. The Ethiopian Airlines jet, en route to Nairobi, crashed shortly after takeoff from Addis Ababa Bole International Airport, plunging into a barren field. Investigators concluded that both the Ethiopian and Indonesian disasters were caused by a malfunctioning system known as MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System). The software, which was triggered by faulty sensor data, repeatedly forced the aircraft's nose downward, ultimately overwhelming the pilots. Following the Ethiopian crash, Boeing's 737 MAX fleet was grounded worldwide. The aircraft was only cleared for service after Boeing redesigned the flawed system. Earlier this year, Boeing reached a separate agreement with the US department of justice to avoid criminal prosecution related to the two deadly crashes.
