Iranian and Israeli media run footage 'showing enormous blast from IDF missile strike in Tehran, sending cars flying into the air'
The shocking clip, which emerged this week after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, purports to show the moment a pair of missiles struck Quds Square in the Tajrish neighbourhood of the Iranian capital on June 15.
It was shared by Israeli and Iranian media and is yet to be verified by Iranian officials, but MailOnline has geolocated the footage.
The first projectile scythed into a building on Bahodar Street opposite municipal offices, with the explosion spraying rubble across the road as a thick cloud of smoke and ash rose from the blast site.
Seconds later, another projectile soared in and struck the middle of the road packed with traffic, mere feet away from the municipal building draped in the Islamic Republic's flag.
The explosion was enormous. Cars were lifted off the ground and tossed aside by the sheer force of the blast.
Huge chunks of tarmac and pieces of debris were ripped up and sent flying through the air. Moments later, they came raining back down, crushing cars and pelting helpless civilians reeling from the shockwave of the initial explosion.
A second video shared on social media in the aftermath of the strikes showed horrified civilians gathered around the blast site.
The entire road was flooded, with the missile having left a gigantic crater and destroyed water pipes and sewage systems.
Iran's health ministry reported shortly afterwards that 12 people were killed in the punishing attacks, with a further 59 people injured.
On June 12, the UN issued a resolution based on findings from its nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, that Iran was not complying with inspection regulations.
That ruling came after IAEA inspectors claimed Tehran had some 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and could be weeks from having enough material to create several nuclear warheads.
Israel began Operation Rising Lion less than 24 hours later, unleashing widespread attacks across Iran that it declared were necessary to prevent the Islamic Republic from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Its warplanes relentlessly targeted Iran's nuclear sites, air defence systems and locations its intelligence found were housing high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists.
Operatives from Mossad, Israel's intelligence service, had conducted a sabotage mission, knocking out some of Iran's air defence systems and missile launchers, opening the door for the air force to pound Tehran with impunity.
In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel over the course of the almost fortnight-long war.
Most were intercepted, but the sheer volume of projectiles - and the use of some hypersonic missiles - overwhelmed Israel's air defence systems.
Some 28 people in Israel were killed by Tehran's missiles, but the death toll in Iran was much greater.
This week, Iran's state-run IRNA news agency published updated casualty figures from its so-called 12-day war with Israel, declaring that 935 people were killed by Israeli bombs. It did not differentiate between civilian and military casualties.
The conflict came to an end on June 25 after the United States Air Force (USAF) sent B-2 bombers armed with 30,000lb bunker-busting munitions and ship-launched Tomahawk missiles to batter Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz.
In the immediate aftermath of the strikes, US President Donald Trump insisted Iran 's nuclear facilities had been 'totally obliterated' and the Islamic Republic's chances of building a bomb erased.
This week, the Pentagon declared that the attacks had set back Iran's nuclear programme by 1-2 years.
Washington is now pushing Iran to enter negotiations over the future of its nuclear programme. Both the US and Israel have declared that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.
But Iran's parliament has voted to suspend its co-operation with the UN's nuclear watchdog amid concerns it could withdraw altogether from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which obligates Tehran to cooperate with IAEA inspections.
IAEA Rafael Grossi sent a letter to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to propose a meeting and urge the Islamic Republic to cooperate.
'Resuming cooperation with the IAEA is key to a successful diplomatic agreement to finally resolve the dispute over Iran's nuclear activities,' Grossi said in a statement.
'I've written to Foreign Minister Araghchi stressing the importance of us working together and proposing to meet soon.'
He said IAEA inspectors have remained in Iran and are ready to start working again.
'As I have repeatedly stated – before and during the conflict – nuclear facilities should never be attacked due to the very real risk of a serious radiological accident,' Grossi said.
