
A real-estate tycoon's loan went bad. Then they came for his Ferraris and fine wine
They weren't thieves. The men were following orders of the French court, and they seized hundreds of thousands of dollars of Cohen's personal belongings in the château on behalf of Fortress Investment Group.
Fortress says it was simply taking what it is owed. In 2022, the New York-based investment firm made a $535 million loan to Cohen Realty Enterprises as a way to consolidate his previous debt. Cohen's collateral included a Manhattan office tower, the Le Méridien Dania Beach hotel in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and four other properties, according to records from New York State Supreme Court, where Fortress is suing Cohen.
But crucially, Cohen also personally guaranteed $187.2 million of that loan. That 'recourse" portion of the debt gave Fortress additional powers to go after Cohen personally if his business defaulted.
Now, that's what's happening.
Cohen's business defaulted last year, and Fortress took control of most of the collateral. But the firm said that the value of those properties falls far short of what Cohen owes.
Now the lender is trying to confiscate Cohen's personal possessions. Fortress launched legal efforts to seize Cohen's houses in Provence and Greenwich, Conn., according to New York court records. Fortress is also going after his 25 luxury automobiles including two Ferraris and other valuable belongings.
Earlier this month, an Italian judge ruled that a 220-foot yacht couldn't leave the Port of Loano without court approval. The superyacht, valued at $49.6 million, is one of five yachts that Fortress is trying to seize from the real-estate mogul. Cohen transferred ownership of the yacht in Port of Loano to his wife last year, court records show.
Each side accuses the other of impropriety. Fortress says Cohen improperly blocked the firm's enforcement of his guarantee by transferring his yachts and other valuable assets—including his $20 million Greenwich home and Château de Chausse—to family members, according to court records.
Cohen's net worth is nearly $2 billion, according to a financial statement that he filed with the court. He said the transfers were legitimate and made for estate and tax-planning purposes. A French court ruled in his favor on the Provence château.
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Cohen said he is in the process of selling some properties to pay Fortress but needs more time to complete complicated deals.
'They keep pecking at us, like a bird would peck at something," he said in a February deposition about his negotiations with Fortress. 'Enough was never enough."
Personal-recourse debt has a long, bruising history in commercial real estate. Developers often turn to personal guarantees because they would have no other way to obtain enough financing, and because they are convinced they can easily pay back their loans.
'They think if you hold on to a property long enough, the values are always going to justify the loan," said Mark Edelstein, chair of Morrison Foerster's global real-estate group.
Donald Trump famously used recourse loans to build his property empire in the 1980s, only to find himself on the brink of personal bankruptcy in the early 1990s because of these personal guarantees. Trump said during a TV appearance that in 1991 he pointed to a homeless person and said he 'is worth $900 million more than I am."
Personal guarantees were also a big reason why New York developer Harry Macklowe faced near financial ruin during the 2008-09 financial crisis, after he took out a $1.2 billion bridge-equity loan from a group including Fortress with recourse contingencies. Macklowe said that the situation was resolved and is now 'old history."
Cohen has used personal guarantees before, but said he has never had this kind of problem. His business is countersuing Fortress. His dust-up with the investment firm is one of the nastiest in commercial real estate for many years.
Attorneys for Cohen say that Fortress's actions amount to improper harassment. The investment firm has put restraints on Cohen's personal brokerage accounts, and on brokerage accounts held by his mother and sister. Cohen cannot withdraw money from his personal accounts without Fortress's approval.
'His family's lives are being disrupted," said Christopher Caffarone, Cohen's attorney, at a court hearing in May. 'They are getting subpoenaed. They are getting deposed."
Fortress subpoenaed Cohen's family members because he transferred personal assets to them and because they are involved in running or financing his companies, a Fortress spokesman said.
Fortress, an investment giant owned in part by Abu Dhabi government fund Mubadala Capital, said that it has a duty to its investors that include retirement and pension funds. 'Fortress is left with no choice but to begin enforcing its judgment against Cohen's assets," the firm said, according to court records.
Charles's father and his two uncles went from selling cars to building what would become a real-estate empire, developing towers on Manhattan's Third Avenue as the old elevated railway was dismantled. Charles became president of the company in 1983 and more than tripled it in size to 12 million square feet.
Nowadays, Cohen, 73 years old, is a widely recognizable figure in New York real-estate circles, where he is known for his tailored suits and reflective stainless-steel glasses.
He also has invested tens of millions of dollars in filmmaking. Cohen's production firm has distributed more than 100 films including 'The Salesman," which won the Academy Award for best foreign language film in 2017. Cohen also purchased movie theaters in Europe and the U.S.
Fortress and Cohen's business relationship goes back decades. The investment giant has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to Cohen, and it financed many of his real-estate deals in the years leading up to the pandemic.
