Students Protest in Bangladesh After Deadly Air Force Jet Crash in Dhaka
Students Protest in Bangladesh After Deadly Air Force Jet Crash in Dhaka |Vantage With Palki Sharma
Protests erupted in Bangladesh's capital, Dhaka, as the death toll from a fighter jet crash rose to 31. The Chinese-made aircraft crashed into a school yesterday (July 21), killing mostly children. A day later, hundreds of students clashed with security forces as they attempted to storm the Bangladesh Secretariat. The students demanded a proper investigation into the incident. The crash is the country's deadliest aviation accident in decades. Palki Sharma tells you more.
See More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
China Is Choking Supply of Critical Minerals to Western Defense Companies
China is limiting the flow of critical minerals to Western defense manufacturers, delaying production and forcing companies to scour the world for stockpiles of the minerals needed to make everything from bullets to jet fighters. Earlier this year, as U.S.-China trade tensions soared, Beijing tightened the controls it places on the export of rare earths. While Beijing allowed them to start flowing after the Trump administration agreed in June to a series of trade concessions, China has maintained a lock on critical minerals for defense purposes. China supplies around 90% of the world's rare earths and dominates the production of many other critical minerals. As a result, one drone-parts manufacturer that supplies the U.S. military was forced to delay orders by up to two months while it searched for a non-Chinese source of magnets, which are assembled from rare earths. Certain materials needed by the defense industry now go for five or more times what was typical before China's recent mineral restrictions, according to industry traders. One company said it was recently offered samarium—an element needed to make magnets that can withstand the extreme temperatures of a jet-fighter engine—for 60 times the standard price. That is already driving the cost of defense systems higher, say suppliers and defense executives. The squeeze on critical minerals highlights how dependent the U.S. military is on China for much of its supply chain—giving Beijing leverage at a time of rising tensions between the two powers and heated trade negotiations. Defense manufacturers supplying the U.S. military rely on minerals that are mainly produced in China for microelectronics, drone motors, night-vision goggles, missile-targeting systems and defense satellites. While companies have tried to find alternative sources of these minerals in recent years, some of the elements are so niche that they can't be economically produced in the West, say industry executives. China's Foreign Ministry didn't respond to a request for comment. In addition to the more recent export controls on rare earths, China has since December banned sales to the U.S. of germanium, gallium and antimony—which are used for things like hardening lead bullets and projectiles, and to allow soldiers to see at night. Some companies now warn of looming production cuts if more minerals aren't forthcoming. On Wednesday, the chief executive of Leonardo DRS said the U.S.-based defense firm is down to its 'safety stock' of germanium. 'In order to sustain timely product deliveries, material flow must improve in the second half' of 2025, CEO Bill Lynn said on a conference call. The company is the U.S. subsidiary of Italian defense giant Leonardo. Germanium goes into the company's infrared sensors, which are used in missiles and other equipment. Lynn said that the company is looking at diversifying its supply chain while also finding ways to replace it in its products. The Pentagon is requiring defense contractors to stop buying rare-earth magnets that contain China-sourced minerals by 2027. As a result, some companies have sizable stockpiles of magnets. But suppliers and defense companies often hold less than a year's worth—some just a few months—of many other critical mineral stockpiles. Drone manufacturers are among the most vulnerable, because many are small startups and have very limited revenue or supply-chain savvy, and never got around to acquiring large stockpiles of rare-earth magnets and metals, say some in the defense industry. A drone flies overhead during a military parade in Washington, D.C., in June. 