logo
School fees: how to save €50,000 to pay for children's school or college costs

School fees: how to save €50,000 to pay for children's school or college costs

Irish Times4 days ago
You won't get much change out of €50,000 for a six-year private education in Dublin these days, while sending a child to college away from home can cost about €60,000.
Add on all the grinds, Gaeltacht trips and a possible master's that are now commonplace, and you could be looking at a small fortune to educate your children in Ireland.
It's a lot of money, but, if your children are still young, there is a solution: start saving now.
'You know when this expense is going to happen, so you can plan for it. Planning for even a portion of it will take the pressure off,' says Grace Webster, a senior wealth executive at Goodbody. 'The big thing is to start early, as the impact will be less.'
READ MORE
Here are some tips on how to maximise your savings by starting early, and taking on some risk. And, for those children who don't end up going down the college route, we have some tips on how you can transfer those college savings, tax efficiently, to be used as a deposit on a house and so on.
But remember, it's not all about the kids: you have to look after your own financial future too.
'Parents do feel pressure,' says Gwen Clarke, director of Gwen Clarke Financial Services in Kildare. 'But I say to people, 'Look after yourselves, enjoy your life. Don't be putting aside everything you have'.'
'There is definitely a big increase in people going to private or fee-paying secondary schools.' Photograph: David Jones/PA Wire
Private school fees
It's mainly a Dublin thing, although not exclusively: paying for private school, either at junior or senior level, or both. And, despite the obvious expense, demand is rising.
'There is definitely a big increase in people going to private or fee-paying secondary schools,' says Webster.
An Irish Times survey from late last year showed that annual fees at secondary level have climbed by up to 19 per cent, with charges for day pupils now costing €4,000-€14,000.
[
Fees have jumped across many of Ireland's private secondary schools. Why?
Opens in new window
]
Sligo Grammar School, for example, charges €4,900 a year for day fees; Alexandra College in Dublin 6 is €8,726; Belvedere College is €7,500; and Wesley College in Dublin 16 is €7,690.
So outside Dublin you could be looking at fees of €30,000, per child, for six years of secondary school, and about €48,000 in Dublin.
And this doesn't even include those additional fees for transition year, books – remember: books aren't free in private schools – school trips, uniforms and activities. In addition, many private schools ask for additional sizeable voluntary contributions towards future development of the facility.
Factor in private primary school and those fees will jump even more: St Andrew's College in Booterstown, for example, charges €10,900 a year, and Lycée Français in Foxrock charges €5,610 a year.
And you will need to factor in that fees will rise from year to year. One way to hedge against such price hikes – as espoused some years ago by the Financial Times – is to ask the finance department of the school if you can pay for a number of years in advance.
The risk here is that your child won't settle and you'll have to move – and will you get your fees back? But the upside is that you can save money on future price increases. Of course, this is only a possibility if you have the money already salted away.
[
Carl O'Brien: Are grinds really worth it?
Opens in new window
]
Even if you don't consider private school, secondary school is expensive, with grinds, supervised study and school trips all adding to the costs.
A one-hour weekly maths grind for fifth-year students, delivered by live stream at Dublin Academy in Stillorgan, for example, costs €1,099 for the year.
Two weeks at Irish college in Uisce, Co Mayo, costs up to €1,700, while a transition year language trip to France or Spain costs several thousand euro. Living Language has a trip next spring to the west of France for €3,500 for five weeks – and air fares are extra on top of that.
Unless your children qualify for a grant (to qualify, at least in part, household earnings should be €47,010-€115,000 based on four children), you'll be looking at a student contribution fee of up to €3,000 a year (though it was reduced to €2,000 this year), as well as all the associated living costs.
TU Dublin estimates the cost of a student living away from home will be €14,402 a year, or about €5,300 for a student living at home.
And it's no cheaper outside the capital. University College Cork suggests a monthly cost of €1,240-€1,880 for a student living away from home in Cork – or as much as €16,920 for the academic year.
Young family of three with a toddler managing their budget,paying bills and taxes online and calculating monthly expenses at home.Inflation concept.