Then during Covid-19, demand for office space plummeted. People also stopped going to the movies, upending Cohen's movie-theater holdings.
Other office-building owners at the time were conceding defeat, giving properties back to lenders. Cohen said he felt the market would rebound soon. He also felt emotionally attached to the properties, some which had been in his family for decades. The two sides agreed on a restructuring plan, which included the personal guarantee.
But the market didn't rebound quickly. The two sides modified the 2022 loan four times but the properties weren't able to generate enough cash to pay the debt service. In March 2024, Cohen's business defaulted.
Cohen said that he had a handshake agreement with Fortress for another extension, according to court records. But the firm said there was no such deal, and the state supreme court ruled for Fortress.
Cohen says now he is selling properties to raise cash to meet his obligations to Fortress.
'I've always been good at hanging on," Cohen said. 'That's what we've always done and we will continue to do that."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
34 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Cryptic poser: Does your rival find you fit and proper for crypto biz?
MUMBAI: Amid the crypto frenzy fuelled by Trump and the digital asset making inroads, new players planning to set up shop in India are dealing with a curious rule: they need 'fit and proper' certificates-not from government agencies or any of financial market regulators, but from existing cryptocurrency service a regulatory void, judging the 'fit and proper' quality of a new applicant has been left to existing virtual digital asset (VDA) service providers (SPs). Some of the applicants are discovering that the rule, introduced early this year, not only runs into conflict of interests, but poses other complexities as cryptos are vulnerable to money laundering and cyber heists. Regulations in most financial markets too insist on such a certificate to evaluate the integrity, ethical standing, and track record of new managers and entities. For instance, in safeguarding the interests of depositors and investors, persons applying for a banking license and intermediaries like stock brokers have to qualify as 'fit and proper'. But, here the assessment is done by the respective regulator (RBI or Sebi)-and not by peers or other business and competing organisations in the case of VDAs, the rule stems from a January 2025 communique to VDA SPs from the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). An agency under the ministry of finance, FIU is dedicated to curb money laundering and terror finance. VDASPs like crypto platforms exchanges, brokers, and custody service firms providing crypto wallets are "reporting entities" sharing information, as banks do, with the 'fit and proper' is one of the conditions a VDA SP must satisfy to register itself with FIU. Failure to register is in itself a non-compliance with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. NO DEFINED PARAMETERSAccording to the January 2025 notification, one of the steps towards registration requires "fit and proper certificate from the FIU IND registered VDA SP(s), in all cases where the applicant VDA SP is into relationship/agreement (B2B/broker/other relationship etc) with the former (either ongoing/prospective/intended)."This widely-worded directive can be interpreted to mean that a new applicant (be it a crypto exchange or an intermediary) could require multiple certificates from different SPs. A custody provider may partner with multiple exchanges and intermediaries, while an exchange may draw liquidity from another platform. According to Purushottam Anand, advocate and founder of Crypto Legal, a Bengaluru-based blockchain and crypto-focused law firm, "The 'fit and proper' requirement effectively introduces a disqualification criterion for entities seeking registration as VDASP. Yet, it provides no defined parameters or standards for registered VDASPs to apply during their assessment. There is a complete lack of guidance on the manner, scope, or extent of scrutiny to be conducted by existing VDASPs. In the absence of clarity, new applicants may be compelled to disclose sensitive and confidential business information to potential competitors. Courts have consistently held that vague, arbitrary, and subjective conditions-particularly those introduced through delegated legislation-are legally untenable and liable to be struck down." The requirement may prove self-defeating where an applicant is compelled to seek certification from a competitor, said Harshal Bhuta, partner at the CA firm P. R. Bhuta & Co. "Moreover, obtaining such certification from several service providers may not be straightforward, given the recent cyberattacks and the liability associated with issuing such certificates. A more effective alternative would be for the government to provide recognition to Self-Regulatory Organisations (SROs) and authorise them to issue certificates," said the past one year, two Indian crypto exchanges lost substantial amounts in cyberattacks. And law enforcement authorities fear that cryptos are misused to move money across the border, bypassing banking channels. Coins withdrawn from an exchange wallet can be transferred to private wallets and other wallet owners in various jurisdictions. Recently, FIU advised platforms to keep a watch on transactions linked to persons in border areas. Data requests from the agency has also gone up, said an exchange official."The ministry has streamlined the registration process, which includes having an in-person meeting with the FIU-IND, submission of prescribed documents, etc. These requirements should be carefully looked into by applicants, especially the clause which requires the VDA-SP to furnish a 'fit and proper' certificate from FIU-IND registered VDA-SPs in all cases where the applicant VDA-SP is into a relationship with the former," said Raghav Bajaj, counsel, Khaitan & to FIU and the crypto industry lobby BharatWeb3 went unanswered till the time of going to press.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