'I can tell you…we talk about this daily and our companies talk about it daily,' said Dak Hardwick, vice president of international affairs at the Aerospace Industries Association, a U.S. defense and commercial aerospace trade group. More than 80,000 parts that are used in Defense Department weapons systems are made with critical minerals now subject to Chinese export controls, according to data from defense software firm Govini. Nearly all of the supply chains for key critical minerals used by the Pentagon rely on at least one Chinese supplier, Govini said, meaning restrictions from Beijing can cause widespread disruptions. Since stepping up export controls earlier this year, China has begun requiring companies to provide extensive documentation of how they will use the rare earths and magnets they import. Chinese regulators often demand sensitive information, such as product images and even photos of production lines, to ensure none of the materials go to military use, say Western buyers. One Western company that supplies Chinese-made rare-earth magnets to both civilian and defense companies says its requests for imported magnets have recently been approved for many civilian purposes—but rejected or delayed for defense and aerospace. In May, New Hampshire-based ePropelled, which makes propulsion motors for drones, received unsettling questions from its Chinese magnet supplier. The supplier sent Chinese government forms demanding drawings and pictures of ePropelled's products and a list of buyers. It also asked for assurances that the rare-earth magnets China would supply ePropelled wouldn't go toward military applications. 'Of course we are not going to provide the Chinese government with that information,' said Chris Thompson, vice president of global sales for ePropelled. The company has about 100 customers, including large American defense contractors and drone manufacturers in Ukraine. So its Chinese suppliers paused shipping, and ePropelled had to delay some customer orders by one or two months—double the amount of time it usually takes to deliver its motors. The company sought alternative suppliers in the U.S., Europe and Asia, including buying magnets from vendors in Japan and Taiwan, although they too rely on rare earths from China. The company also struck deals with startup magnet producers Vulcan Elements in North Carolina and Oklahoma-based USA Rare Earth. However, those startups won't have supply ready for ePropelled until at least the end of this year and will need to build up alternative sources of Chinese-dominated minerals as they scale up production. Metal traders say that because China demands to know the end user of rare-earth magnets and metals, it isn't approving licenses for traders to stockpile. The Department of Defense has awarded grants to expand production of niche materials, including $14 million in funding last year to a Canadian company to produce germanium substrates used in solar cells for defense satellites. In July, the Pentagon took an even bigger step when it agreed to pay $400 million for 15% of MP Materials, the operator of the largest rare-earths mine in the Americas, which is rapidly scaling up its magnet manufacturing capacity. The Pentagon didn't respond to a request for comment. Reporters gather outside the London venue of U.S.-China trade talks in June. On an earnings call last month Lockheed Martin CEO James Taiclet called the MP Materials agreement groundbreaking and said it would help ensure the supply of magnets needed in its F-35 jet fighters and cruise missiles. But building up new supply will take time. The Defense Department early last year established the Critical Minerals Forum, an effort in part to spur more mineral supply-chain projects in the U.S. and allied countries, including helping metals miners secure funding to increase their output of critical materials like antimony and germanium. Defense companies that traditionally outsourced the purchase of critical minerals to sub-suppliers are now using their market heft to try to acquire sources of key materials themselves. Major defense companies 'are starting to get more and more panicked as they go, because they recognize that they're just not going to get the magnets, no matter what happens, unless they get involved,' said Nicholas Myers, the CEO of Phoenix Tailings, a Massachusetts startup that produces rare-earth metals. Beijing is signaling that it takes its mineral export bans very seriously. Earlier this year, one U.S. defense supplier, the United States Antimony Corporation, tried to ship 55 metric tons of antimony mined in Australia to its smelter in Mexico. The load transited via the Chinese port city of Ningbo—until recently a routine practice. But in April, while the shipment was being transloaded in Ningbo, China customs detained it for three months, prompting United States Antimony to ask the State Department and White House for help. The Chinese released the shipment in July, on the condition that it be sent back to Australia and not to the U.S. When it arrived in Australia, United States Antimony learned that product seals had been broken. It is currently working out whether the antimony has been tampered with or contaminated. 'The shipping company, everyone who was involved, they'd never seen this happen before,' said company CEO Gary Evans. Neither the White House, the Defense Department nor the State Department provided comment. Write to Jon Emont at Heather Somerville at and Alistair MacDonald at
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Classroom Spies? Chinese Students In UK Told To Monitor Peers, Here's Why