Get into the saving habit
When should you start saving? 'When a child is born,' says Webster. 'A great way to do it is to save [
Child Benefit
], if you can afford to do that, for at least 18 years.'
By starting early, you give yourself time to ride out market corrections while the positive effect of compounding on your investment over the years 'can be quite substantial', she adds. Also bear in mind that your plan should be reviewed.
And if you don't start early, don't despair.
'It's never too late; as with a pension, anything at all is better than nothing,' says Clarke. 'It's a case of, set it up, and when your circumstances are better, you can save a bit more'.
Where once, many families outside urban areas bought a house or apartment to see their kids through college, Webster says this is not as common as it used to be, pointing to the sharp increase in
house prices
.
Instead, people are looking at saving or investing.
If ensuring you don't lose money when saving is a priority, you will probably be looking for a regular savings deposit account.
Shop around for the best rates, as this will affect the outcome of your savings. Bank of Ireland and AIB, for example, offers a return of 3 per cent on savings of up to €30,000/€12,000 a year.
Remember that you will need to shift the balance on an annual basis, as otherwise the rate of return might plunge.
Clarke also suggests An Post, as returns are tax-free.
And even if you start with a small amount, saving over the long term can generate a decent amount. With just €50 a month, for example, you could save almost €15,000 over 18 years – enough, perhaps, for a year or two of college if the child lives away from home.
But you can potentially do better than this. In today's environment, with interest rates so low, Webster says 'you have to take a level of risk to get a level of return'. She suggests putting your money into a diversified multi-asset fund on a monthly basis. Minimum investment starts at about €100 a month.
Provided you don't run the risk of having to encash the fund when the markets are down, you may end up doing better with your money.
Over the 10 years 2014-2024, the Standard & Poor's 500 index of the largest American companies by stock market valuation has returned 11.01 per cent a year, or 8.87 per cent a year over the previous 20 years.
Applying a rate of return of 6 per cent, for example, means you could boost the return on your invested child benefit to almost €23,000 after 10 years.
If you're a bit wary of the markets, you could put 25 per cent into cash, and 75 per cent into markets, says Clarke.
However, you will have to pay Dirt on anything you make on your savings. The tax applies to interest earned and is levied at 33 per cent.
When it comes to an investment fund, the tax increases to 41 per cent. Under the gross roll-up regime, this tax may be paid out after eight years, but if you consider an investment of child benefit over 10 years, earning 6 per cent a year, you would have a bill of some €2,400.
'If they don't use it for college, it can be used to help them with the property market.' Illustration: iStock
Watch out for inheritance tax
Of course, not all plans work out as envisaged.
'The children will change the plan themselves,' says Clarke, adding that some kids might opt to postpone college. If they do, the fund can remain invested.
Others won't go at all. But the funds can still be used for something else. 'If they don't use it for college, it can be used to help them with the property market,' says Clarke.
Bear in mind that you might need to consider the possible impact of
inheritance tax
. Applying current tax-free thresholds, a child can inherit €400,000 tax free from their parents over the course of their lifetime.
In practice, this is often used upon death when the child inherits from the estate of the parent(s). This means that a lump-sum you save for a child's house deposit may be liable to CAT of 33 per cent.
But there are ways around this. The small-gifts exemption allows each parent to gift a child €3,000 each – so €6,000 combined – tax free each year. Saving €3,000 from birth to the age of 18 could result in a tax-free lump sum of €54,000-€108,000.
The key, if you're hoping to pass this gift tax free to your child, is that the money must be given to the child each year – rather than simply accounting for it at one point in time. Typically, parents will often do this by setting up a specific bank account and transferring the funds each year, or by holding the money in a bare trust for the child until they turn 18. These can be set up through institutions such as Standard Life.
If grandparents are keen to contribute to the cost of educating your children, they can also avail of this exemption.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?
Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?