Israel is believed to have dozens of nuclear weapons, though it has never formally acknowledged their existence, and is not a signatory to the NPT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hamas responds 'positively' to 60-day Gaza ceasefire deal, says Palestinian official - in a huge step towards finally ending the 21-month conflict
Hamas has submitted its response to a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire proposal, a Palestinian official said, describing the response as a positive one that should 'facilitate reaching a deal.' US President Donald Trump earlier announced a 'final proposal' for a 60-day ceasefire in the nearly 21-month-old war between Israel and Hamas, stating he anticipated a reply from the parties in coming hours. 'We have handed the mediators, Qatar and Egypt, our response to the ceasefire proposal,' a Hamas official told Reuters on condition of anonymity on Friday. 'The Hamas response is positive and I think it should help and facilitate reaching a deal,' said the Palestinian official close to the talks. The proposal calls for the release of ten living Israeli hostages and 18 bodies in exchange for 1,000 Palestinian prisoners during a 60-day ceasefire, reports The Jerusalem Post. During that period, both sides are expected to hold talks aimed at ending the war. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalise' a 60-day ceasefire, during which efforts would be made to end the US ally's war in the Palestinian enclave. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to comment on Trump's announcement and in their public statements, the two sides remain far apart. The proposal calls for the release of ten living Israeli hostages and 18 bodies in exchange for 1,000 Palestinian prisoners during a 60-day ceasefire Netanyahu has repeatedly said Hamas must be disarmed, a position the militant group, which is thought to be holding 20 living hostages, has so far refused to discuss. Netanyahu is due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday. Asked early on Friday US time if Hamas had agreed to the latest ceasefire deal framework, Trump said: 'We are going to know over the next 24 hours.' Trump has said he would be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on the need for a speedy Gaza ceasefire while noting that the Israeli leader wants one as well. 'We hope it's going to happen. And we're looking forward to it happening sometime next week,' he told reporters earlier this week. 'We want to get the hostages out.' Israeli attacks have reportedly killed at least 138 Palestinians in Gaza over the past 24 hours, local health officials said, though these numbers are yet to be officially confirmed. Health officials at the Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, said the Israeli military had carried out an airstrike on a tent encampment west of the city around 2am, killing 15 Palestinians displaced by nearly two years of war. The Israeli military said troops operating in the Khan Younis area had eliminated militants, confiscated weapons and dismantled Hamas outposts in the last 24 hours, while striking 100 targets across Gaza, including military structures, weapons storage facilities and launchers. Later on Friday, Palestinians gathered to perform funeral prayers before burying those killed overnight. 'There should have been a ceasefire long ago before I lost my brother,' said 13-year-old Mayar Al Farr. Her brother, Mahmoud, was shot dead in another incident, she said. 'He went to get aid, so he can get a bag of flour for us to eat. He got a bullet in his neck. It killed him on the spot,' she said. Adlar Mouamar said her nephew, Ashraf, was also killed in Gaza. 'Our hearts are broken. We ask the world, we don't want want them to end the bloodshed. We want them to stop this war.' In Tel Aviv, families and friends of hostages held in Gaza were among demonstrators who gathered outside a US Embassy building on US Independence Day, calling on Trump to secure a deal for all of the captives. Demonstrators set up a symbolic Sabbath dinner table, placing 50 empty chairs to represent those who are still held in Gaza. Banners hung nearby displaying a post by Trump from his Truth Social platform that read, 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!' The Sabbath, or Shabbat, observed from Friday evening to Saturday nightfall, is often marked by Jewish families with a traditional Friday night dinner. 'Only you can make the deal. We want one beautiful deal. One beautiful hostage deal,' said Gideon Rosenberg, 48, from Tel Aviv. In a first visit since the October 7, 2023 massacre 636 days ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara Netanyahu are seen at Kibbutz Nir Oz on July 4, 2025 Rosenberg was wearing a shirt with the image of hostage Avinatan Or, one of his employees who was abducted by Palestinian militants from the Nova musical festival on October 7, 2023. He is among the 20 hostages who are believed to be alive after more than 600 days of captivity. Ruby Chen, 55, the father of 19-year-old American-Israeli Itay, who is believed to have been killed after being taken captive, urged Netanyahu to return from meeting with Trump in Washington on Monday with a deal that brings back all hostages. 'Let this United States Independence Day mark the beginning of a lasting peace... one that secures the sacred value of human life and one that bestows dignity to the deceased hostages by ensuring their return to proper burial,' he said, also appealing to Trump. Itay Chen, also a German national, was serving as an Israeli soldier when Hamas carried out its surprise attack on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking another 251 hostage. Israel's retaliatory war against Hamas has devastated Gaza, which the militant group has ruled for almost two decades but now only controls in parts, displacing most of the population of more than two million and triggering widespread hunger. More than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed in nearly two years of fighting, most of them civilians, according to local health officials.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Motion would have aligned SNP foreign policy with Keri Starmer's