Last Updated: Chinese students in the UK are pressured to spy on classmates to suppress sensitive discussions, says UK-China Transparency. The Chinese Embassy in London called it "groundless." If you're a student in the UK, there's a possibility you might be spied upon—not by a government agency, but by a fellow student. A new report has suggested that Chinese students studying at UK universities are being pressured to spy on their classmates, in what is being described as an attempt to suppress discussions on topics sensitive to the Chinese government. Lecturers at several universities have reportedly been warned by Chinese government officials not to discuss certain issues, according to a survey conducted by UK-China Transparency (UKCT), a think tank focused on China studies, as reported by BBC. However, the Chinese Embassy in London dismissed the findings, calling the report 'groundless and absurd." The report comes just days after a new law came into force, requiring UK universities to actively promote academic freedom and free speech—even in cases where institutions have formal agreements with foreign governments. The higher education regulator—the Office for Students (OfS)—has stated that freedom of speech and academic freedom are 'fundamental" to university education. It warned that universities could face fines running into millions if they fail to uphold these values, BBC reported. What Are These Sensitive Topics? China, which is known to suppress dissent within its borders, has refused to acknowledge international allegations of ethnic cleansing in the Xinjiang region and criticism over Covid-19 origin. These are among the issues the Chinese government does not want discussed in classrooms abroad. Other sensitive topics include those related to science, politics, humanities, and the global rise of Chinese technology firms, according to the UKCT. Without naming China, UK Minister of State for Skills Jacqui Smith said that any attempt by a foreign state to 'intimidate, harass or harm" individuals in the UK will not be tolerated." Calling academic freedom 'non-negotiable" in UK institutions, she said the new legislation makes that stance 'explicitly clear." 'We are also working directly with the Office for Students to support universities in safeguarding free speech and tackling any form of harassment on campus," she added. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
After SC Raps Rahul Gandhi, Congress Attacks Govt, Says ‘Centres DDLJ Policy'; BJP Reacts
Moments after the Supreme Court rebuked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his claim that China had annexed over 2,000 kilometres of Indian territory, party leader Jairam Ramesh took to social media platform X on Monday to launch an attack on the central government over its handling of the border situation with China. Ramesh accused the BJP government of following a "DDLJ" policy - "Deny, Distract, Lie, and Justify." Raising a series of pointed questions, Ramesh said, "ever since 20 brave soldiers were martyred in Galwan on 15 June 2020, every patriotic Indian has sought answers to the following questions. Yet instead of providing answers, the Modi government for the past five years has chosen to obfuscate and hide the truth with its policy of DDLJ - Deny, Distract, Lie, and Justify." The Congress leader posted eight pointed questions to the BJP government, highlighting alleged contradictions between the Prime Minister's 2020 statement denying any intrusion and the later military and diplomatic actions that acknowledged territorial concerns in eastern Ladakh. Ever since 20 brave soldiers were martyred in Galwan on 15 June, 2020, every patriotic Indian has sought answers to the following questions. Yet instead of providing answers, the Modi government for the past five years has chosen to obfuscate and hide the truth with its policy of… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 4, 2025 BJP Reaction Reacting to the Supreme Court's statement on Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's remark, BJP National Spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia said, "If the Supreme Court says that a true Indian wouldn't make such a statement, it raises serious questions about Rahul Gandhi's credibility. How mature is he as a leader of the Congress Party?" "The Supreme Court also remarked on how he knew about the area being captured by the Chinese army. Was he there? ... This is not the first time that Rahul Gandhi has shown an anti-India mentality," he further added, ANI reported. Earlier, on Monday the Supreme Court rebuked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his remark that China had annexed over 2,000 kilometres of Indian territory, stating that a "true Indian" would not make such a remark. The Supreme Court said, 'How do you get to know that 2000 sq km was occupied by China? What is the credible material? If you are a true indian, you would not say this. When there is a conflict across border… can you say all this. Why can't you ask the question in parliament?'