With billions flowing into the Government's coffers from our corporation tax bonanza, there were some big winners from last year's pre-election budget. Among the biggest were the children of wealthy parents. While CSO statistics show that an average person receives about €100,000 in gifts or inheritances from their parents over a lifetime, Budget 2025 announced a €25,000 tax cut for the tiny fraction who receive more than €400,000. Such giveaways contrast sharply with below-inflation increases to most social welfare payments over recent years. This has left core rates of payments worth less today than they were in January 2020: a remarkable situation given the strength of economic growth and the tens of billions in new spending announced. These real-terms cuts have contributed to stagnating incomes for the poorest households as well as stubbornly persistent levels of child poverty. READ MORE Research published by the ESRI in partnership with Community Foundation Ireland has shown that 250,000 children live in households below the poverty line after accounting for housing costs: more than one in five children. A wealth of evidence shows this has enormous economic and social costs , with a lack of adequate resources compromising the ability of children to grow and thrive, even in adulthood. The importance of reducing child poverty has been recognised by successive governments, with ambitious targets set out in various plans, strategies and roadmaps since 1997. However, we have seen no real progress for the best part of two decades. Shockingly, the share of children below the poverty line after housing costs is no lower than during the worst years of the financial crisis. The reason child poverty persists is that whenever the opportunity comes to translate words into action there is always some higher priority. This year that higher priority looks to be the hospitality sector, which has engaged in a sustained, well-funded lobbying campaign for even more preferential VAT treatment than it currently enjoys. VAT is currently levied on accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent, compared with the standard rate of 23 per cent. Estimates by Revenue suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year. Cutting the rate further to 9 per cent would cost more than €800 million more a year, sucking up most of the space available for new measures in the forthcoming budget. This is despite the fact the sector is – by any objective measure – doing well. CSO data shows that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier, while figures from the Companies Registration Office show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector. Even if the sector were struggling, a VAT cut makes little economic sense. Rather than supporting struggling small restaurants or cafes, the biggest beneficiaries would be large operators with the highest turnover. On what grounds can a multimillion-euro tax cut for outlets such as McDonald's possibly be justified? Yet the Tánaiste's recent elevation of this expensive and economically illiterate tax cut to a 'solemn commitment' would seem to place it ahead of all other promises in the programme for government. This includes a pledge to 'lift more children out of poverty, giving them the futures they deserve'. Doing so would have immense benefits, but unavoidably requires spending money. The most effective way of spending this money is to introduce a second-tier of child benefit. This would leave the current universal child benefit payment as it stands but give an additional amount to lower-income families with children, replacing the inadequate patchwork of existing supports. Recent estimates from the ESRI suggest such a reform would reduce child poverty by more than a quarter. This amounts to lifting more than 50,000 children out of poverty at a cost of €772 million. While substantial, this cost is about a quarter of achieving the same reduction by increasing the universal child benefit payment. Strikingly, it is also less than that of the planned cut to VAT for the hospitality sector. This is the reason a second tier of child benefit has been called for since 2007 by a range of expert bodies, including the last government's Commission on Taxation and Welfare (which I was part of). A second tier of child benefit would mirror reforms implemented in the UK over the 2000s by then chancellor Gordon Brown. Writing in these pages last year, he described the approach as a 'progressive universalism' that ensures 'a floor of basic social rights for all, but with more support for those who need it most'. When Brown gave a keynote address to the Irish Government's inaugural Child Poverty Summit last year, he was introduced by then taoiseach Simon Harris, who declared that 'ending child poverty is a defining challenge for any leader' . After 20 years without progress in reducing – let alone ending – child poverty, it is a challenge our leaders are failing. Whether that failure defines their legacies depends on the decisions they take in the coming budgets. Dr Barra Roantree is director of the MSc in economic policy at Trinity College Dublin