Normally, the policy formulation dimension represents tweaks to existing policy. On occasion, more pressing issues are debated. Last month's meeting was of the latter type. In the background, subsequently confirmed days later, was the prospect of the US weighing in on the Israeli side in its war with Iran. An act, as the secretary-general of the UN pointed out, that ran a coach and horses through the international rules-based order. In Perth, on the auditorium screen was a topical motion on the issue in the name of Stephen Gethins MP. Had it passed unamended, it would have upended SNP policy in several areas – not only on the party's position on international nuclear disarmament treaty architecture, but broader issues of national security and indeed adjacent economic policy. READ MORE: Protesters stage demonstration inside Reform UK's headquarters Unamended, it would have positioned the SNP group at Westminster behind Keir Starmer and David Lammy's position on the Israel-Iran crisis. It would have also represented a softening of the tone, possibly even the substance, of the critical statements made by other SNP parliamentarians at Westminster and in Holyrood. The unamended motion read: 'MIDDLE EAST SITUATION – National Council abhors the ongoing violence in the Middle East and recognises that destabilisation in the region is a threat to us all; calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and full access for humanitarian relief; further agrees that Iran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons but that the best means of stopping that and finding a sustainable solution is through diplomatic means.' The motion only mentioned Iran and not Israel and was presented in the name of a former professor of international relations. Stephen was not in attendance, so his motion was subsequently moved by another delegate. I proposed that three words – 'be allowed to' – be excised. In the end, my suggestion was acceded to and political embarrassment averted. Other amendments pertaining to the, frankly, barely condemnatory tone on what is going on in Gaza, would have been appropriate but timescales and procedures precluded that. (Image: Anadolu Agency via Getty Images) At first, I wanted to accept the cock-up theory but after a few days of reflection and being faced with some irrefutable facts, the record needs to be put straight. This must be reflected upon by SNP spokespersons, particularly on matters of war and peace. It's interesting how in the repertoire of those who used to promote a 'rules-based order that's not the United Nations', they and the mainstream media are very quick to gaslight anyone who says historical context is important. However, when the historical airbrush is applied to the signature diplomatic achievement of Barack Obama, I must speak out. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the deal that ensured Iran gave up any notion of developing nuclear weapons, was ditched by Donald Trump. My 'textual amendment' reaffirmed SNP adherence to the spirit of the Obama plan. During his first term as president, Trump of course trashed the JCPOA. Now, bizarrely, he appears to want to bomb Iran into a JCPOA-without-the-safeguards. The SNP seek to achieve the restitution of a sovereign Scottish state. It will be a small state and, as such, on the journey to independence, the recognition of the UN will be indispensable. However, I am no naive idealist. The world is a dangerous and uncertain place, particularly when you share a border with the Russian Federation or Israel. Only politicians with links to the arms trade would want to use fear as a key electoral driver. Arguing that man-made global dangers and instability are uniform throughout the world is an understandable though rather unethical marketing tool for arms companies. The truth is, in the bigger scheme of things, some places are a bit safer than others, and Scotland is one of those – a fortunate reality that the independence movement should unapologetically make more of. Bill Ramsay SNP CND
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Europe is scrambling to form a united front and regain relevance in the Iran crisis
Exposed as divided and marginalised during the Iran crisis, European nations are scrambling to retrieve a place at the Middle East negotiating table, fearing an impulsive Donald Trump has diminishing interest in stabilising Iran or the wider region now he believes he has achieved his key objective of wiping out Tehran's nuclear programme. On Tuesday the EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, was the latest senior European figure to phone the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, offering to be a facilitator and urging Tehran not to leave the crisis in a dangerous limbo by keeping UN weapons inspectors out of Iran. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has even broken a three-year silence to speak to Vladimir Putin about the risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East, including how a deal could be struck between Iran and the US on a restricted civil nuclear programme. Macron has been involved in Iranian diplomacy for a decade and came close to engineering a rapprochement between Trump and the then Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, at the UN general assembly in 2018. But Iran, faced with what it regards as craven European support for Israeli and American airstrikes that killed more than 930 people and injured as many as 5,000, is not placing much faith in the continent's ability to influence the White House. For Europe, this signals a slow slide into irrelevance. The three major European powers known as the E3 – France, Germany and the UK – were once key fixtures in Iran's diplomacy and played a central role in brokering the Iran nuclear deal, which they signed alongside the EU, the US, China, Russia and Iran in 2015. Europe had little input in the US's recent negotiating strategy with Iran, led by Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, and was given just over an hour's official warning before the Israeli and US attacks. The one meeting that the E3 foreign minsters held during the crisis with Iranian diplomats in Geneva on 20 June proved a failure and was followed by the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. France claimed it helped Israel repel Iranian drones. Trump crowed afterwards that 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one.' From the Iranian perspective, Europe has long been a disappointing negotiating partner, repeatedly failing to show any independence from the US. When Trump withdrew the US from the nuclear deal in 2018, the E3 condemned the move in a joint statement issued by its then-leaders, Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Macron. But it did nothing effective to pursue an independent strategy to lift European sanctions on Iran as it had promised. The fear that European firms trading with Iran would be put under US sanctions was too great. The view from Tehran, it was felt, was that Europe's timidity left it with no choice but to follow the policy of nuclear brinkmanship, including gradually increasing its stockpile of enriched uranium. At the start of Trump's second term, the E3 plus Kallas tried again to insert themselves into the process by holding three low-key meetings with Iranian negotiators. But Araghchi was always angling to speak to Washington, telling the Guardian of his discussions with the Europeans: 'Perhaps we are talking to the wrong people.' After Trump indicated he was willing to speak to Iran bilaterally and showed some flexibility about Tehran's right to enrich uranium, Iran cast Europe aside. Iran believes Europe played a role either through naivety or complicity in opening the door for the Israeli attack by tabling a motion of censure at the board of the UN nuclear inspectorate, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Such motions have been passed before at the IAEA and usually led to Iran retaliating by increasing its stocks of enriched uranium. But the 12 June motion was different – for the first time in 20 years the board found Iran in breach of its obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Europe had to take that step to use its right as a signatory to the 2015 deal to reimpose sanctions on Iran before expiry of the deal on 15 October. Because of the way the deal was negotiated, neither Russia nor China can veto Europe reimposing sanctions. America is no longer party to the deal so this power to reintroduce UN sanctions is Europe's diplomatic re-entry point into the Iranian file. European diplomats insist that the IAEA censure motion was necessary, and that they had no option owing to Iran's mounting stocks of highly enriched uranium that had no possible purpose in a civilian nuclear programme. Europe also still hoped the talks between the US and Iran, mediated by Oman, would bear fruit, and had not foreseen the US giving Israel the green light to attack. Since the Israeli strikes, European unity has frayed further. Britain has largely opted for opacity, but it was obvious from what ministers did not say that the government's legal advice was that the Israeli attack could not be justified as an act of self-defence under the UN charter. France openly asserted that the attack was unlawful. By contrast, Germany endorsed all that Israel has done. At the G7 summit in mid-June, the chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said: 'This is the dirty work that Israel is doing, for all of us.' Germany's foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, told parliament that 'Israel has the right to defend itself and protect its people. Let me say clearly that, if Israel and the US have now managed to set back the Iranian nuclear programme, it will make Israel and its neighbourhood more secure.' Asked by the newspaper Die Zeit if he believed Israel's actions were lawful, he said Germany did not have the same quality intelligence sources as the US and Israel, but he had to trust their belief that Iran was close to acquiring a nuclear weapon. 'They told us that, from their perspective, this is necessary – and we must accept that.' Such remarks have left Iranian diplomats spitting about European double standards over the sanctity of international law. By contrast, Enrique Mora, the EU's point person on Iran from 2015 to early 2025, has written a scathing piece in which he says Israel has killed nuclear diplomacy and Iran's nuclear knowledge cannot be destroyed. He wrote: 'If Iran now chooses the militarisation of its nuclear capabilities, if it now decides to move toward a bomb, it will do so following a clear strategic logic: no one bombs the capital of a nuclear-armed country. June 21, 2025, may go down in history not as the day the Iranian nuclear programme was destroyed, but as the day a nuclear Iran was irreversibly born.' There are different strategies Europe can pursue. It can, like Germany, show Iran there is no daylight between the E3 and Israel and assert that Iran can only have a civil nuclear programme that excludes domestic enrichment of uranium. It can press ahead with the reimposition of sanctions and hope that Iran buckles. Alternatively, it can champion a compromise that Tehran can wear. In a recent statement, the European Council on Foreign Relations said 'maximalist demands on Iran – including negotiating over missiles now viewed by Tehran as its main deterrence umbrella – will likely push the country to use every means still available to reach nuclear breakout. A more viable endgame would involve a return of wide-scale inspections by international monitors and an immediate, substantial roll-back of Iranian uranium enrichment. The goal should be Iran pursuing this enrichment through a regional consortium backed by the United States.' That is broadly closer to the French position. Europe will never hold sway like Israel or the US, but it has one last chance to help create something durable, and prevent the Iranian crisis becoming a nuclear proliferation crisis for the whole region.