FIR after breach in contactless licence facility leads to 2 fraud cases
Lucknow: The transport department, which has recently implemented an online Aadhaar-based contactless Learner Licence (Faceless LL) system under which applicants can take their LL tests from the comfort of their homes, has ordered revocation or cancellation of two licences allegedly acquired fraudulently. A detailed investigation has revealed that an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated video was created using the applicant's Aadhaar photograph, face authentication and liveness tests (such as eye blinking, smiling) to illegally bypass the test stages for the document. The LL test violation report indicated abnormalities like "No Eye Blink Detected," confirming that the applicant himself was not present during the test. The case was reported in the Transgomti Office, Lucknow. In another case reported from Fatehpur, the learner licence had suspicious entries such as the applicant's name recorded as "froud sale" and the father's name as "payment mat kar asre". Taking strict action in both the cases, transport commissioner, Brajesh Narain Singh, has directed the immediate registration of FIRs against the respective cyber cafés, agencies, or individuals involved. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Learn More Undo A comprehensive report is being sent to NIC and MoRTH for immediate implementation of critical security measures and technological improvements in the Sarathi software system, including OTP login, face verification, enhanced liveness tests, IP tracking, and other necessary security measures to prevent future occurrences. Instructions have also been issued for detailed investigations and comprehensive security audits of learner licences previously issued through all offices of the transport department.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Uproar in J&K over ‘killing' of Gujjar youth in Jammu shoot-out, CM joins demand for probe
J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Friday (July 25, 2025) joined the growing clamour from relatives and political parties to constitute an inquiry into the killing of a 21-year-old youth during an alleged shootout in Jammu a day ago. The deceased, Mohammad Parvez, was engaged in sand mining as a profession. According to the family, Parvez and his brother-in-law, residents of Niki Tawi, left home on Thursday to buy medicine. Family members were later called to identify a body at the Government Medical College (GMC) in Jammu by the police. Parvez got married two months ago, with his family claiming he had nothing to do with drug peddling. However, several Jammu-based news portals citing police officials, claimed there was a shoot-out with drug peddlers at Surey Chak area in Jammu's Satwari area on Thursday and Parvez was killed. The police did not furnish further details about the incident. Parvez's family along with the Gujjar community refuted the claim. 'It is a fake encounter,' Talib Hussian, a Gujjar social activist, said. Guftar Ahmed, a Gujjar leader who joined deceased's family in their protest on Friday, said, 'Top officials of the J&K Police should see the act of police on ground zero. Not a single FIR was registered against him. Union Home Minister and J&K Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha should take strong action against officials involved in the killing of tribal youth,' Mr. Ahmed said. A spokesman of the Gujjar Bakerwal Students Alliance said the 'selective killing of Gujjar youth in Jammu through fake encounters is alarming'. 'Why was Parvez Ahmed murdered? Is this a conspiracy to silence us one by one? Under the garb of encroachment, drugs, and smuggling, our community is being targeted. We strongly condemn this,' the Alliance added. Meanwhile, the deceased's family also urged the L-G administration to initiate an impartial probe, announce compensation and a job for the kin. J&K CM Abdullah urged the Union Territory Police to hold an inquiry into the incident. 'The killing of Parvez of Niki Tawi in Jammu is highly unfortunate and deeply regrettable. Use of force by the police has to be calibrated and cannot be indiscriminate. J&K has paid a heavy price in the past because of incidents such as these,' the Chief Minister said. Mr. Abdullah said the incident should be investigated in a transparent and time bound manner. National Conference (NC) leader and Minister Javed Ahmed Rana raised the issue with the Divisional Commissioner and the Inspector General of Police, Jammu, 'over serious allegations of murder of a tribal youth'. 'An Inquiry is being initiated to uncover the truth and ensure justice in this case. The J&K government led by Mr. Abdullah will ensure that justice is delivered in the case,' Mr. Rana said. Former J&K Chief Minister and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti said the tribal youth was 'killed by the police and labelled as a drug dealer'. 'Even that may be the case, we still live in a democratic country where justice is served through rule of law as opposed to khap panchayats or kangaroo courts. Sincerely hope the Director General takes cognisance of this shocking incident by ordering a time bound impartial probe. We must not descend or condone a culture of extra judicial encounters because that's precisely what alienates people,' Ms. Mufti said. BJP leader Ravinder Raina also condemned the incident. The Islamic Welfare Organisation also expressed deep anguish and outrage over the 'tragic killing' of the Gujjar youth. 'Such a brutal and senseless act not only shatters the faith of the people in the law enforcement agencies but also raises serious questions about the continued misuse of power and growing trend of extrajudicial actions,' the organisation said. The organisation 'unequivocally condemned the act and demand a time-bound high-level judicial probe to ascertain the facts behind the killing'. 'The family of the deceased deserves justice, and the community demands transparency, fairness, and accountability from the system,' it added.