Competition regulator to seek High Court ruling on Boylesports evidence
Competition regulator to seek High Court ruling on Boylesports evidence

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Competition regulator to seek High Court ruling on Boylesports evidence

Competition regulators are seeking a ruling from the High Court dealing with evidence seized from bookie Boylesports in an investigation of the Republic's gambling businesses. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) recently raided the offices of Boylesports, Paddy Power owner Flutter Entertainment and Ladbrokes, among others, seeking evidence for an ongoing investigation into possible price fixing. The commission filed High Court proceedings against Boylesports Enterprise Unlimited Company on Thursday, court records show. 'The case relates to a statutory process initiated by the CCPC under section 33 of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2014,' the regulator confirmed. READ MORE 'This is a procedural matter related to a criminal investigation under our competition law powers. No further comment can be made at this point.' Boylesports did not comment. No date has been set for the hearing. Section 33 of the act bars the commission from taking legally privileged material in an investigation. It must apply to the High Court to decide if information it has acquired is privileged. The commission has taken similar proceedings involving other betting businesses that it is investigating, including Flutter Entertainment and Ladbrokes. Owned by its founder, businessman John Boyle, and run by chief executive Vlad Kaltenieks, Boylesports is one of the top three players in the Irish market. It has a significant British business. CCPC officials and members of An Garda Síochána raided bookies' premises in the Republic in May as part of its ongoing investigation into breaches of competition law. The commission has not commented beyond saying that the raids took place and confirming subsequent High Court proceedings involving three firms. Competition legislation gives the commission significant powers to investigate and gather evidence on suspected breaches of the law, including price fixing. Its latest move against the bookies comes as their business faces the prospect of a new licensing and regulatory regime in the Republic following the passing of a new law last year. The Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland will police the licensing system, which will apply to betting shops and casinos as well as online businesses. It will be an offence to operate here without such a permit. Most companies in the industry say the new system is welcome, as it provides certainty and modernises laws that long predate digital betting. Boylesports this week announced plans to open 200 new betting shops across the UK and a sponsorship deal with English Premier League side West Ham United .

Denis O'Brien says it is time to question ‘conduct' of corporate enforcement chief
Denis O'Brien says it is time to question ‘conduct' of corporate enforcement chief

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Denis O'Brien says it is time to question ‘conduct' of corporate enforcement chief

Businessman Denis O'Brien has criticised the State's business law watchdog over the years-long Independent News & Media (INM) investigation, saying the time had come to question the 'role and conduct' of Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA) chief executive Ian Drennan . Mr O'Brien was INM's main shareholder when it was rocked by turmoil over an unlawful breach of company data relating to 19 named individuals, among them journalists and former company officials, some of whom had come into conflict with him. The disruption in INM, Ireland's largest newspaper business, led to its sale in 2019 to Belgian group Mediahuis. That deal crystallised a loss exceeding €450 million for Mr O'Brien on his INM investment. Mr Drennan ran the CEA's predecessor, the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement, when it asked the High Court in 2018 to send inspectors into the company. READ MORE In a statement, Mr O'Brien said: 'Mr Drennan's failure to engage in due process and interview all relevant parties before heading to the High Court in 2018 in undue and irrational haste calls into question his continued suitability for the position. 'Mr Drennan's conduct showed little respect for due process, proper procedures or basic objectivity. As a result, he inflicted and facilitated very significant reputational damage for several individuals over six years.' [ Leslie Buckley questions way that corporate enforcer investigated INM saga Opens in new window ] Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke , who has political responsibility for the CEA, had no comment on Mr O'Brien's remarks, citing CEA independence of the Government in its work. Asked whether Mr Burke had confidence in Mr Drennan, his department said: 'Yes. The Minister has confidence in Ian Drennan as the sole appointed member of the CEA.' Mr O'Brien was responding to the CEA decision not to take enforcement action over the data breach. The decision was set out on Thursday in its 2024 annual report. How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax Listen | 22:03 That followed on from a report 12 months ago by court inspectors who found after a six-year investigation that INM affairs were not conducted in breach of the Companies Acts. Still, inspectors Seán Gillane SC and UK solicitor Richard Fleck reported 'technical' breaches of the Data Protection Acts. They also found inside information was disclosed to Mr O'Brien by Leslie Buckley, the long-time ally who represented his interests as INM chairman. Mr O'Brien said: 'Mr Drennan took a deliberate decision not to engage with or interview several parties, including myself, who could have provided him with answers to his questions and saved the State and other parties in excess of €40 million. 'His failure to make any reference to this element of the debacle in the annual report speaks for itself.' There was no response from Mr Drennan's office to Mr O'Brien's statement by the close of business on Friday evening. Mr Buckley, the former INM chairman, had criticised Mr Drennan in similar terms on Thursday. Responding on Friday to Mr Buckley, the CEA said: 'As detailed in the annual report, the application to the High Court in this case followed a lengthy investigation and, despite being robustly resisted by the company, satisfied the High Court that the evidential threshold necessary to warrant the appointment of court-appointed inspectors had been fully met and the court's jurisdiction engaged.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store